Here’s a copy of the meme if you wanna use it to banish transphobes from your blog
No title available

izzy's playlists!

if i look back, i am lost
h
One Nice Bug Per Day
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
sheepfilms
hello vonnie
Mike Driver
Cosimo Galluzzi
No title available
Misplaced Lens Cap
Not today Justin
Monterey Bay Aquarium
official daine visual archive
NASA

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
RMH

Andulka
Keni
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Canada
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from Nigeria
seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
@introvertdramaqueen
Here’s a copy of the meme if you wanna use it to banish transphobes from your blog
It takes a certain level of chutzpah to try to deny women and people-you-think-are-women agency and control over their own lives and identities, and call that “feminism.”
Dog breeds are all just…. fan content that humans made of God’s ‘The Wolf’
Chihuahuas are just…. Wolf Chibis
Border Collies are Farm AU
Huskies respect canon a lot but like… goofier
Visual Shitpost
Borzoi:
Anime Proportion
Anime style
Curvy
Very Long Leggy
Alien Face
Very Skinny
Very Tol
Wild Hair
Tail Sometimes
God: “Is that supposed to be a wolf?”
Human, holding a dachshund: “It’s just my style.”
In 2037 God sues us for copyright
the socialisation that terfs like to talk about - and use to deny the possibility of camab womanhood - does not exist. the idea that men and women receive different messages in childhood - as though children were being separated into different rooms based on assigned gender to watch different educational videos - doesn’t hold up.
women receive and internalise the same message of misogyny as men do. this is not, of course, a post about how men and women are “equally bad”, or anything like that. but women do learn misogyny. the difference is that women are misogynist towards each other while men are misogynist towards women, who have no recourse.
if a woman mistreats another woman, she will probably be mistreated in turn. this is normalised with words like “catty,” “bitch,” - we are told this is simply how women are with each other. meanwhile if a man mistreats a woman, he faces no consequences. this is normalised by heterosexuality. his actions will be justified with phrases like “boys will be boys” or, even worse, by attributing his violence to a secret fondness he does not know how else to express.
the consequence of this is that as women grow up, we either learn to treat each other better or risk having no female friends. (a lot of straight women take that second path!) meanwhile men continue to get away with their violence, and so their misogyny only grows deeper and becomes more entrenched.
i think it is common nowadays to imagine that boys and girls start out the same and grow apart, but i think we have envisioned it wrong. the difference between men and women is not that women do not go on to learn misogyny like men do, but that we unlearn it while men dont. and the reason we unlearn it has nothing to do with biology but with consequences, and the need to find shelter among other women. this need is even greater among lesbians, of course, which is why we’re all the best feminists ~
but the need is also greater for trans women, and even more so if you are both trans and a lesbian. trans women need female community because we are so violently rejected from the male - where even the odd “cool” straight cis girl is allowed to be a part of things.
what is also greater for trans women are the consequences we face for internalised misogyny. where cis women are often willing to let it slip amongst each other (nobody’s perfect!) any instance of misogyny that a trans woman has not yet been able to unlearn (as all of us, cis and trans, are still and will always be trying to unlearn) is capitalised on, punished harshly, and held up as proof - either of our inherently violent biology or of our socialisation (depending on which brand of transmisogynist you ask).
and when trans women face these consequences they are often final. they are promptly exiled from whatever community they were a part of and never welcomed back. and there are so few communities that even want us in the first place.
(and this is not like when a man is ousted from a community. he will always have somewhere else to go, every other community in the world is meant for him - including countless which are only meant for him, and men like him. this “consequence” he faces is no consequence at all.)
and so, a trans woman, having had this happen to her or seen it happen to someone like her, knows that her place in society is as precarious as it can be, and her holding on to it depends on her vast and in-depth knowledge of feminism, politics, social niceties, ethics, and her willingness and ability to perform all of these as well as any role or labor her community might demand of her. and that is her socialisation.
Funfact: The overwhelming majority of people who are prescribed HRT are cis. This has been true as long as HRT has existed.
Somehow, this has not prevented trans people’s access from increasing over time.
Literally the only thing that has done so in North America is a cis woman lying about us to the US government.
CIS PEOPLE ARE ALSO PRESCRIBED HORMONES WHEN THEY HAVE A HORMONAL IMBALANCE OR A DIFFERENT MEDICAL ISSUE THAT IS TREATED WITH HORMONES.
THAT’S NOT A FUCKING GOTCHA.
IT’S DIFFERENT THAN CHANGING THE PRIMARY SEX HORMONE YOUR ENTIRE FUCKING BODY RUNS ON.
Okay, and?
It’s still pretty fucking conclusive proof that cis people getting access to hormones is not a threat to trans people’s access to hormones, no matter how many of y’all scream that it is.
So, things transmeds have been demonstrably wrong about, a quick and incomplete rundown:
“You need dysphoria to be trans!” Um, not according to literally anyone else, including the medical establishment you’re trusting to be the arbiters of transness.
“We’re just stating scientific facts!” Half the shit you’re saying is not the domain of science, and basically all of it is actively disagreed with by every single scientific authority on the subject of trans people.
“If transness is demedicalized, hormones will be reclassed as cosmetic!” It was demedicalized five years ago, hormones continue to not be cosmetic, their status as necessary does not depend on extreme-minority off-label usage, and the only thing that has ever gotten transition-related care classed as cosmetic is increasing the pathologization of trans people.
“If cis people get hormones, doctors will get suspicious and stop giving them out!” Most of them go to cis people already.
“Gatekeeping exists because of transtrenders!” Well actually, the book that literally all transition gatekeeping derives from specifically said that there’s no such thing as a transtrender.
“There’s an epidemic of cis people seeking transition for shits and giggles!” Still waiting on literally any evidence for that one. Meanwhile, trans people dying due to lack of care is a well-documented phenomenon.
Transmeds are what happen when your fear and hatred of bogeymen outweighs your care and concern for your fellow trans people.
I feel like you’re assuming that transmeds fully agree with the current system/any amount of gatekeeping that happens and that’s just incorrect. I’m personally being gatekept because of mental illnesses, I sure as fuck don’t support a system that can just tell me to get better and come back when I am before I can get treatment. I also don’t support the idea that HRT (as in hormone replacement therapy, as in replacing your primary sex hormone with that of the opposite sex) should be readily available to anyone who wants it. These things are not mutually exclusive.
There is a shitton of difference between estrogen/birth control for a woman with PCOS and a trans man on testosterone- namely, as stated above, the woman with PCOS isn’t completely overthrowing the major hormone in her system (estrogen). It is for a demonstratable medical purpose in both instances- and you really can fuck people up if you misdiagnose them or give them the wrong hormones for their condition. (Fun fact: an ob/gyn put me on birth control to “cure” my sex dysphoria; it only made it much worse over a three-day period to the extent that I ended up in the psych ward for trying to kill myself.)
And according to the OP, detransitioners wouldn’t even remotely fucking happen instead of going up exponentially due to the “treat first, ask questions later” model that a lot of informed consent clinics are pushing. (And yes, I have run into these people IRL.)
1. You, uh. You know testosterone is prescribed to cis women more often than to trans men, right?
2. What “demonstrable medical purpose” did the cis guy who got boobs have?
3. Who said that there shouldn’t be a demonstrable medical purpose to medical treatment, exactly?
4. You can really fuck up people if you misdiagnose or misprescribe them with literally any medication. I nearly died and still have massive trauma because I was misdiagnosed and misprescribed psychiatric medication, and yet I can go from “no diagnosis” to “pills in hand” in under an hour. So why does transition care have all these extra barriers?
5. You… missed the several occasions where I’ve explicitly stated that false positives go up as gatekeeping goes down, didn’t you?
6. “Exponentially,” on the other hand, is an extremely strong claim. I presume you’ve got commensurately strong evidence?
7. I don’t particularly care if the number of detransitioners goes from epsilon to epsilon squared. I care if the number of dead trans people per year goes down from the uncomfortably high number it’s at.
Why don’t you?
I like this argument for one primary reason: My mother and I share updates on our hormone treatments.
My mother is on testosterone.
I'm on blockers and estrogen.
Funny how that works.
And yeah, definitely agree that reducing dead trans folks is more important since detransitioners are something like 1% of the 1% or so of the population. . .
I love being reminded of how all my mainstream liberal (in the “MORE 👏 FEMALE 👏 DRONE 👏 PILOTS” sense) acquaintances are perfectly fine with mass killings of disabled people as long as it’s done before birth.
We really need disability advocacy movements to take off, because I’m uh, maybe not exactly a fan of being alive but if I do anything about it that better be my own fucking choice.
aspec is for autistic sprctrum not a dumbass uwu uwu ace spectrum uwu uwu
stop using aspec for ace people lmao
Aphobes stop lying about what aspec means challenge
homophobes stop interacting with LGBT people challenge
You really need to learn what homophobe means
you mean fujoshi isnt homophobic?
you mean the majority of mogai “”””idenities”””” arent homophobic?
cause they are. learn for yourself, please.
No they aren’t. Learn what words mean.
they truely are though! im sorry youre too obsessed with everyone equal rights to see that fujoshis really fucking ARE.
we’re sexualized for BEING GAY in a GAY RELATIONSHIP lmao
I don’t discuss anything fujoshi related with people who don’t accept what the word means sorry 😂
fujoshis are fans of yaoi
yaoi is harmful lmao it pushes sterotypes on gay men like they r///////ape others and just do nasty things
That’s not what fujoshi means.
THATS LITERALLY WHAT FUJOSHI MEANS LMAO
No it’s not. You can’t just take words from the communities that use them and redefine them when you feel like it.
BRUH
GET EDUCATED
1. Wikipedia? Really?
2. U are just… Backing me up here.
FUJOSHIS
FETISHISE
GAY
MEN
YOU
DUMB
CUNT
Being a fan of something isn’t inherently fetishizing. Implying that being a fan of media with relationships between men is inherently fetishistic is INCREDIBLY homophobic.
Oh look, he can’t even make his arguments without going to the misogyny well. It’s almost like he just wants a woke excuse to hate women. Anyway, anytime you want to stop diluting “fetishization” into meaningless, trans women everywhere would appreciate it.
imagine being a published author and not getting it so much
I’m putting my face in my goddamn hands Kylo Ren is a TEXTBOOK EXAMPLE of a character who will get a redemption arc why is this hard for people to understand
“Kylo did Bad Things and had a shitty attitude so he can’t be redeemed”
News flash: you have to do bad shit and be a bad person to warrant having a redemption arc????? It’s?????? Required??????
Didn’t you know guys you only deserve redemption for being just a little rude. I mean just look at darth vader :)
I just read an article that claims Kylo Ren having any humanity at all would be a shock?? Like the possibility that he might show some depth of character or - God forbid, the potential for *gasp* REDEMPTION?!? - is the most ridiculous idea they’ve ever heard???
The complete lack of basic story-telling structure is appalling…
It’s not even whether he deserves it or not (and the whole point of redemption is that you have to earn it and atone) - it’s that the author seems to think redemption is not interesting.
She literally said she found Vader’s redemption arc boring too.
It’s like, why do you even watch Star Wars if that’s the case? 😂
I know. If someone abhors redemption arcs, Star Wars is not the right franchise for them. And it’s only getting worse, considering the several characters who managed to find some form of redemption in Rogue One. We can’t be having that!
Call me crazy but I don’t care about real life killers getting redemption arcs, that’s why I like fiction.
#reblogging for that last addition #lmao i can’t #’stop oppressing real life killers by preferring fictional killers!!!’ #mate… #cannot believe people with ~problematic fictional faves get accused of being murder apologists #with these kinds of ass-backwards arguments #star wars via @thatblackdress
i mean,,,fiction is a safe space to indulge in the wonderful idea that people who commit bad deeds can choose to atone for their actions, regardless of if other characters choose to forgive them. of course this isnt applicable to every scenario irl or even a feasibly realistic outlook to criminals in reality but i don’t think anyone is claiming it is?
smh sometimes its just fun and pleasant to enjoy a story about characters who go down a dark path but then choose to turn back and commit to doing good even if that doesn’t erase their actions?
like dude, i hear enough about how terribly we treat people irl, forgive me for wanting to see a redemption arc in a fictional space opera.
I think my favorite thing about that twitter thread is how she says redemption arcs are boring because she’s seen them a million times. And then goes on to basically say that she’s an authority on the subject because she’s an award winning author who teaches MFA of “good” stories.
She legit put good in quotes, so I was like….so are they good? or do you just pretend that they’re good?
I know liking a story is subjective and she says she likes to analyze stories, but her argument in the thread is basically that Kylo can’t be forgiven because he killed Han. Not taking into account how the narrative frames him as being torn apart by the act, and being drawn to the light. It seems to me that her love of Han is keeping her from seeing any nuance of Kylo’s character, which is pretty sad given that she’s an author herself.
It does look like this thread is pretty old, but based on a more recent tweet saying she’s done with Star Wars, I’d assume she didn’t like TLJ, or the fact that it put Kylo on a more definitive path for redemption.
ITT: Fans attempt to abuse a black woman who became successful.
watchgirl5 commented on egowave's photo “so none of yall know what a friend group is apparently”
@fictionmeister queer has been a slur for quite some time Idk where you've been. LGBT people have since reclaimed it
I’m a decade older than you, and when I was a young queer, queer was our word. It was the only word we used as a community.
And friendly reminder that the pink triangle literally comes from the WWII concentration camps and we use it for identification, too.
vixxgod666 commented on egowave's photo “so none of yall know what a friend group is apparently”
Uh polyamorous means romantic relationship between multiple people so no not a friend group…yall DO realize ace ppl in relationships with each other are still romantically involved even without sex or…?
Poly doesn’t conform to one definition, Your friendly neighborhood relationship anarch
For all of you being childish and sharing memes about how the internet will be the same if Net Neutrality is repealed; that isn’t the issue here. The issue is that 83% of the ENTIRE population was against this happening, yet it happened anyways.
The issue was that Ajit Pai was a former Verizon employee who was paid over $100 million from the telecom cooperation’s to repeal this, along with his two constituents. The issue is that the fate of the entire country was decided by 5 rich people and did not allow any hearing from the public.
The issue is that there were over 2 million identities stolen (including the identity of dead people) to post comments in favor of repealing Net Neutrality, 1.9 million of them which were confirmed fake and have legal investigation cases being opened on them for being fraud as well as identity theft.
The issue is that they were asked to halt this vote because of the illegal happenings so that they could have time to investigate it, INCLUDING Republican’s, and they were denied.
The issue is that when giving their ‘reasons’ as to why they thought repealing it was needed, they gave no VALID reasons and did not even acknowledge any of the reasons that the public was worried. In extension, they made no attempts to quell them, they just called us stupid. Instead they all made jokes and laughed, turning themselves into the victims for being rightfully criticized for being sellouts.
The issue is that they constantly poked fun at how idiotic they thought we were acting, even though we have legitimate, valid concerns. Even though we’re mostly concerned about those of us who have our livelihood’s of our businesses on the line, they instead pointed fun saying ‘we can still watch cat videos and share memes’ (legit something that was actually said in their ‘argument’ yesterday). And that was literally all they said. The issue is that there wasn’t even a ‘debate’, despite the corruption being brought to everyone’s attention, and the evidence of the American people not wanting this.
The issue is that this sets the stance that we are willing to let the cooperation’s or anyone with money do whatever the fuck they want and get away with it. This issue is more than just internet freedom. It’s about democracy. And if you can’t see that, you’re beyond help. #SaveNetNeutrality
Another issue is that literally none of the people who voted on the subject were elected. 3 unelected corporate shills just decided the fate of 323,100,000 people and then tried to make ppl arguing with them on twitter sound like morons for wanting a say in their own future.
Additionally, internet access was deemed a human right (due to the huge role it plays in free sharing of information) by the United Nations over a decade ago.
This is not only an act of enormous selfishness, it’s also literally a human rights violation enacted on 300 Million people in the name of fiscal gain, while laughing at those people’s distress.
Hell, 3 supposedly Republican ‘representatives’ voted against the will of 75% of Republicans. 3/4s of their own supposed party.
The only best interests they have in mind are their own. And you really want to question why they’re so opposed to the idea of the average American being able to freely share information, particularly in one of the most turbulent political climates I can name.
food water and shelter were deemed human rights by the un too but do we provide that
We fucking should.
But ya know it’s only the straights that you gotta worry about
YIKES
wow.
That girl is jealous of how beautiful bi girls are. Love you all. 💖💖💖💖💜💜💜💜💜💙💙💙💙
2018 is now the year of supporting bi (and other m-spec) girls! Because they’re wonderful and deserve the best! Reblog this version to make an m-spec girl feel better! (And you better believe this absolutely includes trans and nb girls too!)
I hate gold stars so much.
lesbiantonysoprano replied to your post “the-witching-tree: thelaughingmandrake: lesbiantonysoprano: Sorry...”
How far back did you go weirdo jfc
Like, 4 pages? You don’t exactly hide your shitty opinions.
Sorry for barging in on a community issue but males don’t get to be witches
Historical witchcraft was comprised of men and women. Most of the people in Iceland that were killed for witchcraft were men. The coven of Isobel Gowdie had men in it. George Pickingall was a male witch.
In contemporary witchcraft we have Gerard Gardner, Alex Sanders, and Robert Cochrane. Without these men, contemporary witchcraft wouldn’t exist. We would have no Wicca, no traditional witchcraft.
We have Andrew Chumbley, Daniel Shulke, Robin Artisson, Nigel Pearson, Nigel Jackson, and a host of others.
In short, you’re wrong.
Hey so trans lady mod here, and whilst this would be a good response if shitheel here were talking about men, they’ve actually got the thing tagged “#t.” This person is a trans-exclusionary radical feminist (terf), saying that trans women (“males”) can’t be witches.
So I’m gonna say, firstly, may calamity visit your house and set up shop there, may your hands and tongue be as barren as your pathetic soul, may you be keenly aware in your deathbed of the rejection of all Gods, Powers, and Ancestors…
And secondly: it would legitimately be a shorter list to note the historical and living cultures who DON’T associate trans people with mysticism. Goddamn, you could at least ATTEMPT the slightest of self-education with, say, the Gallai, two-spirits, and seidr practitioners, as a start.
Don’t try to hide your painfully modern chucklefuckery behind the name of the Unseen Power, for it shall bite those who attempt to wield its authority on false pretence.
So, went through her #t tag, and let's just say she's the WORST kind of terf. Women who like eyeliner must have "barbie branded blank space instead of vulvas". People who like queer theory are awful. She's 100% a TERF.
If you somehow think that Trump is pro gay because he mouths the words and waves a pride flag upside down, but Hillary isn’t because of an opinion from the 90s:
You’re a goddamned idiot. Hillary is the REASON the US Passport system is more friendly to trans people than ever.
Hillary fucked up once upon a time, but has mostly owned that fuck up (mostly!) and had plans for making the queer community’s lives better. Trump, on the other hand, keeps talking about how good he’ll be for the gays (Using that oh so unfortunate wording. . .) and then runs next to Mike Pence, suggests justices that literally think we should continue to prosecute sodomy laws, and gives his staff positions to people who have spent their lives trying to kill us.
Remember that whole “actions speak louder than words” idea?
The shitheads are now speculating about my motives.
Hint: Milo and Fox are only two of the reasons I hate you. But your sources are full of racism and homophobia, so none of them pass muster.
Today’s block criteria, as a logical OR list:
Conservative christian
Nationalist
Racist memes
Anti-SJW
libtard
Liberal Lies
Numbers of 4+ digits in username
Anime women icons
Will update as I find more dog whistles.