Final Writing 105M Post: In the Bitter Limelight: K-Stew's Poem
I thoroughly enjoyed this Video-Text Remediation project we had to finish off Writing 105M for this Winter Quarter. As a Film and Media major, it was really enjoyable to transcend major barriers and utilize production elements in another major. I also really liked creating a video versus writing an essay because it required a lot of thinking pertaining to aesthetics, pacing, audio editing, etc. Even though essays are similar in that the varying of sentence structure contributes to aesthetics and pacing, this final project included the visual element incorporated with the text element. It just enabled creativity that many people are not used to if they are not some sort of art major, so it was really fun. The mixture of text within the video really pressured us to think in a different, interesting, bold, and innovative manner. My group had thought the project would be a breeze because our footage was based on images/articles/clips that were already created, but I think that aspect of our project almost made it all the more difficult because we had to put in a lot of research of what was going to be put in the project. Every image had to have a purpose and because of the time constraints of how long the poem was narrated, we really had to pick and choose what we would place in the video.
I did want to make a statement about the ending. The ending of the video was exceptionally difficult because how could we end this statement we are making on “tabloid’s bullying,” per say, because it is such a foreign concept to the mass public. It was difficult because we already chose a controversial person to discuss (Kristen Stewart) and our message throughout the video shows other controversial people being attacked by tabloids and paparazzi. Perhaps it would have been better to add no text at the end of the video, but I feel that had we done that, the video would feel like there was not any purpose to it, especially because the duration of it was so short. Even though we ended with a somewhat funny concept of “STOP #CELEBULLYING,” we believe it would begin a conversation on the topic. Many people could easily make jokes about how the celebrities featured in the video are not talented and they have all the money in the world, so who cares if paparazzi follows them everywhere. But even with one comment on the video, that leads to another, and another, until I fully believe that at one point in the conversation, someone will type up and submit a response that says, “Maybe this video has a point though.” It was tough to take these already hated celebrities and place them in a context that would create sympathy for them, so that is why I think it was necessary to add that text in the end of the video to stimulate conversation, rather than have the video feel like it had no conclusion.
When it came to publishing the video, we tried to do everything we could. We added tons of tags to the youtube description that range from words that describe the video to tags like, “hot, beautiful, robert pattinson,” that would bring viewers in unsuspectedly. I tweeted out the video to several celebrities that have had bad occurrences with tabloids as well as advertised it amongst several friends. We have not gotten that many views yet and it may be a video that someone will stumble upon it and take it seriously or think it’s funny, and then eventually get views.
All I know is I’m glad we weren’t graded on how many views we got versus the quality of our project. There is no formula in predicting how to make a viral video. Trust me, I’ve tried. There are certain elements that can be added to a video that will make it more likely to become viral, but even then, it is hard to predict what the mass audience will want to see. This is why I wholeheartedly disagree with the concept of viral education that Wuebben discussed in class. All because a scholarly article and lecture are “up-voted” does not mean it will necessarily be good, and all because a scholarly article has no rankings or views, doesn’t mean that is it a bad one. Unless we lived in a utopian world that we had everyone put effort in reading and critically thinking about every piece placed online, articles that should be seen may not be seen. When it comes to TED talks, I think it is more reasonable to have these viral pieces as the most shown, but when it comes to broader education that someone could get a certificate for, education should not be judged on the popularity of it online. In the end, popularity contests are just popularity contests. They are hardly a correct judgement of character or quality. They were unfair when we ran for student council in the 5th grade, and they’re still going to be unfair when mass society judges what education will be “liked” or “favorited.”

















