I’m not done yet - Characters quick analysis
I’m so mad for the fact that Samira Mohan has been written off and all the discourse about how stupid fans are. It’s discomforting seeing fellow fans from the same fandom absolutely ignoring - to the point of being annoyed by it - the mistreatment of both the characters and actress, and their supporters as well. And I realized that if I were to be many of those fans I would have very little to celebrate besides the fact that my favorite is not the one being axed.
Let’s talk about a few of them.
Cassie McKay: she started off strong in s2, managing all those cases and personally trying to putting herself out there and feel like a person other than a doctor and a mother. She got a date with Brian Hancock ( which btw was presented as this huge recurring and we’ve last seen him months ago) and had a finger up that old man’s ass. The remaining of her arc has been centered about Roxy, which was good cause we were getting a glimpse of End-of-life treatment and how to make it comfortable for the patient and their family. Then a peek into her role inside the street team, which would’ve been so interesting to explore as well. The whole scenario clashed (for me) when these two strings merged together to create yet another conflict with Robby. He berated her for not being there when Roxy died, and the point of the whole scene was to show how his unnecessary berating is part of his mental health issues. Her next two relevant interactions (beside a whole 10 second bonding with Langdon over their respective addictions) are with Robby (again): one of her telling him that he is - in fact - spiraling; and the other one last episode when she “felt compelled” to give him advice and defending Javadi, who was another one on the receiving end of Robby’s backlash.
Speaking of Javadi: she started off strong as well, her conflict with Ogilvie about competency and her parents pushing her towards different specialties. Yet again, it started to change around ep 8 or 9, I barely remember any of her scenes besides her being here and there with other residents. I remember a scene with Mateo (I will not dive into shipping but it was ship baiting), and the fact that she filmed Jessies arrest. And what was the filming purpose of that? The writing purpose of the whole Dr J thing? Not showing how her account could actively help Jessie; not how young people show up to the ED cause they trust her through social media; not how her platform could me also medically useful (spreading awareness on issues such as STDs for example). None of that. Her TikTok account became another reason to be scolded by Robby.
Mel King: I was so curious about her season and her deposition. Let me say first that Taylor Dearden is unfairly talented and I really hope she got enough screen time for that Emmy nomination. Her arc is maybe the most independent from Robby’s, and at least for that I can be thankful. The problem is that she had so many problems, being pushed to the floor, the deposition, her sister, her meltdown, that it’s a lot altogether and still I can feel disappointed cause she’s the same residency year as Cassie, and yet she barely teaches and is often taught instead. Of course her mind is taken by a lot of problems at the same time, but I do feel that it would’ve been better to spare at least one of her string and focus a bit more on layering. for example, it’s evident that there’s some degree of infantilization from some nurses and fellows, cause we often see either people coddling her or being annoyed by her enthusiasm. I would’ve cut on the evil Whitaker stuff and relied more on the other two issues she goes through to highlight this kind of treatment she receives.
Trinity Santos: at the beginning of the season I was sooo annoyed by her, which is good cause Isa is a superstar and she portrayed that caustic attitude perfectly. Her being behind her charting and clashing with Al-hashimi two hours after meeting her was very in character and beautifully performed. Then we got the bathroom scene and saw the sc*rs. It was dropped deliberately but delicately (if that makes sense), the same way they introduced Abbot’s amputation at the end of s1. Only with Trinity we were halfway through the season and we’ve got no mention (or nod) about it before and neither after, besides her “stealing” a scalpel. I am lucky enough not to have experienced anything like that, but I really think it’s not something they should’ve picked up to leave it hanging between seasons. (That’s obviously my opinion, like everything I write about). I really dont want to dive too much into ships but as a Garsantos truther I’m at a loss.
Whitaker: he’s clearly not my favorite character, but I’ll try to give him justice. I think they were trying to point out how Robby had to find a new heir with LAngdon in rehab and all. What didnt sit right to me was that the outcome resulted somehow unrealistic (sorry to the - most realistic show in the universe - truthers): he’s on his second week as R1 and yet he acts and teaches med students like we saw Collins and Langdon the year before. He’s in charge of Louie and left to do procedures (such as the abdominal draining) alone?? His friendship with Trinity (TO ME) is the most interesting part of his arc. They’re roomies and colleagues ( as Princess points out, she doesn’t know how they can stand each other at home and at work) and it would’ve been juicy to explore other than, again, using this dynamic for the purposes of house sitting, without really exploring it. And I don’t really care about Hucklerobby, but you really couldn’t pass me to care about the whole farm thing, especially given the fact that his relationship with the widow is still uncertain and she’s always an off screen presence.
Langdon: I was very excited about Langdon, and I really hoped to see how his return affected the entire department. We knew that Trinity would’ve reacted negatively (and RIGHTFULLY SO!!), cause how could she not. However, in the end we almost saw more of that negative reaction from Whitaker than from her (WTF was that scene in the break room). And all in all, besides a little bonding with Cassie and Ellis, his return was treated in a very expected way (Robby- Mel- Santos, a little Dana sprinkled here and there). What I am missing is a little layering that he had in the first couple of episodes when he was in triage. Again, I think PBall is delivering a superb performance, but his arc in the later part of the season is very predictable.
Abbot: we’ve seen very little of him. Ep7 was peak, but his interactions in ep 8 with that witty remark and his willingness to follow the patient to another hospital was very on point. Then, he came back and ep.13-14 is this huge effort in babysitting Robby. I understand they’re kinda friends and stuff. But you cannot have an actor like Shawn Hatosy on board and reduce his character like that cause, SPOILER ALERT, he’s going to mention his deceased wife and his amputation for the purpose of what? List to Robby what he has already lost and praying him to stay off that list. Again, for the sake of credibility, I don’t want to make it about Mohabbot but, to me, it’s very odd he doesn’t follow up or hears from a patient he paid an uber to ship therapy for. But hey, that’s me.
Overall, I think that the first half of the season was very well written, and in continuity with the kind of ed universe we saw in season 1. What I think we’ve lost after - I think - is the individualities of the characters. At one point of the show, I can’t really pinpoint a precise scene (but around episode 8 or 9), there’s been an evident shift in the purpose of the entire department and the show in general, and every scene, every arc, (almost) every dynamic and even medical cases all started to focus around Robby and his su1c!de quest. Which is obviously a huge part of the narrative, being him the lead of the show. But there’s a subtle line between having a lead character and the co-stars gravitating around with Their own dynamics which more or less often intertwine with the main storyline; another thing is to witness a sort of Truman show in which every action from the other characters must somehow elicit a reaction from Robby.
That became more and more evident to me, especially cause in some of the new episodes I’m sometimes under the impression that there are some heavy cuts that take too much context out of the dynamics. For example, where did yesterday’s confrontation with Whitaker coming after Langdon came from? It would’ve been more credible if there had been some snarky remark along the past couple of episodes, but it’s not the case and so it’s all and so for that barely uttered joke Whitaker jumping at Langdon’s throat seems a little exaggerated. I saw someone on twitter saying he’s defending Trinity: in what way? Did she ask for it? Did she manifest any discomfort with Whitaker over Langdon’s budding routine? It lacks a little context.
I also saw an article this morning mentioning that “Ok we get it, Robby is su!c1dal. I feel like a lot of dynamics have been cut out or molded ion a way that could be used to point out, at every possible occasion, Robby’s downward spiral. The problem is that, according to me, it would’ve been different is the focus was on how his worsening mental health was affecting those around him. Instead, we get (at best) concern from his closest, while the rest are (allow me) acting to make him react. The pattern is MS/Residents acting, Robby reacting, and the aftermath is about how said action affects and adds on to Robby’s last nerve.
I really love the Pitt and yes, Samira Mohan is a huge part of it for me, but it is not all - or at least it wouldn’t have been all if it wasn’t for this tendency towards centralizing the narrative on one character alone. Which is what, to me, is going to be the pitt’s downfall.