maka the aura farmer
sheepfilms
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

JBB: An Artblog!
Cosmic Funnies
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
dirt enthusiast

oozey mess
$LAYYYTER

No title available
Peter Solarz
NASA
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

Janaina Medeiros

izzy's playlists!
occasionally subtle

pixel skylines

Kiana Khansmith

blake kathryn
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Show & Tell
seen from United States
seen from Argentina

seen from Spain
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from Bahamas
seen from Chile
seen from China

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Italy
@hellserrandgirl
maka the aura farmer
the version of ranma in akane’s mind: bold, confident, straight-forward
what ranma is ACTUALLY like when they are alone: shy, embarrassed, cannot function
thank you sakura cardcaptor
don’t ask chatgpt I can lie to you for free
for all of you:
The Hunter's Funeral Procession
It’s actually crazy how bad feeling bad feels
A German regional court has ruled that Google is directly liable for the content of its AI search overviews. According to the court, previou
Let’s fucking go
This is HUGE.
1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.
2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.
3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."
4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.
TL;DR Google reeeeeally stepped in it this time.
5. If the words are Google's, this solidifies the position of universities who demand that all answers from AI are fully cited. If all the in-line citations now have to be (Google, 2026), that's going to make it obvious when someone's trying to use Google as a source. There's still the difficulty with people who are academically dishonest by trying to pass off the AI writing as their own. 6. 91% accuracy is officially too low to use as a source of references, which means the AI can't be used as a source of references either. This makes it less legitimate for such purposes than Wikipedia of all places (Wikipedia might need date/time proof of when it was accessed for the reference to be valid, but at least it is possible to prove the link existed at a particular date and time). 7. This will help encourage the rollout of courses on how to avoid AI search for students who need academic accuracy, because it's statistically not good enough to use. 8. This strengthens the case intellectual property authors have against Google in the EU, as this is proof that an intellectual property transfer took place.
I don't wanna die, I just want to walk off into the dark and vanish.
Artwork by Niall Grant
The Creation of Adam Necklace // MokoByFarukOzcan