Switching Calendars
Do we make history, or does history make us? I used to think history was made, a once-present-now-past told and seen in the light of context, some cumulative or aggregated sense that discerns meaning from hindsight with the application of perspective. History was a way of knowing what happened when I wasn’t alive. But living through 2020 felt like living history in the making; we were the stories future generations would hear. Surely, this must always be true, but the significance of events in 2020 made the truth more apparent. Though, having said that, I don’t think it’s any less true that we also, in fact, make history. Our editing and curatorial role chooses the frame, lays down the narrative. And while we’re at it, let’s just say “histories” because if we make it, it must be multiple. And likely therefore contested.
Apparently, I woke up this morning, January 1st, in a new year. The fairy tale stroke of midnight bolted into our world and restarted the timeline. Media and social media messaging have avidly proclaimed this reset, longed for it as if it were real. But how real is it? Does 2021 have to be different, easier, better than 2020? Yes, we need our benchmarks, yes, we need to cut time’s ribbon into measurable quantities, but do we also need to make room for history to just keep unfolding? Or if “need” is the wrong term in the latter case, perhaps we ought to make room for history to just keep unfolding. Isn’t the present as full of the past as it is any future we might desire? Or perhaps making room for history to keep unfolding is just another way of saying let the present be the present, make yourself spacious enough for now.
I suppose there is something not entirely arbitrary about a new year. We have an annual path around the sun. We have solstices and equinoxes that mark our tilt and spin. January 1st isn’t that far removed from December 21st and Christmas and Hanukkah and other festivals of light. Our need to punctuate how life ends and begins again is real both at a seasonal scale and a personal one. (Personally, for me, if I’m going to be spacious enough for now, I need some resting points along the way.) And the fact that we place our religious observances in line with the seasonal (and cyclical) calendar is more evidence of how we make not just history, but time itself, even as it makes us.
And speaking of multiple histories, who is this “we” of which I speak? At the very least, American; at the next very least, “Western” (another notation both real and invented and entirely relative — west of what?). This year, 2021, got its launch in 1582, when Pope Gregory XIII, wanting to realign Easter with the spring equinox, announced the Gregorian calendar. It took over 300 years to become globally accepted. Alternative calendars co-exist (though not perhaps with the same heft as world currencies to the dollar). Among them, the Islamic calendar in which we are 1442 years out since Muhammad (peace be upon him) emigrated from Mecca to Medina; the Hebrew calendar in which we are 5781 years out from the genesis of creation; the Chinese calendar in which we are rotating through 60-year cycles, currently moving from the Gold Rat to the Metal Ox.
I suppose a deep affinity for significance drives all these human attempts to classify time. Without measurement, without reference points, the relative does not exist and we are left to tread the waters of the absolute, and that is a significance too significant for most of us to bear. Instead, we look for a significance we can get our arms around (or maybe through like a life jacket), so we can dwell in meaning without drowning.
Photo credit: Liz Wuerffel










