cunt brian

since 2023 I have been a cunt

[lily-orchid-stuff]

Here is where i talk about Taxxon and stuff.

[that-one-kiddo-in-the-back]

Support your local pedo.

[lgbtqiatext]

[berensreverie]

What I want for Pride Month

[creatingblackcharacters]

Hey, if that's the preferable outcome to this situation lmao. I guess we really don't wanna be told when there are bigots in our midst. To each their own. Couldn't be me 😅

[britts-galaxy-brain]

you people really will take every tiny thing someone says and go "OH THEY'RE TRYING TO GET PEOPLE KILLED" while you actively hunt those same people for sport.

pa-the-tic. what's next, gonna accuse the next trans woman who breathes of polluting the air?

Answering this to show we've legit reached a point where people will defend TELLING PEOPLE THAT EATING VASOLINE AND VICKS VAPOR RUB IS A HOME REMEDY.

This is a cult. I've held off on saying that outright because of how heavy something like that is. But this is actually, legitimately a fucking cult.

[broken-glass-of-water]

Funny that you say this, Anon. CD-Call, when still going by [LO], insisted that LGBT people who engage in a certain kind of gay representation (that is, using vampires and werewolves) should be legally required to carry around a potted plant to make up for the oxygen they use.

CD-Call is also the woman who has told people to kill themselves on a regular basis. Her current go-to is telling people to "apply for MAID".

And just because she claims to have eaten Vaseline and Vicks VapoRub as her "grandmother's cough medicine", that does not change the fact that, according to experts, eating Vaseline and/or Vicks VapoRub is inherently dangerous. If anything, it's like the time she claimed to have an intolerance for wheat, but still ate sourdough bread, except much worse because it can kill someone.

How are we the malicious ones for pointing out CD-Call's careless advice alongside her history of telling people to kill themselves?

[broken-glass-of-water]

CD-Call Claims Poison As "Grandmother's Cough Medicine"

Tumblr is a place to express yourself, discover yourself, and bond over the stuff you love. It's where your interests connect you with your

Please, do NOT take CD-Call's advice about her "grandmother's cough medicine".

Molasses is generally considered safe to eat (defined as an organism substance in Canada), but Vaseline and Vicks Vapo Rub are not safe to consume.

Never eat Vaseline on purpose. Swallowing large amounts of petroleum jelly can cause severe diarrhea and stomach cramps. Most importantly, inhaling it into your lungs (aspirating it) can cause severe, long-term breathing issues.

Vicks contains camphor, menthol, and eucalyptus oil, which are poisonous if ingested. Swallowing it can lead to severe symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, and seizures.

Please call the appropriate authorities if you happen to follow CD-Call's advice on this.

Keep in mind that CD-Call is the same woman who has told people to kill themselves on a regular basis, her most recent methods of endorsing suicide is telling people to "apply for MAID".

How is anyone supposed to take CD-Call's advice sincerely if she's endorsed self-harm?

I cannot, in good faith, sincerely take medical advice from a woman who has told me that I should hurt myself.

[lily-orchid-stuff]

Cd Call is speedunning getting banned from tumblr because she was too honest and she needs a out.

Is Vicks VapoRub safe? | Poison Control

Vicks VapoRub has been used for many years as a cough and cold remedy. While this product is relatively safe to use when applied to the skin

" Vicks VapoRub® is not safe to eat. When swallowed, the camphor in Vicks VapoRub® can cause nausea,  vomiting, seizures, and death. Small children are at increased risk for toxicity after consumption of camphor-containing products."

UPDATE!

[broken-glass-of-water]

CD-Call Claims Poison As "Grandmother's Cough Medicine"

Tumblr is a place to express yourself, discover yourself, and bond over the stuff you love. It's where your interests connect you with your

Please, do NOT take CD-Call's advice about her "grandmother's cough medicine".

Molasses is generally considered safe to eat (defined as an organism substance in Canada), but Vaseline and Vicks Vapo Rub are not safe to consume.

Never eat Vaseline on purpose. Swallowing large amounts of petroleum jelly can cause severe diarrhea and stomach cramps. Most importantly, inhaling it into your lungs (aspirating it) can cause severe, long-term breathing issues.

Vicks contains camphor, menthol, and eucalyptus oil, which are poisonous if ingested. Swallowing it can lead to severe symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, and seizures.

Please call the appropriate authorities if you happen to follow CD-Call's advice on this.

Keep in mind that CD-Call is the same woman who has told people to kill themselves on a regular basis, her most recent methods of endorsing suicide is telling people to "apply for MAID".

How is anyone supposed to take CD-Call's advice sincerely if she's endorsed self-harm?

I cannot, in good faith, sincerely take medical advice from a woman who has told me that I should hurt myself.

[ralzei1997]

so apparently @patricia-taxxon defends lily orchard, a known sexual abuser. this is incredibly disheartening to hear, as she is one of my favorite music artists. there's a chance this is someone impersonating her, but if this is actually patty, i'm incredibly disappointed.

edit: i misinterpreted it so much

edit 2: actually i didn't i just got gaslighted

edit 3: i've realized patricia is a much worse person than i originally thought. please go read this document, it's quite lengthy but filled with useful info. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rDqmh6ZyR7ceb1CRXCwhPV1_iUYj_kb91d23EkHcs0Y/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.vh92kbkaq5u8

[starlit-soothsayer]

Thoughts on the idea that the crit sphere specifically targets trans women?

I have provided my thoughts on this already, actually. As a summary: No, though trans women are absolutely more likely to be the target of online harassment in general just due to societal bias, and I believe that the Crit Sphere is a prime example of that.

[f4ster-th4n-sound]

I took these from her own twt btw<3

[noblackwomannocry]

the worst part about that Buyer's Market (the "album" that consists of police interviews with CSA victims and their parents used by a pedophile without their consent so he could set background music and put it together as his work) post is the complete lack of reflection within the whole thing that isn't centred around taxxon as a person and how she thinks She's grown. the justification for being into it then was being such a sad lonely autistic teen boy that she couldn't help but opt for the obscure shock factor of a pedophile's shlock. her more "nuanced" opinion on it now stems from her now not being a sad lonely autistic teen but a grown autistic woman with friends.

even when talking about it being funny is "haha isn't this darkly satirical. it's like a PSA!" in not a single post related to this does she express any thoughts on the fact that a pedophile convicted for his ownership of CSEM took police interviews with CSA victims and their parents and made it into an album other than to go "wow what an interesting piece of art." because she, nor any of the people like her who are constantly going on about the Societal Pedophile Boogeyman in response to any criticism of their child sex fetish posting, actually give a fuck about victims of CSA, they can be brushed aside for the sake of Whoa Cool Art, Convicted Child Sex Abuse Material Owner!

it's how you can tell she grew up on 4chan, prime real estate of teen boys with no sense of empathy or appropriate behaviour for two decades plus, where the shock of anything existing just makes it high quality entertainment. less than ten years after she was actively posting on the music board the only personality growth she has shown is her transition and an openness to talk about her child sex fetish and autopedophilia. if you know what 4chan posters are like taxxon is the type you can glance at and know without a second thought used to post with a tripcode lmao

[rambling-crerchur]

Patricia is doubling down on minors entering NSFW spaces

Alright, I already discussed the initial take that this relates to alongside what Patricia intends for her community to be (since that is important context for said take) in this post, but to keep it short here's the summary I gave in that post:

Patricia Taxxon wants to create environments, both private and professional, where being an admitted rape/incest fetishist and pedophile is normalized to a degree where it is defended. She has also specifically told minors to lie about their age to enter one of these environments, setting them up to be hurt and victimized by the kinds of people that inhabit spaces like that.

She has now decided to double down on telling minors to engage sexually with adults under the pretense that they are adult in this post:

Its difficult for me to put into words what I want to say here just because of how much her doubling down here infuriates me. But I will try. Her trying to frame adults telling minors to not enter 18+ spaces as them taking agency away from minors disguists me. Let me be very clear here, because this will come up: What happened to Patricia in her childhood was horrific, and I cannot even begin to understand what that kind of trauma does to someone. But what she does here is not excused by that in the slightest. She frames minors (using herself as an example) entering NSFW spaces as an attempt to gain agency and that adults trying to restrict them from doing so are removing said agency. Her saying that as soon as she turned 18 she was held responsible for things that she previously wasnt is her blurring the line of who is responsible: She's trying to argue that minors that enter 18+ spaces and come into sexual contact with adults are (at least partially) responsible for this and any consequences that follow. This is victim blaming at best and framing the victim as the perpetrator at worst. To make it short:

Patricia sees minors entering 18+ spaces as them trying to gain autonomy and sees those minors as responsible for the things that result from that decision.

In the next paragraph Patricia tells minors to get into relationships with adults.

That is what she is saying. There's things surrounding it, justifications being made but thats what she is saying at the core of the argument. No amount of trying to make it about minors grappling with adult feelings or being understood will change that.

"[...] you can have fulfilling relationships now and when you grow up [...]"

What is there even left to say here. We have arrived at the point where Patricia Taxxon is telling minors to not only enter NSFW spaces but to get into "relationships" with adults and that all these things are good and adults telling them not to are trying to limit their agency.

Actually there is one more thing to say here. This isnt just Patricia trying to get minors close to her to groom and abuse them. This is something an anon I got an hour ago made me realize:

This is Patricia trying to make a very specific sexual fantasy of hers real

Patricia has on multiple occasions made it clear that she fetishises minors forcing/tricking adults into engaging with them sexually (here and here and here for example). By telling minors to lie about their age, enter NSFW spaces (including her community which she very much makes clear) and engage in sexual activities she's trying to make this fantasy real. She is trying to get minors to reach out to her sexually and initiate contact because thats what she specifically gets off on.

I cant really think of a good conclusion for this post, crimsonender also made a good post on this going into different aspects of this than I did. Give it a read.

Post by @crimsonender · 2 images

💬 0  🔁 4  ❤️ 16 ·  Alright I've been trying to be a good boyo but this needs to be addressed publically. Here's the thing. Patty is right

Apart from that, I'm going to go outside now to get away from this bleak, disguisting and infuriating shitshow.

[fennec-foxhound]

Hey buddy. Pretty sure I did say what my problem with your "evidence" was. It's that your "evidence" for Britt and Tepes has nothing to do with your original claim and is about someone that was openly lying to Britt about someone that was harassing multiple people for months.

I don't need to speak about everything you show, you've already showed your hand. You already got caught being intentionally dishonest.

Again, you're acting like blocking the people that call you out suddenly makes the proof you've been lying about become true. You're fully aware of why what you have doesn't count as substantial evidence, that's why you're trying so hard to steer people away from it.

[how-do-these-people-exist]

i was recently rewatching the joon the king video on lily orchard, which interviews britt about her.

(context: i had a post blow up and somehow end up on lily orchard’s blog, which was a jumpscare, but has become a hidden blessing in that i’ve gotten the chance to introduce a lot of people to her awful behavior and hopefully siphon away more support for her! was reviewing the video so i could confirm it talked about the most important and egregious behavior of LO.)

at any rate, and this is not meant to deny her the trauma of her experiences, but listening to britt talk so vulnerably about how lily groomed her is really subtly horrifying now that i know that this is the same person currently denying the harm to a person i care about, who seems to have turned around and done the same sickening thing to another kid.

why is it that it’s allowed to be traumatic to you, britt, but to nobody else?

Yeah.. I'll be honest, I watched that video and skimmed through it. I know I heard about Lily's predatory shit from somewhere else, but I genuinely cannot remember who. I was maybe around 10 at the time I watched Lily, so I had to have been close to that age when I found out and stopped watching her, too. Generally from what I saw that 'interview' repeated a lot of the same points as Britt's posts, so it wasn't much new to hear. (Imo the editing was.. very sensationalized/comical for such serious topics.) But yeah.. it's. It's really gross. Especially after I heard more about her history with Courtney. She has a habit of only caring about victims and evidence as 'ammo' in her decade of posting against Lily. If a victim's story doesn't make her look good, it doesn't matter what they went through. If it can't be used to hurt Lily, it doesn't matter how bad it is, she only cares if it can be used against Lily specifically. Britt refuses to accept the nuance that both things can be true. Lily can be a predatory piece of shit.. and so can Britt. So can Courtney. That doesn't mean neither of you weren't victims of Lily. That doesn't mean I have no sympathy for what Lily put you through.

[hello-im-dog]

Patricia Taxxon and Hbomberguy

Patricia Taxxon was previously friends with and collaborated with HBomberguy, a popular Youtuber known for his extensive video essays. Some of his most well known videos include ROBLOX_OOF.mp3 and Plagiarism and You(Tube). Patricia composed the music for his videos covering Ctrl+Alt+Del and RWBY.

They eventually stopped speaking to each other, which in itself is not unusual.

However, before being banned from Tumblr, Patricia made a number of posts speaking negatively about HBomb, stating that he was a bad friend and underpaid her.

She also publicly defended James Somerton, the primary subject of the plagiarism video. Somerton was a video essayist who focused on queer media and plagiarized the work of numerous queer authors while making tens of thousands of dollars through Youtube ad revenue, Patreon, and IndieGoGo scams.

On May 14, 2026, HBomberguy made a post on Bluesky that he deleted shortly afterward. He did not mention Patricia by name in the post.

context of Patricia's post:

Patricia's response:

A reddit thread was created, and in the comments Patricia received a considerable amount of pushback.

Hbomb's producer commented on the Reddit thread and asked the mods to take it down.

The thread gained quite a bit of traction.

Patrica then posted the screenshot of what Hbomb had said and continued to talk about the situation on Bluesky.

She received even more pushback.

She then said that she was planning to make a post on her 2nd youtube channel. She deleted the post and then called Hbomb an abuser.

As of May 22nd 2026, Patricia has deactivated her Bluesky.

It needs to be emphasized, while Hbomb was irresponsible in making the initial vague post, he did not mention her by name and quickly deleted it. Patricia, however, continued bringing up the situation herself, which drew further negative attention toward her.

Despite this, some people claim HBomb pedojacketed her.

When it comes to HBomberguy allegedly underpaying Patricia when she was 18 and unsure how to price her commissions, that was definitely wrong. At the same time, I feel the issue would have been better handled privately once Patricia had a better understanding of the value of her work, rather than being discussed publicly after their friendship had ended.

5/24/26 EDIT: She reactivated her Bluesky, presumably because of this post. Hi Patricia 👋

If she genuinely believes this situation reflects well on her, I'm not sure what to say.