17776 and Christina Koch (Artemis II) both saying: we will always choose each other
art blog(derogatory)
Mike Driver
Peter Solarz

⁂
occasionally subtle

No title available
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Discoholic 🪩
$LAYYYTER
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
🪼
ojovivo
sheepfilms
dirt enthusiast

JBB: An Artblog!

#extradirty

if i look back, i am lost
Cosmic Funnies
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
No title available

seen from Netherlands
seen from Albania
seen from Albania
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Italy
seen from Netherlands

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
@lexierius11verse
17776 and Christina Koch (Artemis II) both saying: we will always choose each other
"Everybody knows that everybody dies, and nobody knows it like the Doctor. But I do think that all the skies of all the worlds might just turn dark, if he ever, for one moment, accepts it."
Silence in the Library/Forest of the dead is probably my favorite DW story 😭❤️
[ID: artwork of the Tenth Doctor standing in front of the TARDIS. The Doctor, wearing a long brown coat and red sneakers, is shown with one hand raised as if snapping his fingers. A warm beam of light shines from the open TARDIS door, illuminating the Doctor and scattering tiny glowing particles in the air. /End ID]
"Every time someone steps up and says who they are the world becomes a better, more interesting place." 🫶🏳️🌈
My tribute to Andre Braugher, thank you for Captain Raymond Holt ❤️✨
Destiel and Brooklyn99 crossover Pt.1!!
Wanna draw this for sooo long I finally started today
the way both 2005 and 1971 willy and charlie have matching hair colours T_T so I think at some point when charlie in both of the universes are grown up and wonka cease to exist, people just simply can't see charlie as himself and they continue to see him merely as willy wonka's heir. idk it's just a cute detail.
the 2001 early script of catcf did go in that direction!
do you also want to cry
A toast to bad decisions, good hair, and the Doctor's eternal confusion. 🍷
whumptober #16 repressed trauma
why tell your new besties about your past when you can turn on a hologram of your dead wife instead??
River + The Doctor + text posts pt. 35/?
"this fic uses em dashes, so it must be ai-generated" real humans use em dashes.
"this fic has long paragraphs with overly described details and scenes, so it must be ai-generated" real humans can write like this.
"this fic has inconsistencies, so it must be ai-generated" real humans make errors and mistakes. that's why we have this thing called plot holes. sometimes writers are tired and they don't remember what they wrote in the last sentences or paragraphs, let alone chapters.
"this fic sounds robotic and unnatural, so it must be ai-generated" not every writer writes in their native language. sometimes they can sound 'robotic and unnatural' if they wrote in their second or third or fourth language (and kudos to them).
"this fic has a prompt left in it that the author forgot to delete, so it must be ai-generated" the 'prompt' the author accidentally left in their fic could actually be a part of an outline that was meant only for them, so they could keep track of what they would write.
"this author posts too often, no human writes this fast, so they must use ai" 1.) you don't know how fast someone can or can't write, how much time a person has in a day or how motivated/skilled they are. 2.) the frequent updates you see could be something that has already been finished and sitting in the author's drafts for god knows how long. just because it's recently posted doesn't always mean it's recently written.
my point? no, you can never know if a fanfic is 'ai-generated'. unless the author says they use ai, you're just assuming, suspecting and witch hunting. chances are that you're not going to 'stop ai fics from being created', you're just going to wrongly accuse genuine writers of using ai and ruin their day at best, make them want to quit writing or sharing their works at worst.
saw this being debated and just wanted to talk about it too.
"is it rude if I politely ask a writer if they use ai or chatgpt on their works because I'm almost certain they do?"
yes, it is rude. no matter how polite you are being when you ask them this.
you say you are almost certain. so you are not absolutely certain.
unless you are absolutely, undoubtedly certain — with actual proof — that their writing is ai generated, never ever ask an artist if their work is ai generated.
I know several writers who would stop writing and delete all of their works if they were ever accused of using ai. so it doesn't matter if you are polite when you ask them this, you are suggesting that their works are ai generated, that they didn't create the works they could have spent hours, days, weeks, months or years working on.
ai and chatgpt are trained on real humans' works, they are trained to mimic the way real humans write. so if you say a genuine writer's work "looks ai", I'm gonna have to ask you what you think ai was trained on.
a writer whose English isn't their first language may also write in a way that "looks ai" to some, if they write in English and have to rely on translator.
using em dash isn't a sign of ai. I do it all the time. my fellow writers all love em dash.
having long paragraphs with "overly described scenes" isn't a sign of ai. I do it all the time, and so do my fellow writers.
all the "ai signs" are actually just what most writers actually do. they get mistaken for "ai signs" because sometimes the way writers write or describe a scene in a fanfic or an original work is different than the way people talk or text. because they're writing a fic and describing a scene, not chatting with a friend. the way I talk is different than the way I write my fics.
if you suspect a work was ai generated, but are not 100% sure, you can always just stop reading said work without saying anything.
if someone does use ai to write, they will either a.) deny and continue using ai to write or b.) admit because they see nothing wrong with it and continue using ai to write.
if a genuine writer was wrongly accused of using ai, they may stop writing altogether.
asking a writer if they use ai or chatgpt to write will always do more harm than good. witch hunting will always do more harm than good.
you are not "fighting against ai" by throwing around such accusations. you are harming genuine writers and artists.
It isnt an accusation. Its a fucking question. One that protects the very communities and artists that this post claims to defend.
all of the fanfic writers, whom I personally know, say the same thing that they would feel discouraged and might delete all their works if they were asked this.
it’s not “hey do you like x or y” question. it’s a subtle implication that your work looks like it was written by a robot within a minute. if you personally don’t find that offensive, that’s cool. but I know a lot of writers do. and they have the rights to be discouraged by it.
also we are talking about fanfic writers who write as their hobby, getaway or safe place, writers whose works you read for free. not writers who sell their works and are making profit from what they write. fanfic writers don’t owe you anything.
This just came across my dash. I'm going to be blunt.
Asking a writer or artist if they “use AI” is an accusation, no matter how you dress it up. It’s not neutral. It implies you think their effort, style, or voice is artificial. It implies that their human work doesn’t look human enough for you.
You don’t protect the community by policing people who are actually creating from scratch. You protect it by supporting human creators, reporting confirmed AI misuse when there’s evidence, and learning the difference between this sounds different than what I’d write and this is machine-generated.
Writers—especially fanfic authors—already pour their time, emotion, and identity into what they share for free. They don’t owe anyone proof of authenticity on top of that. And if your question makes someone want to quit writing, it’s not protecting the community. It’s shrinking it.
If you’re not 100% sure, just scroll. AI ethics don’t need to turn into public inquisition season.
“And if your question makes someone want to quit writing, it’s not protecting the community. It’s shrinking it.”
^^^^ this
I had a thought, dear, however scary, about that night, the bugs and the dirt
that’s my emotional support giggling violent old man
I love that the Doctor keeps Nardole just bc of River. Like he was River's dog. And now River's gone and Nardole is the closest thing he has left of her so he WILL take care of him but he does NOT like dogs.
i will blow them up with my mind i think. out of love obviously
Sutekh clinging to the outside of the Tardis as it explodes on loop for 2000 years with River Song inside
2011 called they want them