I'm not mad, just disappointed.
There is a likeability crisis in much contemporary queer sff. Authors are unwilling to make their characters look bad, and it compromises the integrity of the story. I don’t think this is the result of individual authors’ incompetence. The state of the publishing industry and the social media ecosystem around genre fiction has refigured the reader as, primarily, a customer, and the customer is always right. If Yamamoto had written a highly entertaining and optimistic crime novel with a cast of highly flawed marginalized people who the reader is expected to root for even as they hurt each other, themselves, and the people around them—if they took seriously the premise of the story they did in fact write—it may have been more difficult to market. It may have received more negative Goodreads reviews from the kind of people who don’t like Wuthering Heights because it’s just a bunch of terrible people treating each other terribly. But oh my god. Who cares. Those people can go read a book that isn’t about people who steal things for a living and send each other to jail.
i wrote 3,100 words about makana yamamoto's hammajang luck, friends at the table's twilight mirage, heat (1995), suspension of emotional disbelief, and the state of queer genre fiction. cheers. (cc @burins)
you need to read this (all of it, but the conclusion really hits the nail on the head with not just queer sff but so much of contemporary fiction from books to comics to TV.)
















