LiverTree

Welcome to my blog! ——— I like the life series, and writing! I like some other stuff too, 50/50 on if I post about it tho. ——— Heads up, this blog might get hella depressing. But what can you expect from a majorly suffering, barely not homeless, not quite twenty something?

[livertree]

I am stating now, for anything I have said in the past, I have no plans, nor have I ever had any plans, nor will I ever have any plans, to enact any sort of violence, harm, or malicious wrong doing, against any person, entity, corporation, government, or political figure. Nothing I have said has been intended to go viral, or become popular. Nothing I have said, or will say, has and is not intended to incite violence.

[livertree]

https://resist.bot/petitions/PZJJUE

[depsidase]

[livertree]

Aftyn Behn is so cool can she be our President? 🥺

[rootkit]

the way he spilled...

[dappercyborg]

The Simpson literally made a joke about this in 1997 this is a settled issue, stop giving power back to straight people

[youn8ss]

calling yourself homophobic slurs is just doing homophobic people’s job for them, you’re proving them right by identifying within it.

[rootkit]

cry about it to some other faggot then please

[rootkit]

they deleted... my impact

[livertree]

“Faggot” means LGBTQ. “Queer” means LGBTQ. These words are only insults if being LGBTQ is a bad thing. When you attack fellow fags for using slurs, you’re de facto saying that the homophobes are right. You’re literally going to”yeah! It is bad to be lgbtq!” Because they’re not saying “you’re a faggot” because faggots are a very bad thing to be, they’re saying it because faggots are gay and they think being gay is wrong. So if you allow “faggot” to be a bad word, you allow LGBTQ to be a bad thing, and you should prolly go to therapy and see about internalized homophobia.

[kaijuno]

[evilwizard]

[livertree]

It took them a billion years to make a FNAF movie and now they’re releasing a second one already?

[depsidase]

[livertree]

It’s important to note there were founders who tried to stop this, and they lost. Don’t let people convince you every founder was bad and they all loved the shitty shit in the constitution. Because when we need to fix shit, the mindset of the founders that did win will be present in the room when we fix the shit. And if we let it infect the new stuff we create, it’ll fuck other people 200 years later.

[depsidase]

[depsidase]

[ink-the-artist]

[ink-the-artist]

the long awaited sequel

[ink-the-artist]

[feluka]

we need more pathetic female characters written by authors who don't hate women

[feluka]

to be clear since this is making the rounds: she has to be an absolute loser in no way that can be pinned on her gender. no "i'm just a girl tee-hee" stuff. straight up just a loser (nondenominational)

[feluka]

addendum: she must be the most important person in the whole narrative

[feluka]

I decided to sit down and concentrate and properly write the list of rules that qualify a character for this role.

FIRST LAW: This character must be a woman.

SECOND LAW: This character must be a loser, but not in a way that can be pinned on her gender. Misogynistic response from the audience does not disqualify the character.

THIRD LAW: If the audience does not enjoy this character, then it becomes impossible to enjoy the show/film/book/game altogether. It is not possible to ignore this character, for better or for worse.

FOURTH LAW: The character must make bad decisions, and not just be a victim of poor circumstances outside of her control. The character can also be a victim of poor circumstances outside of her control, but it has to be primarily her personal choices that deem her a loser.

[livertree]

Hey look it’s me lol

[depsidase]

[stonerparty]

[o-blivia]

[kira-serialfaggot]

congrats for drugs for winning the war on drugs

[nkp1981]

Bear Selfies Captured By Camera Traps

[depsidase]

[livertree]

My friends seem to think I’m a light weight. They don’t know yet, but on multiple occasions I have drank a big gulp cup full of screw driver (I mix my screw drivers very liberally, because the right amount of orange juice is just enough to not puke)

[livertree]

Hope I’m not a weird awful horrible person for emailing a physicist a question about physics through an email that is publicly available on a page of physicists where they’re described as a physicist and lists their education in physics. Probably am because only had terrible disgusting human beings look up physicists at the nearest university to them and click the first physicist to pop up and read their page to see if they do the right physics and then 5 seconds later use their publicly available university email to send them a very polite email about a physics question. How dare I waste this physicists time with a question about their field that they have no obligation to answer through a means that is publicly available and in no way violates their personal privacy. Fuck me for being curious.