Looks like Iâm doing more debunking like last time.
the FBI released like twenty-five years of evidence after he died (including vintage child porn,
So they found twenty-five years worth of child porn but they didnât send him off to prison immediately?Â
Like it happened with Gary Glitter when it first came out?
Michael Jacksonâs house was searched twice, the first time was in 1993 when the allegations first came out and the second was in 2005.
They searched both of those houses thoroughly from what I remember; if the FBI found âtwenty-five years worthâ of vintage child porn, donât you think they would have sent him off to jail sooner? Especially in 93?
And to counter those bullshit articles you found, I have these:
âRecycled tabloid reportsâ
âNone of this is new â zero â and there was no FBI involvement,â said CNN Special Investigations reporter Drew Griffin. Â âIt just sounds like recycled tabloid reports from 20 years ago.â
Griffin saw and reported on the same material more than a decade ago as a local Los Angeles reporter. Â
âThe bottom line is this stuff was not in the FBI files,â said Tom Mesereau, the lawyer who successfully defended Jackson against child molestation charges in a lengthy trial in 2005. Â "The FBI closed the investigation. It sounds like a bunch of utter nonsense.â
âIt is obvious the paper took this old story and proceeded to make it seem new by adding numbers to it â 24 boys paid off $35 million by Michael Jackson,â Dimond said.  âThe problem is thereâs no evidence to back up the claim that Jackson made that many payoffs.âÂ
âOur article clearly states that we have seen copies of reports, phone transcripts and interviews carried out by an agent working for private investigator Anthony Pellicano who had been hired by Michael Jackson,â Rupert Smith said in an e-mail to CNN. âThe files were seized by the FBI when Pellicano was himself investigated in 2002. The documents then became part of the FBIâs files on Jackson case numbers CADCE MJ-02463 and CR 01046âŠ.â
âMesereau, who reviewed the 330 redacted pages released by the FBI, said the documents purported by the newspaper to have been included in the files were not there. CNN also reviewed the files, which are still posted on the FBI website, and found none referring to other payoffs by Jackson. None of the file numbers matched those quoted by the newspaper.â
âThe FBI never had any files alleging that Michael Jackson had sexually abused 24 young boys, because it never happened,â Mesereau told RadarOnline.com exclusively.
âRemember, in 2009, the FBI released their files relating to Michael Jackson and even though some of it was redacted, there were absolutely no findings of any wrongdoing on behalf of my client. Leading up to the 2005 molestation trial, the Santa Barbara District Attorney was working with the FBI and Interpol and they came up with no evidence of any sexual abuse.
âMichael was fully cooperative during all of his interactions with DCFS,â a source previously told Radar.
âMichael was interviewed for hours without his lawyer. He held nothing back. He couldnât understand why these allegations were being made against him. DCFS cleared him on any wrongdoing in all its investigations.â
https://lacienegasmiled.wordpress.com/category/allegations-and-court-case-information/
Now, looking at all of this Iâm going to be more upfront of what Iâm trying to ask you.
What in the fuck are you talking about?