Oh no job for me thanks I just wanted to fill out this really long and condescending job application for you☺️
Acquired Stardust
No title available
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

ellievsbear
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

PR's Tumblrdome

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Not today Justin

Discoholic 🪩

★

roma★
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Jules of Nature
Keni
No title available
Peter Solarz
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
art blog(derogatory)
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Sade Olutola
seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Sweden

seen from Malaysia

seen from Japan

seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Finland
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia

seen from Türkiye

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Denmark
@fencedinsheeps
Oh no job for me thanks I just wanted to fill out this really long and condescending job application for you☺️
(nods sagely) (nods basily) (nods rosemarily) (nods saltly) (nods star anisely)
Rainer Maria Rilke in a letter to Lou Andreas-Salomé, published in Rilke and Andreas-Salomé: A Love Story in Letters
awww the like button turns into a rainbow when you press it! that's so cute...hey staff what's with all the trans women you keep nuking?
teenage dirtbags or something
i genuinely dont know how to cope rn with not being able to get my dropout sub right :/// *psramore voice* HAHARD TAIMES
meeting hard times ,, saving all money until we can pay backrent on may and then were booking it to make june rent so i cant get my dropout subscription back and or watch any new or missed ep and i am oh so sad
When i say that anti trans laws will affect cis people too, I’m not saying “we’re all in this equally.
I’m saying it because cis people will never care for us on our own.
It’s not some hippie dippy kumbaya bullshit, it’s strategic and necessary. Sorry it doesn’t pass your purity test!
Some of you only care about winning arguments by submission and fail to consider that an outcome where you have rights but people are clueless liberals is still a marked improvement.
#youre right and you should say it#its the same as when people bring up how patriarchy hurts cis men too#and lefties will sneer at you ‘who cares? it hurts women more!!!’#like thanks dipshit i know that#but some of us are more concerned with getting people to fight on our side in the first place#rather than rejecting any potential ally that doesnt get an A+ on the moral purity test#(hint: when you create barriers to entry to your political movement rather than creating more pathways to join.#you end up with less allies and less power to achieve your goals.)
Peer-review passed, baby
Also, a clueless liberal ally is still on the path to becoming a leftist. Most people don't start out as leftists. It is something people have to become, and you are making it harder by being an ass.
sometimes people experiencing psychosis and/or mania will come up to you on the street and talk in confusing or upsetting ways. your job is to either have a regular human-to-human conversation with that person or politely leave. your job is not to call 911. do not call 911. you might kill that person if you call 911.
I don't even have the energy to screenshot and respond to your tags- what the actual fuck is wrong with you? "the cops are scared and rightfully so" "mental health calls are the scariest for cops" OH so this isn't about the safety of psychotic & manic people this is about piggy feelings?
and no, actually, this is not USA specific and no, actually, people from other countries should not ignore this post. police violence and sanism weren't invented in the US and they are certainly not unique to here. if you (or anyone) thinks that this bullshit doesn't happen elsewhere then you are not listening.
cops r Some Guy with a Gun
do we want Some Guy with a Gun in this situation? answer is usually "NO"
This is legitimately useful reframing. A while ago I started replacing the word "cop" in my vocabulary with "a man with a gun." It really puts things into perspective.
This homeless person is making me uncomfortable. Should I call [a man with a gun]?
My neighbor is having a loud party. Should I get [a man with a gun] involved?
There are some teenagers skateboarding. Do you think [a man with a gun] would get rid of them for me?
It makes it very clear what you're saying. I can call a man with a gun to threaten or hurt someone mildly inconveniencing me. You're not calling the cops, you're calling A MAN WITH A GUN into a situation that does not warrant a firearm handled by a volatile lunatic who will not be held accountable for his actions.
^ ^ ^
i think elphaba and glinda are both actually very much idealists, at least in DG, only in opposite ways. elphaba's an idealist because she has this naive idea about affecting change. she thinks something being true or morally good will be enough to enact change, and that she if she can just tell enough people the wizard lies then she'll be able to take him down. but she's also very much a realist because she's able to recognize the flaws and injustices within oz, and that she won't be able to be happy while those injustices persist. she knows a life in the emerald palace serving the wizard could never satisfy her because it'd be partly built on a lie
whereas glinda's a realist in the sense that she's much more aware of the fact that popularity and social clout matter most to people and knows the social game you need to play to move up in the wold. but she's also very much an idealist because she believes that gaming the system enough will result in happiness. and this is idealism too because she gets everything she wants but is unsatisfied with her heterosexual happy ending and guilt ridden because her life is being propped up by lies and elphaba's demonization. and both of their idealized views on the world ultimately serve as a barrier to their happiness
he said what he said!!!
i have been informed by literally every french speaker on earth that “une pipe” is slang for blowjob
the thing about media literacy is that understanding why the author chose to specify that the curtains are blue is the same skill set as understanding that the way the author characterizes all black characters as angry or all chinese characters as meek and silent is racist. it is the same skill set as being able to identify when a news source is biased or when someone is feeding you propaganda. the ability to ask "why did this person choose to present this premise in this specific way?" is a critical skill in a world full of misinformation. why are the curtains blue? maybe it's a characterization detail. maybe it's extraneous worldbuilding. why is this character written as being right all the time? maybe you're intended to disagree with them. maybe it doesn't matter. maybe you should still ask why.