I seem to be functioning in the gray area between online systems and practical art making techniques (installation, material use, assemblage of object and text). A group critique that took place in my studio, reengaged me with my practice in a positive way (having spent a good few weeks working solidly on my dissertation - which is being approached from the position of further investigation into my personal practice, reinforcing my understanding of the subject matter I am working with) receiving positive feedback in terms of the areas in which my practice discusses. An interesting point came up from the group crit. when one person asked if my work concerned feminism - relating to a feminist struggle - because of the repetitious use of the word MAN. (This word has been edited/reduced from the statement I AM MANUSCRIPT.) Perhaps this is to do with the use of text as a material - the form of the letters and the challenge of logical communication. Generalising, there could be an assumption that ordered and logical communication such as text, could be seen as masculine, and maybe the object, or spoken word could be seen as more feminine. My use of monochromatic (black on white) statements might allude to this as well. For the most part, the concern of whether my work appears to question ideas around issues of (stereotypical) gender, is not at the forefront of the work.
Through dictation of material and process led practice, I have restrained the colour pallet I use when making work. This is partly due to the emotive and subjective aspects of colour that resonates with individuals either consciously or subconsciously - I do not wish the viewer to stray from the point I am trying to make; the use of colours (or lack of) has been chosen very carefully to reflect the ideas surrounding that of the machine, labour, repetitious activity, banality, computational systems of work/production. The use of black in my work also relates to Kazimir Malevich's Black Square, (Schor, 2006) and what that represented in relation to the death of painting.
I mention this, not as an overarching aspect of my work, but one that might hint at the question, as to if this might occur with the advancement of augmented reality (AR), such as in Keiichi Matsuda's Hyper-Reality (Keiichi Matsuda, 2016) - whose work has been discussed in my dissertation. A concern which I touched upon in the essay, aided by Owen Hopkins' article concerning the idea of AR in relation to architecture of the future, and is one that I find interesting - he says 'Why bother with windows facing a particular view, when we can decide whether we're looking out on London, Paris, a Tuscan landscape or even the Great Barrier Reef?' (Hopkins, 2017) This could effectively mean that the facades of buildings, interiors of our homes, and even the contents of our galleries could be (pun) blank canvases on which our digitally allocated, and/or commercially controlled projections would overlay.
Keiichi Matsuda. (2016, May 19). HYPER-REALITY [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJg02ivYzSs
Hopkins, O. (2017). "Augmented reality heralds the abolition of architectural practice as we know it". Retrieved from https://www.dezeen.com/2017/01/31/owen-hopkins-opinion-augmented-reality-heralds-abolition-current-architecture-practice/
Schor, G.R. (2006). Black Moods. Retrieved from http://www.tate.org.uk/context-comment/articles/black-moods