okay, there are some fair points on here but i can’t forgive Moffat-apologist posts to be honest.
Steven Moffat, no matter what you think of him, just isn’t that sexist.
Wrong. Moffat is unbelievably sexist for someone who is in charge of such a massive part of British media. Just a few of the sexist things he has said with sources:
“there’s a huge, unfortunate lack of respect for anything male” (x)
"I was called a misogynist because I was reducing women to mothers. ‘Reducing women to mothers’ – now there is possibly the most anti-women statement I’ve heard." (x)
"You could accuse me of having a fetish for powerful, sexy women who like cheating people. That would be fair." (x)
“I remember when I was reading that story as a kid, Sherlock goes on and on about The Woman, the only one who ever beat him, and you’re thinking, he’s had better villains than this. And then you click: he fancies her, doesn’t he? That’s what it’s about.” (x) Yes Moffat, because the only reason that Sherlock would be interested in her is not because she is intelligent, has agency and was one of the only people to beat him, no! Of COURSE he fancies her!
"You have to hand it to the Doctor for dumping a slightly needy girlfriend by palming her off on a copy of himself. He tried leaving her in a parallel universe, and that didn’t work." (x)
“And I thought, ‘well she’s really good. It’s just a shame she’s so wee and dumpy…When she was about to come through to the auditions I nipped out for a minute and I saw Karen walking on the corridor towards me and I realised she was 5’11, slim and gorgeous and I thought ‘Oh, oh that’ll probably work’.” (
Doctor Who Confidential, All About the Girl. 10-04-10 (at 23:10 and 23:34)
"And there’s a moment with two Amy Ponds in it. If you’re a red-blooded male surely that’s enough! You’ve got Amy Pond flirting with herself.” (x)
"Your wife turns into a boat, and shortly after that, you never sleep again and you clean shit off someone. It doesn’t seem like a very appealing prospect. Obviously, the moment I saw my child, that was different, but up until that point, I was thinking, ‘how long before she gets back to normal size? Will this damage anything?’" (From an article in The Times, 19-05-12)
These aren’t even all of his comments. I found so many other sexist comments he has made, if you want to read more then they are here. Moffat is a sexist and a misogynist . And not only that, his homophobic and saying that asexuality is boring runs rampant especially on twitter:
‘“When did I say I thought I was contributing to bisexual visibility?? Please stop being rude to me, you have no reason to be.”. ’
And in any case, if you have to say ‘He’s not that sexist’ to find a redeeming feature in a sexist man, you’re not doing a very good job.
Pointing out every flaw of Davis’ era does not help Moffat, it only creates a bigger gap.
Neither eras are perfect.
Criticising Moffat does include comparing him to his predecessors. Davies was by no means perfect but it’s not secret that representation of women and minority groups was far better in Davies’ era.
Rose is not the most important companion.
This is an opinion. Stop putting your own opinions on things that you think everyone should look at. It’s silly stop it.
Eleven is not the only face to be manipulative. That is a trait the Doctor has always had.
It isn’t simply that Eleven is manipulative, but to quote Claudia Boleyn in this video: "He treats her [Clara] with such a lack of respect it’s unreal." I myself can’t claim to be an expert on all of Moffat’s era as I gave up trying to watch it but the Doctor’s sexist comments to Amy "Put some trousers on" and "She’s a woman" are indicative of Moffat’s own sexism shining through in Eleven’s character.
If you have a problem with the show, don’t watch it. This applies to any other show/book/movie/podcast/etc.
I’m sooooo sick of hearing ‘if it’s so bad then don’t watch it’. Did you know it is possible to like some aspects of a show while being critical of others??? It is important and sometimes even necessary to analyse the media that we are consuming and criticise it because constructive criticism is how things improve!
Nobody benefits from YouTube videos of a person complaining about an era using over opinionated misinterpretations.
This seems to be a thinly-veiled attack on YouTube DW fans who make videos reviewing and criticising Doctor Who, such as previously mentioned Claudia Boleyn (who I highly recommend watching if you like analysis of media like I do). And I’ll repeat myself here, it is important and necessary to be critical of media because that is how media improves.
Do not judge a relationship when they only showed tiny bits of it on screen.
You can judge a relationship if there is barely any relationship there due to fault of the writer.
This show is not tailor made to fit you. You have no right to complain when it doesn’t do what you want.
This show is a British national treasure and when what you want is a show that accurately shows my country for the diverse, multicultural, beautiful place that it is instead of a whitewashed mess that stinks of cishet male writers. Plot of DW aside, there hasn’t been a female writer on Doctor Who for nearly 10 years and there is a disgusting lack of POC in the show as well as women. Jenny and Vastra are the only queer people on the show who have reoccurring roles and they haven’t even kissed, although Eleven has sexually assaulted Jenny and was remorseless about it.
Anyone watching this train wreck of a showrunner has the right to complain if he is writing such shit and putting it on a family show for children to watch and think this behavior is okay. Moffat’s writing isn’t fit for Doctor Who unless he can start creating more diverse casts and starts teaching lessons that amount to more than ‘look how great the Doctor is!!!’