If DC writers were smart like me, they would've been consistent about having Bruce say this.
Nightwing (Vol. 4) #29
Because imagine Dick bringing that up during the candlelit vigil in Dark Crisis.
Dark Crisis #1

blake kathryn
wallacepolsom
untitled
Misplaced Lens Cap

gracie abrams
I'd rather be in outer space đž
Cosimo Galluzzi
Cosmic Funnies
KIROKAZE
taylor price

JVL
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

romaâ
d e v o n
trying on a metaphor
cherry valley forever

tannertan36
Mike Driver
hello vonnie

Discoholic đȘ©

seen from United Kingdom

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Philippines

seen from Greece
seen from Sweden

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Algeria

seen from Japan
seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
@historychic1
If DC writers were smart like me, they would've been consistent about having Bruce say this.
Nightwing (Vol. 4) #29
Because imagine Dick bringing that up during the candlelit vigil in Dark Crisis.
Dark Crisis #1
the batfam fandoms weird obsession with bruce ânot being allowedâ to name his kids because he âjust names them thomas or marthaâ is weird and also fuckin weird. yeah no shit he wants to name his kids after his dead parents who he loved, what an awful crime.
anyways
thinking about batcat's height/size difference đ¶âđ«ïž
HhHHHHHH BATCAT HEIGHT/SIZE DIFFRENCEEE
WHEN SHEâS ON TOP OF HIS BIG ASS CHEST đ„” !!!
AND HIM ON TOP OF HERR :))))
The HANDS
THE HANDS ON HER FACE
The way Bruce will FOLD them in half or lift her up to get to those lips >>
And thatâs why Selina will sometimes need to go for the tackle đŒ
Alternatively, she has been known to stand on something (like his toes!)
Or a chair!
Or just climb him like a tree, she is a cat after all~
Let's debate about superhero capes (feel free to comment your own arguments as well)!
Capes are too dangerous (the Edna Mode argument)
Cape can get caught on things (e.g. branches, mechanical doors, exposed sharp objects)
Heavy capes can reduce mobility (e.g. weighing them down when running and climbing) and get in the way
Capes can be grabbed by an enemy to choke or restrain the wearer
Capes can increase visibility (especially for flying heroes when contrasted with the sky)
Capes can lead to instability and loss of balance at high speeds
Capes can be tactical (the Batman argument)
Capes can conceal movement, making attacks hard to read
Capes give the wearer a dramatic silhouette that can intimidate criminals
Capes can be used as a weapon or tool in a fight (e.g. using it to obstruct an opponents vision, distract them, wrap around a weapon to disarm, or cause an opponent to flinch or create distance)
Capes can be reinforced to provide some small amount of protection against weapons
Capes can be modified into a glider, parachute, or other tool
Capes can obscure body shape to protect secret identities
Capes can provide basic weather protection by using waterproofing for rain or insulation for the cold.
And now for the poll:
Which argument about superhero capes do you find more compelling?
Edna Mode argument
Batman argument
I am allergic to taking sides
Which argument (much information about said argument in above ask so go read or don't I'm not your mother) about superhero capes do you find more compelling?
Edna Mode argument
Batman argument
I am allergic to taking sides
Very few heroes just tie a random length of cloth around their necks and go. Despite looking simple the capes of heroes other than Batman either have a specialized purpose (Superman's cape is woven out of the Kryptonian equivalent of cotton and is also invulnerable) or any downsides are negated by their powers. The number one use for a superheroes cape is as a bulletproof shield that can be used to protect civilians and this is an important tool for any hero to have and pretty much all modern capes can easily by dropped or released when they become a liability.
Would also point out that capes or cloaks were traditionally used in fencing because they could be used to deflect the blade of an opponent, and this is where the phrase "cloak and dagger" comes from. The Batman argument genuinely has basis in reality.
Ep. 200 - Lines Crossed | Batman: Wayne Family Adventures
What are your favourite romantic/little intimate Batcat panels? As much as I love their sexy, sensual sides with each other, I love softer more romantic moments between the two of them even more!
I love the little moments where we see him covering her with his cape casually for non protective reasons bc heâs a gentleman and loves holding on to her đ„č
Batman #78 / Batman #392 / Sirens: love hurts #4
Him immediately going to cuddle and hug her >>
Batman Black & White #4
Catwoman (2018) #34
He loves setting his head on or against hers đ„ș
Batman (2016) annual #2 / Batman/catwoman special #1 / Catwoman (2011) #38 / Batman (2016) #66 / Batman: one bad day - Catwoman / Batman/catwoman special #1
if you havenât realized yet, these two want to crawl into each otherâs souls and canât go one second without physical touch
The way he holds her arms when he gets protective or worried
Batman #323
Detective Comics (1937) #557
Jla #116 / Catwoman: Future state #2
justâŠsoft bed cuddles
Catwoman (2018) #17 / Batman (2016) #44 / Batman/superman #4
Holding hands and gazing into each otherâs eyes
Batman #313 / Batman dark victory
Batman (2016) #15
They are so âI know placesâ đ„ș
Batman #392
Batman: Dark victory
the dots⊠iâm connecting themâŠ
So, you know how certain Christian missionaries are trained to act in a very obnoxious way, so that most people they preach to will reject them outright, so they feel like the world hates them for being Christian and they can only be friends with fellow Christians? You know that thing?
I think as activists, we sometimes need to stop and ask ourselves whether we're acting like those missionaries. I think this type of behavior is a little more ingrained into our society than some of us realize, and some of us have internalized it without realizing what it's actually meant to do.
OP I know that this is probably a different direction than you were going, but genuinely this advice would do so so much to help people not fall into secular political cults.
A lot of high control groups use this tactic to isolate their members. Itâs absolutely not just evangelizing Christians. New age wellness cults often encourage their members to make outlandish and offensive accusations regarding the mental and physical health of other people or their children, because they know that the backlash their members receive will reinforce the idea that the âmainstreamâ simply has no room for people who like crystals and essential oils. White supremacist cults will seed the vocabulary of new recruits with Nazi dog whistles that fly over those recruits heads, specifically so that they will get clocked as possible neo-Nazis and shunned by anyone who might offer them another perspective and help them to get out before itâs too late. And a lot of left-leaning political cults strongly encourage members to share their views in the most inflammatory ways possible, and then say âyou see? everyone outside of this small circle is evil and cannot be relied onâ when, inevitably, that produces bad results.
Sometimes I think that activists fall into these patterns completely accidentally, either because they were raised in culturally Christian evangelical environments and never unpacked it, or else because they just arenât any good at approaching things in a non-inflammatory way and no oneâs shown them how.
âŠBut sometimes, these structures emerge in activist circles because those circles are legitimately becoming high control groups.
I think some things to watch out for especially in this regard are:
Are you being directed to behave in an extremely hostile and alienating way? (even if itâs by someone who you trust!)
Does the group you are in immediately shut down any conversation about the effectiveness of an antagonistic strategy? In particular, do they shut that conversation down using in-group stock phrases?
Is experiencing harsh rejection seen as something of a rite of passage?
Do you receive more validation from the group you are in after you have been rejected by someone outside the group than at any other time?
Have you ever been concerned that the antagonistic strategy you are using hurt someone you cared about, only to be quickly advised by members of the group that that person was toxic and that you should actually completely cut them out of your life?
These to me are all pretty significant red flags about the group in question, whatever the specific thing that brings people together there is. If you start noticing them in a group that you are a part of, be that an in-person activist circle or a Discord server or anything in between, take a step back and seriously consider the possibility that the good thing that you joined is turning into something different, and possibly dangerous.
In the words of Jonestown survivor Deborah Layton, âNobody joins a cult. You join a self-help group, a religious movement, a political organization. They change so gradually, by the time you realize youâre entrapped â and almost everybody does â you canât figure a safe way back out.â
this is a pdf detailing the BITE model of authoritarian control, a method for determining whether or not you're in a cult.
even if you feel confident you are not and have never been in a cult, it's a good idea to familiarize yourself with the signs, just in case one begins to sneak up on you in the future.
Ok, I actually want to talk about this for a moment.
Jonestown, one of the most infamous cults in history, with a mass suicide / mass murder that left more than 900 people dead of cyanide poisoning, hundreds of whom were children⊠was a leftist political cult. That fact is an unambiguous and completely undebatable matter of historical record.
This isnât a footnote in the story of Jonestown, and it isnât a weird anti-leftist gotcha either. Jonestown attracted people to their cause with anti-segregation and anti-poverty activist work, and they did actual, meaningful good for those causes. The Peopleâs Temple was a leftist org, unambiguously. They created mutual aid networks for food aid, and rent assistance, and job placement services, and clothing donations, and winter heating. They leaned heavily on the Indianapolis Human Rights Commission in order to push desegregation, and led sit-ins and boycotts and protests. They participated in significant voter registration efforts. They led the fight against the eviction of tenants from San Francisco's International Hotel.
People joined The Peopleâs Temple because it was a good thing when they joined it. They didnât start out as brainwashed cultists, and they didnât gravitate towards the leadership of Jim Jones out of masochism, or inherent submissiveness, or a perverse love of creeping authoritarianism. They fell in line under Jim Jones because heâd built a community that was genuinely helping people, and was advancing a political cause that seemed worth fighting. They followed Jim Jones because he earned their trust.
Jim Jones then used the trust and the social capital that he had gained from all of the above in order to elevate himself to the status of a messianic figure, and abuse and profit off of his followers. Slowly but surely, he boiled the frog. It was all good â and then it was mostly good â and then, well there was some abuse, but it wasnât that bad, and it wasnât really his fault â and then there was a lot of abuse, but the outside world would destroy them if given the chance, so wasnât it the lesser of the two evils? And then, eventually, it got so bad that hundreds of people poisoned themselves and their children at his command, and murdered everyone in the compound who refused and resisted.
Your cause of choice is not immune from abusers taking advantage of it!
It doesnât matter if youâre right. It doesnât matter if your cause is just. It does not matter if your good thing really is a good thing, because there is always the possibility that it will one day be co-opted by a monster. And if the fact that it started good is enough for you to ignore that gradual, subtle change, you could end up in a truly horrible situation.
One of my best friends in undergrad got sucked into a cult. Years later, we talked about it, and he told me something that Iâll never forget which is, itâs only when you look all the way back at things that they seem crazy. You start off with things that are totally normal and innocuous: âweâre stronger togetherâ; âoppression is badâ; âyou can accomplish more if you believe in yourselfâ; âempathy is important and we should all try to bring more of it into our livesâ; etc. Then, you move to something thatâs just a little step away from that. And then again. And then again. And then again. But it never feels like a big jump, because itâs not! A -> Z is crazy, but A -> B wasnât, and B -> C wasnât, and C -> D wasnât, andâŠ
This friend was smart, and rational, and independent, and normal, and by the time he and his wife left, theyâd gone from just thinking that we should all practice more emotional mindfulness, to being terrified that leaving the cult and the cult leader would literally kill them, via the cult leader having magical powers.
If your only analysis is âWhere I started was good, and no single step since then has been crazyâ that is utterly insufficient to keep you safe.
âThis canât possibly be a cult, because when I joined it was a leftist political org and thereâs never been a single instance where it suddenly changedâ is literally the exact logic that kept people in Jonestown until it was too late.
catwoman as a character and a hero symbolizes the idea of empowerment
bare with me because i do NOT mean white feminist sexual empowerment she is often associated with.
i mean in the ways she often represents the idea of taking power from those structurally "above" her by taking away their social, political, and economic capital/power.
one of the most commons scenes you will get in a catwoman story is selina taking back power from those who she is in conflict with through embarrassing them in some way. this can be in a physical sense like in catwoman (2002) #3 which showcases her habit of striping and tying men up. or in catwoman (2002) #11 and catwoman (1993) #54 where selina bypasses security designed for her with ease (repeatedly in the case of #54) to prove that she can & as a way to show off her abilities or even just fuck with someone who dared cross her. (highly recommend catwoman (1993) #54, she basically keeps stealing the same diamond over and over to make the guy who owns the museum its housed in's insurance go up a lot lmao)
these kinds of scenarios happen pretty consistently across her runs, where she takes delight in embarrassing people in various, often very creative, ways (including, though not limited by taking their money), as a way to destroy their social capital. this also connects with her habit of giving back, because often what ends up putting her in hot water (as in the case with catwoman 2002) is taking money from an antagonist and reinvesting it into her community, something that backfires because of the nature of the individual she is stealing from. (i.e. the antagonist getting back at her, causing her more problems then she started with by trying to end it with embarrasing her foes)
this also ties into her greatest fears, both in being disappointed and being reliant on others (as showcased in catwoman (1993) #58-60). because the ways she has always regained and retaken power, even in the case of her most fundamental backstories (catwoman 1989) is by outsmarting and embarrassing those trying to exercise their power over her. relying on others, or expecting things from them leaves her the space to be disappointed, and to be unable to exit from a situation unscathed and independent.
this also is explored in some of her complicated relationship with the older men in her life, such as stark (from selina's big score) because her backstabbing/outsmarting stark is another example of this habit of trying to regain power through embarrassing others and demonstrate her own independence. her hyper-independence in many ways is her protection mechanism to keep herself alive through the many trauma's of her childhood, (catwoman (2002) #12), and to be able to maintain or take any level of power-- and thus protection-- from the (often) men who hold power over her.
bruce wayne in gotham knights
Gotham Knights is a good video game with no flaws if you ever heard me say anything bad abt it no u didnt
having emotions about the yellow bat on Batman's chest and how its important it stays filled in with colour and isn't just a dingy little outline.
yellow means caution but it's also sunlight and the colour of the batsignal. it is literally a bright piece in an otherwise dark costume. it is metaphorically a light in the darkness. criminals catch sight of it and see WARNING, victims and anyone who is hurting see hope
its not even a particularly pretty shade of yellow, its obnoxious sports car yellow, mustard and traffic cone yellow, but in gotham it's you're about to get your teeth kicked in yellow, it's better things are coming your way yellow
it is a blaring target over Batman's heart and it is so, so important
Was your favourite Batfam member emotionally neglected as a child?
Does he have difficulty believing that heâs loved? Does he think heâs imposing on the family or being a burden if he asks for help? Does he wait to be explicitly invited to their activities and believe heâs not wanted if they donât get in touch? Does he stalk them from afar instead of calling or visiting them?
Does he neglect his own health, forgoing food and sleep while he overworks himself at WE in the day and on patrol at night? Does he try to do everything he can for his family, even when he thinks they donât love him back? Does he accept even the tiniest crumbs of validation and believe he doesnât deserve more?
Does he desperately need a hug but canât ever bring himself to ask for one?
Is he ardently devoted to Dick Grayson, but their relationship has been irrevocably changed after they both hurt each other in a mishandled disagreement over the Robin mantle?
Does he still love Jason as his Robin even though Jason tried to kill him when he came back from the dead, and their relationship is still strained now?
Stop looking at Tim Drake. Iâm describing Bruce Wayne.
I think people get the âBruce dancing like a stripper in the Iceberg Loungeâ situation all wrong. The batkids wonât die of embarrassment because thatâs their dad. Theyâll die of frustration because they will never, ever be able to make Bruce feel embarrassed about it.
Do you really think the man who would strip and bust it down for the secret identity has the capacity to feel shame? Exactly.
40 years old, multiple kids, injured and is completely sober. The feeling embarrassment left him a LONG time ago
dark patterns could be the long halloween of our generation if everyone went and read it right now
âthe Kanes dislike Bruce because of longstanding family tensions and the fact that he runs around town like a spoiled playboyâ but what if the Kanes find out along with everyone else that Bruce Wayne is Batman (after heâs gone) and have the nerve to go to Alfred and still pay their respects
Detective Comics #771
Bruce saving kids from a car chase and then saying, "We had a little scare, but it's all right." <3