Kiana Khansmith
taylor price
Claire Keane
oozey mess
Today's Document
almost home
The Stonewall Inn
icyghini twinkie
Show & Tell
RMH
★
roma★
No title available
Not today Justin
Mike Driver
The Bowery Presents
Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Origami Around
Fai_Ryy
Monterey Bay Aquarium
seen from Australia
seen from Australia
seen from Germany
seen from Russia
seen from Colombia
seen from Tunisia
seen from Italy
seen from Uruguay
seen from United States
seen from Luxembourg
seen from Switzerland
seen from Iraq
seen from Iraq
seen from Malaysia
seen from Venezuela
seen from Chile
seen from Costa Rica
seen from United States
seen from Ecuador
seen from Russia
@kd-heart
I'm pretty sure I made a post with where else you can find me, last time tumblr was burning. It's fine. I'm not going anywhere.
But if you're looking for me elsewhere:
AO3 (fic, podfic, art, recipes)
dreamwidth
pillowfort
deviantArt
Could stare into those things all damn day…
bell mare - david crawford
@elodieunderglass
Awww! Thank you! I thought she'd like to have a jingle baby
trvth nuke
[Image ID: Tweet from Jared Hender... (@/ jHenderso...) reading: Most of the time when people say 'performative,' they just mean 'phony.' It's a shame, because 'phony' is a much better insult and is free from a pseudo-academic veneer. /End ID]
hare riding a hound with a trained snail of prey
Pontifical of Guillaume Durand, Avignon, before 1390
Paris, Bibliothèque Sainte-Geneviève, ms. 143, fol. 165r
Has anybody made this joke yet
A Psalm for the Wild-Built.
(I think we need something summery and positive. I’d highly recommend Becky Chamber’s Monk & Robot series of books; a solarpunk dream with a healthy mix of philosophical journeys.)
Iron lung was good btw
maybe I’m too old but I’ll never understand “racist dni, transphobe dni, homophobe dni” not because I condone the harmful beliefs these people hold but because I don’t think the majority of people who are racist or transphobic or homophobic identify themselves as those things. like, to them they most certainly genuinely don’t see themselves as those things. so they’re not gonna read your dnis and think “oh dear! I have to click away from this blog immediately! phew 😮💨 almost interact with them accidentally offend the op there!”
on the contrary, you are displaying the things that can hurt or upset or trigger you to strangers on the internet just for what? an extra performative point? obviously I’m not gonna judge people who have these dnis on their blogs because it’s their blogs and what they do is not my business. so I apologize if this post sounds like I am being rude or judgmental or aggressive — sometimes I do have bitchy opinions on the concepts of Things people do, but not about the people who choose to do them. but yeah tbh I really think these dnis are about as useful as putting a “do not rob” sign in front of a bank or a “thief and intruder dni” sign in front of a house.
*I get wanting to take a stand. but I still don’t think it’s gonna achieve anything, which is just my personal opinion. you do you
what is your minimum criteria for considering something canon?
when it appears on screen
when it’s filmed, even if it doesn’t air
when it’s in the script, even if it’s not filmed
when it’s documented in an official show bible
when the show runner shares the backstory / details
when an actor/writer shares the backstory / details
other (in tags/comments)
GINA BELLMAN as SOPHIE DEVEREAUX LEVERAGE (2008–2012) S02E06 · “The Top Hat Job”
OCTAVIA SPENCER & HANNAH WADDINGHAM in RIDE OR DIE (Season 1)
Suddenly struck with a need to explain to you how boat pronouns work (I work in the marine industry).
When you're talking about the design of the boat, you say "it".
When the boat is still being built, your say "it".
When the boat is nearing completion, you can say "it" or "she".
When the boat is floating in the water you probably say "she", unless there is still a lot of work to be done (e.g. no engine yet) then you say "it".
When the boat is officially launched and operating, you say "she". If you continue to say "it" at this point you are not incorrect but suspiciously untraditional. You are not playing the game.
If you are referring to a boat you don't really know anything about you may say "it" ("there's a big boat, it's coming this way"). But if you know its name, it's probably "she" ("there's the Waverley, she's on her way to Greenock").
If you are talking about boats in general, you say "it" ("when a boat is hit by a wave it heels over")
If you speak about a boat in complimentary terms, it's "she" ("she's a grand boat"). If you are being disparaging it may be it, but not necessarily ("it's as ugly as sin", "she's a grotty old tub").
If she has a boy's name, she's still she. "Boy James", "King Edward", "Sir David Attenborough"? The pronoun is she.
If it's a dumb barge (no engine), you say it. But if it's a rowing boat (no engine), you say she.
I hope this has cleared things up so that you may not be in danger of misgendering floating objects.
Hit "view post" and lost it
One of my favourite Leverage tropes is when some goons are threatening a member of the team and Eliot just comes out of nowhere from off screen or around a corner, sometimes even when he wasn't anywhere nearby in the previous scene, as if he was summoned like a pokemon coming out of a pokeball. Eliot I choose you.
A daily game that challenges our understanding of human cultures. Ten objects. 5,000 years of human history. Guess where and when each artif
An interesting game where you are presented with 10 artifacts from the MET. You have to place where the artifact is from and what time period it is from. Each artifact scores up to 10,000 points, and you lose points the further away your guess is and how far off in time you are. You can only play once a day. Thanks to @baebeylik for showing this to me.
Today I scored really well. Yesterday ... not so much.
Anthropeum.com · Jun 8 2026 🟩🟦🟦🟩🟩🟩🟥🟦🟦🟩 79,001 · top 3% of players today!
oh this is extremely fun. i did NOT do all that well but i can see myself getting good. i will be doing this regularly.
Anthropeum.com · Jun 8 2026 🟩🟦🟦🟨🟨🟦🟥🟩🟩🟦 68,088 · top 12% of players today!
Anthropeum.com · Jun 9 2026
🟦🟩🟩🟦🟦🟨🟩🟩🟦🟨
77,134 · top 9% of players, baby!
Anthropeum.com · Jun 10 2026 🟦🟦🟨🟩🟨🟨🟦🟩🟩🟦 77,633 · top 8% of players today!
Anthropeum.com · Jun 10 2026
🟦🟩🟩🟨🟨🟩🟦🟩🟥🟦
71,899 · top 21% of players today!
In my defense that red one is where I accidentally flicked the map marker to the wrong side of the planet
Something I really struggle to get people to understand is that like. Sometimes there was no intentional homoerotic subtext, the author was just extremely misogynistic. Sometimes the author wasn't "secretly shipping" those two men, the author literally just hates women so much that they see them as being literally incapable of relationships with depth. Like this is kind of a big thing with misogyny actually. A lot of extremely misogynistic people truly believe that a man can only have meaningful and complex relationships with other men because they literally just think women are so inferior they only exist to birth children and clean the house. It's like when people say along the lines of "no one worships exclusively men quite like straight men do". It's just that phenomenon actually. That happens to be manifesting in a raging misogynist's writing. Writing a man character who literally only puts effort into his friendships with other men while completely ignoring his literal girlfriend or wife is actually an extremely straight thing to write. And that doesn't mean you can't ship those men or that there are no stories with actual intentional homoerotic subtext. I just think it's important to be able to recognize extreme misogyny in writing and acknowledge it without brushing it off and assuming good intentions when literally all evidence is screaming that this was a misogynistic writing choice and not a representing gay men choice.
