i think you should be suspicious of anyone that can't seem to explain their arguments in plain language. Even the most complex topics can be broken down and explained in accessible language. If there is an argument that is always couched in 500 obscure pieces of jargon or turns of phrase and words dug out of the farthest corners of a thesaurus, and the people arguing it seem incapable of talking about it in any other way, it might be because the obfuscation is the point, and they want you to assume you are out of your depth and that you should just trust them as the expert. When really, any real expert can (and will) explain the same concept in different ways to different audiences and should have no problem doing so.

















