Leonavvitch

I love Joker and Daenerys Targaryen

[leonthefyodor]

"...she was alone."

[leonthefyodor]

Very much so a fanart of Daenerys

[ask-duckling-n-tooth]

Dog metaphor this, cannibalism metaphor that. I don't care. Robot metaphors. Using machines to represent the inability to love and enjoy the small things in life, the emptiness of your own life and the lack of purpose

[mewos-laptop]

"Write cannibalism as a metaphor for love and devotion"

WRONG.

CANNIBALISM AS POLITICAL CORRUPTION AND DESTRUCTION OF SOCIETIES. 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🔥🔥🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🦅🦅🇺🇲🦅🇺🇲🦅🇺🇲🦅🇺🇲🦅🦅🇺🇲🦅🇺🇲🦅🇺🇲🦅🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲💯💯💯💯

[communist-ojou-sama]

The greatest victory neoliberalism ever won was to create several generations of the left in the imperial core who have completely abdicated their responsibility to understand and analyze the contemporary state of capitalism because they've convinced themselves that economics is nothing but a capitalist ideological project

[anime-villian-irl]

"id let the world burn for you"

"I'd kill for you"

"id die for you"

"I'd sacrifice the world for you"

BORING!

Yawn snore snore. Honk shoo honk shoo.

I got twelve other guys ready to that for me. You already do that. You already destroy the world I would just happen to be there while you did.

The real question is.

Would you save the world for me?

Would you put aside your hatred for humanity and put my love for it Infront? Would you save the world because I love the world? Would you stop killing because I hate killing? Would you find a way to live because I want you alive?

Death and destruction are easy as hell. Do you know how fucking easy it is to kill someone? To blow up a building? Shure security is in the way but if it wasn't there it would be easy as hell.

You'd do the basics Shure. But would you do the hard thing and save the world because I asked you to?

Would you push aside your hatred of everyone but me because I asked you to nicely?

Would you?

[kathrahender]

"I love enemies to lovers but without the manipulation stuff"

"I love enemies to lovers but without the abuse"

"I love enemies to lovers but without them hurting each other"

"I love enemies to lovers but without them trying to kill each other"

"I love enemies to lovers but without them wanting to hurt/kill the other"

"I love enemies to lovers but only if they fight for little things"

Ma'am, sir, or whatever you want to be called, do you even know the meaning of the word "enemy"?

Enemy: 1) a person who is actively opposed or hostile to someone or something. 2) a hostile nation or its armed forces, especially in time of war. 3) a thing that harms or weakens something else.

These are the different meanings of "enemy". So no, someone you disagree with about little things is not your enemy. For the love of God, understand it already. An enemy is someone you hate. An enemy is someone you want to hurt. An enemy is someone you want to see destroyed. An enemy is someone you'd like to kill. It's someone with a completely different morality, with different morals, with different ways of seeing the world.

An enemy it's not a person who jokes with you like "Oh, you're an idiot" "No, you". It's someone who takes seriously the fights against you, who would do anything to see you defeated and broken. That's what an enemy would do. If they do nothing like these things, they're not your enemy. They can be your rival, or someone you don't get along with, but definitely not an enemy.

And if you don't like these things, then you definitely don't like enemies to lovers ships. Because enemies to lovers ships are based on "two enemies -and I'll repeat it again just in case: two enemies- falling in love, after one corrupts or one redeems". If you don't like/don't accept two people hurting each other when they are enemies and then falling in love, don't pretend you like the enemies to lovers trope, because trust me, you really don't. You don't even know what's the trope about-

[egharcourt]

The Last Days of Judas Iscariot saying that heaven and hell are a state of mind and nothing can obstruct you from salvation and the love of God except your own guilt. And despair being such a dooming force that even if Jesus were to appear in front of you himself and repeatedly remind you how much he loves you, hell, he'll try to hug you and wash your feet even, you can't be let free from the prison of suffering that you've confined yourself in. All because you're so disappointed in yourself that you're gripping the bars refusing to let go. How you cannot love God without first forgiving yourself. How the ultimate tragedy in this poignant dark comedy of a play is that Judas' damnation comes not from the fact that he betrayed Jesus, but from his self-disdain and perceived unworthiness that he basically condemned himself into an eternity of solitary anguish. I can go on about this play forever and ever. Do you get it.

[dubblebubbleibuprofen]

………..sorry

[mesetacadre]

Socialism-communism is not a utopia and it is not free of errors. But the moment you realize it's better to commit our own mistakes than to be on the perpetual back foot in defense against the latest crime committed against our class, you can graduate from an opportunist grifter to an actual proponent of our class interests. Many people never take this step because it's much easier to justify your actions to yourself when everything you do is a reaction, you never have to actually deal with the consequences of the practical implementation of a program (if you even have one) when you never become politically independent enough to begin carrying it out.

[terramythos]

'People are panicking about AI tools the same way they did when the calculator was invented, stop worrying' cannot stress enough the calculator did not forcibly pervade every aspect of our lives, has such a low error rate it's a statistical anomaly when it does happen, isn't built on mass plagiarism, and does not obliterate the fucking environment when you use it. Be so fucking serious right now

[kleyalove]

[why-i-love-comics]

Batman/Dylan Dog #3 - "Nightmare in Gotham" (2024)

written by Roberto Recchioni art by Gigi Cavenago, Werther Dell'Edera, Giovanna Niro, & Laura Ciondolini

[ask-the-sock-ler]

Husbands your honor

[p0is0ngirlfriend]

me trying not to let the shit break me

[closet-keys]

it’s so wild that trumps executive order has that bit about sex being assigned at conception.

I assume this is the anti-abortion position being encoded into the anti-trans legislation. no one is testing what gametes their embryo has— such a thing isn’t possible (embryos don’t produce them yet; there are primordial germ cells, but they aren’t differentiated as sperm or egg cells).

it just goes to show that gender/sex policing is never based on any science— there is no "scientific" definition to what “female sex” or "male sex" is. It doesn’t exist as a material reality. It is a legal construct that is assigned with the first legal documentation assigned to a subject—the birth certificate.

and that isn’t based on chromosomes or gametes. it’s a decision based on whether a doctor thinks the infant will be mostly likely to be capable of penetrative heterosexual sex as “female” or “male.” because penetrative heterosexual sex is the point, the determination is based on whether the clitoris is long enough to penetrate (in which case “it’s a boy”) and if not whether there is a vaginal canal deep enough for penetration (in which case “it’s a girl”) and if neither or both are true the child’s body is forcibly surgically altered.

they can't define sex "biologically" because it is not a "biological" reality. it will be determined, as always, punitively, on a case by case basis on varying traits and legal documentation, to enforce patriarchal economic systems that depend on misogyny and transmisogyny.

one of the most telling parts from the executive order, to me, was this (emphasis mine):

"The erasure of sex in language and policy has a corrosive impact not just on women but on the validity of the entire American system. Basing Federal policy on truth is critical to scientific inquiry, public safety, morale, and trust in government itself."

this bit gives the game away with how important the institution and enforcement of sex assignment is to capitalism, the united states economy, the carceral/legal system, and the ideological buy-in to us-american hegemony.

[sashi-ya]

the more I study meteorology, the more I'm convinced the spiral pattern in One Piece HAS to do with the motions of the atmosphere, cyclones and anticyclones... that and also the forces that keep everything going... Coriolis, gravity... tidal waves, the relationship with them and the moon and luffy standing so pretty right in front of it... Tide rises and what does it do? FLOODS.

HE SAID IT, TIDAL WAVES. now, what will actually Luffy break? gravity? do we need someone with magnetic powers? 👀

I'M INSISTING (since a couple of years now) CAUSE NOW THAT WE HAVE CONFIRMATION THE WORLD WILL SINK (TO ME IS NOT SINK PERSE, BUT FLOOD) PEOPLE SHOULD KNOW!!

also, remember I have a full theory here: part 1 part 2 (confirmed af)