Okay itās not quite an essay, but I wrote most of it when was on mobile and added a bunch just now to streamline/add examples.
The reason genderbend discourse is a thing is because the way cishet people do it is generally transphobic, butĀ itās also a gateway for questioning queer people to enter queer fandom a little more quietly if theyāre not in a safe environment. Thatās part of how it was for me, and part of why I feel so strongly about genderbends being a genre that doesnāt inherently impact trans fandom negatively: genderbends are how a lotĀ of people got into exploring their gender in the first place. Itās a stepping stone for a lot of us.
But hey, letās talk misogyny. Genderbending has a significant history as an entry point for female fans to project wider female presence in fandoms that have a majority male cast.Ā Genderbending BEGAN as a subversive thing: āthis series is almost all male, and I want to see myself in it, so I will change the main character to a woman and explore how that affects the plot and the way the character interacts with the world.ā Female fans got mocked for creating original female characters as much as they did for writing the MC as a woman. Itās a way of taking control of a story that does not have a place for you,Ā which is one of those places where we run intoĀ ārepresentation is important.ā
A decent example of an official production that does this kind of genderbend isĀ āElementary,ā where John Watson is reinterpreted as Joan Watson, a Chinese-American woman. In doing so, the narrative now has a place for women and Chinese-Americans, and anyone who finds it easier to identify with such a character without necessarily sharing the exact same background (e.g. a Korean-Canadian nonbinary person might not share such a background in specifics, but probably has an easier time relating to Joan than they would to white, British, male John of the original).
The problem comes from the fact that⦠well, for one thing, representation isnāt a zero sum game, Ā but it often feels like it is. Elementary havingĀ āJoanā as a character isnāt taking awayĀ representation from trans people by providing it to women, and interpreting it as such just leads to production houses having less room for both, and hopping back over to Straight White Cis Men.
The other problem, of course, is that a lot of genderbend fics, either those by new writers OR those by bigoted writers, tend to be gender essentialist, transphobic, or enforcing a binary. This goes for bothĀ āborn cisswapā fics andĀ āmagical change in biologyā fics. Again, both plots have their place, whether for those who want to process their own experiences of misogyny, andĀ for those exploring their own gender identity, but they are very easy to fuck up.
The way I usually describe it when it comes to fic is like using Tony Stark. In canon, heās in STEM and went to college in the 1980s (at least in the MCU, the decade is different in the comics depending on when the story was written). He is a rich cis white man, so his barrier to entry was much lower than most peopleās, including his own father (who was born to a poor family, likely Jewish immigrants).
Cis man Tony, trans woman Tony, trans man Tony, cis woman Tony, and nb Tony are ALL going to have a different experience based on the world around them and their own identity.Ā
Tony was a public figure from birth, so āpassingā isnāt a thing. Tonyās options are staying in the closet, or being loud and proud.
Meanwhile, thereās a massive bias against women in STEM, one thatās even stronger in the 80s, and while it would apply to every option except cis male Tony, itās going to apply in different ways.
Each gender variant provides a different opportunity for exploration with regards to misogyny, transphobia, and the intersection of the two, and always in different ways.
The story written by a cis woman currently doing her STEM undergrad might be her intentionally projecting onto a character in order to express her frustrations with gender harassment sheās experiencing from male classmates. The trans woman story written by a trans teenager whoās getting the runaround from teachers on whether or not she can report the transphobic harassment from the boys on her robotics team is going to focus on different forms of oppression and microaggressions.
Thereās overlap in the experiences, but both stories perform a vital function for both the writer andĀ readers with similar experiences, and writing the first story with a cis woman Tony does not (inherently) invalidate the existence of trans women like the second author. Itās just an exploration of a different need and experience on the part of the author. ItāsĀ āI want to see myself in this character I love, a character that was not made with an audience like myself in mindā for different people, and the fandom at large wants neither of them.
But as mentioned, a lot of people DONāT approach it that way, and it ends up transphobic, even if the intent was, say, exploration of gender and power dynamics in a heavily misogynistic industry. What you end up with is a lot of people whose first association with the CONCEPT of genderbending is āthat transphobic/gender essentialist thing that hurt me.ā In many cases, even well-done explorations of the concept by queer authors are triggering just due to the connection of terminology, and thatās⦠not great.