Review of ‘Francis Bacon in Your Blood: A Memoir’ by Michael Peppiatt
Originally published in The Spectator, 5 September 2015
Jules of Nature

No title available

pixel skylines

tannertan36
DEAR READER
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

Love Begins
wallacepolsom
Cosmic Funnies
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Today's Document
noise dept.
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
occasionally subtle

Kiana Khansmith
Mike Driver
we're not kids anymore.

oozey mess
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Canada
seen from Georgia
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
@jackbcastle
Review of ‘Francis Bacon in Your Blood: A Memoir’ by Michael Peppiatt
Originally published in The Spectator, 5 September 2015
Review of Christopher Page: Dawn at Hunter/Whitfield, 29 May - 27 June 2015
Originally published at Aesthetica, 20 June 2015
Stanley Spencer: A Primer
An introduction to the life, times and work of Stanley Spencer, drawing on interviews with David Boyd Haycock and Andre Zlattinger. Originally published by Christie’s, 12 June 2015.
Agnes Martin: Interview with Arne Glimcher of Pace Gallery
Interview with Arne Glimcher about the life and work of Agnes Martin ahead of her Tate Modern retrospective. Originally published by Christie’s, 2 June 2015
Review of ‘Curationism’ by David Balzer
Originally published in The Spectator, 18 April 2015
Francis Bacon in Monaco
Interview with Majid Boustany, Founder of the Francis Bacon MB Art Foundation Monaco, about Bacon’s life, work and love of Monaco. Originally published by Christie’s, 2 April 2015.
Rising Stars
Series of eight interviews with emerging and contemporary artists ahead of the Christie’s First Open /LDN x Artstack collaboration on 26 March 2015.
1) Felix Baudenbacher, originally published 16 March by Christie’s
2) Jimmy Merris, 17 March
3) Marisa Olsen, 18 March
4) Michaela Zimmer, 17 March
5) Nathaniel Rackowe, 20 March
6) Oskar Rink, 23 March
7) Roman Liska, 24 March
8) James Balmforth, 25 March
Object Lesson: David Linley
Interview with David Linley on David Roentgen’s desk for George IV. First published by Christie’s on 27 February 2015.
To live, paint and drink in Montparnasse
Feature on the bars of 1920s Montparnasse. Originally published by Christie’s on 23 January 2015.
Growing Up with the St Ives School
Interview feature with Katherine Heron on the St Ives School, Patrick Heron and their house, Eagles Nest. Originally published by Christie’s, 18 November 2014.
Pages from Christie’s Magazine, October 2014
Review of Ezra Pound: Poet, Volume II: The Epic Years, by A. David Moody
Originally published in The Spectator, 18 October 2014
Review of Mary Kelly, On the passage of a Few People through a Rather Brief Period of Time, Pippy Houldsworth Gallery, 5 September 2014 – 4 October 2014
Originally published at Aesthetica magazine
A famous critique of Jean-François Lyotard’s brassy “I define postmodern as incredulity toward meta-narratives” is that, if you go in for his postmodernism, you have to be incredulous towards this statement as well. You also have to distrust the meta-narrative of postmodernism, and have to distrust the “have to” part, then not take that distrust for granted in turn, and so on and backwards. This quickly becomes recursive, the mental equivalent of looking in a mirror at a mirror behind you. So what starts out as a defence against monolithic and dubiously agenda-driven claims to power becomes paralysing quickly – what possible action can you take when everything triggers an endless chain of distrust? For artist Mary Kelly, whose career has been devoted to a narrative-based analysis of Feminism and post-modernism, flitting between the personal and the theoretical as in her famous Post-Partum Document (1973–1979), this is of crucial importance. How much incredulity, or rather self-incredulity, is needed, is healthy – even towards the narratives of Feminism and post-modernism themselves?
On the passage of a Few People through a Rather Brief Period of Time is a careful tending to this, at a point when she feels as though her “era” has ended. Hers is the generation of people born during World War II – those who inherited the spirit of the fight for a just world by being born into a ruined one. From this, they charted a brave course in the fight for civil rights, Feminism, and the hope of a socialist utopia. It is logical therefore that Circa 1968 (2004) is the lynchpin of this exhibition and the point of focus, straight ahead as you walk in, around which all else hangs. Made for the 2004 Whitney Biennale, it uses an image taken by Jean-Pierre Rey from Life magazine, 1968, in which Caroline de Bendern is on the shoulders of Jean-Jacques Lebel, the leader of the student occupation in Paris, hoisting the Vietnamese flag in a zeal reminiscent of Delacroix’s Liberty Leading the People. Light noise is projected onto this image, in a way re-animating it but perhaps not quite enough.
While this is a call to those who were not alive to see or feel this moment, it is also striking how unreal it seems, as though the piece doesn’t quite believe in itself entirely. Delacroix’s own revolutionary zeal has faded into art history, and it is noticeable how the image from Life has become a model for current protests despite being frozen in time. Mary Kelly quotes Guy Debord: “That which was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of the era carried away with it.” How do we access this moment as it, from our perspective, flickers in the light noise and the era that has elapsed since? Is this moment important? At the same time it is only “circa” something. It is an approximation. Some things are passed down: passion, a style, a cause; but even if the past does have answers, they are hard to see through the interference, and remembering is an act of making, not of re-making. Here comes the necessary incredulousness.
Because actually, although this photograph is famous, the moment it features is fairly trivial, just as it is in Liberty Leading the People. A flag is waved, a woman is on a man’s shoulders, a figure surmounts a pile of bodies. These aren’t moments the world changed, but they are something more, ghostly, and potentially more insidious. Although they are forgettable moments in the fluxes of life, they have become allegories rather than just a few people passing through a rather brief period of time, and an allegory is a type of manipulable conclusion. They have become impersonal, like the marines on Iwo Jima in Life, April, 1945 (2014), or the rioter raising his fist “in defiance and rage” as tear gas billows around him in Rhodesia in 7 Days, February, 1972 (2014). Kelly’s work tries to give them back their status as people, though time has lost their personality.
Alderney Street, 1973 (2014) shows why. It is based on a photo of the Alderney Street commune in Pimlico, which ran from 1970–1976 and at which Kelly lived. It shows that action is carried out by a few people passing through, who touch and are touched by historical movement and new ideas, yet barely appear at all and soon fade into the hive of the event, as in 7 Days, March, 1972 (2014). Two unidentified women are on the March front cover, but the issue features an interview with Simone De Beauvoir, who declared “Today, I’ve changed. I’ve really become a feminist”, which in turn enraptured and inspired Kelly to independent struggle for female emancipation.
Although this show is about 1960s and 1970s political activism, friendship, time and awakening, there is no sepia tinting or nostalgia involved. To be nostalgic is to look back on time as lost, but for Kelly it accumulates, sometimes obscures, sometimes passing things of value on to the next generation, things perhaps to be used. This is even evident in her choice of material: tumble dryer lint, accumulated over many months and washing cycles, then printed onto the paper in layers. The more dense the lint, the more saturated the colour area, like a more-vivid memory.
In all the lint built up since 1968, or even 1830, Kelly lays down her one piece about modern conflict – she is modestly nervous about telling things to the internet age. It is based on a photo by Peter MacDiarmid of protesters at a rally in Tahrir Square, Egypt, 23 November 2011. They are wearing gas masks, and one holds a camera phone in one of the three single arms raised in this exhibition. People are still meeting history and the lint keeps falling. The conundrum doesn’t go away. It is necessary to remain incredulous but you have to believe in something, and Kelly’s work seems to tread that line wonderfully. Not by supporting the authoritative answer of a revolution or the meta-narratives behind them, but by spurring us on to the constant questioning of protest.
Review of Digital Revolution, Barbican Centre, 3 July – 14 September 2014
Originally published at Aesthetica magazine
Review of Marina Rosenfeld, ROYGBIV&B (version for South London Gallery), 11 June 2014
Courtesy of Aesthetica magazine.
Where is blue lower than red? Where is F higher than C? In a rainbow; in a musical score – everywhere else in sound and colour ‘up’ and ‘down’, ‘higher’ or ‘lower’ are figures of speech, no matter how accustomed to them we are, and linking them through their use of the same metaphor is what Marina Rosenfeld did on 11 June at the South London Gallery in a version of ROYGBIV&B adapted from a previous performance at MoMA, this time using slightly more Anglicised references and local Peckham youth choirs instead of singers from Brooklyn high schools.
ROYGBIV&B takes its name from the acronym for the colours of the rainbow, and the interlinking choral voices singing within a web of loudspeakers are meant to represent the idea of that spectrum. But there is another angle at work, as each letter in the acronym also becomes a part of well-chosen phrases from well-known songs. Excerpts of Christina Aguilera (“You are beautiful” opens the piece, going from the ‘Y’ of ‘Yellow’ to the ‘B’ of ‘Blue’), Clean Bandit (“When I am with you, there's no place I'd rather be”, from ‘I’ and ‘Indigo’, ‘Yellow’, perhaps the hint of ‘O’, ‘Orange’ in ‘no’, back to Indigo, then ‘B’ for ‘Blue) and Alicia Keys (‘I keep on fallin’…’ to cement the metaphor of directions in colour and sound) give the piece a more sentimental slant as associations are strung across the fragments of songs before the harmonies in the voices resolve into a pure note from the loudspeaker – passing through the reddy-oranges and greeny-blues to a pure colour.
There was a sense of falling short – a sense of disappointment in failed visual description that is practically par for the course in literature and music. That said, the word Rosenfeld uses for the relationship between the sound piece and a real rainbow is ‘evoke’. Any metaphor only ever evokes, and even the most well-worn are fundamentally lies – no love is actually like a red, red rose – so to judge the piece on its ability to resemble a rainbow would be odd. Rather, the fluctuation of sound frequencies (which nod to colour frequencies) became the key point, and the experience of meeting them in a certain space at a certain time.
As last autumn’s exhibition at the South London Gallery at the moment of being heard displayed, recent Sound Art work has been focused on sound as a changing part of the living environment. Each sound is here loud, there quiet, suffused or cut into by other noises. So sitting in a packed South London Gallery again, surrounded by fellow audience members, made these interactions all the more personal and gave a glimmer of the warm, lifting feeling you get in communal prayer – the personal, experiential moment within the holistic work. The choir members were sat on plastic chairs facing in what seemed like random directions, with the audience dotted at their feet. In this way, the concept of the piece was beautifully second to the unique combination of sounds and echoes the work made as each person sat cross-legged, listening, and a blonde-haired little girl in a suitably green-patterned dress sang beautifully, backed by a teenage boy and a soulful, bassy adult. Everyone’s rainbows are different, but there are rainbows.
-- Jack Castle 2014
Review of Restate, by Art:i:curate, 4–17 April 2014, NEO Bankside, Pavilion A
Originally published by Aesthetica.
--Jack Castle
Review of Calder and Melotti: Children of the Sky, 11 October – 30 November 2013, Ronchini Gallery
Originally published in Aesthetica magazine.
-- Jack Castle