let’s all go to the sister convention!
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

pixel skylines
No title available
will byers stan first human second
No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Keni
art blog(derogatory)

Product Placement
KIROKAZE
DEAR READER
No title available

Discoholic 🪩
sheepfilms
todays bird

titsay
Xuebing Du
Stranger Things
Acquired Stardust
h
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from Argentina

seen from Germany
seen from Ukraine
seen from Hungary

seen from Türkiye

seen from Taiwan

seen from Singapore

seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from Australia

seen from Germany
seen from Brazil
seen from France
seen from Australia
seen from United Kingdom
@friolily
let’s all go to the sister convention!
i'd rather every single person on earth have free, reliable, easily accessible, and judgment free access to hrt, even if they regret taking it later, than have one single trans person kill themselves because they can't access or afford or are prevented from taking hrt!!!! i'll forcefem a thousands cismen before i let one trans girl die!!!!
ngl i think it’s more incestuous to like take your sister out on a nice date and be in love with her than to just fuck her. take your sister on dates! make her feel loved! it’s good for sisters!!!
“If a society puts half its children into short skirts and warns them not to move in ways that reveal their panties, while putting the other half into jeans and overalls and encouraging them to climb trees, play ball, and participate in other vigorous outdoor games; if later, during adolescence, the children who have been wearing trousers are urged to “eat like growing boys,” while the children in skirts are warned to watch their weight and not get fat; if the half in jeans runs around in sneakers or boots, while the half in skirts totters about on spike heels, then these two groups of people will be biologically as well as socially different. Their muscles will be different, as will their reflexes, posture, arms, legs and feet, hand-eye coordination, and so on. Similarly, people who spend eight hours a day in an office working at a typewriter or a visual display terminal will be biologically different from those who work on construction jobs. There is no way to sort the biological and social components that produce these differences. We cannot sort nature from nurture when we confront group differences in societies in which people from different races, classes, and sexes do not have equal access to resources and power, and therefore live in different environments. Sex-typed generalizations, such as that men are heavier, taller, or stronger than women, obscure the diversity among women and among men and the extensive overlaps between them… Most women and men fall within the same range of heights, weights, and strengths, three variables that depend a great deal on how we have grown up and live. We all know that first-generation Americans, on average, are taller than their immigrant parents and that men who do physical labor, on average, are stronger than male college professors. But we forget to look for the obvious reasons for differences when confronted with assertions like ‘Men are stronger than women.’ We should be asking: ‘Which men?’ and ‘What do they do?’ There may be biologically based average differences between women and men, but these are interwoven with a host of social differences from which we cannot disentangle them.”
— Ruth Hubbard, “The Political Nature of ‘Human Nature’“
by the way it's fine to like sexual content just for the sake of it. "we can't ban porn because other stuff will get banned" "sometimes nude art has value" "the government will classify queer people as sexual" this is all true but it's okay to just like porn. its okay to not want porn to be banned because you like it.
They should just bite the bullet and make a female James Bond. Hot, athletic, suave. She wears tuxedos with a somewhat feminine cut, drinks vodka martinis, drives sports cars, and goes by "James", because why not.
Also, because this is incredibly important to Bond for some reason, she needs to be an incredibly predatory, womanizing lesbian. Some perfectly happy married straight woman needs to become gay by the end of the movie.
We live in the future, and we can admit that all of the cool things that a Male James Bond can do are things a Female James Bond can do. But at all costs, we need to avoid making this thing feel "woke" of self-aware. If Female Bond is not exactly as toxic and awesome as any of the male ones, we will have failed, and might as well be making another franchise.
Kill Forcefem James Bond
the incest taboo is actually harmful to victims of abuse. this is in part because it often prevents survivors from coming forward in the first place. faced with potential social ostracization and even criminal charges for their own mistreatment, many of those abused stay quiet out of fear - preferring to suffer in silence than risk losing everything they have left. if not for the taboo, countless more victims would be able to come forward with their experiences without fear of social or legal reprisal.
moreover, by lumping consensual romantisexual activity into the same category as non-consensual abuse, one not only de-emphasizes the importance of consent, but also blurs the very line between healthy relationships and sexual assault in doing so. this kind of rhetoric is particularly dangerous with respect to the conversation around abuse, as relationship safety depends on clear definitions for these vital words.
stand with victims. stand with incest.
River puppies 🐊
yk what i hate though. is when i find a meme and im like THIS IS SO [cool intimidating mutual i never talk to] I SHOULD SEND IT TO THEM but then i remember ive never talked to them ever and so i cant just like give them a meme out of the blue and so the meme just withers and rots in my camera roll 😔
Reblog if a mutual who's never spoken to you can randomly send you memes that made them think of you.
to any of my followers who aren't on the pervert transbian side of tumblr: please, if you do anything, kill the protestant puritan inside of you. you need to accept that people will have kinks you do not like and that your disgust is not moral righteousness.
you must accept that people will have kinks that disgust you and you must come to this same understanding.
most of all, you must come to the understanding that the attraction a person experiences is not proof of some "original sin" that lies inside of them and makes them an irredeemable human. not only because accusations like this have been used as thinly-veiled excuses to lynch brown people/queer people/name a minority group here since literal antiquity, but because you as a leftist should not look at someone who likes lolisho or r*pe kink and suddenly decide that certain people DO NOT deserve human rights
and if you get nothing out of this, at least internalize that fiction is not reality
and also understand that many people have had their accounts banned from this site dozens of times for such crimes as... disagreeing with US imperialism. being brown. quite literally just being transfem. if you care at all about trans women, make a stink about this and do something to help your sisters
also learn about youthlib
its nice that we as a community are getting to the point where 'let the plushies watch' is a commonly accepted sentiment but hopefully we can normalize letting them participate as well
a threesome with your sister and your plushie is one of the hottest things of all time tbh
"you cannot have a category of person that stops being a person or everyone that someone wants to get rid of is going to end up being put in that category" and other really fucking obvious and basic observations that everyone ignores in favor of putting people they want to get rid of into a category they think makes them stop being a person
feels like a real step back that with all the sexual freedom available to us we moved to Hookup Culture instead of Having Sex With Friends Culture
I find it weird, actually, that today it's more common to have sex with casual acquaintances you meet on the Hookup App than to have sex with people you already know and like and have fun with. and how if two friends have sex, there's an assumption there must be underlying romantic feelings. because apparently casual non-romantic sex is fine, but only with people you don't already like and care about?
I feel like the hippies and people who lived through the Free Love movement would be rightfully disappointed at us for these made-up lines we're drawing between Sex/Romance and (gasp!) Friendship. shockingly, it's fine to have casual sex with people you enjoy hanging out with and do not want to date. fun and healthy even!
Ahhh... i dunno why but this feels like a result of purity culture.
Where 2 concepts clash:
You can have sex outside of marriage
But also sex is bad and you shouldn't do it.
It's not actually okay to have sex and it's shameful to do it and it'll taint your relationships if they know about it.
But also sex isn't bad and be free to do it whenever you want!
That turns into:
You can have sex but it's bad for your relationships.
So it's okay to have sex only if you're either planning to Marry them or Never seeing them again.
HUH.... Society really fucked us on this one (and not in the fun kinky way ☹️)
the smartest girls know its hotter to say mom during sex than it is to say mommy
if i keep seeing people use "inbred" as an insult i'm going to crash out. the circumstances of one's conception does not dictate their behavior and the implication that consang offspring are inferior is eugenicist as fuck. you can throw shade at somebody without resorting to reactionary rhetoric, actually.
Incest rights activists, please interact :^: I need help trying to get us incestuous folks rights.