They’ve done this a million times. It’s definitely platonic and straight and not weird at all
Keni
Claire Keane
Show & Tell
Game of Thrones Daily
EXPECTATIONS
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
noise dept.

#extradirty

blake kathryn
icyghini twinkie
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
todays bird

No title available
cherry valley forever

tannertan36

Product Placement
The Stonewall Inn

No title available

@theartofmadeline

No title available
seen from Maldives
seen from Venezuela

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Netherlands

seen from Mexico

seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Austria
seen from Sweden
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Canada
seen from Israel
seen from Switzerland

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
@echoshawnwrites
They’ve done this a million times. It’s definitely platonic and straight and not weird at all
The Trump administration is cynically exploiting calls for stricter AI regulation to pass broad censorship measures at the federal level.
So, in terrible news, Trump's trying to pull some strings to pass this massive internet censorship bill, featuring all the kinds of internet censorship we're terrified of, including mandatory ID for accessing basically any website, specifically to crush state regulation of AI, because apparently this man will always see the moral bottom of the barrel and start digging.
So, if you live in the US and hate censorship and AI you know what to do, contact your congresspeople and tell them do not fucking dare let this through or so help us god...
IMPORTANT UPDATE: The bastards just worked out a deal on the package, and they're going to try and ram it through the House in the next couple of weeks.
So, if you've been waiting to call, the time is NOW. Do it ASAP, be polite, be informed, but light up those phones like a Christmas tree!
I am still putting together my thoughts about the Good Omens finale, and while I neither completely hated nor completely loved the ending, I am utterly confounded by one of the writers, Peter Atkins, and the way he has continued to engage with fans on social media. It first started with this post on Bluesky last month, and has now progressed to these tweets from last night:
It is now to the point where I truly do not know what to believe, because I find it difficult to impossible to trust anything this man says. It is abundantly clear that we were lied to by the PTB (Powers that Be) about NG's involvement in S3, and that the writers (who are friends of his) condensed the original six episodes and carried out his vision, seemingly under the pretense of doing it "for Terry."
Whether this bore any resemblance to what Sir Terry actually wanted remains to be seen, but I cannot help noticing the absolute silence from Rob Wilkins and Rhianna Pratchett right now. This could certainly be because the fandom is still in such a volatile place and they (wisely) have chosen not to potentially add to the discourse. But it would be so incredibly easy for them to offer a word or two of praise, to make their stance on the ending clear...and the fact that they haven't done that in any meaningful way since May 13th seems to speak volumes.
It is remarkable, though, how Peter is only making things worse with every new thing he says, along with the condescending way that he says it that has more than a few echoes of how Neil used to interact with fans. And the similarity of tone has reinforced that parasocial dynamic that had existed with Neil, only directed at a different person. The outcome of these interactions is the same, however, which is that critical thinking and open discussion once again begin to fall by the wayside in favor of needless, blind fealty.
While I would not and do not encourage anyone to attack Peter, there absolutely has to be a middle ground between virulent hatred and unquestioning loyalty. It is as unreasonable to demand that fans be grateful to Peter as it is to demand that he/the other crew should have their heads put on a pike. And within that middle ground is the place where we can rationally call out bad behavior and manipulation tactics for exactly what they are.
Because right now, I am not as mad at the ending of GO 3 as I am at the obfuscation and the lies being told and no one giving a simple, straight answer to anything, all under the guise of patronizing comments like "Everyone was working with the best of intentions."
"The best of intentions" for who, exactly? Not for the characters. Not for the fans. And certainly not for Michael and David, who have poured their heart and soul into this show for almost ten years. Michael and David, who knew and know these characters better than anyone, who brought them to life in a way no one else ever could have and built a relationship between them that wouldn't have existed otherwise. Michael and David, who still tried to give us something beautiful to hold onto.
So given all of that, I can only surmise that "the best of intentions" were for Neil. The writers are friends of his, and that is who they cared about most at the end of the day. While Peter Atkins may have taken on a thankless task and made it possible for the season to be released, his actions in the last month have shown the quality of his character.
And no respect is owed to someone who has shown how little respect he has for the show or its fans.
GO3: Perspective from someone who grew up with reincarnation as a religious belief
This might be a bit incoherent.
So, I'm a Hindu. Grew up as one, and honestly learnt about Christianity from cultural osmosis by growing up in Texas and doing my own research. I'm pretty sure I learnt more about Greek mythology before I ever understood why a crucifix was ever important. When I'd first heard about Good Omens its satirizing of Christianity is what drew me in. Namely because if you have the awareness that the majority of people around you follow a religion that says you're going to hell for not believing in the same god as them, you're gonna end up side eying that a little. It was the dynamic between Aziraphale and Crowley that kept me in the fandom. They were the reason I got any social media account at all, including this tumblr blog, just because I wanted to see all the things this fandom created. All that to say is that I fundamentally disagree with the ethos of season 3. Reincarnation, from my experience, is a belief around death. When someone dies, believing that they are reincarnated as someone close to us is comforting. I've heard that belief from my own parents. But the person we knew is gone, and in reality we shouldn't treat someone like their past life is who they are - because they are no longer that person! And it would be unfair to treat them that way. Obviously in a TV show, we the viewer have the knowledge that Aziraphale and Crowley have been reincarnated into Asa and Anthony, even if they don't. But that's kind of the mega huge problem. They have no knowledge of this. And in my opinion, they cannot be treated as the same person. I'm gonna briefly discuss two Bollywood movies that have reincarnation as a plot point. One movie is called Magadheera (2009), and the other is called Manam (2014). Both movies revolve around a couple who die tragically, and are later reincarnated in the modern day. And you know what else they have in common. The couples get. Their fucking memories back! If they don't remember what happened in their previous life, portraying it in the movie would be absolutely pointless. The circumstances and time periods they live in are completely different. Being a queen in ancient India is different from being a regular woman in modern India. Being a middle aged mom is different from being a college student. Only reconciling these memories could indicate not just that these people are the same, but that they develop from the person that they once were. Asa and Anthony have no character development. We don't have the time! All the lessons that A and C learnt, all the time they spent learning from humanity as themselves - it no longer exists. None of it ever did. Hinduism is no stranger to apocalypses. We have a flood story too you know! But when the world ends, there are still people around who remember and pass down the memories and mythology of that time period. And it was still our world! Every time in fact! In the Good Omens universe, who is left to remember what happened? Us the viewers? But if the characters themselves don't remember, can't remember, can't apply these lessons to their own circumstances, then what happened before means nothing.
As a segue way, I never saw being an angel as inherently good. Because as someone, who by Christian canon, would never be accepted by heaven (nor would I want to) I don't have a place there regardless. In season 1, the point was that every character, whether human or angel or demon or green space alien or whatever, still had free will and that doing good or bad was independent of heaven or hell. That really appealed to me as someone who didn't believe in a Christian viewpoint. It felt like there was a place for me even in a world where only Christianity was right. And then season 3 acts like being an angel is the most valuable part of who Crowley is. Not any of his 6000 years on Earth. Just that he used to be an angel. And Crowley himself doesn't seem to value who he currently is! If a character doesn't value who they are, a satisfying conclusion is that they come to value who they are at the end of the story. That doesn't seem to happen, like, ever? Except in season 1, where despite having to face the demise of everything he knows, he still seems more secure and happier by the end than any other time in season 2 or 3.
This post honestly got away from me, but the point is, as someone who grew up with reincarnation as a religious belief, I don't see Asa and Anthony as Aziraphale and Crowley. It'd be one thing if they had their memories but they don't. And I fundamentally disagree with the ending of season 3 from a character and story angle. I think it directly contradicts the main point of season 1 (which was literally the original story) and has an unsatisfying conclusion.
The production of Good Omens: Epilogue, is underway! This is a rough little advertisement that I'll likely spruce up. Links below! Nobody under 15 are allowed to participate.
Oh also we need an actor for God.
Crowley and Aziraphale reappear in the bookshop after speaking with God...
We have three roles that must be filled! We need voices for God, Crowley, and Aziraphale. This is the link to the script! Good Omens: Epilog
Gathering information from the animators to try to split up the work fairly. Unless I've already accepted you into the project, there are no
Happy pride ❤️🧡💛💚💙💜
This painting is very special because it’s for a cause!
For the next week I’ll be selling this print in 5x7 for $5 or 11x17 for $20 and I will be donating all proceeds to The Trevor Project, a nonprofit that has been helping LGBT youth in crisis since 1998. You can visit my Etsy to preorder and I’ll send them out in late June! If you’d like to spread the word I’d be so grateful!
You are lovely and amazing people! Please stay safe, you can always send me a message if you’d need to talk 💕
The Shuttered Garden: How the Good Omens Finale Betrayed its Humanistic Roots
Text: Aivelin Illustration: a-ida
The series finale of Good Omens dropped this Wednesday, leaving the fandom shaken and in absolute distress. The audience reaction was immediate, driving the Rotten Tomatoes score for Season 3 down to a disappointing 36%. The online debate grew so heated and overwhelmed with grief that numerous fan accounts faced 24-hour social media bans for their highly emotional confessions.
Viewers are highly divided. While a fraction accepts the heavy ending as a necessary evil, the overwhelming sentiment across platforms is utter bewilderment and heartbreak: "These characters do not feel like the ones we grew to love in previous seasons!"
This raises painful, critical questions: Is this sudden shift in characterization a narrative misstep? Is the tragic, suicidal ending a harsh subversion of the original book, which famously promised a comforting happily ever after?
To find the answer, one must look closely at who held the creative reins for the scripts of Seasons 2 and 3. By analyzing the writing credits, clear and undeniable patterns emerge, linking these distressing plot choices directly to Neil Gaiman’s broader, often dark and subversive, body of work.
The Solitary Vision and the Realigned Mold
While the first season captured the shared spirit of Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman’s 1990 novel, the subsequent seasons belong to Gaiman’s solitary vision. When viewed alongside his wider world of storytelling, such as The Sandman, American Gods, and Stardust, the tragic fractures in Aziraphale and Crowley’s bond lose their surprise. Gaiman’s worlds are populated by immortal beings who are deeply fractured at best and cruel at worst. In these narratives, it is almost a rule that celestial entities will take advantage of the hearts that love them, turning devotion into a tool before abandoning those souls to a devastating fate.
Crucially, Gaiman always veils this emotional cruelty behind high-minded dilemmas. The act of abandonment is never framed as simple coldness; instead, it is masked as a profound moral crisis ("We cannot be together because I am a god and you are human"), a sacrifice of monumental importance ("I must leave our future to save my kingdom"), or an unyielding divine necessity. Even when Gaiman’s romances lack outward malice, they are consistently denied peace. In Stardust, the mortal husband passes away, leaving his immortal, celestial wife to endure eternity in silent, isolated grief. By transforming Aziraphale into a colder, more emotionally distant figure who abruptly leaves Crowley for a heavenly promotion, Gaiman is merely reshaping Good Omens to fit his favorite creative blueprint.
Deeply Pessimistic Parallels
Ultimately, the ending of Good Omens Season 3 and the conclusion of The Sandman reveal deeply pessimistic parallels. The Sandman closes with its protagonist suffering the consequences of his own rigid nature, forced by higher powers into self-destruction so that his kingdom might survive. In the wake of this death, the universe offers a surrogate replacement - a new entity stripped of the original’s memories, whom the remaining characters are forced to accept despite their lingering grief.Â
Aziraphale’s sudden, illogical decision to leap at Heaven’s offer mirrors this exact brand of narrative cruelty. Neither Aziraphale nor Crowley deserved to have their hard-won autonomy stripped away for the sake of a grandiose self-sacrifice.Â
A Profound Departure from Terry Pratchett
This shift represents a profound departure from the late Terry Pratchett’s fundamental worldview. Pratchett harbored a deep-seated aversion to suicide tropes and grand, sacrificial violence in fiction. His works respected the dignity of both life and death. In his narrative, the Apocalypse is defeated not through self-sacrifice or bloodshed, but by the quiet resilience and stubborn pragmatism of ordinary people. The first season beautifully honored this philosophy, as the Antichrist and a group of children stopped the Apocalypse through sheer, down-to-earth humanity.
The subsequent seasons discard this logic entirely, altering the very cosmology of the universe. In Season 1, God was an infallible, detached observer whose ineffable plan quietly empowered the right people at the right moment to prevent ruin. By Season 3, God is reframed as a petulant, semi-malicious entity capable of erasing existence on a whim.
Furthermore, while Pratchett and Gaiman likely brainstormed the concepts of the South Downs cottage and the conflict between Heaven, Hell and Earth together, Pratchett would never have designed an intentionally suicidal and destructive endgame. In his philosophy, survival is achieved through an attachment to mundane, earthly joys. In the first season, Crowley is saved from hellfire by his love for his car and his human-like imagination, while Aziraphale survives because of his eccentric, earthly devotion to collecting rare books.
Conclusion: Fanfiction or Harsh Reality
A true thematic continuation of both authors' visions would look radically different. It would find Aziraphale and Crowley left alone in a quiet bookshop for eternity, weaving their magical memories and shared love for humanity together to rewrite every lost book back into a brand-new universe. If that choice ultimately stripped them of their divinity and left them mortal, it would be a logical, bittersweet happily-ever-after within the sanctuary of a beautiful, earthly garden.
Instead, Gaiman has opted for character regression and profound emotional devastation. To pretend that Aziraphale's betrayal of Crowley and their martyrdom makes narrative sense within the established logic of Season 1 is an exercise in denial. Audiences are left with a stark choice: either view everything past the first season as high-budget, angst-driven fanfiction, or accept a harsher reality. The original, humanistic spirit of Good Omens died with Terry Pratchett, leaving behind a cold universe engineered for heartbreak.
Absolutely. Bravo. Couldn't have said it better.
The omens are good
It´s been a long time since I drew Aziraphale and Crowley. But I really wanted to draw them in the pretty Strawberry dress
Tummy
Copyright class actions could financially ruin AI industry, trade groups say.
AI industry groups are urging an appeals court to block what they say is the largest copyright class action ever certified. They’ve warned that a single lawsuit raised by three authors over Anthropic’s AI training now threatens to “financially ruin” the entire AI industry if up to 7 million claimants end up joining the litigation and forcing a settlement.
well…darn
like to charge reblog to cast financial ruin of the AI industry đź”®
originally posted August 8th, 2025.
Authors have until March 30th, 2026 (That is just 9 days as of this reblog, which I am posting on March 21st, 2026) to file their claim against Anthropic to be reimbursed up to $3,000 per work found in the list.
Updated February 18, 2026 IMPORTANT: The Claims Deadline Is March 30 Background Bartz v. Anthropic is one of the major copyright lawsuits b
Please click the above link for all of the exact details of how to file a claim and to check for your works, and share this post as far and wide as you can before March 30th, 2026!
!!!SIGNAL BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOST!!!
PHEW
Finally done! That surely was a lot of work but I am proud of this piece. I am usually avoid coloring because I am not good at it and I always pressure myself to get more things done so I leave it as sketches. But this one felt really zen to me.
At first I had so much fun sketching out this scene that I kept adding more and more details and WELP here we are (also sorry for the wonky architecture)
It's a mix of my love for Good Omens, the fun I currently have with Pokopia and the joy with me going outside and start gardening.
I hope you enjoy this piece too ❤️
⚠️ Don't reupload my art ⚠️
Good omens
DAY TEN
Of posting Good Omens memes/related content until GO season 3 comes out~!!
WE'VE EEACHED THE DOUBLE DIGITS!! HELL YEAH! THE MORE DAYS, THE CLOSER WE GET TO MAY 13TH!!~
<3
FANFICTION
I want to thank everyone who read my first fanfiction to the very end. It has been an amazing journey! I had no idea if I would ever finish this story, or that it would grow to be 8 chapters & over 10,000 words long. :-)
Name: Grace in the Furnace
Chapters: 8/8
Summary: In the frozen mud of 1944, in the shadow of the chimneys of a concentration camp, two strangers meet. Anthony Crowley, a mechanic who long ago lost his faith in humanity, and A.Z. Fell, a librarian who inspires him to find it once more. A raw, historical Human AU set in a world of blood, ash, and systematic cruelty, where everything dies - except for love and hope.
https://archiveofourown.org/works/78022321/chapters/204459371
Thank you! ❤️❤️❤️