Because part of my point is that, regardless of whether they're autistic or not, people have stress thresholds, and pushing someone past their stress thresholds will absolutely result in aggression and violence.
How normal it must be to be a small child, where everyone is 10x bigger than you, and they're asking you over and over again if you're ready for lunchtime, and you know that you don't actually have a decision to make because when you're very young demands are often presented as questions. All the colours, the carpet has a bad texture, and your teacher will not stop "asking" you to get your things because it's lunch time, and you want her to shut the fuck up. Oh look, one of the most common experiences you can have as a teacher is being hit, spit on, bitten, or having things thrown at you by a student. This remains consistent regardless of whether the kids have a disability or not.
And yet, we have a pervasive cultural narrative of autistic children biting. Not just being violent, biting specifically.
Could this be in part how stereotypes are formed and could this therefore be something of a self-fulfilling prophesy distorting evidence around the issue, especially when surveys and teachers' self-reports are used as the primary source of that evidence, as is very often the case in all studies on the subject?
There is a lot of mythologisation around autism and violence specifically that lends itself to the cultural expectation that autistic people, as with all "able-bodied disabled" people, are more violent than the general population. This is used to reinforce and justify violence against us. Back when deaf people were considered synonymous with intellectual disability because they "can't be educated," a common literary stock character was the ultra-violent intellectually disabled deaf person, for instance. Turns out, deaf people are neither commonly intellectually disabled or more violent, but it was considered cultural truth through the early 1800s that this was the case. And let's consider.
How normal it must be to be a deaf child, where everyone is 10x bigger than you, and they're asking you over and over again -- idk what, you're deaf. All the colours, the carpet had a bad texture, and your teacher will not stop yapping at you with her mouth partly obscured, refusing to use gestures and other symbols you'd recognise because ugh, that fucking Milan Conference.
I think this ignorance often faces inward and prompts a lot of autistic and adjacent people to self-mythologise, too. For instance, something happened here where you saw two schizophrenics discussing in part the trauma of institutionalisation and how that is a cyclically violent environment, in part perpetuated by the expectation of violence, which psychiatric staff always find often unconscious ways to justify, and how this lends to a similar stereotype that the schizophrenics are inherently a violent people who perhaps need to be caged and controlled (something that very industry profits from). And you were like, "idk why OP left out that autistic environments can make kids overwhelmed and violent!" as if that wasn't implied, firstly, but in a way where autism is sort of placed on a separate island from schizophrenia. That's part of this specific pattern, frankly.
origamiaround
germansingergirl
janainaart
kaledo-art
romaincrisis
