I don't really get what people mean when they say they struggle to "make sense of" some atrocity. Like. Did your model of humanity not include "does violence"? That should be like. In your top 5 traits. After maybe "lives in groups" and "uses language"
I agree for like individual or small-group interpersonal violence, but I think I understand the need to "make sense of" a lot more for large-scale atrocity—because I and (I think) many other people would also put "creates systems of care" (or perhaps "builds societies") in those top 5, so a large-scale atrocity is like the entropic "all the air molecules go to one side of the room" of human collective behavior. most people's models of humanity have roughly balancing tendencies towards violence and towards care/kindness, so an event where so many people's actions align totally on the side of violence all at once seems to demand explanation
























