tumblr dot com

titsay
cherry valley forever

Discoholic 🪩

pixel skylines
Stranger Things
official daine visual archive
Sade Olutola
One Nice Bug Per Day
hello vonnie
trying on a metaphor

⁂
Sweet Seals For You, Always

No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Three Goblin Art
wallacepolsom

@theartofmadeline

blake kathryn
No title available

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Slovenia

seen from Romania
seen from Türkiye
seen from Denmark

seen from India

seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from India

seen from Australia

seen from Senegal

seen from Estonia
seen from Nepal
seen from Estonia

seen from India
seen from Russia
seen from Canada
seen from France
@i-need-a-pilot-tho
This was a deleted scene in the crossover episode (trust)
It took me forever to dig this out of my camera roll
Some stranger somewhere still remembers you because you were kind to them when no one else was.
just a heads up. im gonna do a big curse soon
okay so honestly i wasn’t expecting they’d be able to hide the body for this long
LINDSEY GRAHAM ?
Good news, another one down, boys!
What is prev to you?
the smell of woodsmoke in the dark
sunlight glittering on drifts of snow
opening chords to a classic song after an ad break on the radio
daisies in a mason jar
the curve in the road you always take a bit too fast
blank notebook with a leather cover
a stone church with carvings and spires and stained-glass
a cool pillow and a warm blanket at midnight
playlist that makes sense to no one else
yellow leaf floating down a clear cold river
silver fog over green hills and warm hands in raincoat pockets
a strain of violin music floating through a crowded subway
A frustrating part of the mainstream vegan “love all animals and protect the environment” mindset is the fact that things need to die in real-life ecology all the time but deer hunting season makes icky feelings and carp culls aren’t cottagecore
The vegan “any animal death ever is morally wrong” mindset doesn’t hold up when:
We don’t have any of the large predators we used to (black bears, mountain lions, or gray wolves) but still retain large deer populations. If nothing is removing animals, they’ll quickly overload the carrying capacity of the environment and have massive losses to starvation and disease that can also pass on to livestock. Human hunters replace the large predators that our landscape can no longer support.
It’s kinder to euthanize an un-releasable hawk rather than try to find it a permanent home with humans. Wildlife rehabs have extremely limited space and resources and are usually run entirely on donated money and volunteer time. Only a few are large and stable enough to care for permanent residents long-term, and those spots are few and far between.
An invasive species poses a danger to threatened native wildlife. I will admit- Australian possums are adorable. But not in New Zealand, where they’re an invasive species that eats the eggs of ground-dwelling birds that previously had no such predators. The landowners I worked with replanting native bush, all native Maori, had no qualms about setting the dogs on them.
I don’t know how to end this except. Sometimes things just gotta die and acting otherwise just isn’t a realistic expectation.
Highlights from the notes over the past 6 months include a lot of angry vegans saying “you’re blowing things out of proportion, no vegans actually think like this!” and a lot of people who work in conservation and education saying “Every day. I have to fight people who think like this.”
As a bonus this post was originally inspired by the vegan who called me racist for saying we should kill invasive species
i feel like "feminist" anti-kink sentiment is very tail-wagging-the-dog. like male doms playing out bdsm scenes of abuse are not oppressing their female subs that's acting. you're mad at acting. you're those aliens from galaxy quest. same with fearmongering about "booktok". however an eroticized version of patriarchal dynamics being a popular kink DOES speak to the pervasiveness of sexism, bc eroticizing the oppression is a way of coping with living under it. it's women creating a fantasy world where men being menacing to them is sexy and not scary like it is irl, or where it is still scary but in the fun way like a horror movie bc you can tap out at any time by using a safe word or putting the book down. acting like this sort of kink is oppressing women is like if you assumed the thermometer controlled the weather outside. it might be depressing to look at the thermometer and see the impact of climate change, but it's not the thermometer's fault
"eroticizing the oppression is a way of coping with living under it"
say it louder for the people in the back
“Death and the Lady” by Joseph Hall (1906)
HELLO ! have you thought about Van Gogh’s First Steps today ?
Here you go. This world is beautiful. Humans are beautiful. I love you
Polyamory is safe for work. Polyamory is safe for kids. Polyamory is safe for day time tv. Polyamory isn’t more sexual than any other relationship and it can be just as romantic, sweet, and healthy.
Aggressively reblogs.
So......Ticket to Heaven ended. And we need to talk about it.
Some, expected and wanted a dramatic, high stakes rebellion against God, or a neat little happy ending where everyone magically becomes ✨️progressive.✨️
Instead, P’Aof gave us a six episode thesis on the ✨️art of the compromise.✨️
It's a show that manages to offend religious purists while simultaneously hand delivering a reality check to non-religious spectators who show up to the discourse with a massive savior complex.
This, will be different from my usual analysis, since it's late, I worked a 16 hour shift and I get deep melancholy this time of year.
Let us unpack the heavy handed symbolism, the directors ultimate message, and why the final choice not to return to St. Magdalene College is the most realistic thing about the entire series.
Disclaimer : Everything I know about religion (ANY religion) is from word of mouth, a lot of research, a lot of reading of religious text and in depth conversations with various religious ministers. I do not claim to know everything, as long as we are alive, we learn, I do however believe that I know enough. Let us remember that this is tumblr, not a courthouse.
🥀 The Choreography of Touch (tenderness as a radical act)
Everyone talked about the physical climax of their intimacy, but the real emotional weight of Tanrak and Barths relationship is told through the micro movements of their hands.
In a seminary school, hands are strictly regulated instruments. They are used to fold in prayer, clasp during confession, and turn pages of scripture. They are mechanical, disciplined, and performative. But notice how Barth and Tanrak interact? When they touch, there is an excruciating, deliberate gentleness.
When Barth brushes a stray piece of hair or touches Tanraks hand, it's not an aggressive, passionate grab. It's an incredibly soft, cautious reverence, almost as if Barth treats Tanraks body with more sanctity than the altar itself.
By filming their intimacy with such quiet tenderness the show does something brilliant, it strips away the 'taboo' lens.
To the church, their love is a violent, disruptive 'sin.'
But to the camera, the sheer gentleness makes it look entirely harmless. It highlights the absolute absurdity of the institutions panic.
How can something that soft be considered a threat to salvation?
🥀 Courting you, Wanting you
In the '90 , in a hyper-religious Thai boarding school, you can't exactly drop a love letter without getting expelled. You have to speak in code.
Barth isn't just handing over a pretty plant, he's participating in a quiet courting ritual under the very noses of the authority figures. Depending on the exact bloom P'Aof put in that frame, it changes the conversation completely.
If it's a chamomile or a simple wildflower, Barth isn't trying to corrupt Tanrak.
He's acknowledging Tanraks purity and devotion while subtly offering a piece of the outside world, something wild that grew naturally, untamed by the church's shears.
It's an act of worship.
Barth, who openly admits he has no faith in God and sees no light at the end of the tunnel, finds his own version of a holy ritual. He presents an offering to Tanrak.
He is essentially saying, "I don't believe in their heaven, but I believe in you."
It's a declaration of love disguised as a harmless gesture, completely bypassing the strict rules of Magdalene House.
🥀 Institutional Conditioning
One of the most complex moments is the reaction of Kongdech when he finally puts two and two together and realizes they aren't just bunkmates. (And they were bunkmates!)
In a lesser show, he would instantly turn into a screaming, homophobic monster, or a perfectly progressive ally.
Instead, his reaction is wrapped in deep panic and profound sadness.
He doesn't look at Tanrak with disgust, he looks at him with terror.
This reaction is brilliant because it captures the heavy psychological conditioning of organized religion.
He genuinely loves Tanrak.
Because he is a 'true believer', he genuinely thinks Tanrak is actively destroying his own soul.
He is looking at his best friend stepping off a cliff into eternal damnation, and his panic comes from a place of desperate, helpless care.
It perfectly mirrors the tragedy of the whole system: it weaponizes genuine love and friendship into a tool for surveillance and guilt.
It shows that the worst part of religious homophobia isn't always the loud zealots shouting slurs, it’s the quiet heartbreak of your friends believing you are broken.
🥀 'We can Love You, but We can't Keep You'
This brings us to the collective ✨️meltdown✨️ over the finale.
People wanted a clean, Hollywood ending where the ✨️church changes its mind✨️, or 🔥the boys burn down the institution.🔥
But P’Aof is a realist. (Blah, blah censorship, blah, blah backlash)
The underlying, brutal message of the ending is simple: Yes, the Catholics can love you, but they cannot accept you if you are queer.
Think about Father Arnon.
He isn't written as a cartoonish, mustache twirling villain.
He's benevolent, gentle, and genuinely loves Tanrak.
He literally tells Tanrak to 'love himself more.'
But notice what he doesn't do: he doesn't rewrite the catechism.
He doesn't say, 'You can stay here at St. Magdalene, become a priest, and bring your boyfriend to Sunday brunch!'
The institution has a hard boundary.
And that's exactly why Tanrak and Barth do not return to the Magdalene church after they run away.
They realize that to stay in that space would require an unholy fragmentation of their souls.
The compromise is geographical and emotional: they keep their love for each other, and they keep their personal, internal relationship with faith, but they leave the structure behind.
They choose a cheap love motel and a bus ride to an uncertain future over a golden cage of conditional institutional safety.
🥀 A call out to the 'Holier-Than-Thou' secular crowd
Now, as someone who isn't religious myself, I didn't watch this looking for the boys to yell 'FUCK THE CHURCH, WE OUT!!!', but this show serves as a necessary, deeply sarcastic mirror for the non religious viewers who did.
Often, people outside organized religion look at the historical and modern atrocities of said religion and instantly develop a massive savior complex.
They look at kids like Tanrak, who is deeply devoted, orphaned, and surviving on institutional gratitude, and want to ✨️rescue✨️ them by force.
They look down on their faith as a primitive coping mechanism or lesser intelligence.
They act self righteous by demanding these characters completely denounce God, burn their bibles, and become perfectly healed secular activists overnight.
But Ticket to Heaven shows how incredibly damaging that secular arrogance actually is.
Barth tries to play the cynical rebel initially, but he eventually realizes he can't just amputate his spiritual side.
Faith isn't just a set of rules you can flip a switch on, for Tanrak, it's the fabric of his memory of his dead parents.
When secular observers treat a queer persons personal faith as a defect to be cured, they do a different kind of damage, one that can be even more alienating than a religious zealot shouting the usual crazy things.
At least with the zealots, you know where they stand.
The patronizing 'sympathy' of the secular savior complex just isolates them further.
🥀 Conclusion
Life is not an ✨️all or nothing✨️ Twitter discourse. Ticket to Heaven is beautifully produced because it refuses to give us a fairytale ending where religion magically stops being homophobic, or where the main characters magically stop believing in God.
Instead, it forces a deeply realistic compromise.
The characters choose a messy, authentic life outside the church walls, proving that sometimes your actual 'ticket to heaven' is just a bus ticket away from the people who claim to own the gate.✨️
San + text posts (pt. 15/50)
bonus: