[its-slander]

Question, why did mj change his skin if he was proud to be black?? i don't understand 😔

Michael had a skin condition called vitiligo that causes the patient to lose the pigment of their skin steadily over a period of time. He often disguised the disease with the application of make up matching the pigment of what skin tone he had left, which makes it look like he gradually “lightened” his skin. If he hadn’t been wearing make up consistently in public, you would’ve seen his skin in a patchwork of tones ranging from his original tone to the stark white associated with his later years.

We have lots of information on this on the sidebar of our blog.

Michael was never ashamed of his heritage.

[its-slander]

truly, i know michael wasn't a pedophile. but honestly why do these people feel the need to attack him. even IF he was, he's dead. what's the point.

MONEY.

[firesintheireyes]

“Martin Bashir confessed he lied in Living with Michael Jackson” x

[inmisericordes-deactivated20161]

Flowering Desert, Chile

The flowering desert is a climatic phenomenon that occurs in the Atacama Desert, known as the driest place in the world. The phenomenon consists of the blossoming of a wide variety of flowers between the months of September and November in years when rainfall is unusually high. The flowering desert involves more than 200 species of flower most of them endemic to the Atacama region.

[edgyy]

One of the most important artists of our generation everyone

[its-slander]

So all in all, all these things actually help prove MJ's innocence. They prove that the "best evidence" people have is entirely fabricated tabloid stories by people who have been successfully sued and admitted it. They prove the FBI went to all kinds of lengths to get him, including ransacking video tapes with his name on them in airports that had nothing to do with him. That's how thorough they were. And yet still to this day: no real evidence against him exists in any type of form.

[its-slander]

Then there were two video tapes the media tried to claim had child porn - these were video tapes found during a luggage search of someone who had nothing to do with MJ while at an airport, but they'd put MJ's name on the tape, something like "Michael Jackson's Boys". It had nothing to do with MJ, factually. and didn't even feature child porn.

[its-slander]

Then the claims that someone made a report to the FBI in 1985, before anything became public, FALSE. That was Victor Gutierrez, a pedophile and a pedophile supporter, who MJ successfully sued in the 90s for lying about him and pedophilia. He made a call to the FBI in December 1993 telling them they had investigated MJ for child abuse in 1986 or 1985 (he meant 1984 when MJ was out of state meeting the president). They searched their files and stated NO such investigation had ever happened.

Included in this post are the sources:

https://turningthetableonthechandlerallegations.wordpress.com/tag/victor-gutierrez/

[its-slander]

The 25 years of child porn thing - all it was was heterosexual pornography MJ had for 25 years, but the media twisted it. They included two books a fan had sent him in 1985 which had photos of kids playing in a Lord of the Flies movie, some were nude, it had the inscription from the fan inside it, and MJ had kept it. If MJ wanted child porn, he wouldn't resort to only needing 2 books from a fan about Lord of the Flies in 1985.

Yup!Source:http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/011805pltreqaseemd.pdf

[steviemcfly]

Plus, and I’m about to go to sleep so I won’t be around for the messages I get about this, Michael Jackson 100% did what he was accused of doing. I wish it wasn’t so, because he’s one of the most brilliant musical artists of all time without question or doubt and because he had some smart shit to say on race issues, but the whole thing about the kids recanting was made up for a chain e-mail and the FBI released like twenty-five years of evidence after he died (including vintage child porn, child porn filmed at Neverland Ranch, investigations dating back to 1985–eight years before the first public allegations, witness statements, former friends and employees saying he was obsessed with child porn, and so on). And he spent $35 million to keep twenty-four victims from speaking to the media.

Like, he did it. It doesn’t change the fact that he made Thriller, just like Roman Polanski still made Rosemary’s Baby and Chinatown, and Cosby made The Cosby Show and A Different World. Bad people can, and frequently do, make good art. How that colors your experience of that art is completely personal, but loving that art doesn’t change what its creators did.

Michael Jackson’s influence on music (in and out of his own genre) and culture at large can’t be denied or overstated, but he was still guilty as hell.

[borednschooled]

Looks like I’m doing more debunking like last time.

the FBI released like twenty-five years of evidence after he died (including vintage child porn,

So they found twenty-five years worth of child porn but they didn’t send him off to prison immediately? 

Like it happened with Gary Glitter when it first came out?

Michael Jackson’s house was searched twice, the first time was in 1993 when the allegations first came out and the second was in 2005.

They searched both of those houses thoroughly from what I remember; if the FBI found “twenty-five years worth” of vintage child porn, don’t you think they would have sent him off to jail sooner? Especially in 93?

And to counter those bullshit articles you found, I have these:

‘Recycled tabloid reports’

“None of this is new – zero – and there was no FBI involvement,” said CNN Special Investigations reporter Drew Griffin.   “It just sounds like recycled tabloid reports from 20 years ago.”

…

Griffin saw and reported on the same material more than a decade ago as a local Los Angeles reporter.  

“The bottom line is this stuff was not in the FBI files,” said Tom Mesereau, the lawyer who successfully defended Jackson against child molestation charges in a lengthy trial in 2005.  "The FBI closed the investigation. It sounds like a bunch of utter nonsense.“

…

“It is obvious the paper took this old story and proceeded to make it seem new by adding numbers to it – 24 boys paid off $35 million by Michael Jackson,” Dimond said.  “The problem is there’s no evidence to back up the claim that Jackson made that many payoffs.“ 

…

“Our article clearly states that we have seen copies of reports, phone transcripts and interviews carried out by an agent working for private investigator Anthony Pellicano who had been hired by Michael Jackson,” Rupert Smith said in an e-mail to CNN. “The files were seized by the FBI when Pellicano was himself investigated in 2002. The documents then became part of the FBI’s files on Jackson case numbers CADCE MJ-02463 and CR 01046….” “Mesereau, who reviewed the 330 redacted pages released by the FBI, said the documents purported by the newspaper to have been included in the files were not there. CNN also reviewed the files, which are still posted on the FBI website, and found none referring to other payoffs by Jackson. None of the file numbers matched those quoted by the newspaper.”

Here’s another:

“The FBI never had any files alleging that Michael Jackson had sexually abused 24 young boys, because it never happened,” Mesereau told RadarOnline.com exclusively.

“Remember, in 2009, the FBI released their files relating to Michael Jackson and even though some of it was redacted, there were absolutely no findings of any wrongdoing on behalf of my client. Leading up to the 2005 molestation trial, the Santa Barbara District Attorney was working with the FBI and Interpol and they came up with no evidence of any sexual abuse.

…

“Michael was fully cooperative during all of his interactions with DCFS,” a source previously told Radar.

“Michael was interviewed for hours without his lawyer. He held nothing back. He couldn’t understand why these allegations were being made against him. DCFS cleared him on any wrongdoing in all its investigations.”

https://lacienegasmiled.wordpress.com/category/allegations-and-court-case-information/

Now, looking at all of this I’m going to be more upfront of what I’m trying to ask you.

What in the fuck are you talking about?

[mpencil]

I looked at the sources on the original post a few people reblogged on my dash and I didnt find anything immediately credible honestly. 

really people do your own research and come to your own conclusions, I don’t see anything new or shocking here that proves he’s guilty. 

“if the FBI found “twenty-five years worth” of vintage child porn, don’t you think they would have sent him off to jail sooner?” Like really this doesn’t make a lot of sense to me but if someone can explain I’d love to hear it 

[borednschooled]

Sorry, I didn’t word that part correctly due to anger. What I should’ve said was “if they found twenty-five years worth of child porn in his house, why didn’t they charge him for that?”

Child porn is a pretty serious thing you can serve jail time for, up to fifteen to twenty years in prison at least in the US, as well as being registered as a sex offender. 

[mpencil]

I understood you and agreed with you! Sorry I meant, if someone could give an answer to your rhetorical question I’d love to hear it. Sorry for being confusing!

[borednschooled]

Don’t mention it, I misread your post too. My apologies!

[its-slander]

Why was Michael's fingernails /nail bed brown during his later years some pictures it looks really bad could that be from the drug use

No. It’s an offset of having both vitiligo and lupus. 

[its-slander]

What are your thoughts on believers and knowers? They kind of annoy but I also feel bad that they just can't accept and let MJ go

Don’t pay them any attention. They started the day MJ passed and they haven’t stopped since.

[its-slander]

how can you be sure that michael jackson didn't pay off families? there's no proof that that isn't true.

Read the blog.

[its-slander]

where do I find court documents? not the transcripts from 2005.

Google it. It's readily available. 

[its-slander]

um how do you know what's true and how do you know what's false? like what makes vindicatingmj accurate and not false? can't they just say things that make MJ look innocent?

Cited sources, facts, evidence, dates, times, audio recordings, photos, court transcripts, autopsy reports, medical records… Rather than sensationalized outlandish declarations made without anything to back them up debunked years ago, or made 5 years after the person accused died and can no longer defend himself that are contrary to the statements that were sworn to be true when made in court

[its-slander]

could u perhaps link me to a post that says that isn't true? I'm on mobile and it's hard to navigate through posts

Literally the whole blog.

http://its-slander.tumblr.com/tagged/allegations

http://its-slander.tumblr.com/michaeljackson101

http://its-slander.tumblr.com/post/38450793114/did-michael-jackson-sleep-with-children

http://its-slander.tumblr.com/post/38493706180/if-he-was-innocent-why-did-he-settle-out-of-court

http://its-slander.tumblr.com/post/38454802668/why-did-he-hang-around-with-children-isnt-that

[its-slander]

Do you know anything about ''This is it"?There rumors about it be a documentary from the start that there were lots of camera's and it was never as 50 shows. Do you know??

There's a lot of misinformation and conspiracies surrounding This Is It. I don't consider myself knowledgeable enough to comment on it, but do some lurking on some MJ forums (MJJC - gotta get through the crap first though, MJJE, PositivelyMichael etc). There's a lot more gathered information on that topic.