It’s also outrage-bait. Just one more thing to enforce the SJW circlejerk.
No double entendre intended.
“Trap” originated, IIRC, from 4chan. Basically, someone would show a picture of a trap, get anons to admit ‘she’ was hot, and then go ‘tricked you! It’s a dude!’ SJWs managed to do some sort of logical contortion and decided the term referred to trans women ‘tricking’ dudes, with no evidence whatsoever. I have literally never seen a single one support the claim, only use it as a sort of purity test; if you question the dogma in any way, that ‘proves’ you’re a transphobe.
Bee is probably thinking of ‘futanari’. Or maybe mixing up the distorted versions of both terms.
>Picture having only ever met two trans people, that’s mental…
The incidence of trans people is estimated at about 1/1,000. So it would be quite possible to meet a few hundred people but only know two ‘out’ trans people. I personally don’t know any IRL.
What I don’t understand is if you’re implying probabilities are somehow SJWow’s fault. But >since you think it’s literally impossible for transtrenders to exist< for no logical reason*, I’d say more likely than not.
* Apparently it’s impossible for someone to falsely convince themselves they have Gender Identity Disorder, unlike shedloads of other mental issues. Even when they’re actively making up a new definition because they don’t fit the real one. And no one ever comes into an environment chock-full of people with X quality and fakes having X quality to fit in.
jacobvanloon
dededos
dailybridgerton
baratheonpilled
