A New Push For Campus Climate Reform
By Pamela Nonga
The Problem
Being the victim of a hate or bias incident can be an isolating experience, especially on a college campus the size of UC Davis, where you’re one among thirty thousand. Sometimes the hate is recurring to the point where you grudgingly accept it as a part of life. Other times it happens so fast you can barely process it. Either way, you’re left with the question of, “What do I do now?” For many students, this question has no answer, because they feel they have nowhere to turn. Or, when they do seek help, the follow-up is nonexistent or dissatisfactory. They are bereft of closure.
In an effort to address these problems, UC Davis administration and Student Judicial Affairs (SJA) have launched a revamped reporting process for students to utilize which will be accompanied by a mass marketing campaign and continued forums. The new and improved reporting system for hate and bias incidents was revealed in a campus climate dialogue held on February 13, 2014 at the Student Community Center. Among those in attendance were Associate Vice Chancellor of Student Life Milton Lang, Student Judicial Affairs, staff from the CCC, WRRC, SRRC and other community resource centers, the UC Davis Police Department, and representatives from ASUCD as well as concerned students and community members.
“The students needed this,” said Dr. Lang. The dialogue and updated system are just the first step of administration’s promised re-commitment to increasing accountability, communication, and safety in regards to campus climate.
What’s new?
While the official campus policy regarding hate and bias incidents hasn’t changed, the new system is easier to navigate and addresses some of the concerns raised by students about their past experiences. When reporting online, students can provide their name or do so anonymously. If they choose to identify themselves, they will get a notice that their report has been received. The notice is in direct response to student complaints that they previously had no way of knowing if someone had read their report and if anything was being done about it. ASUCD Senator Mariah Watson suggested that a number be assigned to those who report anonymously so that they too can receive a status on their report. Submitted reports are received by SJA staff and may be sent to other relevant departments such as the Cross Cultural Center. The website also identifies 9 locations where students can file a formal report in person.
The new system may be a step in the right direction, but it’s useless if students don’t know about it. Student Judicial Affairs currently receives about 50-60 grievances per year, and a majority of those are about grade issues and roommate disputes. That’s where the marketing campaign comes in. Nefretiri Cooley-Boughton, director of Student Affairs Marketing, unveiled an informational pamphlet that will be distributed throughout campus. It includes definitions of hate/bias incidents and hate/bias crimes, a list of resources available, and information on the reporting system. Freshmen will especially be targeted in this marketing effort so that they know from the outset where to turn as victims or witnesses of hateful acts.
Lingering Issues
Administration and Student Judicial Affairs recognized that a new website and pamphlet will not be enough to solve all campus climate issues. A continued point of conversation is what constitutes a hate or bias incident and which parties have the authority to make that distinction. Don Dudley, the director of Student Judicial Affairs said that speech can be “reprehensible and offensive” and still be protected under free speech. Determining when speech has crossed the line remains a gray area.
Another issue is classroom climate and diversity training for faculty and staff. Students find it difficult to speak out against faculty who discriminate in the classroom or create an uncomfortable environment because of the power imbalance between students and professors. The fear of being punished academically for speaking out is real and valid. The Office of Campus Community Relations is taking a preventative approach to addressing this concern through faculty diversity training. Faculty members are currently provided with 18 courses, some of which deal with cultural competency. There is also a 2 day intensive diversity workshop provided for staff. However, these courses are not mandatory.
“There is a whole series of workshops available…[The] challenge is in encouraging more faculty to take advantage…Some faculty do it, some don’t,” said Rahim Reed, the Associate Executive Vice Chancellor for Campus Community Relations. The OCCR is looking at ways to incentivize diversity training through methods such as special recognition and evaluations. In Fall 2014, the office will make publicly available diversity profiles on every faculty member which will provide, among other information, which faculty members have participated in diversity training.
Continued Dialogue
The conversation doesn’t end here. Administration plans on hosting future forums to maintain communication with students on campus climate issues they are experiencing, so be on the lookout for those in the upcoming weeks and months if you want your voice to be heard. Additionally, feedback, suggestions, and collaboration with student groups on actions taken and programs implemented by administration are all welcome.
Remember, this is your student experience and your university. Every student deserves to feel welcome and safe as they pursue their higher education.
Links/Resources
File A Report: http://studentaffairs.ucdavis.edu/reportit/index.html
What is a Hate/Bias Incident or Crime?: http://studentaffairs.ucdavis.edu/reportit/definition.html
Student Judicial Affairs FAQ: http://sja.ucdavis.edu/faq.html
Office of Campus Community Relations: http://occr.ucdavis.edu/
CAPS: http://shcs.ucdavis.edu/














