Misplaced Lens Cap

Product Placement
official daine visual archive
No title available
Jules of Nature

Love Begins

@theartofmadeline
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
almost home
todays bird
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Monterey Bay Aquarium
d e v o n

blake kathryn
we're not kids anymore.
tumblr dot com
Game of Thrones Daily
Noah Kahan
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

roma★

seen from Germany
seen from Morocco

seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from Italy

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye

seen from Japan

seen from Malaysia

seen from Thailand

seen from New Zealand

seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malta
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Japan
@kimmruth
I try to avoid political rants on Facebook, as many of you do. But this is an exception. One I feel pretty passionate about. Not only does providing low cost, and sometimes free birth control to young women reduce the amount of unwanted births, it also teaches them about being a responsible adult. It is naive to think that young women aren't going to have sex, be them my age or younger. Making birth control expensive and in turn inaccessible isn't going to make girls stop having sex. That is an ignorant claim. A dangerous one, in fact. Further, providing birth control for women doesn't make them promiscuous. That's a fallacious argument. If your position on birth control is rooted in religious faith, fine. Don't get your daughter birth control; don't get yourself birth control. That is your choice. However, that argument shouldn't have a place in government decisions. We aren't all religious. We don't all hold the same beliefs. That's one of the great things about America. The law that was put in place that provided young women with low cost contraception in Colorado reduced teen pregnancy by 40% in five years...just in case you missed that part. That's significant. That means the number of teenagers who were sexually active and didn't get pregnant was drastically reduced as a result. And that means unwanted babies weren't created. Logically speaking, in turn, this probably reduced the amount of abortions. Republicans want abortion to be illegal. They want to make birth control nearly impossible to access. They can't have it both ways. Once again, it is NAIVE to think young women won't be sexually active just because you don't want them to be. If you want less abortions, less unwanted babies, taking away low cost birth control isn't the answer. Sex is part of life, whether one is poor, rich, educated, uneducated, young or old. It may terrify parents that their teens are having sex, and that fear is completely justified. But ultimately, it's inevitable. Wouldn't you rather your child be protected? Furthermore, arguing that you simply shouldn't have sex if you can't afford birth control is ludicrous. Again, sex is part of life. A healthy part of life. It has been forever. That isn't going to change. As a young women who has been able to access affordable birth control, I know I've avoided bringing a child into this world I wasn't ready for. Instead of deeming sex a promiscuous, filthy act, which by the way, it isn't, educate your children on the risks and benefits. If your child comes to you with questions, answer them. I was lucky enough to have a mother that provided me information and a listening ear. This alone saved me from making a mistake. Try communication. Your child will likely surprise you. If they still make the choice to have sex, help protect them. Birth control is not a bad thing, America. It's precisely the opposite.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/colorado-gop-blocks-successful-birth-control-program
Shoes
They’ve walked hundreds of miles.
Dirty, tattered,
A tattoo ink stain on one front.
Stained with the elegant, archaic atmospheres
Of both London and Paris.
Worn from the rowdiness of many mosh pits;
She always dances hard in them.
Wet from rain in Versailles,
Faded from the sun in Leipzig –
They walked the streets that Bach once did.
They’ve danced along the river Seine and the Thames,
Shopped in Camden Town, and Brick Lane.
They’ve met Dessa and Sims and Nick Diener,
Kris Roe, and P.O.S and famous anthropologists.
They’ve seen Cannon Beach, and Lake Michigan,
Chicago and the Rocky Mountains.
Where she goes, they go.
Dependable, comfortable.
Fitted to her feet.
Mercy
A shadow leans heavy on nostalgia,
Against the doorway,
Weighted by her heavy key
That unlocks the door to my dreams.
She often comes home late,
But at least always fashionably.
People are good;
But ghosts are better –
Especially in intimate moments.
She tip-toes towards the window,
And drapes a garland made of music
Around the panes.
A gentle reminder of our past.
She’s both lovely and tired,
But there’s no need to speak.
If I could, I’d stitch her ghost parts,
Her shadow back together.
I’d paint her face, stitch her smile.
I’d go back in time,
Change her fate.
Because I can’t,
I’ll settle for these few brief moments.
At the very edges of my sleep
She finally notices me,
Patiently waiting for the dark to become to light.
“Hello my dear, sweet friend.
I’ve missed you,” she says.
It’s in these words
Each time she comes to visit
I start to wake and her smile slowly fades.
Without sleep her memory,
In its infinite supply of comfort
Keeps me fighting to fall back asleep.
I woke up this morning to immediate thoughts of you. Right on cue, the lingering pain in the pit of my stomach took its toll, forcing me to remember that once again, this wasn’t a dream. I think to myself everyday, this isn’t the way it was supposed to be. You won’t supposed to leave so soon, but then again, I don’t believe in meant to be. And this is when I find myself wrapped up in memories that hit me like tidal waves; they never stop.
I wish I could talk to you. I don’t long for reassurance of any sort; I don’t miss you because you were good at listening to my bitching. While your advice was always sound, it isn’t what I seek late at night when my brain won’t let me sleep. I would be content sitting in silence, or even the exact opposite. Every song reminds me of you. Moments spent with you never needed to be filled with conversation; I never needed to pretend to keep from feeling uncomfortable. With you, I could always just be. That’s what I miss.
But like many after death, I don't have to settle for memories that get lost in the creases of my mind. I don't have to rely on pictures to tell me stories. I get your family, all the best pieces of you. For that I am grateful.
Today was set aside for you. Today you will be remembered in the brightest and biggest of fashions. Today we will celebrate you with permanent memories, and live music. This is the only way I know how to carry my favorite parts of you, to share with the world my best friend. So with your brother and sister I will go get tattoos and see Yellowcard. Wishing the whole time you were here.
C.B.F.F.
There are no words that could possibly describe the wonderful beauty that is my best friend. There seems to be no possible way to say goodbye to the woman that shared half my life, and was my safe place when I had nowhere else to turn. But I don't know where else to pour my grief, or love.
I haven't been able to catch my breath. Every time I close my eyes, I see you. If I listen really hard, I can hear your steady voice assuring me that everything will be okay. But I haven't stopped crying, and I only feel broken. Conversations spent discussing not knowing what would happen if one of us lost the other have become a crushing reality. I wish I could wake up from this place.
Twelve years you've been my best friend, the one who understood my heart best. Twelve years we've spent sharing music, laughter, tears, heartbreaks, dreams, fears, love, hate, and everything else in between. You know me better than I know myself and I don't know what I'm going to do without your guidance, and advice.
This isn't enough. No words ever could be. But here is my promise to you, my dear, sweet, beautiful best friend:
I promise to take you with me everywhere I go. Every adventure I take, I will take with you.
I promise to tell your June all about your free spirit, your passion for music, your love for your family and friends. I will help your Adam and family take care of her in any way that I can.
I promise to remember you in the utmost of fashions, and tell anyone who will listen about my best friend. Because no one has touched my life quite the way that you have; no one has ever understood me and accepted me wholeheartedly the way that you have. I will live the rest of my days in honor of you. I will make you proud.
Here's to you, best friend.
I love you so very, very much.
Waffengewalt
I realize everyone is entitled to their own opinions. I also realize that many, many people in this country disagree with my position on the following topic. But having struggled to make my points known in recent conversations, I felt it necessary to write this.
Before I begin, I should clarify that when I say "mentally ill," I mean those that have a history of violent behavior or thoughts that could potentially bring harm to themselves or others.
I am not against Americans owning guns.
I am not against the rights that the Second Amendment provides Americans.
What I am against is children having access to guns. I am against those who are mentally ill having access to guns. I am against letting those who cannot be responsible gun owners, having guns...the irresponsible being those who allow their guns to end up in the hands of their children, and others who shouldn't have access to them. I am against innocent children, teachers, parents, siblings, friends, and American citizens dying because there isn't proper gun regulation in our country.
If one believes there is not a problem with gun violence in America, they are wrong. "Since 1982, there have been at least 62 mass shootings across the country, with the killings unfolding in 30 states from Massachusetts to Hawaii. Twenty-five of these mass shootings have occurred since 2006, and seven of them took place in 2012;" there have been 5 thus far in 2013 (Follman et al). One of the more troubling aspects of these shootings is that many of the perpetrators had mental illnesses. Some of these individuals even displayed signs of mental illness before committing their terrible acts. Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook Elementary shooter, and James Holmes, the Aurora Theater shooter are two excellent examples of this.
On December 14th, 2012, Adam Lanza entered an elementary school and murdered 26 children and 6 adults. Years prior to this mass shooting, Lanza displayed signs that he was mentally ill but his mother, who is also the person who provided him with the many firearms he used to murder, ignored them. In his room, police found articles about mass shootings; graphic photos of dead people and children holding weapons; a spread sheet that was so detailed in its comparison of body counts and weapons used at so many mass shootings that it had to have taken years to compile. Friends of Lanza's mother stated they had been told by his mother that he was using lighters to burn himself. Yet, the warning signs were ignored and she continued to buy guns, provide teach him how to use them, seemingly without explaining potential consequences of gun, and providing him access to all the guns she owned (Saletan, 2013). Considering the fact that 26 innocent, elementary aged school children died as a result of not only Lanza's actions, but also his mother's, this is perhaps the worst example of a mass shooting resulting from a person's mental illness in the last decade.
On July 20th, James Holmes killed 12 people and injured 70 others inside a Colorado movie theater. A month before this, a psychiatrist met with Holmes and has testified that she had concerns about Holmes' mental state and even went as far as contacting campus police. He admitted to her that he was fantasizing about "killing a lot of people" and despite knowing this, neither the psychiatrist, nor the campus police did anything about it. They also didn't report it to the Aurora police which is perhaps something they should have done, since he lived in Aurora (Saletan). Furthermore, Holmes is now on trial, and has entered a not guilty plea by reason of insanity. It is now the defense attorney's job to prove that Holmes shot and murdered dozens of people because he is severely mentally ill.
Mental illness is real, and something that that should be take very seriously. Stigma surrounding mental illness has existed for centuries. It is time America, and the world for that matter, takes it seriously. When mental illness is mixed with guns, death is imminent. To not see the correlation between these two things, is to ignore facts. If steps to help mental illness are not taken, but rather, we allow guns to be purchased by anyone, anywhere, through any means, at any time, these mass shootings WILL NOT STOP.
On another note, children seem to be dying more and more because they have access to guns. Without even looking at school shootings as an example, there have been many preventable deaths and injuries due to guns, that were committed against, and by young children. Some of these were accidents, yes, but happened because parents weren't behaving responsibly. I know that many parents like to teach their children how to use guns. I am not against this. But if children are going to be around guns, they should absolutely know how to use them properly. They should also be taught about the power guns have and that using guns as a means to threaten someone, or to harm themselves or others is not okay. All that being said though, the human brain doesn't fully develop until one's early to mid 20's. That is, on average, age 23-25. Obviously children can be taught that guns can kill people. But children may not be able to grasp larger concepts behind gun use, such as why it's "okay" to shoot animals while hunting, but isn't okay to shoot the bully in his class. Along with this, comes the concept of death itself. Children aren't necessarily capable of understanding that death means the end, and that when someone dies, they aren't coming back. This is why it is imperative to keep guns away from children.
Furthermore, to compare mass shootings to car accidents, suggests that mass shootings are accidents. They are not. It also suggests that a person taking a gun into a school, movie theater, navy yard, or convenience store with the intent to shoot and kill others is normal. IT ISN'T NORMAL. People are dying because of intentional gun violence. It is so easy to purchase guns. It is easy to purchase ammunition. It is easy in so many places to buy a gun without having to register it, or pass a background check. This puts guns in the hands of people who shouldn't possess them. People who are potentially dangerous, and a threat to society.
Going even further, to compare gun violence to death by golf club, baseball bat, or a car itself, is to commit a logical fallacy. These things are incomparable. Not only that, but more deaths by firearm occur each year than these other weapons, cars being the one exception. And though that is the case currently, a recent study suggests that by 2015, it will no longer be. (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-19/american-gun-deaths-to-exceed-traffic-fatalities-by-2015.html). Not only that, but in many states, including the District of Columbia, this is already true: (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/05/29/1212375/-Most-recent-data-Gun-deaths-outpaced-auto-deaths-in-12-states).
I would like to reiterate that I am not against a person's right to bear arms. What I am suggesting is that America is turning a blind eye to this issue because we are more concerned with preserving the right to own guns, then even talk about possible ways to reduce gun violence. Our fellow Americans are unnecessarily DYING because no one wants to regulate guns. Now, I understand the opposing argument to gun regulation. The point that I am trying to make though, that our President has tried to make and others who want more gun regulation, is simply that too many guns are killing too many people. The following link to an article compares guns, and cars. What the article proposes makes all too much sense: http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2013/02/learn-lot-comparing-guns-cars.html.
The U.S. Constitution which provides Americans with the right to bear arms was written in the 1700's. During this time, there weren't massive shootings taking place in locations that should be safe. Children weren't shooting their teachers, parents, siblings and peers. Mental illness was something that certainly existed, but something that was ignored, and wasn't something that could be helped like it can now. I am NOT proposing we amend the constitution, and I am certainly NOT suggesting that people no longer be allowed own guns. I am suggesting that creating new laws and regulations that help limit specifically who can have guns, which is most of the American population, will ultimately only benefit American citizens. Implementing laws similar to those that were suggested in the article mentioned above, are not unreasonable.
If you took the time to read this, thank you. Below is a list of links that will take to you to all sources I got my information from.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-19/american-gun-deaths-to-exceed-traffic-fatalities-by-2015.html
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_04_tables.pdf#I01
http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2013/02/learn-lot-comparing-guns-cars.html
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/05/29/1212375/-Most-recent-data-Gun-deaths-outpaced-auto-deaths-in-12-states
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2012/12/19/gun-regulation-phlr-needed/
http://m.soundcloud.com/slate-articles/unfit-to-bear-arms
A Tale of Two Educations
For-profit colleges have become a huge part of America’s education system. They educate a large portion of our college students, but at a steep price. Students are major stakeholders when it comes to higher education; for this reason and many others, some for-profit colleges are a danger to the students of America. In many cases, the money for-profit colleges receive via student’s federal and private loans is not being spent on qualified instructors or educational resources. Instead, for-profit colleges seek to perpetuate their own ill-gotten gains by syphoning a large portion of their profits into hiring elite administrators, and backing likeminded political candidates (Halperin 167). They maintain their profits by promising a time effective and extendable education, with degrees that can be earned more quickly than those at traditional four-year universities and course credits that may be transferred to accredited colleges. In reality, they are preying on vulnerable groups of people, such as veterans attempting to gain relevancy in the job market, and leave their students indebted, with non-transferable credits and no profitable career opportunities. As such, for profit colleges are robbing hopeful individuals of a higher education that provides relevant skills for future intellectual advancement.
Advocates for for-profit colleges suggest that many of these colleges are benefitting students. Some even argue that “they are becoming more like community colleges because of regional accreditation, federal financial aid, and the programs offered” (Schilling 169). As such, many of them use a “customer service model” to target particular sets of students (Schilling 173). In order to serve their customers, for-profit colleges need to know what their “customers” want. That is, students want small classes with accessible teachers, hands on experience, and they want their education to quickly lead to fruitful careers or further education (Schilling 173). While some for-profit colleges believe they serve these requests, this approach does nothing to enhance learning or meet the expectations of employers, despite the considerable amounts of money being paid to for-profit colleges. Treating students as customers doesn’t benefit student learning. Rather this concept strives to give their students what they want regardless of the merit it holds within educational standards and practices.
Despite the fact that these for-profit colleges can provide small class sizes and less time consuming classes, some of these colleges charge their students higher than average tuition prices. Generally, for-profit colleges cost up to five times as much as universities and community colleges (Kirkham 183). In many cases, students need to use federal student aid in order to attend college. Some for-profit institutions cost so much though, that students are forced to find private loans to fund the remainder of their tuition (Kirkham 184). This results in the rapid accumulation of high interest debt before even finishing their first year of school. Upon graduating, students are bound to seek employment, or continue their education at a different institution, but in many cases are left with too much debt as well as un-transferable credits to find relevant positions that they will profit from. We can see this in the following example from Woodruff’s article: Nick Keith attended a for-profit culinary school that admittedly lied to him and others about “the value of the program and the statistics of the number of graduates getting employment in the culinary field.” Unaware of this before attending, Keith obtained a $60,000 private loan. The institute lied to him about the terms of his loan and upon graduating, his first job in his new field only paid him $10 an hour. Unable to make his loan payments, Keith was forced into bankruptcy, a crippled credit rating, cannot go back to school, and lacks the skills necessary for a job that allows him to repay his student loans (151).
In addition to looming amounts of debt, in many situations, credits earned from for-profit colleges won’t always transfer to other colleges, due to accreditation standards. Accreditation is ultimately what signifies whether or not courses that have been taken meet the same standards at both institutions (Marklein 159). If they do not, credits become un-transferable. This becomes a problem when students laboring within an Associate’s program at an unaccredited for-profit institution, attempts to transfer to an accredited program at a university only to discover that they do not meet the minimum requirements for acceptance despite dedicating 2-3 years of their lives to quasi-college level coursework. This can be seen in another student example, this time presented by Marklein: Chelsi Miller attended Everest College, and was told by administration upon enrollment that her credits would transfer to the University of Utah. After completing a degree at Everest College, Miller spoke to the University of Utah about transferring her credits. She was told her credits from Everest College would not transfer to their school, and she was left with a $30,000 student loan, an inadequate associate’s degree and credits that cannot be transferred to advance her education (157). The lines drawn between schools with different accreditations, and those without accreditation are blurry and confusing which is why many students opt to believe they are being told the truth by the institution they enroll at (Marklein 159).
The issue of non-accreditation is compounded by the way that for-profit colleges invest their profits: Advertising, lobbying, political campaign contributions, and public relations. In 2011, the for-profit college industry spent millions on lobbying and public relations, some of which went to backing supporting political candidates in the following year (Halperin 167). Instead, these for-profit colleges should spend profits on restructuring their educational programs to fit certain standards which would allow credits earned from their courses to transfer. Furthermore, providing educational resources, such as reference materials, and qualified teachers, could ultimately benefit their students and course programs. Adjustments such as these, may allow for any degrees earned to be enough to qualify for jobs sought after graduation, even if accreditation standing doesn’t allow their credits to be transferred to a new institution.
We can find further evidence for their disregard for student welfare by examining how some of these institutions target specific groups of people, such as veterans. Within the for-profit sector, there is a law known as the 90/10 law that requires for-profit colleges to acquire a minimum of 10% of their profit from resources other than federal student aid (Kirkham 182). For-profit colleges have found a way around this law by receiving more federal aid that is specifically for veterans. Though this money is still considered federal aid, the funds are not considered to be a part of “federal student aid funds” meaning, for-profit schools can consider it as separate funding (Kirkham 182). Knowing this, these institutions direct their marketing to entice veterans, again making promises of accreditation, and future job opportunities in order to “enroll as many veterans, service members, and family members as possible” (Kirkham 183). This can be appealing to veterans, many of whom are young men and women who skipped college to join the military and, upon coming home, are limited in regards to obtainable careers outside of the military and higher education opportunities.
Though the for-profit education model may seem appealing for many reasons, students can potentially end up spending more for an education at some of these institutions than they would at a community college, or four-year institution. Furthermore, they wouldn’t have the same opportunities the latter would provide. Higher education is important not only because it opens doors to job opportunities one may not be eligible for otherwise, but also because education is the key to understanding the world we live in. Perhaps the key to students avoiding long-term debt, and unrecognized degrees and credits, is to simply research any institution they plan to attend. Learning about their programs, and any benefits these institutions may provide can only help in aiding students make decisions about college. From there, one can decide if attending a particular institution makes sense financially. College is an investment, certainly, but students should demand that the investment they make is met with qualified instructors providing the best education possible. Unfortunately, some for-profit colleges are unable to meet these standards. Until they can meet them, they shouldn’t be allowed to instruct America’s students.
Works Cited
Halperin, David. “Taming the For-Profit College Monster.” Ethics in Higher Education. 1st Edition. Nancy Henke et al. United States of America. Fountainhead Press, 2013. 165-168. Print.
Kirkham, Chris. “Senate Legislation Targets Aggressive Recruiting of Veterans by For-Profit Colleges.” Ethics in Higher Education. 1st Edition. Nancy Henke et al. United States of America. Fountainhead Press, 2013. 181-185. Print.
Marklein, Mary Beth. “For-Profit Colleges Under Fire Over Value, Accreditation.” Ethics in Higher Education. 1st Edition. Nancy Henke et al. United States of America. Fountainhead Press, 2013. 157-164. Print.
Schilling, Joanna. “What’s Money Got to Do with It: The Appeal of the For-Profit Education Model.” Ethics in Higher Education. 1st Edition. Nancy Henke et al. United States of America. Fountainhead Press, 2012. 169-178. Print.
Woodruff, Mandi. “9 Unbelievable Student Loan Horror Stories.” Ethics in Higher Education. 1st Edition. Nancy Henke et al. United States of America. Fountainhead Press, 2013. 145-152. Print.
Love.
As we anxiously await to see if a decision will be made by the Supreme Court in regards to Proposition 8 in California, I can't help but get frustrated at the fact this this is even an issue. I was raised in a family where gay and straight weren't really defined separately, and I was taught to love and accept everyone. Unfortunately, not everyone is capable of those things.
Last night while on Facebook I noticed that many of my friends had changed their profile picture to one that represents equality. I think this is significant because it shows that despite what other people may think, they are supporting equal rights for everyone. They know what's going on, and they are open about supporting the cause. Certainly some may lose "friends" over publicly showing their support, and for believing in something that shouldn't even be questioned in the eyes of the law. We live in America, a country that is supposed to be free, and yet, people with different sexual orientations are still being suppressed. I feel that the issue goes much deeper than changing your Facebook profile picture, and I feel that some support gay marriage because they know its right, but don't fully understand that it shouldn't be gay marriage; it should just be marriage.
Love is something that can't be described in a textbook, or the bible, which is so often used as "evidence" as to why marriage should only be between a man and a woman. Despite the fact that we live in a country that is diverse, and is home to many different kinds of people with different religious backgrounds, we allow Christianity to interfere with lawful decisions. Churches like the Westboro Baptist Church spread their evil hate across the country, and expect us to listen because they are only preaching what god said. And, after all, we are a country full of Christians, right? Deciding whether or not homosexuals should be "allowed" to marry should have nothing to do with god; it should have nothing to do with someone's personal opinion. Unfortunately, our government allows that to happen. Why shouldn't marriage be an institution that is afforded to everyone? Arguments stemmed from faith shouldn't hold ground in our government.
I am disgusted that this country can't move forward. I am disgusted that love that isn't love to someone else can't be recognized because so many of us in this country are hiding behind strayed ideological views. What this issue comes down to is humanity and love. We are all humans. We are all capable of love. There are so many different kinds of love - how can we define marriage based on only one? I grew up knowing no difference between gay relationships and straight ones. My aunt loves her wife just as I love my boyfriend, just as your mother loves your father. Being gay isn't a choice. Being straight isn't a choice. Why should there even be a distinguishable difference?
I love seeing support for equality, and I hope it spreads like wildfire. But when you're talking about this issue to a stranger you meet at a bar, don't forget you posted that equality picture on your Facebook page. Stand up and show support for equality out in the world, instead of just behind your keyboard in the safety of your home.
I will never understand why people put so much effort into caring about other people's lives. I will never understand why people are so hateful, judgmental and afraid of difference. I only hope that in generations to come, this state of mind will slowly cease to exist. I only hope that one day humans can recognize that we are all human, and we all deserve the same rights, no matter our color, cultural background, religion, or sexual orientation.
http://clubsauce.wordpress.com/2013/03/26/when-is-a-meme-just-a-meme-and-when-does-it-have-meaning/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlVBg7_08n0
Though still in bed, my thoughts go out to you, my Immortal Beloved, now and then joyfully, then sadly, waiting to learn whether or not fate will hear us - I can live only wholly with you or not at all - Yes, I am resolved to wander so long away from you until I can fly to your arms and say that I am really at home with you, and can send my soul enwrapped in you into the land of spirits - Yes, unhappily it must be so - You will be the more contained since you know my fidelity to you. No one else can ever possess my heart - never - never - Oh God, why must one be parted from one whom one so loves. And yet my life in V is now a wretched life - Your love makes me at once the happiest and the unhappiest of men - At my age I need a steady, quiet life - can that be so in our connection? My angel, I have just been told that the mailcoach goes every day - therefore I must close at once so that you may receive the letter at once - Be calm, only by a calm consideration of our existence can we achieve our purpose to live together - Be calm - love me - today - yesterday - what tearful longings for you - you - you - my life - my all - farewell. Oh continue to love me - never misjudge the most faithful heart of your beloved. ever thine ever mine ever ours
--Beethoven
Melody. <3