Botticelli Babe @jynkiess - Tumblr Blog

snoopy of the day

when your only contribution to a fandom is to write rarepair fanfic that caters to your own incredibly specific tastes

#Writing LuNish fics #Not that there's that many Nish/Gian fics either maybe like 40' or so of those #But there's fewer LuNish fics and I exist to fill that void #Maybe not well but I do it anyway #For myself mostly lol

sailor-slam-dunk

no offense but how come none of y’all can just like or dislike something normally. it’s always gotta be “this is literally fucking flawless and pure” or “this is shit and you’re an immoral person for liking it” it’s so. Uncomfortable

margotsrobbie-deactivated202402

I’ll set them on one another like starving rats in a cage. Margot Robbie as Annie in Terminal (2018)

retquits

artistic rendition of how my cat fell asleep this morning

peasant-player

Ungoliant

Primeval devourer of light

#!!!!!#Oh gorge!!

lemonomelette

Feanorian lineups are apparently a rite of passage for silm artists, so I wanted to include Feanor and Nerdanel but they're on honeymoon.

lemonomelette

some close-ups because I spent so much time looking at them so you have to as well:

anyway I make caranthir wear an absurd amount of gold because I think he has that Rich Person™ obsession with coating everything in glit to a garish degree.

#OHOHOOOO #I love it!!

monstermonger

He's worried about stepping on flowers. He loves nature. - (ref)

kate-komics

The current random brain worm is if Logan found an abandoned fawn in the woods and just raised it and named him Sue like the Johnny Cash song… i’ve been making it my warm ups.

And like what if I made a whole story about that instead of his man pain? Fucking what then??

#And if I said I love this and am gonna think about it forever?

yuujies

KIKI’S DELIVERY SERVICE (1989) • dir. Hayao Miyazaki

wardengrill

Misfortunes, we are told, have been sent to test our fortitude | Pride and Prejudice (1995)

soqqart

besties

#Nightcrawler #OOooo love it!!

I have IWTV/TVL blacklisted right now to avoid spoilers so I have no idea what the general consensus is, but I’m really mentally hung up on thinking about the differences between how Lestat recalled the seance vs how Louis would recall the seance vs what actually happened at the seance, because I don’t buy all of that. Early on, in Lestat’s admitted guesstimate of the first conversation between Louis and Malloy, we see Lestat imagine that, out of every critique and criticism he wrote, Malloy discovers and comments on the ‘NEVER HAPPENED’ page in the book, then he claims during the seance Claudia randomly, unprompted, also brings up the same event? Out of everything else? I don’t believe that.

I can see Claudia being upset that the two people who are responsible for basically every bad thing that ever happened to her held a seance not to apologize or anything like that but just to get closure for themselves, but I can’t see why she would think to bring up the one thing that Lestat seems so stuck on claiming didn’t happen, the thing we’ve already seen him completely imagine another character bringing up when he has no proof they did, the one thing out of everything he’s done that he seems to crave most to alter and have people acknowledge as false. I just don’t buy it. I don’t see Claudia taking time during her brief trip in the living world to patch a hole in Louis and Lestat’s relationship by absolving Lestat of something she said he did, but I do buy that Lestat would claim that happened to anyone listening to these recordings, even if Louis is the intended/a potential listener, because this is the lie he seems obsessed with convincing people is true. I think Louis is an unreliable narrator because he’s genuinely misremembering things that happened either because of his trauma or his personal biases, but I think Lestat is an unreliable narrator because he’s just a plain, old, regular, run-of-the-mill liar.