I <3 buff women
šŖ¼
Show & Tell
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
cherry valley forever
almost home
Cosimo Galluzzi
trying on a metaphor
No title available
todays bird

ā
Today's Document

bliss lane
Misplaced Lens Cap
The Stonewall Inn
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Monterey Bay Aquarium
d e v o n
Cosmic Funnies

Andulka
Claire Keane

seen from Australia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from Laos
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Indonesia
seen from Belarus
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from South Korea

seen from Brazil

seen from Türkiye
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
@lastyearsmodel
I <3 buff women
wedding dresses are white specifically so that if the bride goes axe-crazy you can rest assured you will see the blood stains all over her and it'll be sick as fuck
I donāt like this actually
This is depressing does anyone else find this depressing
I would actually make the argument that the heart of the problem here is not either about fans, as the article claims, or production companies being exploitative cowards, as some of the comments are claiming. The heart of the problem is the increasingly eroding privacy we are seeing in the modern age.
There's some people in the comments saying "fandoms have always been like this" and others saying "No, it's worse than it was." And both are to some extent right. Fans (or at least a small percentage of fans, and the larger a fanbase gets the larger a group this will describe) have always been Like That; but they did not always have the level of access to creators and actors that they have now.
The notion that a performer needs to be constantly available to public scrutiny, that their personal information should by default be available to any rando with google, is pretty new. It used to be that actors would only be expected to engage with the public on limited, specific, and controlled occasions, usually with security provided. Now they're being asked to rawdog exposure to the mob 24/7 on their own.
(Also, production companies have always always always been exploitative cowards, just to get that straight; reading the biographies of literally any actress from golden Hollywood years makes that clear. It's just, again, more public now.)
There has also been a negative feedback loop as fandoms come to realize that the constant access they have to creatives increases their leverage and power. It did not use to be the case that this was so; fandoms pre-internet largely worked under the assumption that they didn't really have any meaningful way to contact or influence the publication houses. Even if they sent a letter or a campaign of letters, they wouldn't even know whether the letters were being received or read unless the publishing house chose to respond. So, without that expectation of access, the drama usually stayed internal. Nowadays, with constant immediate feedback from creators and publishers, fans are ever more incentivized to act out to try to push an agenda, get attention, or just vent whatever is going on in their lives onto a face contractually obliged to be friendly to them.
CYBERPUNK 2077 | Carmel Street
FREJA | "I move quick. Keep up, if you like."
The small voice in your head that says: "I don't need to write down every small detail of this plot idea, I love it so much, I'll remember this."
That's the devil speaking.
ā Caitlyn Kiramman ā
Stand amongst the ashes of a trillion dead souls and ask the ghosts if honor matters.
they're kinda fun to draw
BLADE dir. stephen norrington
sight I saw in san francisco, twice: gaggle of tiny children leashed together being herded along, everyone in hi-vis
on sharing one's opinons
I am once again begging you to get your hands on physical media and/or save your fave stuff OFFLINE.
āfeeling like a person againā collection
Yaz/ Iran
Photos: behzad jourabchi
Chat, I'm not sure how I feel about this one š„“ but I figured I'd share regardless