under construction

please be patient i need a lil space // 00z liner

[ji-lixie]

🍊 hello! i’m daisy! i’m a ‘00 liner, a gemini and my pronouns are she/her

🎃  this is where i yell about 90% stupid feelings and 10% cute kpop men. sometimes i gif things too. please don’t repost my gifs.

🍂 my number one ult group is shinee! my other big groups are treasure, stray kids, and seventeen but i’m a shawol before i am a person tbh

🐹 sometimes my existence is spotty here and its very much from untreated mental illness. please be patient with me.

🧡 please know if we're moots and i ever break it via an unfollow it literally means nothing aside from our interests differing. hard blocks mean something, unfollows don't

[lgbtqiauserboxes]

[herewegobebe]

Jonghyun & Roo Back In her papa's arms again 💞💞💞

[shineemoon]

[shineemoon]

swimming_roo: 2010.3.5 - 2025.8.28 루야 그동안 함께해 줘서 고마웠어😊 덕분에 많이 웃었고 힘낼 수 있었어 그곳에서 평안하길 바라🙏 엄마랑 나랑 언제나 지켜봐 줄꺼지? 언제나 사랑해💚🩵💜 그리고 벌써 보고싶다…. Roo, thank you for being with us all this time😊 Because of you, we laughed a lot and could stay strong I hope you find peace there🙏 You’ll always watch over Mom and me, right? We’ll always love you💚🩵💜 I already miss you…. ©

[ji-lixie]

ok thats enough feminism posting for rn

[prof-grace-aspen]

Intersectionality doesn't mean "I'm x and y which means I'm more oppressed than you"

It means "what I am cannot be fully explained by describing me as only x OR as only y"

To use the original thesis by Kimberlé Crenshaw: a black woman is not just a woman, and she is not just black. The struggles she faces are unique due to the intersection of these identities.

In her example, a company was accused of discrimination against a black woman. The company's defense was that it hired black men, and white women. If you classified her as black, there was no discrimination because other black people worked there. If you classified her as a woman, again there was no discrimination because women worked there. But she was a black woman. And that made all the difference.

[carapaced]

people on here will really say “cis men created the patriarchy and are wholly responsible for perpetuating it” as if we don’t all have a responsibility from being raised under patriarchal thinking to unpack how we might be unconsciously promoting those beliefs in our everyday lives, and as if women aren’t just as responsible for spreading patriarchal values as men.

Im thinking of ‘boy moms’ excusing their son’s negative behaviors and favoring them, or moms who get upset with their male children for expressing femininity because they are terrified to have a queer son (importantly a son that is perceived by others to be queer). I think of tradwife influencers that spout bioessentialist rhetoric such as the divine feminine and fated role of women as mothers and homemakers, or the mothers who teach their daughters how to endure abuse by saying “oh he’s only teasing you/hurting you because he likes you” or telling them to “cover up” around their male family members.

I’m also thinking of some of the self named feminists on tumblr who genuinely believe the rhetoric that all women are fragile broken victims and all men are violent predatory aggressors and think this is progressive or promoting feminist values, when really it’s just repackaged misogyny and more of that same bioessentialism that the literal tradwives agree with.

we are all responsible for unlearning patriarchy and consciously choosing feminism instead

[genderqueerdykes]

you don't believe in intersectional anything if you believe the parts that overlap between different experiences and identities are hard barriers that cannot ever be crossed or communicated through. it's an open field, not a brick wall.

[prof-grace-aspen]

I'm going to say it again:

"Men are dangerous" is 100% patriarchal rhetoric.

The patriarchy does everything it can to train men to be dangerous. It creates a toxic version of masculinity that only profits and privileges men who choose to be dangerous. It does everything it can to put men into positions where they can be dangerous.

Which means that danger is artificially constructed.

Men are not dangerous because they're male. Men are not dangerous because they're masculine. Masculinity and manhood are not dangerous things.

The dangerous version of masculinity sold by the patriarchy is a social construct that can, in fact, be opted out of. Men and masculine people can construct a masculinity that is not toxic, that does not promote violence, that is centered around healthy relationships and communication and helping others.

Building a healthy, vibrant vision of masculinity is absolutely a part of feminism. I'm not saying it needs to be done by women - do not twist this into a claim that I'm attempting to burden women with remaking masculinity. Men can be feminists. Men who are feminists are eager and willing and actively taking part in the act of ripping masculinity away from the patriarchy and reforming it into something new.

[ftmtftm]

Radical Feminism is foundationally dogshit theory regardless of who is vomiting it out! Any theory whose foundational core encourages in group/out group dynamics is dangerous!

A Radical Feminist and a feminist who has radical politics are two different things.

One is someone who engages with a distinct political ideology that has a 50 year long history that is rooted in bioessentialism and is foundationally tied to genocidal politics (yes the SCUM Manifesto was the inspiration for the original Radical Feminist Manifesto this is an indisputable, verifiable fact about Valerie Solanas and Ti-Grace Atkinson and the political formation of Radfem politics). It cannot be meaningfully salvaged if you truly want to engage in liberation focused politics.

The other could literally mean a feminist with any kind of politically radical leaning, like a Decolonialist Feminist or a Communist Feminist or an Anarcha-feminist.

There are so many schools of Feminist thought — stop limiting yourselves to literally one of the most politically destructive branches of the philosophy outside of Liberal / pop culture Feminism. Especially because Radical Feminism will lie and try to convince you it's the only option in opposition to Liberal Feminism when it's objectively not. You can be a politically radical feminist without being a Radical Feminist — and you should be.

[genderqueerdykes]

it actually blows my mind that tons of queer people seriously think that viewing women as inherently weak, scared, pathetic, incapable of holding power, and defenseless is feminist and progressive. how on god's green earth does it empower women at all to tell other women that they're just inherently weaker than men, need to be scared of men, that no matter what women can't hurt or abuse them, are always prey and never predators, have no autonomy, that women are literally incapable of holding positions of power over others, that women who abuse others are just "traumatized by patriarchy," or any of this nonsense?

this is misogyny for the sake of making men look bad. that's not empowering at all. regardless of the "men evil woman good" narrative you're trying to spin, it's still reinforcing that women are weak, pathetic, stupid, defenseless babies who can't ever do harm or protect themselves. the reason for reinforcing it does not matter: it's still misogyny. you are still acting with hatred for women. you still have patriarchal views of womanhood you need to abandon. how is telling women that they're inherently weaker than men progressive?

how is any of this feminist? this is literally just misogyny. you can't take misogyny and slap a new coat of paint on it and call it progressive. if you think this way, you have been suckered into hating women whether or not you realize it. you can't blame every shitty thing a woman does on trauma from cisheteronormative patriarchy. you're removing the autonomy from womanhood altogether. what you're saying is that women aren't responsible for their actions because they're too scared and and can't think critically because of how "scared" they are. what, you think women just can't take accountability because we're too dumb and pathetic and useless...? because that's what it sounds like.

you're telling women we're brainless and shouldn't think for themselves. stop calling yourself progressive if you promote the idea that women shouldn't think for themselves, but rather listen to you, instead, to make their decisions for them. stop proudly being a misogynist for the sake of trying to make men look bad. telling women that they're too stupid to be able to tell a genuine threat from a guy just standing there is misogynistic as fuck. this isn't liberating women. it's not liberating ANYONE

[prof-grace-aspen]

Feminism isn't "Women vs Men"

Feminism is "Us vs The Patriarchy"

And "Us" includes everyone.

[ftmtftm]

Radical Feminist theory has no home in Intersectional theory. Radical Feminism is practically innately antithetical to Intersectional Feminism. The ideas and criticism that would create the framework of Intersectional Feminism pre-Kimberlé Crenshaw came to be as a near direct result of questioning Radical Feminist practices and ideology.

Audre Lorde, bell hooks, Angela Y. Davis, Judith Butler, Leslie Feinberg, all wrote/have written in ways that challenge and defy the core principles of Radical Feminist dogma. Kimberlé Crenshaw created terminology, Intersectionality, that ended up enveloping it all. People like Patricia Hill Collins, Mikki Kendall, Roxane Gay, Kate Bornstein, Leah Thomas, and Emi Koyama continue to write in ways that challenge Radical Feminist ideology - half the time purely by the nature of their framework.

You don't need Radical Feminism. Radical Feminism is not your friend. It will never be your friend. There is better Feminism out there - I promise you.

[minimosquitogirl-deactivated202]

i’m so tired of white feminism. us woc point out the eugenics undertones in the sydney sweeney ad and the conservative reaction towards to it (celebrating the superiority of white blonde blue eyed women and how they’re “finally taking America back!”) — and white women respond by degrading and silencing us, telling us we’re just ugly and jealous of her “great genes” and “what happened to girls support girls?” white supremacy is becoming more and more accepted in our culture and I mean this as someone with other privileged identifiers— the first step to recognizing your privilege is realizing that it’s not about your comfort or feelings. the biggest issue is not marginalized women resenting white blonde women for defending the status quo, for using their ideal femininity to their advantage during a period or growing fascism. i’m so tired of white feminism, i’m so tired of the idea that white blonde women like Sabrina Carpenter or Barbie (2023) championing their traditional femininity is the most subversive feminist idea. but most of all, I am so, so tired of white women silencing us woc and degrading us for our different analyses and perspectives. the blatant disrespect I’ve seen white women leverage towards woc in this Sydney sweeney situation alone— telling us to “sit down and listen,” that this is our fault because we asked for too much, that we’re just “ugly” and “jealous”— is appalling. you have no right to exercise authority over us.

[oncelerfucker]

There's a lot of radical feminist thought brewing in trans circles on this forsaken website and none of you are inoculated against it because radfems have been infiltrating queer spaces here for over the last decade and now you don't know how to recognize radfem thought without overt transphobia.

You think feminism is when women create a feedback loop to justify acting within their fear and trauma responses (which is literally the line of thought that founded radical feminism btw) instead of viewing it as a political movement with several different schools of thought and several connections to and solidarity with other liberation movements.

Take 10 minutes to read There Is No Hierarchy Of Oppression by Audre Lorde [ here ] and truly think about what solidarity in action actually looks like. I'm begging you.

"I simply do not believe that one aspect of myself can possibly profit from the oppression of any other part of my identity. I know that my people cannot possibly profit from the oppression of any other group which seeks the right to peaceful existence. Rather, we diminish ourselves by denying to others what we have shed blood to obtain for our children. And those children need to learn that they do not have to become like each other in order to work together for a future they will all share." - Audre Lorde

[cinnayanny]

Here's why women should be allowed to have woman-only spa-

DELETE YOUR REBLOG

Do you see how easy it is to fall for radical feminism?

Because it is WAY easier than anyone wants to admit.

Radical feminism isn't bad because it's transphobic, or the radfem treats trans women as men. It's bad because they treat men as an inherent evil that cannot be fixed outside eradication.

Early feminism was about how women should have the right to exist in the same spaces as men without risk, why do you want there to suddenly be segregation again?

It's all gender essentialism and an inability to actually fix the core problem. We can demand that society does better in getting rid of abusers but we cannot say that "abuser = man".

Radfems think that transandrophobia isn't real and use mocking terms for it.

Radfems think that a woman is uniquely incapable of being an abuser.

Radfems will doubt a man's ability to control his sexual urges.

Radfems will state that a man's romantic attraction are different from a woman's.

Radfems try to act like sex is a binary and intersex people should just "pick a sex".

Radfems think that the mutilation of intersex people at birth should happen under some circumstance.

Radfems say "cis people can get hormone blockers" as a way to erase intersex people.

Radfems don't believe in nonbinary people if they're AFAB, and if a nonbinary person dare present masc then clearly they're a man.

Radfems believe AFAB nonbinary people are just playing a funny pronoun game

Radfems will ignore WOC

Radfems will see a WOC not fitting the White Woman Beauty Standard, and then treat her as subhuman and evil

Radfems will see a MOC and start throwing slurs such as the n-word because the target is a man

And if you agree with any of those, even performativity, I will call you a radfem. I don't care if you don't think of yourself as one, you are.