Dragifying your fave rogues Pt. 1
noise dept.
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
đ
h
YOU ARE THE REASON
untitled
hello vonnie

Andulka
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

gracie abrams
Today's Document

No title available

oozey mess
$LAYYYTER

pixel skylines
Sade Olutola
Noah Kahan
Xuebing Du

PR's Tumblrdome
taylor price
seen from China
seen from Spain
seen from Denmark
seen from United States
seen from Latvia
seen from Malaysia

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Bulgaria
@flora-ware
Dragifying your fave rogues Pt. 1
A little love for my favorite episode.
And I finally chose the best way to draw Ozzie's face for myself. Now he doesn't look like Humpty Dumpty.
Hey! Whoever reblogs this post gets there hame put into a spinning wheel. I will draw the winnerâs oc.
You have 24 hours.
May the odds be ever in your favor.
Happy birthday David đ„łđ„łđ„ł
From Hubble to dragons and even magic
From the article:
NASA has released a free, original tabletop role-playing game, and itâs one part educational experience and another part sci-fi/fantasy epic with magic and dragons. The crux of The Lost Universe, the organizationâs first TTRPG,involves a mystery: What would happen if the Hubble Space Telescope disappeared? Itâs a simple premise and one that hides the complex backstory underscoring the events of the role-playing game. Without getting into the weeds, the game takes place on a planet called Exlaris, which was once thrown into chaos when a black hole moved too close and kicked it out of its orbit. The planet has since gone back to some degree of normalcy and is now almost completely dedicated to academia. In one city, a scholar named Eirik Hazn made a spell to connect with Earth to study the Hubble Space Telescope, which has famously collected data on black holes. However, the spell and telescope are stolen by a dragon, and researchers working on the project have been disappearing, so the players â Earthlings who worked on the telescope at NASA who were brought through a portal to Exlaris â have to save the day. The official 44-page gameplay book is available to download for free on NASAâs website. You can play it in a party with 4-7 players, but you may need to fudge a few things to graft this narrative onto your TTRPG system of choice. The book says itâll take around 3-4 hours to get through the adventure.
NASAs what?
captain picker isgonna finger himself
his wife is. 44 years old.
The fucking that old man website when someone actually fucks that old man
totally heterosexual things to say to your best and only friend with whom youâve shared a rich history of unspoken love and sacrifice and being there for each other when no one else was
Nora AlMatrooshi
Nora AlMatrooshi, the first Emirati woman astronaut, worked as a piping engineer before becoming an astronaut candidate for the United Arab Emirates. https://mbrsc.ae/team/nora/
Make sure to follow us on Tumblr for your regular dose of space!
open and raw communication with your partner may be uncomfortable and feel so ugly and vulnerable but it solves soo many problems in the end
The idea that was sold to us of "love is effortless and you should communicate telepathically with your partner" is false. Love is awkward as hell. It's A LOT of straight up talking and realization of your self - your own needs. It's important to make those needs heard. Do not deny yourself full love
that idea robs us of so much intimacy, the intimacy that comes with honesty and vulnerability and being known.
Petition for people to stop saying that Remus Lupin belonged at Hogwarts because he actually refused to take his potion to stop his transformation and put the lives of students in danger and nearly literally killed the Golden Trio for crying out loud.
Can I add that Severus made the potion (when he didnât have to except maybe to please his overlord Dumbledore) and saved the golden trio from said negligence and somehow heâs the bad guy.
I donât really blame Remus as much for forgetting to take the potion that one time, as I do for his not telling Dumbledore all school year that Sirius was an Animagus and could get into the school that way. Even though he, and everyone else, fully believed that Sirius was guilty of everything heâd been accused of. Despite believing that Sirius was on his way to Hogwarts to kill Harry. Even after Sirius slashed the Fat Ladyâs portrait and stood over Ronâs bed with a knife. He still didnât tell.Â
And why? Because he hoped Sirius was innocent? No. Remus said he convinced himself that Sirius was getting into the castle âusing Dark Arts he learned from Voldemort,â so he did believe Sirius was guilty. No, he risked the lives of the Hogwarts students and staff, and of Harry in particular because he couldnât stand to lose Dumbledoreâs trust. Trust he has already betrayed during his school days by leaving the Shrieking Shack as a fully transformed werewolf with the Marauders despite ânear misses, many of them.â Trust that he betrayed again by keeping this information to himself despite the risk he believed it posed to others. Trust he didnât even deserve.Â
This, this, this - all of this.
Remus Lupin is an interesting character, but the most startling thing about Prisoner of Azkaban is how fandom holds Lupin and Snape to very different standards.
In addition to the above, Snape and Lupinâs reaction to Lily and Jamesâ murderer is entirely opposite:
-Â Snape disarms and disables, and returns the culprits to the authorities so that justice can be done.
-Â Lupin raises his wand with the intention of murder; deciding to mete out his own justice.
Itâs not the supposed Death Eater who leaps to kill. Itâs the âgoodâ guy.Â
And thereâs a horrible undertone to the series reading of Nevilleâs boggart. Sure, Snapeâs a jerk and on first read, itâs almost cathartic to see Snape get his comeuppance in Lupinâs class.
But when you know the whole story, you find out that:
-Â Lupin was an active member of a group who bullied and attacked Snape for the duration of his schooling - sometimes 4 on 1.Â
- Lupin was given prefect duties so that he would curb the excesses of his friends, and yet on witnessing their bullying, Lupin sat and said nothing. He didnât stand up to his friends, he didnât stand up for what was right, and he didnât help the victim.
-Â Lupin enters the workplace where Snape has been a respected teacher for over a decade, and within weeks has reduced him to a figure of ridicule amongst the student body, completely undermining his authority.Â
How would you feel if your school bully came into your workplace and did the same? No wonder Snape feels utterly justified in outing him. Iâm amazed he didnât spit in his potion that month.Â
Two reasons for the double standard, I think. First, Lupin is nice to Harry! I find this one understandable, if odd. I thought this way myself while reading the first book - clearly the nasty Professor Snape was going to be the villain, bringing back memories of my childhood fave Nancy Drew books. Only then it turned out not to be that kind of book. And I presumed, also not that kind of series.
The second reason drives me up a wall. And that is that Lupin is seen as having the noble motive of wanting justice for his betrayed friend, while Snape is seen as having the less noble motive of wanting revenge for his own childhood suffering. Which was fine while the series was being written; heck, I fell for this one myself. But this reason is quite evidently still in play for many fans, even now that we know Snape had the very same motive as Lupin did in those scenes.
Yes, absolutely.
I think thatâs what I find most frustrating about Potter; so many people appear to have clung to their initial impressions about such a flurry of characters - and to me, the whole point of the series is that virtually every character has done both good and bad thingsâŠand that most characters donât have the same motivations that they appeared to have on first read - which is what makes the characters so fascinating.
So, for instance, Lupin appears to be solely standing up for Neville - and as a reader (especially a child reader), you cheer him on for helping the underdog gain revenge against a professor who scares the life out of him.
âŠbut in the context of the series, Lupinâs charitable act has much darker connotations.Â
Yet so often, it seems like we donât critique the âgoodâ characters enough, and we criticise the âbadâ characters too much.
#this #also the shack incident wasnât the first time he was negligent #snape is shown or references having to track him down multiple times to give him the potion
So, Lupin was actually my favorite of the adult characters the first time I read the Harry Potter series as a younger girl (although I recall thinking he was gay even back then and I had to realign my reading of him as bisexual once Tonks came into the picture because I just cannot read him as hetero myself). Snape was up there on my list of preferred or favorite characters too but he wasnât at the top. That only happened when I became older and returned to the series with a new perspective and a few years experience with literary criticism under my belt. He shot right up to the top as I realized what an utterly complex, dynamic, and fascinating character Rowling had given us with Snape.
That being said, later readings of the series also really shifted my impression of Lupin as a character too (I would argue that while it made him less of the âpure cinnamon roll who can do no wrongâ it did make him more fleshed out as a character and a lot more intriguing). One of the interesting things about Lupin is the way Rowling presents him. He would have you think he was a mild-mannered, bookish personality yet, not unlike Snape, this man could be said to have a mask that he wears. Lupin is honestly a wolf in sheepâs clothing and Rowling gives us hints to the fact that appearances can be deceiving with him and that he is capable of having a âdarker side,â if you will. She does this very early on, in particular, we see the cracks in his mask when Peeves taunts him. She gives us some insight into who Lupin is as a character and how his outward amiability is something Lupin uses to disarm; his response to Peeves is passive-aggressive and done with a very flippant sort of air that underscores the edge Lupin has when he wants to show his teeth.
Similarly, when Snape enters the scene when he and Harry are in his classroom talking in a later chapter, we see a return of that flippancy and passive-aggression that underscore his personality. In contrast, Snape is very clearly wrong-footed; the cracks in his mask reveal his anxiety and he literally backs out of the room rather than turn his back to Lupin. Lupin, seemingly aware of this, delays drinking his potion, changes the subject on Snape to make a glib reference to the tanks he had installed when Snape lingers and presses for him to drink his potion, and waits until after Snape has left and cannot see him drinking his potion to actually drink it in an act that could be read as Lupin potentially baiting Snape (someone he did once bully) when confronted by the evidence of his discomfort by refusing to make any effort to put his mind to rest or assuage his anxiety. In this scene, Rowling is not just foreshadowing that Lupin is a werewolf but showing her readers that Lupin is being flippant about taking his potion in order to foreshadow him forgetting it entirely later. Sheâs also subtly providing us with a deeper, more complex glimpse into Lupin as a character by having him respond this way to Snapeâs discomfiture as the reader can interpret it in one of a few ways: Lupin is merely being petty and enjoys making Snape uncomfortable or his passive-aggression is also an expression of how Lupin copes badly (i.e. by being petty) with Snapeâs anxiety as a reminder of the âprankâ Sirius once involved him in without his consent. In either case, Lupin and Snape are not entirely removed from each other in being examples of adults who are shown to be flawed in the presence of Harry.Â
With the additional context of the antagonistic relationship the Lupin and his friends once had with Snape even the Boggart scene assumes additional meaning, as has already been noted by @deathdaydungeon. However, I would go further to observe that in a year that thematically explores the concept of time-travel, what motivates Lupin to enlist Neville that way may be read as an instance of Lupin regressing (as Snape does) back to the mindset of his youth in response to Snapeâs presence at Hogwarts and his unpleasant/unprofessional demeanor towards Neville (whom Rowling even has Harry symbolically link to Peter at one point). From a young readerâs perspective, Lupin certainly is doing something âgoodâ by bringing Neville forward and encouraging him to tackle his Snape-Boggart the way he did. However, from the perspective of an adult-reader and one in a similar position of authority with the same professional expectations and responsibilities Lupin would have had, I find that I must question the relative wisdom of Lupinâs choice. Compare his response to Snapeâs criticism of Neville (the potential motives of which Iâve analyzed more thoroughly here) with McGonagallâs de-escalation of the situation when Moody transfigures Draco in book four and youâre left with two very different examples of professionality and appropriate teacher-conduct in response to teacher bullying and/or cruelty.Â
Rather than address an issue of professional confuct with a colleague, Lupin does escalate matters by responding to Snapeâs bait and using Neville to humiliate him. Itâs significant that while Neville is the one whose fears determine his Boggart, Lupin is the one who instructs Neville on how to combat it. It is Lupin who tells him to âforceâ (the specific word Rowling chooses which has very important connotations, especially when you consider how they could relate to what weâve seen in SWM) Boggart-Snape into the most humiliating ensemble of womenâs clothing (a trend where Snape is concerned of characters insulting him by targetting his masculinity, which when you consider the dichotomous way gender is presented in this series does carry its own troubling implications) Neville can imagine and it is Lupin who presses Neville to go the extra lengths of including specific and embarrassing details like the big red handbag and the vultureâs hat, as âforcingâ Snape into the clothing of an older woman is not âcomedicâ enough it would seem.Â
After this, weâre told that Neville became even more of a target of Snapeâs with no further intervention on the part of Lupin. If this were truly about objections to Snapeâs behavior as a professional, Lupin could have addressed it directly versus passive-aggressively (as McGonagall did with Moody) or taken the issue to Dumbledore once it escalated but he does not. Instead, we have a case where it seems one teacher responded to another being cruel to a student by encouraging that student to humiliate that teacher and then he promptly leaves him to deal with the repercussions once heâs been made more of a target than he was before with no further mention in the narrative of Lupin attempting to do anything further to address it as an issue. I would argue that it is plausible to conclude Lupin was responding to Snape as he would have when they were students and, further, by involving Neville he was thinking in the same terms of school-yard retaliation that he and his friends once did when Snape struck back at them. Lupinâs actions werenât really the appropriate actions of a teacher so much as they were the passive-aggressive actions of a man who had regressed and fallen back into school-boy behaviors as much as Snape.Â
Moreover, Lupinâs confession in the Shrieking Shack and Hermioneâs disapproval truly lends us some insight into what narrative Rowling intended and how we were meant to respond to Lupinâs choices as readers. As Hermione is often her mouth-piece when it comes to addressing failings in the wizarding world, she condemns Lupinâs carelessness for what it is (just as she condemns Siriusâs behavior with Harry in book five for what it is) âselfishness. This gives us another side to Lupin, one that is far more complex and flawed than the mild-mannered academician he would have us see him as. Lupin, admittedly as a circumstance of his condition and his own anxieties of being the outsider, can be capable of remarkable degrees of selfishness and self-deceit. Heâs very much a man who has been wired for survival and his instincts when it comes to protecting himself and preserving what social connections he does have are strong enough he would gamble with Harryâs safety and the safety of the school just to avoid making Dumbledore aware of his betrayal of his trust and losing his esteem. Indeed, this awareness of his character faults further heightens the reality of how emotionally manipulative and hypocritical he was earlier in the year when he responds to Harry being found with the Maraudersâ Map by Snape by throwing his parentsâ deaths in his face and making him feel shame and guilt for his actions (this while Lupin has been attempting to deceive himself into believing not revealing Sirius as an Animagus is not endangering Harry).Â
Finally, there is much to glean of Lupinâs nature and his capacity for coldness and violence in how he responds to Peter being revealed to them. His readiness to join Sirius in committing a murder, in front of three thirteen-year-olds no less, is a sobering casting off of his mask. At that moment, we see the wolf with his teeth bared; we see the monster-in-the-man who can cross that line and murder without flinching in retaliation and revenge for betrayal. Sirius informs Peter he would have died before betraying James and Lily and Rowling shows us both he and Lupin are more than prepared to kill as a result of their betrayal. Yes, Lupin endured many lonely years of hardship following the deaths of Lily and James and, yes, Sirius was falsely accused and lost years of his own life yet the fact remains they are not just killing a stranger-spy âtheyâre gearing up to murder someone who they once called a friend.Â
To kill someone you know, laughed with, shared with, grew up with requires a very different set of nerves than it does to take revenge on a stranger on the opposite side of a war. Where we can observe that Snape would have been coming onto the scene with a long-standing hatred of Sirius âespecially while under the assumption it was he who betrayed the Pottersâ and even Sirius has had twelve long years in Azkaban to nurse his hatred of Peter, Remus likely once mourned Peterâs death and the loss of him as a friend. To be able to make that mental and emotional transition from regarding Sirius as an enemy and traitor and mourning Peter as a fallen friend to accepting Peterâs betrayal and conspiring with Sirius to murder him within the amount of time it took him to get from the castle to the Shrieking Shack cannot be underestimated. That was Lupin at his darkest, contrasted perfectly with Snape and his actions when weâre led to presume (partly because that is the persona Snape wears) that he is already dark, and it is through that contrast (i.e. between de-escalation with the intent of turning the guilty party over to the authorities and vigilante justice via murder) that Rowling most demonstrates for the reader that Lupin is far more dangerous and far more interesting than he would have us to believe. These days, that is why I appreciate Lupin as a character because he is not just the mild-mannered book-worm he seems âheâs the wolf in sheepâs clothing personified.
i donât hate lupin but iâd rather siriusâ hatred over lupin calling severus by his first name, acting like theyâre friendly, not apologising despite pretending to be apologetic, lying and twisting what happened to harry. honestly as a bully victim, the second is worse because itâs gaslighting. it makes you feel ridiculous for being resentful and it presents your bully as a kind person in contrast to your bitterness and anger. itâs just awful and 100% understand why severus canât stand him.
I believe Severus really cannot stand people who are not following their own targets and ethics because they are longing to be liked by others like Lupin.  On one side he is doing everything to be the nice, kind and funny teacher, and that, as we see with the boggart also on Snapes costs (and Nevilles because he became more a target to Snape because of it). He still got the habit to make fun of Snape. And that, even though it is only because of Snape brewing the Wolfsbane potion perfectly for him! It would have been impossible for him to teach without that.                                                 On the other hand we see him defend Snape against Harrys suspicions. I believe him to have a guilty conscience about never doing anything against James bully Severus. But I cannot see much effort to redeem that really. In the end instead of so much as a thank you Snape is accused to out him as Werewulf to expel himâŠâŠ.Sorry, but he endangered students againâŠ..and Snape was afraid of that to happen from the start. We all know whyâŠ.       No wonder he cannot stand him.
I love Remus and the man deserved so much better, but I think Severus judges more harshly cowardice than agressivity, and not only because Sev is both brave and agressive.
In a way Severus and him were in a similar positions : the estranged kids, with no social power. Lupin had the opportunity to hide his condition and took it - while Severus reclaimed it. He was poor, strange, and above all, half-blood, that could be a terrible prejudice in Slytheryn by the time. But he chosed to be called âthe half-blood Prince.â
Of course, it wasnât as terrible as being outed as a werewolf. He didnât risk to be expelled or socially excluded for a life time because of this blood status. But letâs be real, teen!Sev was as socially aware as a brick. (He joined the DE to impress a Muggleborn, ffs.) So for him, Remusâ choice to hide was just cowardice - and inconscience from the staff.
Growing up, I think the two adults understood their situations werenât as different as it seemed, and more awkward, that they made the same choices in life to survive. Both needed to be protected by more powerful than them, and both chosed popular, rich pure-bloods. But deep down, their situations were polar opposite : Lupin was potentially dangerous, and needed to be seen as inofensive; Severus was potentially inofensive, and needed to be seen as dangerous.
What could save them was either love or power. Remus chosed love, Severus chosed power.
And it worked. In the end, Sev is the one who is treated as the dangerous one, even though heâs the one who prevents Remus to be actually dangerous.
But their primar similarity in their situation - combined to, I believe, a guilty conscience - probably led Remus to think heâs spared the effort to apologizes to Severus and had him think they have something in common, that Severus understands (without excusing) his choices just like, probably, Remus understands his (without excusing either). This time, itâs Remus who doesnât take into account the power imbalances : as if Remus couldnât have opposed James and Sirius, just like Severus couldnât have opposed Voldemort himselfâŠ
I strongly believe that Remus is aware he could have easily joined the Death Eaters. Letâs remind that by the time, there wasnât anything about the blood supremacy bullshit and killing all Muggles around, and it was easy for well-meanng kids just like Severus to fall into the trap. His condition could have been far more easier inside the DE. But itâs canon that Remus has a very hard time with involvement. He has to push himself to stay faithful to his own wife and kid. So joining a kind of cult⊠not for him. He felt on the winning side mostly by chance, and I think heâ aware of that. This is another reason why I think Remus feels a genuine sympathy for Severus, and doesnât understand why itâs not reciprocated.
When your sole existence is treated as a fault, when guilt is pushed into you for things you never did and you canât do anything against, it leads to a passive behavior when you just follow what you need to do to survive, when you take no decision in the fear that this decision can be reproached to you - and often leads to a problem with involvement. There is a limit to the guilt a man can endure. itâs really hard to admit you did something wrong, by yourself, by your choices, your acts. So Remus draws himself in a position where he had no choice, instead of admiting he did the wrong one. Once, again, Severus only can see this as cowardice, and well, this time, it is.
Also, letâs remind that Remus is unaware of the still lasting bound with Lily. Itâs easier for Remus and Sirius to consider their bullying as a part of the past. Not only they were not on the suffering side, but more, James and Lilyâs deaths, Siriusâ incarceration, marked a rupture in their lives. It was their before/after limit. For Severus, it was just the continuity. Itâs still his present, every day.
the only adjectives in the english language:
1. tender
2. feral
3. horny
for your consideration
Why is Jesus Feral
- Killed a tree because he was angry that it didnât give him fruit when it wasnât fruit season
- Destroyed a bunch of tables and chased the owners with a whip
- Blew up and then acted like he didnât know nobody (Mark 3:33)
- Yelled at his followers for interrupting his nap to let him know their boat was about to sink
- Healed a blind man by spitting on him
- Explicitly ordered his followers to steal a donkey for him
And thatâs just the highlights from Mark.
âWhy is Jesus feralâ
*me, having read the bible* um the boi he wildÂ
...Why are show content creators not allowed to enjoy fan content without fans declaring that they're being baited if the subject happens to be a ship? Especially with stories and characters that they had when they were young? It seems really unfair to me tbh.
you ainât never had a friend like her đđ
âđâ
Oswald Cobblepot + penguin children đ§đ§đ§đ§đ
â« âȘ You are the master of you âȘ â«