I'm guessing this is a meme since it's the second time I'm seeing this, ironically after seeing it the first time in the first reply to a conversation about you (despite you not having been in that community for years, which has not quelled them for some unknown reason).
I have a multi-part question about that, one I would like to ask where you're urged to answer everything but in a thirty-six word answer.
What even are your views on this meme, or at least the ones that are canon to the doctrine/dogma of the self-applied code of ethics that is applied to yourself and all your groups/functions?
People who use it imply they're talking about narcissism, right? But when I hear remarks like "if it did happen, then it wasn't bad, and if it was bad, it's not that big a deal, etc." but it's not like these aren't natural responses people totally don't give each other just out of disagreement with each other; otherwise, would some of your haters be doing just that when one of you claims truth is never an evil while the other claims it can be incomplete, abused, and taken the wrong way to destructive effects that beg the question of whether people can handle the truth?
(e.g. "I may have told your child they were adopted, BuT iT wAs NoT bAd!" or "I may have told these complete strangers about the one time you did something shameful as a child, BuT iT wAs NoT bAd!"... what's the difference? It's a moral dispute, right? How is it different from a politician saying "I just sacrificed the autonomy of a certain territory because the motherland needs its resources, BuT iT wAs NoT bAd" or "I just mandated that divorce require both parents to agree to it, BuT iT wAs NoT bAd"? Does this not technically make people who spread the meme the real narcissists because they're implying people who disagree with them are wrong?)
If someone actually has narcissism (or NPD since you and your acquaintances have implied in discussions before that it should be seen medically if it's to be), and it's a spectrum (because it is said to be a spectrum), how do you apply the possibility that the meme might represent a scale, with narcissists owning up after a certain point (e.g. a supposed narcissist apologizing and making amends once it gets down to the "I didn't mean it" level or the "you deserved it" level)?
If two people were using the meme as a retort against each other, how would you know who is the actual narcissist, if the defense could be used as a shield that treats disagreement (or objection to the narcissism label) the same way? Perhaps someone can chime in on the already-cerebrated takeaway that you are freer from the label than them due to you having apologized for things before and they haven't.
Is what all of the confusion here entails also one of the indirect, seemingly minor implications of the Mary Sue conversation you previously had?
And not just because you might actually conclude I'm testing you, how do you square the answers to all of these questions together?
Also, especially given parallels to the topic of NPD have been discussed enough to be second-handedly alluded to, what would be the answer that most reflects you if someone were to ask you if you have NPD/narcissism? There was a conversation once that brought up histrionic disorder, but it was vague.
Forgive me if I sound wanderingly skeptical of you.
