Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Sade Olutola
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
KIROKAZE
No title available
No title available
d e v o n
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă
Jules of Nature

No title available

pixel skylines

tannertan36
DEAR READER

Love Begins
wallacepolsom
Cosmic Funnies
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Sweet Seals For You, Always
seen from Italy
seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Paraguay
seen from Paraguay
seen from Paraguay

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
@liamforkes
When I Have to Wake Up Really Early for Something
All Day Iâm Like:
Arenât you supposed to be babysitting Gina?Â
Doesnât need my help. Sheâs over there, dazzling some psychologists.
"Mire - Drained EP" Review
Since their formation in early 2014, small Norfolk-based band Mire has achieved many things. They have played a few local shows, caught many an eye throughout their hometown, and have managed to churn out a debut EP âDrainedâ. Whilst not perfect, this EP demonstrates exactly why theyâre doing as well as they are, and hints at bigger and better things for the trifecta.
As soon as you press play, âNot Right Nowâ kicks straight in with a catchy riff that instantly reminds the listener of grunge bands such as Nirvana, whom the band consider to be one of their main inspirations (even going as far as to cover Kurt and Courneyâs âStinking of Youâ at the end of the EP). This feeling of nostalgic grunge mixed with newer influences continues throughout the EP, with catchy riffs and pleasant solos throughout. For an EP released in 2014, it is an impressive feat to have been able to encapsulate this spirit. Otherwise, Tim on base and James on drums both do a fantastic job in making the entire EP sound like it has been carefully written and put together fantastically, making the EP sound good overall, with all parts coming together well.
The main thing that stands out from the EP is the quality of lyrics. Clearly, singer/guitarist/lyricist Fraser Clarke has put a lot of thought into every word, and the deep emotion which comes out of these lyrics is what helps to make this EP so entertaining and original. These songs clearly havenât been banged out in an afternoon, but instead have been cleverly considered and crafted in order to have a great impact on the listener, something which is achieved very well.
Another impressive part of the EP is the production value of the tracks. Considering how small the band is, it would have been expected for the production value to have been a cheap microphone in someoneâs garage. However, the songs all sound very clean (perhaps too clean for the genre?), with the layered vocals giving some nice extra effects to the songs and, as mentioned earlier, all parts of the songs fit together well to create a clean, pleasant, and appealing sound to the listener, and credit for this goes to Mark Thaxter for his talented production.
Overall, âDrainedâ is a solid first EP for the band. A good production value coupled with talented musicians and strong lyrics, there are little flaws to be found within the EP. The only question that remains is: Where will they go next? I for one am excited to find out.
The Royal Divorce
Since I started this blog, I have discussed many serious and, in my opinion, important issues, such as body image and death. This is not one of those. This is complete nonsense which serves only to amuse me and other like-minded people.
I was thinking about the Royal Wedding earlier. Kate and Will signifying their undying love for each other in front of God (and pretty much everyone else on the planet). However, statistics from December 2012 show that 42% of marriages end in divorce. This is an incredibly high number, and so it isn't exactly unlikely that the pair of them would eventually fall out. Perhaps Kate doesn't like Will's bad habits, or maybe Will is just sick of constantly being told off for leaving the royal toilet seat up. Either way, it could happen.
Through a simple Google search, I found out that the royal couple refused to sign a pre-nup. For those who don't know, this is basically an agreement which means that people keep their own assets (wealth, furniture etc.) when going through divorce. An increasingly common agreement these days (and rightly so), not signing one can often leave divorcees broke. This could potentially mean that the Royal Divorce could be an excuse for her to take as much of his wealth as she could (which, in case you couldn't tell, is a lot).
Alternatively, she could wait until he eventually becomes King (assuming she can tolerate him for that long) and then decide to divorce. I'm not a lawyer so I don't know how these things work, but I'm about 98% sure that Kate could then legally claim a good portion of England for her own from him. Similar to Dr Doom ruling Latveria, his own country, Kate could then technically be Queen in her own right, ruling over whichever part of England she chose (most likely the North, the South isn't that great).
Aside from the country, she could also take Will's helicopter. This was a birthday present from good ol' Queen Liz, and although she cannot fly it quite yet, I'm sure when she was Queen of the North she could get someone to teach her. With half of the royal wealth combined with half of England and an attack helicopter, I see no reason why Kate then wouldn't take the only remaining logical step and become a super-villain. She wouldn't need anything more (if Iron Man can do it, so can she, and he didn't have a helicopter).
I envision her becoming The Anarchist or something like that, with her costume being based around a ruined Union Flag with the anarchism "A" logo somewhere. She could do basically whatever she wanted, then. Especially as super-heroes aren't real yet (although let's be honest, Prince William would have to adopt his own alter-ego to fight her, but he'd probably be useless because he no longer has a helicopter), she would have no problem inciting a Civil War between her part of England and Will's. She would inevitably win, what with being a super-hero and all, and then the whole of England would bow down to The Anarchist.
But why stop there? Soon, the whole country would be bowing down to her majesty. Many would try to stop her, but her pure wealth alone invested into weaponry and defences would make her practically unstoppable. Soon, the whole world would be bowing down to her, and then she could have literally anything she wanted. All because of Will's confidence in their ever-lasting "love".
So, to conclude, you should sign a pre-nup if you own a country or a helicopter, and if you eventually manage to gain a helicopter, vast wealth, and half of a country, you're wasting your time doing anything other than working towards world domination.
Body Image.
For as long as I can remember, I've always been 'fat'. Not spills-over-the-side-of-a-chair-fat, but I've had a bulging stomach and the thighs to match. I have been told by most people I know and love "You should lose some weight", and I simply ask "Why?" People often become bewildered when I ask this question, as if it should be blatantly obvious why I don't want to look so big, but to me, I don't care. And neither should you.
I'm not exactly big on the whole 'dignity' thing. Ask anyone I frequently spend time with and they will happily spend a long time telling you about a situation in which I made a fool of myself. I've stolen microphones from bands mid-set to continue the song myself. You name it, I've probably done it in front of a large number of people. So it isn't a surprise to anyone I've ever spoken to that I will happily remove any clothing which disguises the upper half of my body, especially in the summer.
And yet I have no problem with this. I even had a woman shout from her car "Put it away!" at me once because I wasn't wearing a t-shirt. It just doesn't bother me. Body size shouldn't be an issue. I don't care how much I weigh. Most others do, but not me. I enjoy cramming my face with food (although saying that, I really don't eat as much as other, far skinner, people I know do) and exercise is really boring and painful. Why people feel the need to be so concerned about how much I weigh is beyond me, and they need to stop.
The way I look is the same. I really don't care. For example, when it comes to my hair, I adopt the "try in vain to flatten it then give up because I don't care" technique, and it hasn't done me wrong in years. If I look unsuitable to some judgemental stranger, then so what? I don't know who they are, neither do they know me, and so what they think of me is completely irrelevant. And if people I know are concerned, then why is that my issue? It's like them complaining because I'm wearing a t-shirt that they don't like the look of. So what? People shouldn't care as much about body image as they do because as long as you are happy with you, everyone else should be.
I'm not trying to condemn exercise and unhealthy eating, I do believe that it is important to be healthy. I'm just trying to make the point that nobody should be worried about their body size, just because of what others say. I completely get that for a lot of people, especially females, looks are important to them and self-esteem plays a major part in wanting to be thin. In which case, good luck. I wholeheartedly support people wanting to feel confident in their own bodies. I just don't think that how I feel about how I look should be based upon the views of others. Be happy as who you are, not as how others want you to be.
Belief and Death
I recently finished a project for my Philosophy A-Level all about Dualism. I won't bore you with the ins and outs, but it has a lot to do with the concept of a soul. A soul, of course, is supposedly a person's 'essence', it is a non-physical part of every person which defines who and how they are, and leaves your body at death to progress to the after-life in whatever form you see that to exist. I had an interesting discussion with a class mate about the concept of a soul, and I seemed to be the only person who was simply unable to believe in the existence of a soul. I just can't believe in it.
Maybe it's something to do with my upbringing, or simply my overly keen interest in any form of science, but I just cannot bring myself to believe in a soul. Even holding the thought that the concept is true is simply subconsciously rejected as incorrect. I can't believe in anything that I do not have evidence of the existence of. I'm not so ridiculous to go as far as to say nothing I haven't seen exists (I've never seen Scotland, for example, yet I have no doubt that it exists), but I can't bring myself to do it. I just don't understand why.
The same rings true of religion. I have never been a religious person, although I have nothing against those who choose do be religious and don't force their beliefs on others (those who fail the latter section, however, are a different kettle of fish). I simply consider religion to be preposterous, a concept which is little more than fantasy concocted by those who simply want an easy answer to the big questions in life. But I digress. I cannot bring myself to believe in things which I cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt to be true.
My thoughts on death echo this perfectly. I simply believe that we die, and that is it. There is no cloud kingdom full of my heart's desire, neither is there a fiery underworld in which a red being will poke me with a trident. I simply believe we stop existing. This isn't an existence I can comprehend, but I imagine it to be similar to sleep. One minute we are aware of it being night-time, and the next moment it is the morning. The time in between is time we are not conscious of (although we are dreaming, we are usually not aware we are dreaming), and it is almost impossible to describe how we feel when we are asleep. I believe death to be like an eternal sleep, in a state where we are simply not aware of ourselves. As I said, this isn't an existence I can comprehend, but it is what I think to be true.
One question which I have been asked more than once is "Aren't you afraid of death if you believe it's just nothing?" The answer to that is, quite simply, yes. Right now, I am terrified of death. I still haven't been out clubbing, or gotten a tattoo, or skydived for charity. I hate the idea of my girlfriend, who I am assured adores me, and my family, all having to confront the idea of my death. Typing this alone upsets me. However, I firmly believe that, sixty years from now, my answer will be entirely different. One day, I will be able to say "I have lived my life, and it was good, and I am done". I will welcome death, because I know it is coming, and I will have nothing left to worry about.
Which is why I live life to the best I can. I overeat and I smoked for two years and I do things which could potentially harm me, but I enjoy all of them. It's well known that the best things in life are bad for you, but that's why they're so good. It's looking death in the face and laughing. Life shouldn't be lived by a mantra, by some prehistoric code which dictates what you should and shouldn't do, because what if you are wrong? I'm not going to claim any religion is right or wrong, but surely all bar one must be? The idea of living my entire life like a saint just to be told that it was all a waste and that I could have slept with that girl, or I could have had too much to drink, seems like a waste. So I live how I please because that is the one thing I can say at the end of my life: It was mine.
Becoming A Marvel Nerd
Since I was a young boy, I've always loved the idea of superheroes. One of my earliest memories is coming out of the cinema having seen Fantastic 4: Rise of the Silver Surfer (being ten, I was young enough to enjoy the film) and pretending to be the Silver Surfer with my cousin when waiting to be picked up. There's just something to the idea that you could be something more than just your average human, something that has always appealed to me. However, it wasn't until recently when I decided to try and immerse myself, and it was a lot less difficult than I thought.
I have always loved the movies. From X-Men to the Avengers, from Spiderman to Daredevil, the films are, overall, entertaining. Again, the feeling of seeing someone bestowed with extraordinary powers fighting for the good of the world is something special, something that I really enjoy. Whilst I know that these films aren't exactly stellar in terms of comic book accuracy (Phoenix who?), they still prove to be a fun way to kill two hours. I think it was this enjoyment that spurred me on to start with the comics. Well, that and LEGO Marvel Super Heroes.
I've always liked the LEGO format when it comes to video games, and so I was excited to play a game which combines some of my favourite heroes with this style. Oh boy, did it deliver. The gameplay was enjoyable, it was funny and charming in all the right ways, but for me what stood out was the massive range of playable characters. There were all my favourite heroes and villains, all my least favourite heroes and villains, and a lot of people I'd never heard of (Howard the what?!). But these characters were interesting none-the-less. Of course, a LEGO game is never going to satisfy my desires to know more, and this was when I decided to get into comics.
Something I've flirted with in the past but never committed to, The Walking Dead was the first real series of graphic novels which I've consistently read since the beginning. And I love them. Such detailed beauty goes into every single panel that it's so lovely to become immersed in. Comics are one of the few things that can transport me from a stuffy, crowded bus into the middle of New York, or Asgard, or some other mystical place. It's a marvellous experience that I would recommend to anyone.
The Walking Dead is as simply as "Read #1, then #2, then #3 etc. etc." The series follows chronologically and all issues make sense within the context of the others. The same cannot be said for Marvel. Not only are there over seven-thousand characters, but each character or team of characters have multiple different storylines which often contradict each other. When I first decided to venture into Marvel and Google'd how to go about this, the simple answer which I got from various fan sites was: "You don't." You simply pick an interesting story and, assuming you have a basic knowledge of the character (which can be gained from the films), away you go. You pick up on who is who and what is what as you go. Simple.
So off I pottered to my local library, where I found a cornucopia of publishings to take my pick of. I am not the sort of person who can afford to collect individual comics (neither am I a fan of paying ÂŁ5 for twelve pages), however thankfully Marvel publish their story archs in paperback editions (as TWD do). This means that I can do exactly as I was told: Browse the shelves, pick a story that sounds good (Fear Itself? Nice. The death of Spiderman? Done. Hulk Vs Wolverine?! Bring it on!) and away I read. And the best part is, it's all totally free thanks to Norfolk County Council.
So the main thing I've learned here is that you don't have to be massively overweight with glasses and social difficulties in order to enjoy Marvel. If you, like me, simply enjoy the films and want to learn more about your favourite characters, simply pop to your local library (or book store if you can afford to own these glorious stories), pick up an interesting story and immerse yourself in beautiful worlds we can only dream of. You'll be much better off for the experience.
South Park: The Stick Of Truth - PC Review
As a long time fan of the show, I was highly anticipating this game. After the last South Park game I played, Lets Go Tower Defence Play!, I was hoping that this was not another unnecessary game which South Park had simply put their own name to. However, I was not disappointed.
The game itself is very enjoyable to play. With around ten hours needed to complete the main story line, plus another thirty or so needed to complete the entire game, it feels worth the purchase whilst not outstaying its welcome. The game does not feel like it drags at any point, but it still does not rush through the combat to reach a conclusion. The game can be a challenge, however there is no real point at which this halters the gameplay. The side-quests extend the game further, allowing for a longer play time and more references to the show to be brought in.
The combat is entertaining, with the RPG-style being incorporated well, and the sandbox-style roaming system means that players can explore South Park at their own pace, and complete quests and side-quests when they wish. The controls are not difficult to master, and the levelling system allows for upgrades and new perks to be unlocked so that as the enemies become harder, the character becomes stronger. The frequent weapons and armour which can be found whilst exploring also add to this, meaning that the combat experience has the potential to be constantly interesting.
The main concern for me when playing a tie-in game such as this is that they can often feel like the brand has simply been stamped onto an irrelevant game. However, this is certainly not the case. The game perfectly blends the dark humour of the show (See: Nazi zombie aborted foetus) whilst still managing to satire countless pieces of pop culture. The game itself is a parody of other games of its type, even stealing "Dovahkiin" from Skyrim, however it still retains what makes this kind of game so fun to play. Fans of the show will notice no end of references to the show, even from passaway comments from characters or noticeboards around town, and these are pleasing to those who get them. The game feels like an extended episode which a player can interact with, instead of something South Park stamped their own brand onto to cash in, and I enjoyed this.
However, the game is not without weakness. The combat can often become very repetitive. Whilst new moves and buddies coupled with the levelling system means that new upgrades and moves are always available, I still found myself using the same moves over and over again (For me personally, I would practically only use Rochambo when fighting bosses). That isn't to say that it must, especially with allies such as Mr Kim, Mr Hanky and Jesus coming along to help when necessary, as well as new and amusing weapons being available. To me, it just felt like the majority of moves were unnecessary.
As well as this, it is very difficult to reach a 100% completion level unless a player sets out to do so from the beginning. As someone who likes to enjoy the main plotline of the game and then go around finding collectibles afterwards, I was disappointed to find that there is no longer any point continuing to find these collectibles when I can not get all of them anyway.
Overall, South Park: The Stick Of Truth is an entertaining and hilarious game which is sure to appeal to any South Park fan. Whilst it can often be repetitive and full completion can be a challenge, the game regardless is fun to play and entertaining. Most importantly, the endless references to the show and the satirical nature of the game makes it feel like it is a part of the South Park brand, and not just something which had the name added on to increase sales. If you are a fan of South Park, this game is definitely worth purchasing.
9/10
Skylar White: Stupid Bitch or Sexist Scapegoat? (Spoilers)
When it comes to Breaking Bad, I personally found that all I wanted was for Walt to do incredibly bad-ass stuff. Whether it be cooking meth, killing tweakers, or simply saying more stuff like "I am the one who knocks" or "I'm in the empire business", the transformation from everyday man to drug kingpin is a fascinating one and one which which I personally believe constitutes the reason why this show stands out from all others. Throughout this process, Walt's wife Skylar seems to oppose everything he does. From starting this business in the first place to him simply buying a car for his son, she is constantly seen to be "the bad guy", which is interesting seeing as she can be seen to be one of the most morally upstanding characters in the entire show (assuming we ignore "the Beneke incidents"). So why is it that so many people hate Skylar?
On one side, it seems quite apparent. We simply don't like anyone who stands in the way of Walt becoming a super bad-ass. The majority of people watching the show really aren't overly bothered about his relationships with his brother-in-law's psycho wife, but instead simply want to see explosions, meth, and cool catchphrases. Throughout the progression of the show, we see this explored in greater depth, although at every turn Skylar seems to be preventing this. She will frequently call him out for his lies, his homicidal tendencies, and even his jeopardising of his family, the ones whom he set out to protect in the first place. Whilst we do not particularly see this exactly as a bad flaw, it seems that BB fans simply disagree with anything that comes between our anti-hero and the super-awesome character we are all anticipating he turn into. It would seem that the majority of the hate for Skylar simply comes because she stands between what we want and what we are getting.
However, I recently stumbled upon an Op-Ed contribution to the New York Times, written by Anna Gunn, the actress who plays Skylar on the show. Whilst she does not deny that her standing in the way of Walt contributes to the dislike for her character, she claims that this goes much deeper. She claims that the hate for Skylar is because people "canât stand a woman who wonât suffer silently or âstand by her manâ? That they despise her because she wonât back down or give up? Or because she is, in fact, Walterâs equal?**" Whilst I do not necessarily agree or disagree with the point Gunn is making here, I believe it is an interesting one. First, Gunn claims that it is due to gender stereotypes not being met and the male frustration that supposedly arises from this. Whilst I personally do not believe that all women must merely sit in the kitchen and do as their men tell them, I will admit that there are, to this very day, many men who still believe that this should be the case. However, I find it unlikely that people genuinely dislike her character purely because of the fact that they believe her to be a woman who does not "know her place", as I do not believe that sexism still holds a view this deep, that merely defying a stereotype is a reason to be hated. Although saying this, when we look at the three main women in Breaking Bad, these being Skylar, Marie (Skylar's sister), and Lydia (a woman Walt later goes into business with), all of these women have a reputation for being the least popular characters in the show. Whilst I personally disliked Marie more than any other character for reasons I do not have the time to go into, I believe that there is the potential that this point may hold SOME credibility. Come season five, Lydia is shown to be the only person with the power to ship and sell Walt's meth. Skylar is shown to have power over Walt, to an extent, in that she often knows how to convince him to compromise or change his ways (and Gunn's claim that Skylar is "Walter's equal" shows us this). Marie is shown to be powerful in that her marriage to Hank means she has a certain security, which can be seen when she walks free from her shoplifting. All three main women in BB are shown to be very powerful, and all three women are hated. Whether or not there is a direct corrolation there is to be disputed, however it seems possible that people watching the show have a problem with the power these women hold merely because they are women.
This is even more interesting when we look at the fact that, most of the time, Skylar is RIGHT. Many fans of the show call Skylar a "bitch", however she is trying to convince a man to give up a life of crime in order to protect her two children. In any other show, or in "real life" for that matter, this would be a perfectly rational response to this stigma. However, in the context of Breaking Bad, we do not agree with the points she makes, and in fact actively disagree with them. So why is it that, just because of this context, we disagree with what we would interpret as a rational reaction? This links back to my earlier point, that all BB viewers simply wish to see Walt become a super bad-ass. Because we all want to see something completely unrealistic, we are completely willing to put all personal senses of morality aside in order to support our protagonist in his adventures in order to see something totally mega awesome. Whilst it is nature that we try our hardest to sympathise with the protagonist with shows, which is why shows in which hardened criminals are central are often to interesting, it still bemuses me that people will completely disagree with pure, rational sense in order to watch a normal man become a psychopath.
So to conclude, I see both sides of the spectrum. Whilst we are given SOME valid reasons to hate Skylar (her exploits with Beneke), the majority of the time she is simply a rational woman whom we hate purely to give us a greater chance of sympathising with our protagonist. I believe that Gunn's claims that the BB fanbase hate Skylar purely because she is a woman who does not conform to gender stereotypes is misled and exaggerated, because gender stereotypes in this form simply do not manifest to such an extent in general society, however that is not to say that Gunn does not have a point in what she says. The idea that women have power still does not appeal to some men, and they will try to convince themselves that said woman is at issue because of it. Skylar White is certainly an interesting character, and one who raises many issues, but I do not believe she is either a "Stupid Bitch" OR a "Sexist Scapegoat", simply a strong female character who is open to interpretation by any who choose.
** All quotes taken from the full article, written by Anna Gunn, which can be found here
"Talent" Shows.
First off, the people on them. Albeit, some of them are genuinely talented and prosper from these shows (Susan Boyle or Sam Bailey, for example), however most of them are simply ridiculous. These untalented, useless wastes of space are not only ridiculed, but the first few (untelevised) stages let them through purely because of how terrible they are. It's incredible. It wouldn't even be so bad if some of the worse acts (Jedward) didn't actually gain fame from these sort of shows. People that have no talent shouldn't be made famous purely because they are riduclous, if anyone can become famous then what value does fame have? It's absolutely incredible.
Next, the judges. The people who make the calls. It still irritates me that judges such as Simon Cowell and Jason Gardiner, the ones who filter out the untalented ones in search of actual talent, are slated. The less abled judges are the "nice" ones, who will actually just say "That was amazing!" to any performance, which actually offers little real meaning other than giving false hope to disappointing performances. It doesn't make sense and certainly doesn't help the people being discussed.
Finally, the people who watch these shows. The people who make a routine out of sitting down on a night to have full-out democratic discussions over these shows. The people who will give away their hard-earned money every week just in the hopes that some seventeen-year-old nobody will get to spend another week in the delusion that they might actually get somewhere in life. These people don't seem to realise that all they are doing is being swallowed into the media's financial extortion (not to sound like a Neo-Marxist here) and are in fact consenting to it. The worst part is that the people who go to the live shows make a point of booing every single piece of negative feedback. "You need to work on your stage presence" does not deserve booing, as this is actually helpful to the performer and will allow them to go further in the competition than "I really liked the song choice". Don't boo the judges that have the guts to actually make helpful comments, praise them for actually helping the person you want to see do well in life.
So, to conclude, pretty much everyone involved in these shows are ridiculous. Whilst they might be very entertaining, they achieve little more than devaluing fame and talent whilst simultaneously teaching that constructive criticism makes you a bad person and that you should give all of your money to a big company that doesn't need it at all. Maybe you'll think next time you sit down to watch these shows.
Update - 10/12/2013
Hey guys,
So as you may have noticed, I haven't posted anything on here in a while. This isn't because I'm done with the reviewing (not at all), but because instead my reviews have moved house.
I have joined with Happing Online (www.happing.co.uk) and now they guestlist me for gigs in return for a review of that gig and occasionally some photos of it.
I would appreciate if you could all go and show your support to my reviews on that site (as of today, the only uploaded ones are Harry Radford and Call It Reckless, although there are at least four more in the pipeline) as it would mean a lot to me :)
I can't promise there will be a lot more content on here for a while, but I will try my hardest.
Thanks for all of your support, I guess this is me going up in the journalism world :-)
-Liam <3