I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

Love Begins
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Stranger Things
Keni

tannertan36
taylor price
noise dept.
KIROKAZE

pixel skylines

⁂
𓃗
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Cosimo Galluzzi
will byers stan first human second

if i look back, i am lost
todays bird
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from Argentina
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
@infernoenigma-blog
I’m so here for Taylor Swift bringing James Dean and Liz Taylor’s “Giant” and “Rebel Without a Cause” style to a new generation.
John and Meg’s Weird Situation.
im glad i only stan 2 people this season and one is john, who died 35 years ago, and the other is steve, who is a member of production that we accidentally saw refilling the stock room on the feeds
What I think every time I see #BBAustin on #BB17
okay but lito dealing with suns period is literally all ive ever wanted in a show and i didnt even realize it
When I see someone concern-trolling that Nomi and Lito are only defined by their sexuality.
Zach's meltdown today...
Andy and Sharon: A Shattered Romance (a 59U love story)
So, I realize this note is very long, but it's worth it. Trust me. The other night, we waited for fifteen minutes or so in the cold to catch the 59U. There's nothing unusual about that. When the bus finally came, most of the seats were full, and there was a big crowd waiting to get on the bus. Rita pushed her way up to the front of the crowd, but Pat and I were stuck at the back, so while Rita was able to stand on the top step leading up to the back of the bus, Pat and I were stuck in the crowd at the front. This half hour worked out perfectly. Our group was splintered, so we were able to get both angles of the high drama playing out on the 59U. The bus pulled away from the curb, and that's when the action started. Andy is standing by the back door in the alcove where they tell you not to stand. He's wearing bright blue. Sharon is sitting in the frontmost seat of the back section of the bus, so that she is behind the plexiglass that is at Andy's eye-level. Rita is standing next to Sharon's seat. Sharon and Andy appear to be in their late 30s, early 40s. Sharon is on the phone. She hangs up and, with a severe speech impediment, says, "They're gonna meet us at Forbes and Murray. And if the 59U is too crowded they'll take that C bus." Andy nods and pulls out his own phone. He speaks to someone on the other end of the line, too quiet for Rita to hear, and when he hangs up Sharon turns to him and bellows, "WHY DO YOU CARE?" And that was that. Also with some speech problems: "Why do I care, Sharon? What kind of question is that to ask someone, Sharon? What do you mean, why do I care, Sharon? I'm a nice person, Sharon, that's why I care. The difference between me and you, Sharon, is that you don't care about being rude to people, but I'm a nice person, Sharon, and I consider feelings. You hold grudges, Sharon." Sharon is intermittently yelling "No!" at him. "You're a good person, Sharon, I know you are." "No!" "You have a good heart, Sharon. I don't know why you have to be like this, Sharon. You don't have to be friends with her, Sharon, but you don't have to be mean to her. Sharon, if you were... if you were a criminal, Sharon, I'd forgive you. Sharon, if I... if I stole something? Or if I killed someone, and I went to jail, and I did my time and then I got out, Sharon, would you forgive me, Sharon?" "No!" "Well, I can understand that, Sharon, but if you were a criminal, Sharon, I'd forgive you." The bus, which is packed to capacity, is absolutely silent except for these two yelling at each other. Pat and I look at each other worriedly, and then look back at Rita, who looks terrified. "Listen, you need to keep your personal business OFF the bus. Shut the fuck up," says a girl standing near Rita. "It's not my personal business, it's hers!" Andy yells. "Sharon, why do you have to be like this, Sharon?" "It's because I'm stubborn," Sharon responds. "Stubborn? What is stubborn?" "It means... strong will. My grandfather and my father were stubborn and I guess I just learned to be stubborn." "Well, why do people have to be like that, Sharon? I don't understand it. Why be this... stubborn. Why are people stubborn, Sharon?" At this point, the yelling has been going on for close to ten minutes. We pull up to Forbes and Murray. A number of people get off the bus. A seat opens up next to me, so I sit down. Pat moves toward Rita, who sits down across the aisle from Sharon. I'm sitting next to an old man. A dozen large people get on the bus and squeeze in around me, all of them chattering loudly, all with trouble speaking. One particularly short woman is standing next to me. She has an enormous fur hood and an enormous purse, and as the bus begins to move, she puts a hand on the pole next to my face and swings freely around the aisle, slamming into the side of my head with her hood and her purse. A woman tries to get off at the next stop, and the woman next to me shrieks, "THERE'S NOWHERE FOR ME TO MOVE, MA'AM! YOU CAN'T GET PAST HERE!" "Now now, Jackie, settle down," says an older woman with better control over her voice. "I've had it, Sharon! If you're going to act like that, I can't talk to you, Sharon!" screams Andy, and he rushes to the front of the bus, where he is immediately surrounded by these new women, who rub his back and say things like, "Aww, Andy is Sharon being mean to you again?" and "Where is Sharon? She's so mean." Sharon, in the back, sits there with her arms crossed and her lower lip jutting out. "She's so mean!" shouts Andy. "Sharon is so mean. I don't understand why she has to act like that. Do you guys remember that time we were over your house, and she just started SCREAMING at Dawn? That was back in 2001 and she still acts like that! She holds a grudge! It's so mean!" "I know," says one woman, patting him on the back. "It's okay. You're better than her." "I'M NOT GOING TO PAY FOR YOU AT RED ROBIN!" shouts Sharon. "But Sharon!" gasps Andy. "Then I won't eat!" "AND YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH OF US! YOU HAVE TO CHOOSE!" Andy straightens up. "I've had hit," he says. "I'm going to straighten this out." The old man next to me looks at me and says sadly, "I'm not going to make it off this bus, am I?" "No sir, you're probably not," I reply. Jackie sits down across the aisle from me, next to a man even bigger than she is in a Steelers shirt. "Sir! MOVE OVER!" she screams in his face. "Now, now, Jackie, he's a big man, there's nowhere for him to go," says the older woman. Jackie stands up, smacks me in the head with her purse one more time for good measure, and pushes the bigger man out of his seat. He stands up and exits the bus, muttering. "It's so wrong of him to talk about his girlfriend to his ex-girlfriend," one of the women says to her seatmate. "You just don't do that." The woman who was comforting Andy sits down in the handicapped seats, directly in front of me. "I know," she says, "But I know he still loves me." She has tears glistening in the corners of her eyes. "I know he loves me. Why is Sharon so mean?" At the back of the bus, Andy leans down in Sharon's face and bellows, "IF YOU DON'T STOP ACTING LIKE THIS, SHARON, I'M GOING TO PULL YOU OFF THIS BUS AND THROW YOU ON THE RAILROAD TRACKS, SHARON!" The old man taps me on the shoulder and says, "I need to leave." I stand up, strong-arm one of the women out of the way, and force a path for the old man to get to the front. Then I sit back down, not thinking, and move over to the window seat. A massive woman sits down next to me. "Hi Karen!" says a male voice from the seat behind me. "Hi Robbie!" says Karen, the woman now pressing me up against the window. "Hi Karen!" Robbie returns. "Hi Robbie!" says Karen. This goes back and forth at *least* a dozen more times. I slam my head against the window just because I can. Sharon starts sobbing, so Andy runs back up to the front of the bus. He sits down hard next to the woman who believes he loves her, and puts his head in his hands. "Why is she so mean?" Andy says. "What's wrong, Andy?" she asks, rubbing his back. "Sharon is so mean." Across the aisle, the women talk loudly about how he needs to just choose already. "You know, Andy, she's right. You can't have both of us. You are going to have to pick, eventually." Andy lifts his head up and looks the woman in the eyes. "You know, if she's going to act like this, I won't be able to eat at The Activity tonight." "Aw, Andy, hang out with the rest of us! She's mean. You don't need her." "But I can't eat. And if she's gonna act like this... I choose you." Tears spill out over the woman's cheeks. "Nikki!" bellows the woman sitting next to me, Karen. "I didn't hear! Who'd he choose!" "He chose ME!" Nikki says, blubbering. She pulls vibrant purple lipstick out of her shirt and applies it to her lips, tucking it back in her cleavage when she's done. "Aw, shit," says the woman sitting behind Karen. Karen turns around and says, "Now, don't you get upset, or you'll have seizures again." "This like a fucking soap opera!" a young guy a few rows back exclaims. Karen twists around in her seat and says, "Amen! You think this is bad? I live this every day!" "Who did he choose?!" exclaims one of the women across the aisle. "Wait, he chose someone? Finally!" shouts another. "He chose Nikki!" someone yells. Sharon shrieks quietly in the back. Karen turns back to Nikki, who is engaged in a half-hearted hug with Andy. Karen says, "Well, we'll see how long this lasts, won't we." Nikki begins to bawl, but for a different reason this time. "That's not nice!" she says. The woman across the aisle frowns at Karen, who hangs her head. Nikki looks at Karen, and then Andy, and then cranes her neck to see Sharon in the back. Then she turns back to Karen, who is rifling through her purse. "Where's your gun." I feel like all of the air is instantly sucked from the bus. My eyes open wide, my cheek against the window feels even colder. "I want your gun, Karen. Is it in that compartment?" She reaches for Karen's purse, who clutches it to her chest. "He don't know what he wants. Sharon is being mean. I'm sick of it. Where's your gun." "Now, now, Nikki, don't even joke about that," says the older woman. "Let's be nice. Let's have fun at the Activity." "I'm serious, I want the gun," Nikki says to Karen, slowly rubbing Andy's back. "I want it now." Karen shakes her head, and Nikki crosses her arms and sticks out her lower lip, tears streaming down her face. "He picked me," she mutters to herself. The woman behind me says, "This needs to stop or I'm going to have problems again." She begins to rock back and forth. "Let's go!" shouts Rita, and I see she and Pat are standing next to me. I stand up, literally shove Karen into the aisle, and push my way off the bus.
"That Doesn't Sound Real..."
I haven't blogged in forever but I felt compelled to do so because this customer interaction was too good to let slip away.
A girl with a very thick Indian accent came into Software Licensing a little bit ago.
"How can I help you?" I asked.
"Yes. I need software." People say this all of the time. If you're coming to Software Licensing, I think it's a safe bet that you need software.
"What can I get for you?"
"I want Excel This Message Powered By A Samsung Mobile Device."
"Sorry?"
"Excel This Message Powered By A Samsung Mobile Device."
"I'm not... huh? We have Excel... that comes as part of Microsoft Office..."
"No, I have Excel from the University of Pittsburgh already. I need This Message Powered By A Samsung Mobile Device." Her accent was thick, so I was convinced I didn't understand what she was asking for.
"What is it?"
"It's part of Excel. Add on."
"We don't have add-ons or extensions here. You have to download them from the Internet. But that doesn't... sound real..."
"No, you do have it," she said. "Some friends came here, they got it. Excel This Message Powered By Samsung Mobile Device, please."
"No, I'm pretty sure we don't..."
"I need This Message Powered By Samsung Mobile Device! Here. I show you what my professor ask for."
She then proceeded to reach into her bag and pull out the biggest Dell laptop I have ever seen. At this point my eyes are very wide -- I hate when people bring their laptops to me. Would you bring your DVD player to Hollywood Video and ask them to fix it?
She fired the monster up. When I say monster, I mean monster. The thing was humongous. The fan was so loud I couldn't hear myself think. She loaded Microsoft Outlook, searching for the email from her professor. She turned to me triumphantly.
"Look! He said I need copy of This Message Powered by a Samsung Mobile Device."
I looked. There's an email from her, reading:
What program is required for next week's project?
Then, there's a reply from her professor:
You'll need Excel.
--
this message powered by a Samsung Mobile Device
Glenn Beck Rejects Claim That FOX News Promotes Conspiracy Theories and Violence, Claims It's All A Plot To Make You Think You're Crazy And To Eventually Silence You, And Urges Everyone To "Hit The Streets" to "Take Back The Country"
Now, I really wish I stole that super-long title from an article by The Onion. I wish I'd made it all up. It really sounds like satire, doesn't it? But unfortunately, it's all too true.
On his super-popular show on FOX News, Glenn Beck spoke out against Friday's editorial by Paul Krugman in the New York Times that warns of conservative television being a springboard for a lot of the right-wing extremist violence we're seeing today. You can read Krugman's editorial and think for yourself, I hope. To me, a lot of what he's saying makes sense. I don't know if I draw a DIRECT line, as he does, between Bill O'Reilly mentioning Dr. Tiller on the air and Dr. Tiller's subsequent murder, but personally I'm a big believer in the power of words. I can see where constantly making points using alarmist fearmongering can lead to viewers acting irrationally.
On Friday Beck opened his show with a claim that the government wants to know what kind of oil you're using to heat your home. He wonders why they want to know, then says "They NEED to know." Sorry, but I have no problem with the government knowing what kind of fuel I heat my home with. Is our choice of fuel some kind of secret that needs to be kept?
Then he says:
"The EPA is going to tell farmers how to farm. If you believe this country is great, but the government wants to control every aspect of your lives, it's time to take your power back."
That last statement poses a problem. Krugman asserts, and I tend to agree, that the people out there who are already crazy can easily misinterpret Beck's insinuation that the government is out to get you and that you need to get out and take your power back. People who are already crazy take this as encouragement to commit violence.
Beck's show then devolves into some awful kind of self-parody that I almost don't want to believe he doesn't recognize.
He discusses Krugman's claim that
"For the most part, the likes of Fox News and the RNC haven't directly incited violence... At this point, whatever dividing line there was between mainstream conservativism and the black helicopter crowd has been virtually erased."
His response to this is to state:
"This isn't about me, it's not about Bill O'Reilly. It's about you. You're crazy. You're.. a conservative? Oh my. They're watching you. They're trying to make you feel like a crazy person. Why? To silence you."
Beck does absolutely nothing to disprove the claim that mainstream conservativism, which he inarguably embodies, is becoming indistinguishable from the black helicopter crowd. His discussion of this assertion involves telling people that it's all part of a plan to make conservatives think they're crazy in order to silence them. Sounds an awful lot like a conspiracy theory to me.
Whispering "They're watching you!" like some preposterous idea that only crazy people are worried about is especially funny in a show that lead with a promise to talk about the Census being interested in what kind of fuel you use and farmers being told how to farm, as well as a call to action for those who believe the government is trying to micromanage your life. Glenn, YOU DO think "they're watching you!" The entire premise of your show is based around assertions to the general public that the government is controlling your life!
He goes on to say:
For those who refuse to listen to what I actually say, let me do it again, and I'll speak very slowly because Paul is apparently a slow learner. Anybody who thinks that violence is a way to get their message across is a nutjob. They discredit themselves and their own cause. But recognize this for what it is. This is an attempt to shut not me up, not Bill O'Reilly up, not the FOX News Channel up. Nuh-uh. This is an attempt to shut you up.
Glenn, I'd disagree with you. First of all, this is an attempt to stop giving a national platform to people like you. Second, it is not Paul Krugman who is the slow learner, but you. And I'll show you why, and I'll do it in list form, since you don't really understand Krugman's thoughtful, well-written editorial.
Your response to a claim that you're prone to inciting violence and supporting conspiracy theorists:
Open your show by telling people the government is too interested in what kind of fuel they use and that the EPA intends to tell farmers how to farm.
Tell viewers that if they think America is great, but are worried about the government controlling every aspect of their lives, then they need to "take their power back" by following you.
Read a quote that claims you and your colleagues are virtually indistinguishable from the black helicopter crowd, which is worried about government oversight of everyday life.
Respond to this quote by saying "They're watching you! You're crazy!" like it's a foreign and preposterous idea.
Respond to this quote by saying this isn't about you or your colleagues, but is instead an attempt to make your viewers paranoid and to silence them.
Pretend that a link between a cautious word against global warming and eco-terrorism is comparable to a link between telling people the government is out to control their lives and people being worried that the government is controlling their lives
Invite a guest on your show who reiterates your point from a day earlier that you were angry people weren't "hitting the streets"
Make jokes about crazy people thinking that by hitting the streets you meant dropping safes out of windows and throwing cartoon bombs at people
Have your guest claim that America's appendages are falling off
It sounds to me like you, Glenn Beck, are missing a clear link that exists here. Your show, if nothing else, proved beyond a doubt that you're flippant about the possibility of inciting violence with your alarmist rhetoric. You laughed off assertions that mainstream conservativism is close to conspiracy theory, while claiming it's absurd to think conservatives are worried that the governement is watching them. You do that while starting your show with the statement that people who are worried about the government controlling them need to take back their power. I feel like I'm repeating myself a lot. Apparently that's needed.
WATCH FOR YOURSELF:
Bristlewood Apartments
I am proud to announce the launch of what I hope will be a very enjoyable experience for everyone this summer.
For years I have wanted to write a novel. I've never really had the time or the energy to do so. Last May, I self-published a collection of short stories, but since then I've been itching to do something more.
So, here's what I've come up with. Throughout the Summer of 2009, I'll be writing a novel, and I want you to share in the experience. "Bristlewood Apartments" will be the story of the residents of the second floor of an apartment building in Pittsburgh. Throughout the summer, as the tenants struggle with where they want their lives to go, getting themselves back on track after some serious setbacks, and looking to express themselves through their art, they find themselves drawn to one another.
Every Tuesday and Friday, new chapters will be posted over at http://bristlewood.tumblr.com. Subscribe to the RSS feed of that site to keep updated, or follow the project on Twitter at @bristlewood. The novel will be written in the third person, with each chapter focused on a revolving set of main characters. For example, the first chapter is all about Graham Harding, artist and "new guy" in the building, but the second focuses on Jackson Carlisle, twin brother of the man who gives Graham a tour of Bristlewood Apartments in the first chapter.
But wait -- there's more! There will be some interaction with the characters throughout the summer. For example, you can follow the aforementioned Caleb Carlisle on Twitter at @CFCarlisle. More character interaction to follow.
Any publicity would be incredibly helpful. Tell your friends, even if you're not interested. Talk about us on Twitter, even if you're not saying nice things; just be sure to tag your tweets with #bristlewood. Join our facebook fan page, once I get that up and running. This is my first attempt at writing a novel, so any and all feedback would be great!
And most of all, enjoy! I have some great stuff planned out for my little cast of characters, and I hope you'll be there to come along for the ride!
Look Guyz! Obama Shirts Cause Evildoing!
Today I got an utterly ridiculous email forward in my inbox. Now I'm not sure why, because I'm pretty outspoken about the fact that I supported Obama and I agree with (mostly) everything the Democrat party stands for. People continue to send me emails filled with unfounded drivel and absolutely ludicrous claims about Obama's character, presidency, heritage, intentions, and so on.
But today... today's email is the top of the bunch. Here it is, in full.
The New Fashion Rage In Mug Shots
Look at their shirts! So funny!
These are actual Police Photos...too funny. Just think about this for a second: Did you ever see anyone arrested wearing a Bush T-shirt, or for you older guys, an Eisenhower, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, or even Nixon, or Bob Dole shirt.
Obama must be proud of his supporters! (Wonder if ACORN recruited them!)
There are so many ridiculous parts of this email forward that I'm not even sure where to start. I think something must be said for the instruction to make sure we look at their shirts. I think it's safe to say that this email is intended for hardcore Republicans, because honestly, do they expect this to change a Democrat's mind? If that's the case, an instruction clueing people in to what's so funny about the shirt probably is necessary.
Then there's the "Did you ever see anyone get arrested wearing a Bush t-shirt..." bit. No, I can't say that I have. But I have seen George W. Bush lead this country through an awfully long, incredibly costly war to make Daddy proud, torture prisoners in direct violation of the Geneva Convention, turn a surplus into (if you'll allow me to use a stupidly-overplayed phrase) the worst recession since the Great Depression... But because I haven't seen anyone arrested in a Bush shirt, that means, incredibly, that Obama is proud of these people.
Tell me something. If I were to show you a list of six convenience store robberies that claimed a bottle of Pepsi was stolen in every single case, would it prove that Pepsi encourages theft? If I were to stab someone with a knife while wearing a shirt that has the American Eagle logo on it, does that mean American Eagle is evil and is proud of me for doing what I did? Come on. I'd hope we can all be a little more grown up than that.
Are you watching closely?
The Prestige
Twitter Thinks We're Dumb? Nah. -- The "#FIXREPLIES" Confusion
I've figured out why people are so passionate about the whole #fixreplies nonsense going on over on Twitter right now -- They don't understand what's going on.
As is usually the case with Twitter panics, there is an awful lot of information flying around the twittersphere, most of it put forth as fact by people who are not sure what they're talking about.
I'm seeing a ton of people re-tweeting a message that says "RT this if you disagree w/ Twitter's decision to hide replies from people you don't follow! #fixreplies" (see @scottmonty, an extremely popular guy at Ford -- here.)
Twitter did not decide to hide replies from people you don't follow. That makes it sound like you won't be able to see if someone you don't follow @ replies you. That's false.
What twitter has done is hide @ replies TO people you don't follow. If someone you do follow tweets "@username_here haha thanks man," and you don't follow @username_here, then you won't be able to see that tweet from the person you do follow.
If you ask me, why would you want to? There are PLENTY of other ways for serendipitous social discovery than seeing @ replies from a conversation you're not involved in. Personally, if I'm looking for new people to follow, I pay attention to #FollowFriday every week. Contrary to what a lot of people are saying in the #fixreplies stream, Follow Friday wouldn't be affected by the change, as long as people start their tweets with "#FollowFriday-" or anything other than beginning with the name of a user. I also look at re-tweets, which are a great way to see who your friends are following. If someone re-tweets a certain name often, I check them out.
@ replies to people I don't follow, for me, just adds a whole lot of noise to my twitter stream. For example, @zaibatsu is an extraordinarily popular twitter-er. He follows more than 80,000 people, and he frequently interacts with whoever talks to him. That's great, but if you check out his page you'll see that a lot of what he says is an @ reply to something that person sent him. I don't need to see every time he replies to someone. That's an incredible amount of noise.
Twitter, what do you think about putting a toggle next to the part where, on each user's page, we can choose to receive device updates for just that user? This way, we can see all @ replies by some people we follow, but can choose to opt out if a certain twitterer interacts with followers a lot? That way, you pacify the #fixreply hoardes and give the rest of us some more flexibility.
I'll stop rambling now, but please, people, before we launch into a panic over this, stop and read a bit about what Twitter is actually doing here. I can see where some people might think it's useful to see all @ replies that people you follow write, but if that's the case, then people who complain about twitter being mostly noise need to re-think their positions. Twitter should #fixreplies and give us the option again, but before you take everything everyone is saying as truth, think for yourselves.
This is going to be the next story I'll be writing about in a few days, in case you're interested in getting a head start on reading it.
"Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius" by Jorge Luis Borges
You can read the story for discussion here
This story is without a doubt one of the best I have ever read. I like conspiracy fiction an awful lot, and this is a shining example of the genre. The conspiracy is far-reaching and absolutely massive in its scope.
Borges can be extremely difficult to comprehend. In my Short Story In Context class last semester, we read another of his stories, called The Garden of Forking Paths, (here, if you're interested) and I confess I was absolutely lost. It's probably not unusual for that to happen, though; the story is about a book and place in which anything is possible and everything does happen.
I was a bit nervous on reading "Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius," but I was glad to find it was more accessible. Of course, a lot of the wordiness in this story comes from the translation, which is to be expected when you read something written in a different language. This story almost makes me wish I knew Spanish. Almost.
When I read this story, I can't help but marvel at Borges' imagination. I like to consider myself a creative person, which is helpful because I also consider myself a fiction writer, but I like to write about the little things in life, small incidences that speak to humanity. The scope of the conspiracy and the work produced by that conspiracy in this story is so massive that I can't imagine coming up with something like that on my own.
I really enjoy stories where form and meaning coincide. A classmate of mine wrote a story where a psychologist realizes that he has immortalized the work of a killer by creating an extensive archive of interviews with the guy; I told my classmate that he too had memorialized his character by writing the story. It seems to me that Borges has done something similar in "Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius," which was really cool to read. His character reads a volume of an encyclopedia hinting at a fully realized planet, with a culture, a way of thinking, and even a language completely different than our own. In writing about such a volume, Borges had to fully develop this planet himself so he could give details in this story.
I have two favorite parts of the story, so I'd like to conclude this post by explaining why I think they're the best parts. First, the paragraph directly following the parable of the nine coins.
The language of Tlön resists the formulation of this paradox; most people did not even understand it. The defenders of common sense at first did no more than negate the veracity of the anecdote. They repeated that it was a verbal fallacy, based on the rash application of two neologisms not authorized by usage and alien to all rigorous thought: the verbs "find" and "lose," which beg the question, because they presuppose the identity of the first and of the last nine coins. They recalled that all nouns (man, coin, Thursday, Wednesday, rain) have only a metaphorical value. They denounced the treacherous circumstance "somewhat rusted by Wednesday's rain," which presupposes what is trying to be demonstrated: the persistence of the four coins from Tuesday to Thursday. They explained that equality is one thing and identity another, and formulated a kind of reductio ad absurdum: the hypothetical case of nine men who on nine nights suffer a severe pain. Would it not be ridiculous - they questioned - to pretend that this pain is one and the same? They said that the heresiarch was prompted only by the blasphemous intention of attributing the divine category of being to some simple coins and that at times he negated plurality and at other times did not. They argued: if equality implies identity, one would also have to admit that the nine coins are one.
I love this paragraph because here Borges has done something amazing. He has created a parable that was put forth as a radical idea on that planet, which seems entirely trivial and commonplace to us here on Earth. But then, instead of just telling readers that it was treated with scorn and disbelief on planet Tlön, Borges delves into exactly why, and does so in a way that also seems logical. I have a hard time telling if Borges is trying to get us to think like the people of Tlön, or if he's trying to demonstrate that their entire system of thinking about things is complex and more difficult than it needs to be. I like to think it's the former; he wants us to see that we view the world one way, and it's the only way we know, but there could potentially be other, more developed, more complex ways of seeing things.
This brings me to my second favorite section of the story, which actually came just before the section above:
One of the schools of Tlön goes so far as to negate time: it reasons that the present is indefinite, that the future has no reality other than as a present memory. Another school declares that all time has already transpired and that our life is only the crepuscular and no doubt falsified and mutilated memory or reflection of an irrecoverable process. Another, that the history of the universe - and in it our lives and the most tenuous detail of our lives - is the scripture produced by a subordinate god in order to communicate with a demon. Another, that the universe is comparable to those cryptographs in which not all the symbols are valid and that only what happens every three hundred nights is true. Another, that while we sleep here, we are awake elsewhere and that in this way every man is two men.
I like this section because of the mindbending "truths" it puts forth. What if one of these were true? Would there be any way for us to tell? Could we ever know that we're living in a fantasy for 299 out of every 300 days? Would there be any way to break the barrier between the two people we are when we are sleeping or awake? Imagine if life is just a memory and we've already lived. Would we be able to take anything seriously? Is there such a thing as fact? Or are all nouns just theories, just metaphysical nothings, as the people of Tlön believe?