Before sending any asks, it may be worthwhile to read this post and check this tag. You can choose not to, but I will redirect you to it if you ask something already covered here.
If I ignore a post you've reblogged from me or tagged me in, it's because it's either has insults/assumptions targeted at me (in the post body or in the tags) or is answered already through this FAQ.
I am aware I have an imitator. They are entirely unaffiliated with me, and I do not endorse anything they say.
If you want a particular piece of information, or you're just curious about something, my inbox is always open (though I may close it during breaks). I don't block non-bot users on this account, no matter how insufferable; the only exception is users on my posts that are intentionally trolling.
Interaction with other's opinions is not endorsement. If I don't say something myself, then you should not take it as something I personally believe.
This blog exists to provide information, regardless of any personal gripes. You can come here and draw your own conclusions without the influence of others. That is its primary purpose. Everything I've compiled is here (several documents/images still pending). There is also this tag for posts on my blog with screenshots or links to files.
Who are you?
If you don't know who I am, you haven't been paying attention. You can always make guesses in my inbox or DMs, and if anyone guesses correctly then I'll provide a link, no questions asked. The only stipulation is that is that guesses can't be made anonymously.
I am protective of my identity for good reason. I won't give it away easily.
How old are you?
Much older than several people think. I've been online longer than most people on Tumblr have been alive.
[Something about comparing Sai to Lily]
I've stated my piece on this already. No, I do not care that Sai has said slurs. It's not exactly a good look, but she's an adult and can deal with the consequences.
Comparisons of personality are not comparisons of crimes. If you can't get over this hurdle, you're too young or too emotional for this blog.
[A lazy insult]
Cry harder. I might start to care.
You just want attention!
[Something about gooning or pedophilia]
[An assumption about my stance on NSFW content]
[Something about Lily being a predator/pedophile/incest writer]
I'm aware. You're preaching to the choir. I've reported her already. Let's stay focused.
[Something about this is a waste of my time / get a life]
This is a side blog for a reason. I have projects I work on that are my main focus. When I'm no longer interested I'll disappear.
[Something about piracy/ art theft]
If you're reading this, there's a 90 percent chance you have pirated something before. This is not the morality smoking gun you think it is. Regardless, any information I provided is public knowledge that can be obtained for free in some form or another, it just may be incredibly inconvenient for the average internet denizen to do so. I will never share a DM that isn't already posted somewhere else (even if where it's posted is not on Tumblr).
Did you send me an ask?
No. Never. I don't send asks from this account. I provide information. What others do with it is up to them.
Did you delete [insert post here]?
No. I don't delete posts. If a thread gets to be incredibly long I may remove a few of the posts in-between, but the entire chain as a whole will always be accessible. I may delete replies that are pointless argument bait.
[XYZ person] interacted with your post!
Great for them. I don't care.
[Something NSFW directed at or about me]
I will not answer questions like this, doubly so if it is anonymous. Ask off anon or don't ask at all.
I don't follow everything Britt does— quite frankly, it's gotten to be far too much to keep track of— however, I have noticed that she's come under serious fire as of late. Seems like another instance of the lolcow cycle in action. Groups like these always cannibalize themselves.
Does it count as moving on and growing up if you replace Twitter with Bluesky and one Tumblr blog with another? Disappointed, but not surprised in the slightest.
A lot of people seem too stupid to know the difference between a legally backed warning to stop and, say, ILoveKimPossibleALot DMCA striking her critics and using that to dox their homes.
What KP did is vastly different than Jazzy making a legally reviewed statement requesting Sai stop. It's also vastly different than a SLAPP suit, yet based on how people are panicking in Sai's camp, you would think Jazzy just handed Sai a summons.
The irony of course being, in your response, you are spreading damaging rumors about Jazzy that could be used in reference to a lawsuit should Jazzy choose to take stronger measures. Because that would be damaging to her reputation and would be entirely fraudulent.
And your only legal defenses could be you didn't know the difference between a C&A and a SLAPP....or you were too scared to think clealry.
So which is it? Fear or stupidity?
Also, for legal purposes, I have no involvement in what is happening, so if you imply I do, that legally also counts as libel.
Ant babe saying somebody is a stinky doo doo head or a "Z list actor" because you don't like them is not damaging anybodys reputation lmao. Your friend is crashing out because she said dumb things online and is getting made fun of for it and is getting law involved because she's a big baby who can't stand by what she says lmao.
You backing this makes you just as much of a troll as any of the others cuz surely you know how stupid this looks
No actually I see somebody spiraling on bsky writing paragraphs about how much they totally don't care guys to themselves as crashing out lmao.
If you think threatening to throw Cease and Desists at people because they make fun of you online is "mature" then I'm afraid yall are never gonna leave the lolcow vortex. And honestly I hope you don't this shit is fun to watch.
But hey if you wanna continue gassing up Jazzy for a bogus C&D be my guest bro. I'll simply be laughing at yall the entire time lmao. Like I said the antics you idiots get to online are a million times funnier than any of your actual content.
Sure thing buddy, you just happenned to be on frog's blog and also 100% share frog's opinion on the subject but still felt the need to personally voice your opinion despite just echoing frog's. Sure buddy, suuuuure.
-Admin
They're being 100% honest, actually. That account isn't Spacefrog's, it's @/ballsette on Discord.
Spacefrog's alts are much easier to spot, as the pattern is consistent across all of them; for example, there's @celestialpollywog @orbitalaxolotl @cosmictoad1984 @deepspacenewt @galactictadpole @astroamphibian and @cosmictoad, to name a few.
Hey so can a certain group of people PLEASE move your never-ending circular personal beefs out of the fuckin Lily Orchard discussions?? ALL of yall are flooding the space with petty bullshit and it's distracting from the actual issues.
Y'all in the Lily hatedom need to start noticing when someone who makes videos on Lily acts like Lily.
Essence of thot did it, and y'all ignored her horrible personality because she was a trans person going after Lily.
Poppy did it, and only one of you noticed. And you got rid of them because Courtney made up some accusation y'all never questioned, (cause hearts were trying to get you all to act less like rabid dogs and be normal, and you didn't like that ) Poppy was allowed to get away with it until Courtney let too much of his true personality out, and Poppy got nudes of him.
Courtney, God bless him, acted like anyone who disagreed with him was a pedophile rapist so no one wanted to risk being the next Hearts. But when he started going after Brittneigh (The patron saint of Lilyhatedom and the top Bitch of the Critical blog community ) then you suddenly cared. Courtney was also a victim of Cd-call and her sibling. So you ignored all the ted flags because you wanted to USE HIM AS A SWORD AND SHIELD.
Sai had screenshots of her typing out the HARD UNCENSORED N-WORD and y'all accepted that the context that she was totally doing it to argue with a racist.... When the truth was that Nugatory was BLACK. Which changes a whole fucking lot. Sai insisted that people only hated her for ' setting boundaries ' and being a loud woman. You ignored when Crim, a reasonable and kind man, suddenly cut ties with Sai and left the Lily-hatedom. You ignored when Brittneigh left her Discord.
This is a PATTERN that y'all KEEP falling for!
Stop putting Lorch snarkers on a pedestal and start being critical of your blorbo.
What I mean by this is that y'all will run defense for these people and IGNORE red flags that are trying to TELL YOU that this person is not a good one.
You will use people like tools to get to Lily.
You use former fans as testimony while not really treating the victims of Lily/Cd 's TOXIC behavior with respect.
You just see them as a sword and shield. Not a person with feelings.
If they turn out to be flawed or speak too much, then you turn on them and try to play pretend that you NEVER LIKED THEM and TOLERATED them.
You did it to Courtney. You did it with Patch.
If they're too loud and not controllable, then you push them out and act like they're a bad seed.
So, just to clarify something before I get into the meat of this:
Yes, this is in direct response to an earlier post I made about the ongoing Ant and Sai Drama.
Yes, this is in direct response to how @agramuglia replied to said post in the comments of it.
What I am about to say is meant as genuine advice and with all due respect in terms of what my initial advice was and the response that I got. And that I fully warned this advice is something that the recipient will likely not like to hear, will likely want to lash out for, but I genuinely believe you need to hear it.
I am an outsider in all of this. I was never friends or even really interacted with any of the people involved. The only people I talk about on this blog that I HAVE had personal dealings with and been victimized by were Lio Convoy and Verlisify. This is just to Clarify that I don't really have an Emotional Stake in this but can view it from an outsider's perspective.
the following will be under a Read More due to length
Ant, to be clear you are a Public Figure. You work in the Media, your social media presence is directly tied to your real and legal name. This means that every single thing you do online, especially in this day and age, is going to be scrutinized to absolute HELL and back. Whether you are in the right, wrong, or inbetween. Some of it will be earned, some of it won't.
You need to learn to let things go. You need to learn to "Shut the Fuck Up" for a turn of phrase. You need to learn to just ignore things said by people who think the worst of you.
So Sai and her fans and friends talk about you. Who cares? Genuinely.
If she and her fans and friends want to spread your posts from your social media and spin whatever narrative they want, why let that bother you?
Why respond?
Why give them more ammunition by letting them know it bothers you and gets under your skin?
Don't get me wrong, the fact she has three seperate threads dedicated in some way to essentially stalking your social media (with one being joint to talk about Lily, LioConvoy, and Crim) and the fact that not a single person points out how fucking weird that is that they all continue to look through your social media to screenshot it and talk about it amongst themselves when after the initial blowout of it all you and Sai blocked each other and wanted to be done with each other is something I am HIGHLY critical of as well.
But my advice to you was to stop responding to it for a reason. Be an adult and a brick fucking wall to it. They wanna screenshot and run their mouths about what you are doing? Let them. Don't respond to it, don't react to it. Be a duck and them water and let it slide off.
You want to be done with it. Be fucking done with it and stop responding.
Because here's the thing: They aren't going to stop talking about you. Why did you ever think they would? They still talk about Crim. They still talk about Limus, they still talk about every single person Sai has had drama with in any form. Why would you think they would stop?
So to flat out tell you how to make the drama and your involvement stop, which is to just flat out refuse to engage with it, and have your response be "
I will say this, though. I was off Tumblr for basically a week, and they still were obsessed with me, crafting narratives about how evil and awful I am, and insisting I was engaging when I wasn't even on the site. They're self-sustaining and not going anywhere.
But ultimately, despite them insisting this is two sided, it really isn't." isn't the take you think it is to my advice.
So they are painting you their villain. The thing about life and living is that you will ALWAYS be someone's villain. That is completely unavoidable. They wanna paint you as their villain? Big fucking whoop. Let them.
I mentioned this in my post: I've seen situations like this before where a personal drama ended up destroying a person's social media career. I was being genuine when I said that in relation to this situation as well.
The two people in general covered the same topics and one of them got jealous. The two ended up having beef over it and when of the two decided Enough was Enough and stopped engaging with it to focus on their own content, platform, and growth they started to excel.
The other person who refused to give up on that drama and continued to try and bring it up constantly and everything the person did?
Go look up Verlisify's Channel. The way his channel now is the direct consequence to not letting the drama go when the other person did. To death gripping that he was right and everyone else was wrong.
It's not a perfect analogy in a lot of ways, but it does show the potential outcome this could have.
Because here is the major hard hitting thing that I know you aren't going to like but I'm going to say it anyway and I mean it fully with my chest as someone who was a victim of LioConvoy's Abuse:
Right now when I see how you are acting and responding to criticism, how you are continuously interacting with the drama between you and Sai (not just on here but on Twitter and Bluesky as well), with how you are responding to other people about your takes (whether they agree or disagree) all I see is you becoming the next LioConvoy.
Not in the Predator Hunter way.
In the refusal to let drama die sort of way. In the refusal to be seen as wrong or that perhaps something you said is being taken as wrong sort of way. In the way you are still keeping tabs on former friends and responding to them or (whether directly or indirectly) getting screenshots from accounts that have blocked you to respond to them still after they've had enough.
Sai is guilty of it as well in some forms, but genuinely as someone who is seeing this from the outside and is fairly neutral on you both (and still enjoys the content the both of you make in some areas even if I disagree with some of your takes), I say this fully that I do genuinely believe you are taking things way to far in a way that reminds me of LioConvoy and how he handles things.
You want things to be done. You said you were tired of the repeat drama.
I told you to be done with it then. Put your foot down and say you refuse to engage with it anymore, to either ignore people who bring it to you, block them, or tell them you aren't interested in it so to please stop.
Maybe this is rambly, maybe I'm wording things wrong and I have no problems apologizing for that and clarifying or changing where needed but the core of this is that while you might not see it personally I am outright saying you are slowly becoming a bully. You are refusing to let the drama die on your end and continue to engage with it in your own way that is allowing it to perpetuate.
I hope you take this to heart. I hope you think about it. I hope I'm making sense and you understand what I am trying to say.
Because genuinely I still maintain that I don't think you, SaiScribbles, CrimsonEnder, any of the people involved in what happened (outside Lily Orchard) are genuinely bad or evil people. I never have and I don't think I ever will. Faulty, yes. But not bad or evil or even all that (intentionally) malicious.
This is all genuinely coming from a place of wanting to see you and everyone involved be better. Even if I'm a complete nobody that you could outright ignore and it be fine.
Treating your publicly available and visible social platforms on the internet like a private space will always be the funniest thing to me. No, you're not at home, you walked out into the street and yelled something, it's only private if it was a truly private server or group with only people you know or direct communication.
Paywalls aren't private either. It's a gated community maybe but if I can buy access to it it's just as public as a trip to a theme park.
You are entitled to internet privacy when your private life is dragged into someone's attention seeking ramblings. You are not entitled to privacy when you shittalk someone's family and friends on a publicly available discord and get your messages scraped.
I hope betraying your other friends for Sai’s sake was worth it, you backstabbing snake.
How did I betray anyone? Who did I wrong by not giving into peer pressure and dumping Sai as a friend? If you look at what Sai has done or said and come away thinking she's a racist, a transphobe, or any other kind of bigot, then you're probably not the type of person to treat others with dignity and kindness, you'd be the type of person to assume the worst in others and not check on the facts or others' perspectives. I can only imagine that you're incapable of appreciating things from others' perspectives - I'm not saying you can't see things from others' perspectives, you just disregard them in favor of your own, which you see as the objectively, morally correct perspective. That's ignorance, pettiness, and self-righteousness at work. If you find yourself hurt by something Sai has said or done, you have every right to walk away and say what you want, but you don't have the right to demand others do the same as you, that's not being a very good friend.
Just to bring this full circle - what do you think Steven Universe would do? Do you think he'd look at a person and instantly assume the worst of them? Do you think he'd make demands of friends, dictating who they associate with? Or do you think he would approach situations with understanding and compassion? I'm sorry to have to use a fictional character from a cartoon aimed at children as my example of how you should treat people, but you should have learned how to be a friend and a caring person earlier in your life, and Steven just seems like a good guide for you.
I doubt you're actually someone who has ever considered me a friend, you probably just want to speak for others so you can feel superior, and that's sad.
But if you were a friend of mine, think about how you might want to treat your other friends better in the future. I doubt I ever treated you with anything other than kindness, but now you're repaying that kindness with vindictiveness. Please just think about that for a bit.
I don't mean to jump in and help pound you into the ground here bud-- but I gotta say something about this right here.
I'm pretty sure you know my background, right? We've discussed it. I'm from a very conservative upbringing. I'm Albertan, you know, so no shit right?
I've had a life experience that's forced me to come to terms more than most that bigotry is not contingent on evil or active malice. It's conditioned into people intentionally by the state and other oppressive bodies to cause class devision. To weaken community, family and cohilition. To isolate both the bigot and the person the bigotry is being directed towards in a perpetual state of fear and distrust in their fellow.
And we all live in this system of oppression. *Everyone* internalizes bigotries. Even victims of it. That is a wound on your soul you can heal from-- but that still leaves a scar. This is just the reality of the social order we were born to.
*Many* people use the word 'bigot' as shorthand for, essentially, an inherent moral degenerate. I don't. Anyone really farmiliar with how bigotry works as a tool of systematic oppression doesn't. I know this post wasn't directed at me specifically, or anyone in particular-- but just to make definitions clear here.
I hope that, from interactions we me, you trust me when I say-- I do not judge people for their ignorance. For ideas they have absorbed and never been challenged to question. For being confused by language that threaten the authority of the powers that be so they've denied them it.
So when I call Sai a bigot-- I'm not calling her that because I am judging her for the bigotries she's absorbed. Not really. I'm calling her that because she's chosen complacency that. Whether she knows that's the choice she's making or not.
At least, at the moment (or when last I interacted with her) that's what she's chosing.
She has the option to not make that choice-- but I ran out of patience the more and more it became clear that she wasn't really interested in chosing otherwise. Not because I think she's the fucking devil-- but because it's fucking unpleasant to be subjected to and you have to make those quality of life calls at some point.
This is not me saying "this is why you should no longer associate with her." I've defended Sheev's choice to continue being her friend and I'll defend your's too.
What I'm saying is-- I'm sorry man but I gotta call fowl on this statement here. Respectfully. And I hope you can appreciate why.
She's said quite a bit of shit that's absurd to deny is bigotry. Which *would* be forgivable (within reason) if she didn't then insist on doubling, sometimes tripling down on it.
I know some of it she's . . . I'll be generous and say, "apologized" for in private. Maybe she's genuinely now absorbed why her impulse to be stubborn that her view is infallibly the correct one isn't always the super sister slay response, maybe not-- I don't know.
But this reflexive aversion to accept she's capable of bigotry is why people are calling her this in the first place. 'Bigot' is not a slur.
An interesting case study, but the options here skew the poll results, as does the blog source. If you have questions that rely on previous polls, it should account for all scenarios. There should be options for starting with just Crimson and moving to one of others. There should also be options for watching Sai and either Crimson or Ant at the start, rather than just one or the other.
Welp now sai deleted her drama blog. Too little too late, she's still in full damage-control mode
I was hoping she would delete her blog and move on. Things were going well. It looks like she has now opted to use another side blog to keep going with internet spats.
There's a blog that's a copy of yours calling out a fan of Patricia Taxxon just letting you know.
I'm curious as to why they would copy my blog only to use it for something I have never talked about in-depth. I have mentioned Patricia only because others had frequently asked, and came to the conclusion there wasn't anything worth talking about. It'd be gossip for gossip's sake.
What is the goal? I have been very clear previously what the purpose of my blog is, and generalized call outs is not one of them. If it's to make me look bad, they're doing a poor job. No one else seems to be falling for it. It's mostly just... confusing.