Anyone wordling today had to deduce that writing rabid was necessary in order to win the game. Once my mother figured it out, she said something about a sick dog. Easy as it was for me to second her sentiments, I also gave her some gentle reassurance it had something to do with our species too since passionate fandom of something and/or somebody can receive such recognition, whether a cult leader or simply an esteemed presidential figure (something between genuine and sarcastic putting it like that).
During some random Scrabbling sessions of mine later today, I was able to write editor, naturals, federals, resonate, suitable, edition, parental and enaction on the boards I had their respective letter assortments.
Couldn't an editor be taken as demonstrating rabid support or hatred for something depending whether they picked or didn't choose certain letters for publication inside their paper than others? Doesn't seem daunting for me to suspect, easy as any newspaper can have it being on the left or right. Any individual editor could be taken like that in addition; God knows editing of mine will indicate various ideas, biases, etc. no questions asked, whether at large (e.g. affirmation of anyone queer as sexual orientation and/or gender identity has it) or zoomed in as personal analysis has it (dub me a dyke or gay woman rather than lesbian, please and thank you).
People like me, who regard respecting people as they want to be known as right, will be identified as naturals-perhaps via a dismissive tone of voice by people who don't want to show such respect-for doing so. I'm not unaware talking to and/or about others properly can show a kind of talent, easy as my mom has it failing to acknowledge the right gender identity a friend of mine happens to have. Doesn't mean I don't feel uneasy being talked about like that though.
Having a look to federals, whether mine, those inside the USA and/or those inside any other nation on earth, can easily show how supportive governments are about something, whether broad stroke or inside specific spots. Sure doesn't seem hard saying federals here are much more supportive of trans people than those inside the USA and federals inside many other nations don't want to give any protection to anyone under the GLBT rainbow umbrella, happy as they are to criminalize bisexual and gay people for simply coming out, let alone doing anything sexual in nature.
If a message speaks to you as a peer, it will resonate as something positive in nature. If it talks to you implying you're problematic, its resonance will be negative, right? It would be nice if everything always had the kind of resonance we want but it very obviously won't always be so. To that effect, if its resonance is proper to you, it will probably be taken by you as suitable, whereas something counter to anything you regard as right won't be so. Don't have it hard saying I'm very much a group member, happy to avoid unsuitable (as in bigoted) news as completely as I can, repulsive as I find it.
It's not as if we're unaware something can change according to its edition number either. Something could have started according to the half of something we felt was right then flipped. It could have been problematic to us at its start then became something we were able to regard as right, perhaps as inclusion or exclusion had it (since years ago it was easy to spot man, as opposed to human, kind being put to paper, supposedly acknowledging everyone no matter their sex)
How much parental behaviour has helped young people feel rabidly about something, for better or worse? Don't have it hard saying it has exerted an effect on me as far as alcoholic drinking goes. I'm very much a teetotaller due to everything I witnessed my dad go through as a functional alcoholic.
Come to today and many discriminatory policies have undergone enaction, enabling organizations, governments etc. to ensure peoples' realities are ignored if not downright denied. Much as my ex-employer has it easy denying its authorities have done so, I'm hardly unaware they enacted something to make me disappear, rabid as they are about their determination to ensure people like me don't influence students a second.
Pretty crazy those individual terms happily went to create a 'rabid' rainbow. Perhaps I'm not supposed to feel shocked given seven's a number linked to completion inside Judaism and I'm a genderqueer Jewish woman, doing a 180. Obviously fascinating no matter anything.