I need to do this. (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't d
Xuebing Du

JVL

bliss lane
taylor price

oozey mess
Misplaced Lens Cap
RMH
Mike Driver

No title available
No title available
noise dept.
wallacepolsom
Game of Thrones Daily

ellievsbear
d e v o n
$LAYYYTER
we're not kids anymore.
Jules of Nature
tumblr dot com
Sweet Seals For You, Always

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Indonesia
seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Canada
seen from Ireland

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from T1

seen from Malaysia
@hardtobeasaintdotmp3
I need to do this. (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't do it) (Doesn't d
it's crazy how february-june didn't happen
call me terminally academia-brained but i do think a lot of the fun of character analysis is figuring out how to build a compelling argument for a particular reading using lines of evidence from canon as well as meta/intertextual support
and you could say that what i’m saying here is basically “a lot of the fun of doing character analysis is doing character analysis” but let’s be real a lot of fandom character analysis is pretty heavily vibes-based. and i think that’s where i really chafe up against the traditional thought-terminating fandom attitude of like, everyone’s opinions hold equal weight and any interrogation of that is inherently hostile. because i think it’s fascinating to dig into where others are coming from in terms of their views on characters or dynamics or whatever, especially when they differ significantly from more commonly expressed views, and part of that digging is asking people okay what parts of canon are you drawing from to support your opinion? what parts of canon are you disregarding or downplaying? how does this argument hold up in the light of how race, gender, class, ability, etc. operate both in the piece’s in-fiction and real world contexts?
Harry Gruyaert - Trastevere, Roma
Ok this is it, I have to get something of my chest. Because of this goddamned Odyssey film I keep reading everywhere that Emily Wilson is the first woman to translate the Odyssey and because of this she has a unique take on the text.... NO NO NO THIS IS NOT TRUE she's the first ENGLISH woman to translate the Odyssey but women have been translating and publishing their translation since the 1700s !!!! In French and Italian and I'm sure other languages too!!
I'm so mad because students in Italy have been studying on Rosa Calzecchi Onesti's translation for decades!! Her translation is so well regarded it keeps being used in academia to this day and it's from the 60s!!! There have been dozens of other translations since then but we keep using that one !!!
(and also many other women published their translations both before and after her)
The irresistible urge of english/american ppl to make universal statements out of their experience
whatever 𓆝 𓆟 𓆞 𓆝 𓆟
thanks to compilation efforts, three posts regarding the gneep gnorp population are able to be read together in a single post, and they are now the most documented species out of all creatures on earth
AOi MORIo
what do you mean I can't control everything, why not
impression, soleil levant — claude monet, 1872
📍 musée marmottan monet, paris (17.07.2026)
they added another luftballon while you were sleeping
from terracat studio
Singin' in the Rain (1952) dir. Stanley Donen & Gene Kelly
all my haters become freighters when I ride on the railroad of success