Lost Geeky Daddy

some content is nsfw. read at your own discretion

[issagordomybaby]

Idk this my first time living this life too

[kosmogrl]

[vashito]

mermaid megafauna

patreon . bsky

[vashito]

more big mermaid

[enjolraean]

TERFs be like

“We’re not trans-exclusionary! We include trans men in our feminism, they’re our ““sisters”” too!”

*proceed to fight against language that includes trans men in necessary reproductive healthcare and rights*

*refuse to listen to the lived experience of trans men and the unique struggles they face in comparison to cis people of either (binary) sex*

*victim-blame transmasc survivors of s//xual assault bc they went into men’s spaces and apparently that justifies fucking r//pe*

*just outright insult transmasc bodies with no provocation, for fun I guess?*

[catchymemes]

[ferngullynationalist]

Shocking: Local Woman Fails To See Weird PM From Random Strange Man On The Internet As Fulfillment Of Desire For A Loving, Healthy Relationship

[oncelerfucker69-deactivated2019]

Even worse, a stranger from reddit specifically

[gaypitbull]

[dingdongyouarewrong]

that isn’t even why they privated!! this dude just made that up

[whoismrrobotgifs]

[boyd-stevens]

Captain America: Civil War (2016) dir. Joe Russo and Anthony Russo

[guitarbeard]

Gender discourse will continue to flounder in mindless squabbling because we refuse to accept that the pinnacle of masculine performance is when a pizza chef spins the dough in the air

[fracturednerd]

Haha

Agreed, though...

[just-shower-thoughts]

You knever know how ignorant the media is until they fuck up something you know about

[alaija]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gell-Mann_amnesia_effect

[brosefvondudehomie-deactivated2]

Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray’s case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the “wet streets cause rain” stories. Paper’s full of them. In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.

— Michael Crichton

[star-wars]

Do or do not. There is no try.

[homunculus-argument]

When you write, when you start worrying that the story is repeating the same elements, you can either go the cowardly way and erase the second time the same damn thing happens, or you can boldly simply have the characters acknowledge it, and quietly remark to themselves that this kind of thing apparently happens surprisingly often around these parts.

"Hmm. If I had a nickel for every time I've been told to shut up when two people were trying to negotiate selling me like property, and I started haggling my own price, I would have two nickels. Which isn't much, but it's annoying that it has now happened twice."

[homunculus-argument]

Character concept: A woman who is knowingly married to a man who is actually an emotionless and calculating killer robot with a thin sheet of artificial skin, trying his best to impersonate a human being. He is, naturally, a villain. Once the protagonists track him down, they're shocked that he doesn't spend his time "off-duty" laying on shelf somewhere like an object that isn't in use, his actual human-disguise goes so deep that he - or really, "it" - actually has a family. The programming fooled an actual human into marrying it.

Once they go to the killer robot's wife like "ma'am we know this is going to shock you to your core and you'll never recover from this, if your brain can even process this information, but your husband is actually a killer robot from outer space", and instead of fainting or rejecting the information she's like

"oh yeah I figured a long time ago that there's something off about him", and they assume she lives in fear that he'll exterminate her if he figures out that she knows, but no, the killer robot knows that the mysterious death of his Human Identity's wife - or ex wife - would attract unwanted attention.

When asked why she doesn't leave, despite of knowing that her husband of seven years is a robot, she's like nah, he's the best husband she's ever had. He's consistent, punctual, does what he says and says what he does and his patience is literally endless when helping her kids with math. He has discovered the statistic that in a successful marriage, positive interactions should outnumber negative ones 7:1, so for every time he has unintentionally upset her, he has deliberately planned seven things that would make her happy.

Since his super designer killer robot body is literally fucking indestructible anyway, they couldn't destroy him even if they tried, so in the end, the protagonists only end up destroying that part of his brain (or what counts as one) that concerns killing. The now-lobotomized killer robot and his human wife (and their kids) live happily ever after together.

[homunculus-argument]

Apparently a part of the reason why farmed bees stay in the beehives that humans build for them is because the farm hives are safer and sturdier. I don't know how a busy Discord server's worth of bugs that only have one brain cell each would logically conclude that the humans protect them from outside threats, illness and parasites, but if I understood right, the bees would be free to move away and build a new nest somewhere else any time they'd want, and they simply choose not to.

You know how in almost every culture, people have some concept of "if I sacrifice something that I made/grew/produced to the Gods, they will ward me and my harvest from evil"?

So, in a way, don't the bees willingly sacrifice a part of their harvest to an entity not only far greater than them, but nearly beyond their comprehension, in exchange for protection against natural forces wildly outside of their own control?

So tell me, beekeepers, what are you to your bees, if not a mildly eldritch God?

[globalriseofblackpeople]

One of the most iconic cinematic moments by Actor Sidney Poitier....

The controversy in the movie “In The Heat of The Night”

was this was the first time a black man was allowed to slap a white man back on film...

[mtfoss]

Different oppressions don't cancel out it's not a math problem you don't get to be transmisogynistic because you're gay, you don't get to be antisemitic because you're poor, you don't get to be racist because you're a trans woman (disclaimer I am a white trans woman), etc etc etc. You shouldn't be trying to use your identity to shield yourself from accountability you should be trying to understand and support people who face oppression you don't face.

[globalriseofblackpeople]

One of the most iconic cinematic moments by Actor Sidney Poitier....

The controversy in the movie “In The Heat of The Night”

was this was the first time a black man was allowed to slap a white man back on film...

[bugsifindd]

a beautiful garden and duck area in my hometown.