Untitled

[loudnproudgays]

[lionboygoofy2]

it's so sad no one has told you it's okay to be raped yet... I feel bad for you.

[loudnproudgays]

[lionboygoofy2]

it's so sad no one has told you it's okay to be raped yet... I feel bad for you.

[diana-lostandfound]

Younger 4B women: expect to be constantly told that you're "being too afraid to live life," or that you're "running away from love to avoid heartbreak" or whatever. This is the primary way you'll be psyopped back into domestic servitude. Expect it, anticipate it, or you might not be able to see through it.

You are going to constantly be told--both explicitly and implicitly through constant propaganda and social conditioning--that finding a male mate is natural, healthy, and the secret key to a rich and full life. You WILL be beaten over the head with the concept that as long as you stubbornly and childishly refuse men, your only choice is to live a sad, unfulfilling, half-life.

But think about it. Of course men are going to try their hardest to woo you back into servitude!! They were getting the best deal ever and you were getting totally scammed. Btw, he knows that he had the better end of the deal (even if he complains that women have it easier), so he looks down on you because he thinks you're stupid and naive for getting tricked by him. When your boyfriend acts distant and unloving it's because he is.

Remember: everything men say is projection, especially when it's about women. When a man (or a male-allied woman) tells you you'll be sad and alone if you don't want to get married, that's pure projection. HE would be unfulfilled and alone because you were supplying all of the spark and personality and excitement in the relationship. But you'll be fine.

Men are biological parasites. The origins of sex are literally the scientific definition of parasitism. When men wax philosophical about "the other half" or how "men and women complete each other," it's because the host completes the parasite. Again, projection. The parasite is nothing without the host. But men are too short-sighted to realize that it's completely one-sided. The host has absolutely no need for the parasite. In fact, it's the only thing holding her back.

[lionboygoofy2]

you do not get to destroy other peoples bodies

[diana-lostandfound]

Younger 4B women: expect to be constantly told that you're "being too afraid to live life," or that you're "running away from love to avoid heartbreak" or whatever. This is the primary way you'll be psyopped back into domestic servitude. Expect it, anticipate it, or you might not be able to see through it.

You are going to constantly be told--both explicitly and implicitly through constant propaganda and social conditioning--that finding a male mate is natural, healthy, and the secret key to a rich and full life. You WILL be beaten over the head with the concept that as long as you stubbornly and childishly refuse men, your only choice is to live a sad, unfulfilling, half-life.

But think about it. Of course men are going to try their hardest to woo you back into servitude!! They were getting the best deal ever and you were getting totally scammed. Btw, he knows that he had the better end of the deal (even if he complains that women have it easier), so he looks down on you because he thinks you're stupid and naive for getting tricked by him. When your boyfriend acts distant and unloving it's because he is.

Remember: everything men say is projection, especially when it's about women. When a man (or a male-allied woman) tells you you'll be sad and alone if you don't want to get married, that's pure projection. HE would be unfulfilled and alone because you were supplying all of the spark and personality and excitement in the relationship. But you'll be fine.

Men are biological parasites. The origins of sex are literally the scientific definition of parasitism. When men wax philosophical about "the other half" or how "men and women complete each other," it's because the host completes the parasite. Again, projection. The parasite is nothing without the host. But men are too short-sighted to realize that it's completely one-sided. The host has absolutely no need for the parasite. In fact, it's the only thing holding her back.

[lionboygoofy2]

you do not get to destroy other peoples bodies

[loudnproudgays]

[lionboygoofy2]

it's so sad no one has told you it's okay to be raped yet... I feel bad for you.

[loudnproudgays]

[lionboygoofy2]

it's so sad no one has told you it's okay to be raped yet... I feel bad for you.

[diana-lostandfound]

Younger 4B women: expect to be constantly told that you're "being too afraid to live life," or that you're "running away from love to avoid heartbreak" or whatever. This is the primary way you'll be psyopped back into domestic servitude. Expect it, anticipate it, or you might not be able to see through it.

You are going to constantly be told--both explicitly and implicitly through constant propaganda and social conditioning--that finding a male mate is natural, healthy, and the secret key to a rich and full life. You WILL be beaten over the head with the concept that as long as you stubbornly and childishly refuse men, your only choice is to live a sad, unfulfilling, half-life.

But think about it. Of course men are going to try their hardest to woo you back into servitude!! They were getting the best deal ever and you were getting totally scammed. Btw, he knows that he had the better end of the deal (even if he complains that women have it easier), so he looks down on you because he thinks you're stupid and naive for getting tricked by him. When your boyfriend acts distant and unloving it's because he is.

Remember: everything men say is projection, especially when it's about women. When a man (or a male-allied woman) tells you you'll be sad and alone if you don't want to get married, that's pure projection. HE would be unfulfilled and alone because you were supplying all of the spark and personality and excitement in the relationship. But you'll be fine.

Men are biological parasites. The origins of sex are literally the scientific definition of parasitism. When men wax philosophical about "the other half" or how "men and women complete each other," it's because the host completes the parasite. Again, projection. The parasite is nothing without the host. But men are too short-sighted to realize that it's completely one-sided. The host has absolutely no need for the parasite. In fact, it's the only thing holding her back.

[lionboygoofy2]

you do not get to destroy other peoples bodies

[diana-lostandfound]

Younger 4B women: expect to be constantly told that you're "being too afraid to live life," or that you're "running away from love to avoid heartbreak" or whatever. This is the primary way you'll be psyopped back into domestic servitude. Expect it, anticipate it, or you might not be able to see through it.

You are going to constantly be told--both explicitly and implicitly through constant propaganda and social conditioning--that finding a male mate is natural, healthy, and the secret key to a rich and full life. You WILL be beaten over the head with the concept that as long as you stubbornly and childishly refuse men, your only choice is to live a sad, unfulfilling, half-life.

But think about it. Of course men are going to try their hardest to woo you back into servitude!! They were getting the best deal ever and you were getting totally scammed. Btw, he knows that he had the better end of the deal (even if he complains that women have it easier), so he looks down on you because he thinks you're stupid and naive for getting tricked by him. When your boyfriend acts distant and unloving it's because he is.

Remember: everything men say is projection, especially when it's about women. When a man (or a male-allied woman) tells you you'll be sad and alone if you don't want to get married, that's pure projection. HE would be unfulfilled and alone because you were supplying all of the spark and personality and excitement in the relationship. But you'll be fine.

Men are biological parasites. The origins of sex are literally the scientific definition of parasitism. When men wax philosophical about "the other half" or how "men and women complete each other," it's because the host completes the parasite. Again, projection. The parasite is nothing without the host. But men are too short-sighted to realize that it's completely one-sided. The host has absolutely no need for the parasite. In fact, it's the only thing holding her back.

[lionboygoofy2]

you do not get to destroy other peoples bodies

[diana-lostandfound]

Younger 4B women: expect to be constantly told that you're "being too afraid to live life," or that you're "running away from love to avoid heartbreak" or whatever. This is the primary way you'll be psyopped back into domestic servitude. Expect it, anticipate it, or you might not be able to see through it.

You are going to constantly be told--both explicitly and implicitly through constant propaganda and social conditioning--that finding a male mate is natural, healthy, and the secret key to a rich and full life. You WILL be beaten over the head with the concept that as long as you stubbornly and childishly refuse men, your only choice is to live a sad, unfulfilling, half-life.

But think about it. Of course men are going to try their hardest to woo you back into servitude!! They were getting the best deal ever and you were getting totally scammed. Btw, he knows that he had the better end of the deal (even if he complains that women have it easier), so he looks down on you because he thinks you're stupid and naive for getting tricked by him. When your boyfriend acts distant and unloving it's because he is.

Remember: everything men say is projection, especially when it's about women. When a man (or a male-allied woman) tells you you'll be sad and alone if you don't want to get married, that's pure projection. HE would be unfulfilled and alone because you were supplying all of the spark and personality and excitement in the relationship. But you'll be fine.

Men are biological parasites. The origins of sex are literally the scientific definition of parasitism. When men wax philosophical about "the other half" or how "men and women complete each other," it's because the host completes the parasite. Again, projection. The parasite is nothing without the host. But men are too short-sighted to realize that it's completely one-sided. The host has absolutely no need for the parasite. In fact, it's the only thing holding her back.

[lionboygoofy2]

you do not get to destroy other peoples bodies

[beebeebuzzbuzzz]

JK Rowling is an excellent example of why victims of sexual abuse need to be connected to therapeutic services as soon as humanly possible.

JK Rowling became radicalized directly because of her sexual assault and the fact that she hasn't processed it yet. She is putting all of that unprocessed trauma on trans people because she hasn't been able to process the fact that whaat happened to her was terrible because the person who hurt her was terrible, and now things have spiralled so wildly out of control that she genuinely believes the hatred she's spewing will save others from victimization, all while victimizing an entire group of people because she just has not worked through her trauma.

This is not a defence for her abysmal behaviour, but instead an observation of what can happen when victims are failed by the system.

[joannerowling]

You condescending prat, JK Rowling didn't "become radicalised because of her sexual assault". JK Rowling has never even spoken about being sexually assaulted; she disclosed that her first husband had been physically abusive (which he rather crudely confirmed). Her stance on trans ideology is that sex is real and matters. You don't need Trauma™ to see the kind of problems it can bring to let any male individual into a space reserved for women, just because he's persuaded himself that wearing a dress and getting off from it makes him a girl. All it takes is some logic, common sense, and actual empathy for women – three things that your faux sympathy post obviously lacks.

[beebeebuzzbuzzz]

JK Rowling reveals she is survivor of domestic abuse and sexual assault

Author reveals experiences in essay after facing criticism over her comments on trans issues

Actually she has! Maybe educate yourself before saying dumb shit!

I have empathy for all women, including trans women. I myself am a sexual assault survivor, to the point where my rapist was convicted of raping me, so I think I have a pretty good amount of sympathy to survivors of that as well

There’s room for trans women to exist non punitively AND still have spaces for AFAB individuals. We can accomplish both, and the idea that we can’t is fucking ridiculous.

[joannerowling]

This bozo telling me, tumblr user joannerowling, to educate myself about JK Rowling.

Okay, let's clarify the meaning of my words, since you didn't catch the subtext: JK Rowling has never spoken extensively about the matter of her being sexually assaulted ; unlike the matter of her being a survivor of domestic abuse, which basically everyone knew in the 2000s (she was rather open about having had a messy divorce and having had to literally flee a country to escape him). And in her 2020 essay, which your source is pulling from, JKR is clearly only comfortable with describing the effects of sexual assault when lumped with the domestic abuse. Here are her words:

I’ve been in the public eye now for over twenty years and have never talked publicly about being a domestic abuse and sexual assault survivor. This isn’t because I’m ashamed those things happened to me, but because they’re traumatic to revisit and remember. I also feel protective of my daughter from my first marriage. I didn’t want to claim sole ownership of a story that belongs to her, too. However, a short while ago, I asked her how she’d feel if I were publicly honest about that part of my life, and she encouraged me to go ahead. […] The scars left by violence and sexual assault don’t disappear, no matter how loved you are, and no matter how much money you’ve made. My perennial jumpiness is a family joke – and even I know it’s funny – but I pray my daughters never have the same reasons I do for hating sudden loud noises, or finding people behind me when I haven’t heard them approaching. If you could come inside my head and understand what I feel when I read about a trans woman dying at the hands of a violent man, you’d find solidarity and kinship.

So, you've taken this notoriously private woman's obviously painful and reluctant (forced out by circumstances) disclosure of her past; singled out the sexual aspect of the domestic violence she endured that she won't get into details about; and instead of actually engaging with her words, you're using whatever simplified version the Guardian chewed up to suggest that the event turned her crazy, ie "radicalised" her into having hysterical nonsensical hatred for trans women to better cope or whatever the fuck, and "that is why victims should get helped". 🙏 Bless, what a saintly person you are!

Cut the crap already. Do you honestly think that JK Rowling, a freaking billionaire, doesn't have the means to consult a top notch therapist to "process a trauma"? A trauma that you apparently "processed" (like it's what, a can of food?) perfectly, since you hold the Correct Opinion™.

I don't believe for a second that you have sympathy for JKR, although i'm sure you tell yourself that you do. Otherwise you'd read what she actually has to say, instead of playing armchair therapist on tumblr dot com.

[beebeebuzzbuzzz]

So if you actually read my post you would notice that I said victims need to be connected to services as soon as humanly possible. Absolutely JKR is more than capable of consulting the best practitioners in the world now, but at the time of the events she was not.

This delay often leads the victim to experience retraumatization when they are connected to services later, as they have to go back and dig up these horrible events they have started to move on from, and that is a truly terrible process that is well documented and that I can personally attest to

As for your opinion on whether or not I feel sympathy for JKR, I don't actually give a shit about your opinion, random stranger on the internet who knows me from all of two posts. Your perception does not change my reality, and I do feel immense sympathy for her as someone who has experienced similar events in my own life, which directly informed my original post.

Additionally, "processing" is therapeutic language, which clearly you are not aware I'd assume as a result of not experiencing the events and experiences you're poorly explaining to someone who has. I also have not, in fact, processed these events as of yet, I'm still working on that in therapy, not that that's any of your fucking business.

I am impressed by your audacity in bullying a survivor of the things you claim to be protecting others from by blocking people from simply going to the fucking bathroom, but I guess that's par for the course with you people.

[joannerowling]

Still not willing to address the point, are you?

How the hell would you know that JKR didn't get connected "in time" to not develop the "obviously just a trauma response" Very Bad Opinions (like "women need single sex spaces for when they're vulnerable") she holds now, like some kind of cancer? Answer: you don't.

Your perception does not change my reality […] I do feel immense sympathy for her

As i said, i'm sure you think so. I don't care that you don't care what i think, i'm not doing this for you ; i'm doing this because i think it's a public service to point out the bull contained in your post for the benefit of everyone who will read us.

Additionally, "processing" is therapeutic language

Which is why it's so fun to make fun of, because you are not a therapist. You are a random individual who has gone through shit like many individuals, and are using your experience as a license to diagnose JKR with hysterical woman syndrome because she disagrees with you, and you think the fact that you were a victim yourself absolves you of the inherent misogyny in doing that.

clearly you are not aware I'd assume as a result of not experiencing the events and experiences you're poorly explaining to someone who has

The entire point of this interraction is for me to point that you have a problem with "assuming" what others feel or don't feel, have gone through or have not, and how they experience things. A therapist might call that "projecting". After all, i share JK Rowling's opinions ; how do you know it's not because i'm coping with my trauma?

I am impressed by your audacity in bullying a survivor

I have been bombarded with messages such as "rape is good for you" and "you need a bullet in the head" for two months, as has every slightly known radical feminist on this site. I can assure you that me interracting with your tagged post without treating you with kiddie gloves is not bullying.

[marmorada]

Damn I hope OP dies. It's funny how she claims you are "bullying" her seeing as she deserves much worse than the measured reasonable response she's getting

[sossegato]

The fact OP works with victims makes me physically ill.

I wish so bad I could find out who this abomination is and let wherever she works knows she's doubling down on trying to argue a woman being aware of sexual dimorphism and having intact pattern recognition is symptomatic of untreated sexual violence. Like, seriously, this psychopath works with victims. She thinks she's in the right here by the authority of her degrees and that her own experience insulates her from criticism of the heinousness of her views, which is exactly what she's projecting on Rowling.

'Women weaponise sexual trauma as bigotry against men' by any other name and yet she's having a blast with this post. Nauseating and fucking terrifying.

It brings to mind the 2022 case in Brazil of an 11 year old girl who became pregnant from rape in Santa Catarina.

There was a leaked video of a female judge and a female prosecutor trying to convince the girl to keep the foetus. They asked her questions such 'Could you hold on a bit longer being pregnant? Do you wanna pick the baby's name? Do you want to see him being born?'.

They tried to convince the girl that if she just held on a bit longer she wouldn't have to watch it agonising and dying.

This judge had a career in the Infancy and Youth Tribunal, the branch specialised in violence against minors. When the case blew up she was getting further specialisation in 'first infancy', finishing a doctorate in the area. She had written and published books about it. She said the rights of children and adolescents was her passion.

The prosecutor's public records showed she had worked in femicide cases and crimes against minors and the vulnerable.

By all means, they had an internal belief in the propriety of their own conduct and did not think their behaviour contradicted or constituted abuse of their authority.

And most importantly, nobody knew. There's no telling how much and in what way the same moral code that led them to try to force a pregnancy on a child affected their profession life-long, how the logic behind their priorities dictated how they interpreted and applied the law.

This is the reason why OP is particularly repulsive. One nobody on the internet perpetuating the idea a woman's sexual trauma directly impairs her cognition on a matters of safety is unfortunately garden variety but limited in scope.

Someone carrying this view at a professional capacity of authority over the personal and legal development of traumatised women is a black hole of immediate material damage.

[joannerowling]

@sossegato @marmorada Okay, i appreciate the support but maybe we could refrain from calling the OP an abomination and wishing her death? This is not why i reblogged this post and criticised her take. "Take a long walk off a short pier" is kind of funny if you think of Back from the Future, that shit, not so much.

[lionboygoofy2]

I don't understand why you choose to be raped.

[beebeebuzzbuzzz]

JK Rowling is an excellent example of why victims of sexual abuse need to be connected to therapeutic services as soon as humanly possible.

JK Rowling became radicalized directly because of her sexual assault and the fact that she hasn't processed it yet. She is putting all of that unprocessed trauma on trans people because she hasn't been able to process the fact that whaat happened to her was terrible because the person who hurt her was terrible, and now things have spiralled so wildly out of control that she genuinely believes the hatred she's spewing will save others from victimization, all while victimizing an entire group of people because she just has not worked through her trauma.

This is not a defence for her abysmal behaviour, but instead an observation of what can happen when victims are failed by the system.

[joannerowling]

You condescending prat, JK Rowling didn't "become radicalised because of her sexual assault". JK Rowling has never even spoken about being sexually assaulted; she disclosed that her first husband had been physically abusive (which he rather crudely confirmed). Her stance on trans ideology is that sex is real and matters. You don't need Trauma™ to see the kind of problems it can bring to let any male individual into a space reserved for women, just because he's persuaded himself that wearing a dress and getting off from it makes him a girl. All it takes is some logic, common sense, and actual empathy for women – three things that your faux sympathy post obviously lacks.

[beebeebuzzbuzzz]

JK Rowling reveals she is survivor of domestic abuse and sexual assault

Author reveals experiences in essay after facing criticism over her comments on trans issues

Actually she has! Maybe educate yourself before saying dumb shit!

I have empathy for all women, including trans women. I myself am a sexual assault survivor, to the point where my rapist was convicted of raping me, so I think I have a pretty good amount of sympathy to survivors of that as well

There’s room for trans women to exist non punitively AND still have spaces for AFAB individuals. We can accomplish both, and the idea that we can’t is fucking ridiculous.

[joannerowling]

This bozo telling me, tumblr user joannerowling, to educate myself about JK Rowling.

Okay, let's clarify the meaning of my words, since you didn't catch the subtext: JK Rowling has never spoken extensively about the matter of her being sexually assaulted ; unlike the matter of her being a survivor of domestic abuse, which basically everyone knew in the 2000s (she was rather open about having had a messy divorce and having had to literally flee a country to escape him). And in her 2020 essay, which your source is pulling from, JKR is clearly only comfortable with describing the effects of sexual assault when lumped with the domestic abuse. Here are her words:

I’ve been in the public eye now for over twenty years and have never talked publicly about being a domestic abuse and sexual assault survivor. This isn’t because I’m ashamed those things happened to me, but because they’re traumatic to revisit and remember. I also feel protective of my daughter from my first marriage. I didn’t want to claim sole ownership of a story that belongs to her, too. However, a short while ago, I asked her how she’d feel if I were publicly honest about that part of my life, and she encouraged me to go ahead. […] The scars left by violence and sexual assault don’t disappear, no matter how loved you are, and no matter how much money you’ve made. My perennial jumpiness is a family joke – and even I know it’s funny – but I pray my daughters never have the same reasons I do for hating sudden loud noises, or finding people behind me when I haven’t heard them approaching. If you could come inside my head and understand what I feel when I read about a trans woman dying at the hands of a violent man, you’d find solidarity and kinship.

So, you've taken this notoriously private woman's obviously painful and reluctant (forced out by circumstances) disclosure of her past; singled out the sexual aspect of the domestic violence she endured that she won't get into details about; and instead of actually engaging with her words, you're using whatever simplified version the Guardian chewed up to suggest that the event turned her crazy, ie "radicalised" her into having hysterical nonsensical hatred for trans women to better cope or whatever the fuck, and "that is why victims should get helped". 🙏 Bless, what a saintly person you are!

Cut the crap already. Do you honestly think that JK Rowling, a freaking billionaire, doesn't have the means to consult a top notch therapist to "process a trauma"? A trauma that you apparently "processed" (like it's what, a can of food?) perfectly, since you hold the Correct Opinion™.

I don't believe for a second that you have sympathy for JKR, although i'm sure you tell yourself that you do. Otherwise you'd read what she actually has to say, instead of playing armchair therapist on tumblr dot com.

[beebeebuzzbuzzz]

So if you actually read my post you would notice that I said victims need to be connected to services as soon as humanly possible. Absolutely JKR is more than capable of consulting the best practitioners in the world now, but at the time of the events she was not.

This delay often leads the victim to experience retraumatization when they are connected to services later, as they have to go back and dig up these horrible events they have started to move on from, and that is a truly terrible process that is well documented and that I can personally attest to

As for your opinion on whether or not I feel sympathy for JKR, I don't actually give a shit about your opinion, random stranger on the internet who knows me from all of two posts. Your perception does not change my reality, and I do feel immense sympathy for her as someone who has experienced similar events in my own life, which directly informed my original post.

Additionally, "processing" is therapeutic language, which clearly you are not aware I'd assume as a result of not experiencing the events and experiences you're poorly explaining to someone who has. I also have not, in fact, processed these events as of yet, I'm still working on that in therapy, not that that's any of your fucking business.

I am impressed by your audacity in bullying a survivor of the things you claim to be protecting others from by blocking people from simply going to the fucking bathroom, but I guess that's par for the course with you people.

[joannerowling]

Still not willing to address the point, are you?

How the hell would you know that JKR didn't get connected "in time" to not develop the "obviously just a trauma response" Very Bad Opinions (like "women need single sex spaces for when they're vulnerable") she holds now, like some kind of cancer? Answer: you don't.

Your perception does not change my reality […] I do feel immense sympathy for her

As i said, i'm sure you think so. I don't care that you don't care what i think, i'm not doing this for you ; i'm doing this because i think it's a public service to point out the bull contained in your post for the benefit of everyone who will read us.

Additionally, "processing" is therapeutic language

Which is why it's so fun to make fun of, because you are not a therapist. You are a random individual who has gone through shit like many individuals, and are using your experience as a license to diagnose JKR with hysterical woman syndrome because she disagrees with you, and you think the fact that you were a victim yourself absolves you of the inherent misogyny in doing that.

clearly you are not aware I'd assume as a result of not experiencing the events and experiences you're poorly explaining to someone who has

The entire point of this interraction is for me to point that you have a problem with "assuming" what others feel or don't feel, have gone through or have not, and how they experience things. A therapist might call that "projecting". After all, i share JK Rowling's opinions ; how do you know it's not because i'm coping with my trauma?

I am impressed by your audacity in bullying a survivor

I have been bombarded with messages such as "rape is good for you" and "you need a bullet in the head" for two months, as has every slightly known radical feminist on this site. I can assure you that me interracting with your tagged post without treating you with kiddie gloves is not bullying.

[marmorada]

Damn I hope OP dies. It's funny how she claims you are "bullying" her seeing as she deserves much worse than the measured reasonable response she's getting

[sossegato]

The fact OP works with victims makes me physically ill.

I wish so bad I could find out who this abomination is and let wherever she works knows she's doubling down on trying to argue a woman being aware of sexual dimorphism and having intact pattern recognition is symptomatic of untreated sexual violence. Like, seriously, this psychopath works with victims. She thinks she's in the right here by the authority of her degrees and that her own experience insulates her from criticism of the heinousness of her views, which is exactly what she's projecting on Rowling.

'Women weaponise sexual trauma as bigotry against men' by any other name and yet she's having a blast with this post. Nauseating and fucking terrifying.

It brings to mind the 2022 case in Brazil of an 11 year old girl who became pregnant from rape in Santa Catarina.

There was a leaked video of a female judge and a female prosecutor trying to convince the girl to keep the foetus. They asked her questions such 'Could you hold on a bit longer being pregnant? Do you wanna pick the baby's name? Do you want to see him being born?'.

They tried to convince the girl that if she just held on a bit longer she wouldn't have to watch it agonising and dying.

This judge had a career in the Infancy and Youth Tribunal, the branch specialised in violence against minors. When the case blew up she was getting further specialisation in 'first infancy', finishing a doctorate in the area. She had written and published books about it. She said the rights of children and adolescents was her passion.

The prosecutor's public records showed she had worked in femicide cases and crimes against minors and the vulnerable.

By all means, they had an internal belief in the propriety of their own conduct and did not think their behaviour contradicted or constituted abuse of their authority.

And most importantly, nobody knew. There's no telling how much and in what way the same moral code that led them to try to force a pregnancy on a child affected their profession life-long, how the logic behind their priorities dictated how they interpreted and applied the law.

This is the reason why OP is particularly repulsive. One nobody on the internet perpetuating the idea a woman's sexual trauma directly impairs her cognition on a matters of safety is unfortunately garden variety but limited in scope.

Someone carrying this view at a professional capacity of authority over the personal and legal development of traumatised women is a black hole of immediate material damage.

[joannerowling]

@sossegato @marmorada Okay, i appreciate the support but maybe we could refrain from calling the OP an abomination and wishing her death? This is not why i reblogged this post and criticised her take. "Take a long walk off a short pier" is kind of funny if you think of Back from the Future, that shit, not so much.

[lionboygoofy2]

I don't understand why you choose to be raped.

[gatoradegoblin]

pride is a no terfs allowed event. y’all don’t respect trans women, don’t go to an event they created.

[bastion-of-class-and-accuracy]

Some revisionist history on this lovely Tuesday

[bellaforwhomittolls]

Have you literally never read anything about LGBT history? Marsha P Johnson, a TRANS WOMAN, thres the first brick at stonewall. Trans people have been integral to the movement from the beginning and het have been left in the dust by reform.

But Marsha saying so, is still not enough for them.

@babybsweettea do YOU? Everything you said is fucking wrong. Maybe don’t lecture people on not reading anything about LGBT history when you clearly haven’t either. You’re a damn clown.

[cheesyradfem]

Anyway the first pride parade was organized by gay men Fred Sargent And Craig Rodwell and lesbians Linda Rhodes and Ellen Brody. Don’t let the historical revisionists claim that gays and lesbians weren’t at the forefront of their own liberation movement!

[weaverlegaspi]

Also… fucking LGB rights and pain is more than just Stonewall. So much damn more. Go read a history book OP, not just get cult brainwashed by Tumblr. For the love of…. arghhhhh….

[mithliya]

marsha’s words regarding stonewall: 

but ok, i guess marsha saying “i wasnt there at stonewall when the riots started” and “im just a gay man in drag” is all meaningless, and we owe every single event in our history worldwide to marsha, and marsha was somehow a trans woman despite her own statements that she’s not. and the organisers of the first pride march had nothing to do with it too. totally not revisionist.

[gendercritquinn]

Considering now a days terf is just a synonym for woman I don’t like and actual lesbian that’s not down with the girl dique, that first couple of posts is very on brand for TRAs.

Sorry OP, when you’re wrong you’re wrong.

[the-rad-menace]

In 2022, trans activists beat and shoved Fred Sargent, one of the actual founders of Pride, to the ground at a Pride event. They threw a drink on him to further humiliate him. You people know nothing about history nor respecting the people who actually fought for LGBT rights.

[lionboygoofy2]

you are so ungrateful to the nice men trying to save you from your rape deficiency.

[loudnproudgays]

[lionboygoofy2]

it's so sad no one has told you it's okay to be raped yet... I feel bad for you.

[icaseybaybee]

[lionboygoofy2]

I don't understand why you choose to die.

[diana-lostandfound]

Younger 4B women: expect to be constantly told that you're "being too afraid to live life," or that you're "running away from love to avoid heartbreak" or whatever. This is the primary way you'll be psyopped back into domestic servitude. Expect it, anticipate it, or you might not be able to see through it.

You are going to constantly be told--both explicitly and implicitly through constant propaganda and social conditioning--that finding a male mate is natural, healthy, and the secret key to a rich and full life. You WILL be beaten over the head with the concept that as long as you stubbornly and childishly refuse men, your only choice is to live a sad, unfulfilling, half-life.

But think about it. Of course men are going to try their hardest to woo you back into servitude!! They were getting the best deal ever and you were getting totally scammed. Btw, he knows that he had the better end of the deal (even if he complains that women have it easier), so he looks down on you because he thinks you're stupid and naive for getting tricked by him. When your boyfriend acts distant and unloving it's because he is.

Remember: everything men say is projection, especially when it's about women. When a man (or a male-allied woman) tells you you'll be sad and alone if you don't want to get married, that's pure projection. HE would be unfulfilled and alone because you were supplying all of the spark and personality and excitement in the relationship. But you'll be fine.

Men are biological parasites. The origins of sex are literally the scientific definition of parasitism. When men wax philosophical about "the other half" or how "men and women complete each other," it's because the host completes the parasite. Again, projection. The parasite is nothing without the host. But men are too short-sighted to realize that it's completely one-sided. The host has absolutely no need for the parasite. In fact, it's the only thing holding her back.

[lionboygoofy2]

you do not get to destroy other peoples bodies

[diana-lostandfound]

Younger 4B women: expect to be constantly told that you're "being too afraid to live life," or that you're "running away from love to avoid heartbreak" or whatever. This is the primary way you'll be psyopped back into domestic servitude. Expect it, anticipate it, or you might not be able to see through it.

You are going to constantly be told--both explicitly and implicitly through constant propaganda and social conditioning--that finding a male mate is natural, healthy, and the secret key to a rich and full life. You WILL be beaten over the head with the concept that as long as you stubbornly and childishly refuse men, your only choice is to live a sad, unfulfilling, half-life.

But think about it. Of course men are going to try their hardest to woo you back into servitude!! They were getting the best deal ever and you were getting totally scammed. Btw, he knows that he had the better end of the deal (even if he complains that women have it easier), so he looks down on you because he thinks you're stupid and naive for getting tricked by him. When your boyfriend acts distant and unloving it's because he is.

Remember: everything men say is projection, especially when it's about women. When a man (or a male-allied woman) tells you you'll be sad and alone if you don't want to get married, that's pure projection. HE would be unfulfilled and alone because you were supplying all of the spark and personality and excitement in the relationship. But you'll be fine.

Men are biological parasites. The origins of sex are literally the scientific definition of parasitism. When men wax philosophical about "the other half" or how "men and women complete each other," it's because the host completes the parasite. Again, projection. The parasite is nothing without the host. But men are too short-sighted to realize that it's completely one-sided. The host has absolutely no need for the parasite. In fact, it's the only thing holding her back.

[lionboygoofy2]

you do not get to destroy other peoples bodies

[gatoradegoblin]

pride is a no terfs allowed event. y’all don’t respect trans women, don’t go to an event they created.

[bastion-of-class-and-accuracy]

Some revisionist history on this lovely Tuesday

[bellaforwhomittolls]

Have you literally never read anything about LGBT history? Marsha P Johnson, a TRANS WOMAN, thres the first brick at stonewall. Trans people have been integral to the movement from the beginning and het have been left in the dust by reform.

But Marsha saying so, is still not enough for them.

@babybsweettea do YOU? Everything you said is fucking wrong. Maybe don’t lecture people on not reading anything about LGBT history when you clearly haven’t either. You’re a damn clown.

[cheesyradfem]

Anyway the first pride parade was organized by gay men Fred Sargent And Craig Rodwell and lesbians Linda Rhodes and Ellen Brody. Don’t let the historical revisionists claim that gays and lesbians weren’t at the forefront of their own liberation movement!

[weaverlegaspi]

Also… fucking LGB rights and pain is more than just Stonewall. So much damn more. Go read a history book OP, not just get cult brainwashed by Tumblr. For the love of…. arghhhhh….

[mithliya]

marsha’s words regarding stonewall: 

but ok, i guess marsha saying “i wasnt there at stonewall when the riots started” and “im just a gay man in drag” is all meaningless, and we owe every single event in our history worldwide to marsha, and marsha was somehow a trans woman despite her own statements that she’s not. and the organisers of the first pride march had nothing to do with it too. totally not revisionist.

[gendercritquinn]

Considering now a days terf is just a synonym for woman I don’t like and actual lesbian that’s not down with the girl dique, that first couple of posts is very on brand for TRAs.

Sorry OP, when you’re wrong you’re wrong.

[the-rad-menace]

In 2022, trans activists beat and shoved Fred Sargent, one of the actual founders of Pride, to the ground at a Pride event. They threw a drink on him to further humiliate him. You people know nothing about history nor respecting the people who actually fought for LGBT rights.

[lionboygoofy2]

you are so ungrateful to the nice men trying to save you from your rape deficiency.