hello vonnie
Keni
★
No title available
Discoholic 🪩
Janaina Medeiros
⁂
Claire Keane
will byers stan first human second
if i look back, i am lost
we're not kids anymore.
ojovivo
sheepfilms
DEAR READER
Misplaced Lens Cap
i don't do bad sauce passes
styofa doing anything
Cosmic Funnies
Andulka
shark vs the universe
seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Italy
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Ireland
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia
@jarvofgalen
Good post
Reblog to piss off a nazi
Fuck Nazis. and fuck anybody who sympathizes with Nazis.
The one ki8d with the paper flags is all like YEEEET
Burn baby burn
Burn in hell.
Not to ruin a good message, but I think you’re about seventy years too late to the party, guys P:
As much as I hate reblogging politics, this is true as fuck.
Yes. Not just letting the children of illegal immigrants run free in the wild without a guardian while their parents are in detention, and instead housing them in temporary lodging in the meantime is totally like kidnapping them, and using them as free labour.
Yeah, this is 100% analogous.
Does this also apply to those who’ve been in the US for months or years, or the people who did not apply for asylum until they were caught by ICE? I mean if you visit the US, and remain past the 90 days or however many is the allowed time for people from Mexico, you are there illegally if you have not yet requested asylum.
If someone goes to the US because they are being persecuted in their country, and when they arrive they request asylum, I’m fully in support of them. Not so much when someone uses the asylum request as a last resort because they are being deported.
There are perfectly legal ways to do this. Hell, I have a friend who immigrated to the US from Russia recently, and his family asked for asylum because he was in danger due to being gay. I have no issues with this, because they did it legally. The problem with illegal immigration is not the immigration part, it’s the illegal part.
As much as I hate reblogging politics, this is true as fuck.
Yes. Not just letting the children of illegal immigrants run free in the wild without a guardian while their parents are in detention, and instead housing them in temporary lodging in the meantime is totally like kidnapping them, and using them as free labour.
Yeah, this is 100% analogous.
‘Forcing children into free labor and blatantly abusing them bc you imprisoned their parents for (peacefully) crossing an imaginary line that you literally just made up’
Do you understand what a complete moron you sound like
Holy fucking shit. Forcing children into free labour and blatantly abusing them? Please do tell me what your sources are, because if this was true the government would be in deep shit.
Also, calling the borders of your fucking country “imaginary lines” is pretty damn scary. Do even know what the purpose of those “imaginary lines” is? It’s what’s keeping your individual nation’s economy and culture secure. It’s kind of important. You must at least realize that if there were no borders the world would fall into anarchy.
And the tags. Oh boy, I just noticed the tags: #i cant tell if this is a joke Yeah, the feeling’s mutual.
#stealing kids from their non violent parent so you can exploit them is so obviously kidnapping just use your brain for like two seconds God, this phrasing; “stealing kids”. Yeah, legally housing kids while their parents’ cases are handled sure sounds like stealing. But then again this is coming from someone who doesn’t seem to care about the fact that the parents are criminals, violent or not. People who manipulate wall-street are also criminals; should they also be let off the hook, because they are non-violent?
#this comment embodies everything i hate about anti immigrants The word your looking for is “reasonable”.
#the entitlment is ridiculous Yeah, glad we agree. The entitlement that these illegal immigrants feel, that they should just be allowed to enter someone else’s country without any sort of consequence or repercussion is ridiculous.
Warning, popular horror game is deceptively scary to unsuspecting people who can’t read
https://twitter.com/VictoriaLIVE/status/1012252547610890240
http://archive.is/3SsrI
Are y'all unironically and uncritically reblogging a post from “gamergate-news”
Please activate your brain cells before you do this
Further fucking more you idiots get really fucking heated any time any criticism is levied at your precious vidya James because “OH NO JACK ROMPSON 2.0” instead of thinking for two seconds that 13 year olds consume all of this garbage through YouTube let’s players so the mere idea of “oh just go to the steam store page” is moot.
Like y'all really expect 13 year olds to instantly understand the vast cultural gulf between your academic knowledge of weeb shit and them.
You really gonna get your asshole prolapsed when someone looks at a 13 year old watching pewdiepie or some fucker play Yandere Simulator: Snuff Porn Fetishism With Highschoolers edition and they go hm… perhaps this is ducked up and not good?
Can you people think for 2 seconds?
censor all entertainment everywhere becuz parents let 12 year olds use youtube unsupervised. got it.
looking forward to a future of toddler friendly only entertainment since companies are responsible for any young children who might stumble onto their content through a 3rd party online.
& lets never put serious topics like suicide in a work of fiction ever again.
at least i assume thats the solution since none of yall cant be assed to actually propose one.
Can you talk like a normal person instead of having to use reaction pictures every other sentence?
You’re about as embarrassing as the teens who use ace attorney gifs to argue about ship drama on here.
I simply adore how well you evaded having to respond to any of the points brought up in ehrhardt’s reply just by complaining about the reaction images in their post. How cunning of you!
I’m actually kind of disappointed no one at @gamergate-news pointed out this obvious manipulation of the conversation on @gun-flame’s response :/
(unless I missed a reply)
I think if there’s a gamergate'esque rebellion over Starwars Ann’s its horrible mismanagement and sjw pandering to the point its fracturing or outright destroying canon…..it needs it’s own name, Stargate is already taken tho
-Buddy of mine on facebook
……I wish I could slap someone over the internet for such a lame joke…. but now I’m gonna share it here so I’m not the only one who suffers
- ninja
i’ve grown annoyed at the people saying the new star wars is destroying the canon, or doing SJW pandering.
i would appreciate evidence from people who don’t overuse “soyboy.”
I don’t know much about the SJW themes in the new movies, but I think the reason so many people are against most of the new Star Wars movies, is due to the way they handled the source material.
I think most people would agree that The Force Awakens was an all right movie, with some interesting new characters who could have been built into great ones with the right writing, however the movie didn’t feel like it tried to build on the original trilogy. It felt more like it wanted to re-establish a status quo, with the good guys being rebels and the enemy a big empire, despite these factions having ran their course, and finished their arc in episode six.
The biggest offender among the new movies is undoubtedly The Last Jedi (and I’m gonna go into spoilers here). A movie which disregarded any sort of established characters (both from the old and the new films), continuity, in universe rules, and lore.
The movie was all over the place, with poor writing for the characters and the story, and building almost 100% on subversion of people’s expectations. Replacing interesting ideas, not with other, unexpected, interesting ideas, which might even make more sense, but with either less original, less interesting concepts (Luke just wanted to run away to die, and Snoke just wanted to get his hands on Rey to kill her), or just no concepts at all (Rey’s parentage being brought up again, just to turn out to be irrelevant, and Snoke dying without his backstory being explored).
Old characters are robbed of their dignity (Luke is a coward now, who at some point contemplated killing his nephew because he showed sight that he might be influenced by the dark side, Leia is space Mary Poppins and spends most of the movie in a coma), and new ones are either robbed of their purpose for existence in the movie (Finn’s plot line ending up being pointless), or of their humanity (Rey becoming a fully fledged marysue).
The newly introduced characters are either portrayed as incompetent (Admiral Holdo failing to share her plans with her crew, and causing the conflict in the movie, then being portrayed as a hero) or preachy and out of place (Rose’s “rich people are evil” subplot and final action in the Crait battle, causing the victory of the First Order).
But yeah, despite being rather wordy here, I’d suggest that if you are truly interested in having an irrefutable answer to your question, and you have the time and the patience to, watch these three videos by MauLer detailing the unbelievably long list of flaws The Last Jedi has, and refuting some of the defenses fans made for them.
Anyway, it’s not like the new movies are all bad. Like I said, The Force Awakens was an all right movie, and definitely better than any of the prequels
And I personally thought Rogue One was great. Probably the best Star Wars movie to be made since the original trilogy. It has interesting, relatively well developed characters, both on the Rebel and the Empire side. An interesting plot, which ends up improving upon the original trilogy by plugging up an infamous plothole in episode four. And all this without relying on what makes Star Wars what it is for most people; like light saber battles, or constant, forced references to the old movies. And the references which do show up generally make sense, or are brief enough that they don’t feel like they are taking valuable time away from the movie’s own plot and characters.
Of course it’s not a perfect movie, but I think it was handled as well as a movie of such a scale, with so many characters, and in such a limited time-frame could have been.
So it’s not like they can’t make good Star Wars movies with a “diverse” cast, it’s just that they are not truly trying. Hiring people who are either not skilled enough for the job, or simply don’t care.
And I haven’t seen Solo yet, so I can’t speak for whatever is in that movie, but I’m guessing there probably was a reason why it ended up having the worse box office of all Star Wars movies to date :I
As much as I hate reblogging politics, this is true as fuck.
Yes. Not just letting the children of illegal immigrants run free in the wild without a guardian while their parents are in detention, and instead housing them in temporary lodging in the meantime is totally like kidnapping them, and using them as free labour.
Yeah, this is 100% analogous.
hot take: hrt, gender therapy and trans surgeries should be free
if cis people don’t have to pay to have a body that doesn’t make them dysphoric, neither should trans people
So by that logic does that mean that I should get anti-depressants and all the other pills for my mental issues for free because the people who don’t suffer from them don’t have to pay to have them?
And does that mean that corrective lenses should also be free, because people with good vision don’t need to pay to see clearly, and that devices to aid in mobility for people with limited mobility (from crutches to (practical) canes to wheelchairs to prosthetics) should also be free, because people who don’t have limited mobility don’t need to pay for them?
yes? why does everyone in the notes keep trying to come up with gotchas lmao everything to do with healthcare should be free
You know what should also be free? Food, lodging, clothes, hygenic products.
The reason why these things aren’t free, is because people have to make them, much like medicine, and prosthetics, and the surgeries some people require. The people who make these things don’t make them as a hobby. They are sacrificing valuable time from their own lives so that people can have these things, and it only makes sense that they require compensation for their work.
I don’t know what your job is, (assuming you do have one) but just imagine if someone came to you, and asked you to do your work for free. You probably wouldn’t take very kindly to the idea.
Suggesting that goods which require manpower should be free, because nature is unfair is extremely entitled. The fact that life dealt someone a worse hand than someone else, is not that other person’s fault, nor is it their responsibility to improve their lives out of charity. If someone decides to do so regardless, that is their choice, but saying that otherwise expensive medication should be free is extremely stupid, and out of touch with reality.
imagine being one of the most powerful people in the world and having the audacity to tweet some useless shit like that
Yes, I agree. Donald Trump should outlaw school shootings, effective immediately!
...oh wait!
Seriously tho; what the fuck is up with these people? They act like he could just don a superhero outfit and fly around, stopping school shootings right before they happen.
Or should he go from home to home, and figure out which student is suffering from homicidal tendencies?
You know America has gone to shit when HIGH SCHOOLERS expect school shootings to happen to them.
Correction: American media and education are what’s gone to shit. Children are this afraid because of their constant fear mongering around this subject.
That’s not very professional for a “congresswoman” to mock someone’s death just because of mean words on the internet.
Brianna has sympathy for the cancer. After all, for Wu it’s family.
Just soak in the stupid. Soak in that powerful stupid.
I mean it’s just one thing that animals cannot be trans, so the idea that this statement is “transphobic” is moronic, but then this person tries to explain that it’s also transphobic to say that there are only two sexes, because there can be genetic defects.
Apparently reality is extremely transphobic.
Someone sent me this picture in tumblr chat, and I would’ve responded to them directly, but...
...apparently they have me blocked.
So they sent me this picture, ...and then they blocked me. Brilliant!
This is so important.
Wow! Such pretentious, manipulative bullshit -.-
Being trans is not special or fun.
You need dysphoria to be trans.
Being cisgender is great.
Being trans is not your aesthetic.
Truscum/transmeds are the only ones who really care about trans people.
Hopefully, people like Skye are still a minority. If you have gender dysphoria, I hope you will be alright. You can always talk to me if you feel bad
Also, sorry for my English mistakes
>> Visit my art blog [NSFW]
“Truscum/transmeds are the only ones who really care about trans people.”
Never mind that that’s not true; it’s outright manipulation of vulnerable people.
anyway, skye is a boy and i support him way fucking more than i would ever support truscum
“I support cis people who pretend to be trans for brownie points more than actual trans people who point out this bullshit”
Transgenderism is a neurological disorder caused by abnormal hormonal exposure in utero, resulting in a more feminized/masculinized brain of the child. This results in the transgender person having a severe disconnect with their body (AKA gender dysphoria) as well as a slew of other symptoms. The possibility of a cure is slim at best and the only known working treatment is transition.
Cis people who know nothing about passing, stealth, HRT, surgeries, estrogen shortages, legal name/gender changes or other trans matters have no place in the trans community, yet we are the assholes for pointing that out.
Demedicalization of transgenderism will lead to insurance companies/state healthcare not covering transition, which would kill even more people who already have a 40% suicide rate.
Trenders kill.
“cure”
wow, you just don’t want trans people to exist, do you?
I’m trans, you oblivious zucchini. There is no cure and likely will not be, because transgenderism results from changes in the fucking structure of your brain. Outside of invasive brain surgery, there’s no way to fix that and said surgery would raise a lot of ethical questions, since men and women have different behavioral and cognitive patterns and trans people display ones closer to their gender than their sex. “Curing” transgenderism would be closer to lobotomy, than anything. And I brought this up to stress that transgenderism is a medical issue and requires treatment. It’s close to autism in that way, as both are incurable neurological disorders. But you seem to not know what being trans is actually like. Speaking of which, yes, I would like to be cured by turning into a cis woman. I remember a good excrept from an interview with Dana International: an Israeli trans singer who won a Eurovision in the 90s. “If offered a chance, would you trade your fame and beauty for being a regular cis woman?” And she didn’t hesitate to say yes. Trans people want to be cis. There’s nothing fun about being disconnected from your body.
oh my fucking god
we shouldn’t WANT to be cis
i don’t want my “transgenderism” to be “”“cured”“” and i don’t want my autism to be “”“cured”“” either
jesus fucking christ
you sound like Blair fucking White
Wanting to be cis is the most common actual trans experience, like it or not. Do you think I’ll be paying a fortune to turn my dick inside out for funsies? And your reading comprehension is incredibly poor. I literally said there’s not way to cure transgenderism, outside of very unethical methods. But none of us want this. Being. Trans. Is. Shit. Staring in the mirror and seeing a stranger for at least 26 years of my life was not fucking fun. Crying because my hands were too big was not fucking fun. Being called an “it” by a stranger and then getting beaten up was not fucking fun. I did not choose to be trans. If you want my transness, you can fucking take it.
what do you expect with someone who has the url “imtooqueerforthisnonsense”
Bless Dasha’s patience because at this point I would’ve gone off.
Sounding like Blair White is not an insult tho. I mean, she’s a queen.
I feel so bad for them because they actually believe they shit their saying I true.
Thanks Dasha. But don’t waste your time answering to them, they’re not worth it.
i got mad lmao
It’s always fascinating to watch people react, when their own methods and stupid ideas are being used against them.
it must be pretty exhausting being a neo-nazi publicly
updates about richard spencer being constantly shit on by everyone has been the best meme of 2017 tbh
The saddest fucking part is, (I mean apart from the rights of an individual being violated), is that the regressives don’t even realize that they are currently creating the next oppressed minority.
Because regardless of whether you agree with the likes of Spencer or not, people like him are being discriminated against for their views and opinions. So at this point they have a very good case for demanding protection from the discrimination they receive.
Now believe it or not, I don’t want Richard fucking Spencer and his supporters to receive special treatment. However by treating them like shit, that is what you will soon be responsible for granting them, because you’re creating a case for them.
Just stop fucking discriminating against these douchebags, and fight them the way you’re supposed to; with better ideas and facts. Otherwise you’re no better than them in your actions, if not even worse.
But then again, what sort of a response do I expect from “Berkeley Antifa” -.-
You do realize that…..private businesses have a right to do this right lol? No one’s rights are being violated. You’re a huge ass fucking idiot you know that right?
Neo-nazis don’t fall under a protected class so no their rights aren’t being violated.
You just like to bitch and moan about any old thing regardless if you’re right or wrong.
So, I’m guessing you also stood up in defense of that bakery which refused to make a wedding cake for that gay couple a few years back, right? Because private businesses have the right to refuse service to whomever they choose.
The Civil Rights Law of 1964 made it illegal for businesses to refuse service based on race, gender, national origin and religion.
Both bakery incidents [Colorado and Oregon] There’s a law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation. So unless you think business have the right to ignore STATE and FEDERAL law you’re wrong.
It’s only hypocrisy if context means nothing to you and here’s the context Nazis are not a part of a protected class and therefore it is not illegal for a business to say I don’t want to serve Nazis
Okay, first of all, we weren’t talking about nazis. I don’t know why you felt the need for bringing them into the discussion, as they are one of the the most extreme examples.
Not that it really matters, since someone’s political views should have no bearing on whether or not they receive service from a business. If you believe that someone should not be discriminated against based on their gender, but you are fine with them being discriminated against based on their political views, you are a hypocrite.
You can’t have it both ways. You gotta decide whether you want everyone to be serviced, or establishments to have the right to refuse service.
Or to put it another way; if you heard that a republican establishment refused someone service, because they identified as liberals in support of gay rights, would you speak out against them, or just accept that as the decision of the company?
Richard Spencer is literally a neo-nazi. Nazis were brought up because the guy this post is about is a fucking Nazi.
Didn’t realize that ethnic cleansing constituted a political view and thank you for confirming that either you don’t understand the meaning of context or you just simply don’t care.
Here’s what you are saying. “You can’t have it both ways. You gotta decide whether killing someone is wrong or killing someone is right.” The reality is it depends on the context. If I kill a man that’s about to open fire on a crowd of people I’ve done the right thing. I just saved those people vs me killing the same man because he cut me off in traffic or something. Your black and white attitude doesn’t work here and anyone with a brain can understand why.
I feel like you’re missing the fact that there is a difference between me and a government entity. I have every right, as a person, to protest an establishment that does what you’ve said HOWEVER the government has no right to prosecute said establishment because liberals do not fall under a protected class and therefore while I find it morally reprehensible what that republican establishment is doing, it is not illegal for them to do it.
ALSO answer my question, do you think businesses have a right to break federal and state laws?
I’m not arguing whether or not Spencer is actually a nazi, because honestly it would be like arguing shades of grey, but I get your point.
However I disagree. Saying that a company has the right to refuse service to someone purely based on their ideologies is just as asinine as doing the same because of someone’s sexuality.
Whether someone’s gay or straight, whether someone’s a liberal, a conservative, a fascist, or a communist, as long as they do not behave in a way that disrupts the order in one’s establishment, as long as they follow the rules of a service, I cannot see refusal of service to them as anything but discrimination.
On the other hand, I have no idea where that murder scenario came from, or what you’re trying to say with it. I have no idea how it connects to what I was talking about. The two scenarios are not analogous. Not even in concept.
Though it does seem to show a lot about your way of thinking. Murder is a crime, having a disagreeable opinion is not, and it should not be. At least that’s the rational way to think about it. But the way you compare someone with a “wrong opinion” to someone “about to open fire on a crowd of people“ seems to suggest that you think “bad” opinions should be criminal offenses, and not only that, but people should have the right to make judgement on these “wrong-thinkers” and preferably take action against them.
On a completely unrelated note: I don’t suppose you were one of those people who thought, the guy who punched Spencer in the face was in the right.
As for whether or not businesses have the right to break laws? I really hope you are joking. Also, where did that question even come from? What is its relevance?
Very cool Merriam-Webster,very cool.
how do you pronounce it?
Yo thats cool as heck
RIP Merriam-Webster as well, I guess.
The fact that there are people who cheer this on, and support this bastardization of the language is pretty fucking scary.
Lemme translate: “I hate when language evolves like it always has to accommodate the changes happening in the world.”
Do you have no concept on how language works, changes and words are created to suit peoples needs? Or do you just not care cause you’re one of those assbackwards bisexuals that shit on part of the queer community [i.e. the nonbinary part]
Oh, sure. Just go ahead and assume my opinions for me, please. Thank god there’s someone here to misinterpret my thoughts.
How exactly does this improve the English language? What linguistic need does it fill? How is ‘Mx’ better than it’s original alternatives? This honestly just sounds like the same kind of crap they did with ‘latinx’. The other pointless addition/replacement to an already fully functional language.
Also, I do not care about the “queer community” one way or another. What I care about is that people get the same treatment regardless of their personal preferences. Language is a separate issue altogether.
It fits the need of non-binary individuals who don’t fall into the category of Ms. or Mr. same goes for Latinx.
You’re talking about the bastardization of a language that has ALWAYS been a combination of other languages and is made up itself??
There seems to be a flaw in your reasoning. Mr, Ms, and Mrs, do not refer to an individual’s gender, but their sex (and I’m even using the “progressive” usage of the term gender here, as in not synonymous with sex).
So whether or not someone is non-binary has no bearing on the terms used to refer to them. This is the same issue as it is with pronouns. He and she don’t denote ‘gender’, they refer to sex.
There seems to be a flaw in your reasoning. Mr, Ms, and Mrs, do not refer to an individual’s gender, but their sex
WRONG:
Keep reading
“It can go both ways, so technically it’s correct, but you’re still wrong.” Of course; I’m sure that’s how that works.
Actually my argument is correct, and you prove it yourself, with those definitions. Man and women, in this context refer to male and female, much like boy and girl, guy and gal, or what have you. Because man and woman DO denote sex, as when these terms were originally defined, the concept of the modern day “gender” did not exist, so they cannot refer to it.
These words came into being when gender was just a synonym of sex, not this separate, vague, nebulous term that it is nowadays.
They are also “religious” people who ignore the part of the Bible when Jesus said to take in the needy…
Refugees: Can we live here
White people all across Europe: Sure!
Refugees: Sexual assault is going to skyrocket
WP: Wait
Refugees: You won’t be able to go to certain areas in your home country without being assaulted
WP: But..
Refugees: Sharia law will be enforced
WP: Can we stop….
Refugees: Huge crime jump incoming
WP: I didn’t mean…
Refugees: Terrorism incoming
WP: Aight you know what get out
Refugees: FUCKING RACISTS HAVE A HEART
