styofa doing anything
noise dept.
ojovivo
i don't do bad sauce passes
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Misplaced Lens Cap
trying on a metaphor
Product Placement
KIROKAZE
tannertan36
@theartofmadeline
#extradirty
pixel skylines
dirt enthusiast
hello vonnie
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
AnasAbdin
No title available
Sweet Seals For You, Always
cherry valley forever
seen from Japan
seen from Poland
seen from Germany
seen from Canada
seen from France
seen from Malaysia
seen from Australia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Australia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore
seen from Singapore
seen from Australia
seen from Germany
seen from India
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Germany
@im-a-scone
do you have any plans on playing the uuuhhh..... kfc dating sim coming out soon? and yes... kfc as in the fried chicken place
excuse me ?
nevermind i cant actually bring myself to google this i cant have “kfc dating sim” in my search history i cant
Can i get a komahina eating flowers?
If you get the reference, ily - mod yuki
iS tHaT a mR bEaN rEfErEnCe-
Y e S!!!
Can i get a komahina eating flowers?
If you get the reference, ily - mod yuki
If I could pick? You know what, I’m gonna pick the Super Puppet Level Billionaire! That’s right! I want to be rich so I can pay off all these school fees! I want to be so rich that I can buy the whole school…!
Buy Hinapape and Friends a Ko-fi so that he can achieve his dreams of becoming a billionaire!
I'm sorry to do this because so many people do but, my birthday is July 28th, could I get a hug from Kaito and Sonia? Sorry again
No worries! Happy birthday to you! We will gladly give you a hug!
Buy Hinapape and Friends a Ko-fi!
What are you watching on YouTube hinapape?
Nothing much, just some Minecraft videos.
Buy Hinapape and Friends a Ko-fi!
When ants die, a few days later they emit oleic acid, which tells the living ants to dispose of their corpse.
A myrmecologist named Ed Wilson discovered this and dropped the chemical on a living ant. It was immediately carried off, despite the fact that it was still moving, and clearly not dead.
“I’M GETTING BETTER”
Bring out your dead. Eh, close enough.
IM NOT YET DEAD SIR
You left out the part where the ant, believing HERSELF to be dead, stayed in self imposed exile in the ant graveyard until the acid wore off and she realized she was not supposed to be in the ant graveyard.
what a drama queen (heheh)
You’re mad at me because I tried to strangle you? Look at yourself. Your hand had already impaled me. Hey, let’s get crazy together, Hinata-kun.
You know you’re my super star! (Wrong franchise)
I... I like drawing characters with face tattoos
- Mod Maria
we’reくコ:彡 entering squid territory
くコ:彡 くコ:彡 くコ:彡 くコ:彡 くコ:彡 くコ:彡 くコ:彡
I know I’m following the right people when I see this kinda stuff on my dash
@setepenre-set
now C:≡ approaching octopus territory
C:≡ C:≡ C:≡ C:≡ C:≡ C:≡
C:≡ C:≡
onwards C{≡ to jellyfish territory
C{≡ C{≡
C{≡ C{≡ C{≡ C{≡ C{≡ C{≡
/ ________________o_==================== / oh |=================<=> \ giant squid |=================<=> \ ————————–0– ====================
Yeah cats TOTALLY only like us for food and have no emotional dependency at all.
THIS IS SO CUTE I CANT
it’s like, human, excuse me, i would like you to pet me. thank you.
i love this so much.
👏👏👏HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO ALL THE KOMAEDAS 👏👏👏
- Mod Neysa
Um, if you don’t mind, could you do a bitty Komaeda hugging a normal sized Hinata?
I didn’t know how bitty you wanted bitty Nagito so I present two options
I hope you like it~
- Mod Maria
Maby draw Ko in a Fran bow style? Love all the drawings btw ^^
I’ve never done any painting like style like this. It’s really interesting!
-Mod Neysa
Under normal circumstances, I’d take a long time to choose a flower. But rn i just wanna doodle something angsty
-mod yuki
Pay attention, 2014 Mad Men: This little girl is holding a LEGO set. The LEGOs are not pink or “made for girls.” She isn’t even wearing pink. The copy is about “younger children” who “build for fun.” Not just “girls” who build. ALL KIDS.
In an age when little girls and boys are treated as though they are two entirely different species by toy marketers, this 1981 ad for LEGO — one of our favorite images ever — issues an important reminder.
Read More
This is my favorite advertisement. Also, a short story about sexist parenting with LEGOS. I work at a toy store that sells thousands of dollars of legos and I’ve seen time and time again parents refusing to buy blue box legos for girls and refusing to buy pink box legos for boys even when they ask for them. One girl came in with her parents and she wanted LEGO CITY because it was her birthday and they wanted to buy her gift with her at the store. [LEGO CITY is a LEGO series that lets a child build train stations, firetrucks, passenger ships, space exploration vehicles, drawbridges, garbage disposal trucks, basically anything related to the running of a city and it is not a gender based toy.] I showed them the LEGO CITY, but the mom told the child over and over “No, this is for boys you can’t get that” and eventually, she made the little girl choose a LEGO Disney Cinderella Castle instead because it was “more appropriate”. Even after I pointed out that every box has female and male LEGO people because the toy is meant for both boys and girls, she refused because it looked like a “boy” toy. I’ve had many occasions where a girl will be drawn to the LEGO CITY series only for the parents to come to me and ask “Where are the GIRLS Legos, you know, princesses and stuff. I’m not buying her this sort of thing” and it makes me so, so, so, so, sad every time because I can already imagine the types of values in education and career choices the parents will be scolding child for wanting in the future when they aren’t even allowed to play with anything blue. Let girls be kids without all the forced gender stereotyping, dammit.
You know what little girls could grow up to be? Architects, engineers, builders.
You know what little girls cannot ever be, no matter what they do in life? A princess.
We sell real life careers to little boys, but to girls we sell lies and fantasy. Then we have the gall to say that girls ‘choose’ careers that earn them less, that girls just aren’t interested in STEM fields, that girls are stupid for pursuing frivolous nonsense, etc. etc.
This is gender in action. Not nature, but socialization.
That last comment especially 👏🏻👏🏻
As a female architect I approve this message.
I loved LEGO when I was little, and it was an activity I enjoyed with both my sister and my two brothers. It galls me how the brand was marketed so heavily to boys in the 80s and 90s, because now those kids are adults and remember it as ‘something for boys’ and keep it away from their girls. Marketing can do damage for *generations*, not just in the immediate short term.
GENDER IN ACTION what a great fucking way of putting it
I was just thinking about this post/ad the other day. I’ve reblogged it before, and there’s a version that links to an interview with the little girl in the picture about her memories of the photo shoot. It’s all very girl-positive and how gendering toys is terrible, and for the most part, I agree. There’s no such thing as boys’ toys and girls’ toys. Or there shouldn’t be.
The thing that occurred to me about this ad, though - it’s not really breaking any gender barriers. The little girl in the picture? She’s dressed like a boy. She’s not wearing pink. Her hair’s not in ringlets. She hasn’t built what could obviously be called a princess castle. If you looked fast, you’d probably think she was a boy (until you noticed the braids).
So yeah, maybe this ad is saying, “Hey, girls can play with Lego too!” Except, not really. Because what it’s actually saying is, “Hey, girls who are actually tomboys can play with Lego too!”
I’m just saying - I think it would have been way more powerful if you’d had a girl in pink and ruffles and ringlets building space ships and skyscrapers and King Arthur’s castle. That it’s possible to be both girly - and want to do those things. This ad? Ain’t showing that.
Okay, so the thing i’m having a problem with here is that this little girl is NOT dressed like a boy, she’s dressed like a little girl at play in 1981.
Girls’ clothes in 1981 were not limited to various shades of pink and purple but ran the full spectrum of colors. They were also expected to stand up to the wear and tear of regular play (which in 1981 meant running around outdoors). Ruffles and the like existed but those clothes were fancy, meant for occasions or events like church and holidays, not everyday wear.
For example, here is a photo of my brother and i in 1983 wearing our everyday clothes
I am five years old here. At this time, my room was painted pink, i had what i called my princess dress, and my Barbie was the one that came with an all-pink wardrobe. At that time in my life i was absolutely NOT considered a tomboy; i was a typical little girl.
To your modern eyes, inundated with the sharply gendered clothing of today, the girl in the ad didn’t even read as a girl whereas in 1981, she did. And i’m wondering who is in the more constrictive box, girls then or girls now?
Also i saw these from the same campaign and they are adorable!
How terrible is it to know that as a society we’ve probably gotten worse with pushing gender norms on kids instead of better.
1980′s kid here… yeah, we all dressed like that. Don’t know where we fucked up tbh.
Listen here kiddo
