Burner2burnlol

Proshitters and other perverts and predators DNI

[suchusoid]

[sincerely-aaliyah]

sorry, people complaining about certain laws having to do with banning fictional pedophilia or incest is SO unserious to me. yall sound SO dumb it’s not even funny anymore.

“NOOOOO!!!! this is SCARY. my INCEST PORN is BANNED in the UK. WHAT THE FUCK. this is FACISM. this is ZIONISM. fight for OUR RIGHT to have PEDOPHILIA RAPE FICTION! this is NOT something to excuse!!!!!!1!!1!1!1!1!1!”

[curateddiary]

Hi everyone, just a tip here. If someone says it's a coping mechanism, remind them that coping mechanisms can be maladaptive. They are not exempt from being criticized. Someone can cope with anxiety by self harming. Hurting yourself or desensitizing yourself to harm to others is not justified by your useage.

As a fan of horror, its always good to resensitize yourself to how bad things are and be considerate of how others feel about things. If you realize you could probably see a corpse and be unaffected, you need to resensitize. Same with any dark or horrible thing. You need to be self aware.

!!!

[junoisabug]

radqueers like “we js wanna be respectful and accept identities” and then you’re “transnazi” shut up

[lilithcreature]

original post by @.puppybaby15 but has since been deleted

HI EDIT this post has blown up so here's a much better pedo warning

edit: wonderful post someone made

https://www.tumblr.com/ari-doodles-stuff/799597309670375424/phrases-they-use

[ev1lgoob]

radqueers aren’t inclusive.

they’ll mock the abuse you went through just because you don’t want them around.

argue all you want about “safe spaces”, but its just an excuse to masturbate to kids. :/

and no, i wont be debating anyone on this topic. im pissed, i wont even be able to calmly argue.

[radnormal]

poster made by me — reblogs appreciated

[locksoccasionally]

Aaaaaand of course proshitters are defending this too, even though the "artist" themselves thinks it's a joke. They talk about "slippery slopes" and it's clearly projection of their own sick minds.

What's worse are freaks (again) claiming being against this crap is "puritanical" and "harming minority sexualities". Which ones? Do tell...

[akira-the-bunny]

TW: Xenosatanists, pedophilia, bestiality, cults, noncon, etc

Holy shit

[locksoccasionally]

Too all the proshitters telling people to stop talking about abusers and predators bc they're "old and sick" and "it was in the past"...no, we will never stop spreading awareness about predators.

Do you think the trauma caused by abuse simply ends because of age? It's a life-long battle for victims, and it should be a life-long battle for the abusers to face the damage they've caused to others.

[antiproshipbabajakala]

"erm.. isnt fnaf proship material cause it has child abuse/murder."

oh my god carol child murder and abuse in a story is different from your werid "ahaha so sexy" incest pedophilla crap.

[antiproshipbabajakala]

Not gonna lie, It kinda bugs me seeing proshippers comparing antishippers to like nazis/police, that or saying that their fanfiction is somehow in the same leagues as, banned books that were censored for, either being anti-facist, lgbtq, or themes such as oppression.

Just because someone doesnt like and is disgusted by your fanfiction that romanctizes incest and pedophilla, doesnt make them a nazi.

Your not, oppressed, your not being "censored." your just, making and jacking off to, romanctized, disgusting incest porn and saying "omg guys... proshippers are oppressed.... we're being censored... We're just being mature and we're leftists." when people rightfully call out that, that shits disgusting.

[anti-willo-recluse]

"Why radqueers are bad?"

If you have IQ more than a newborn you should be able to understand why grooming and raping children and animals are wrong

[rantblogblog]

The Hypocrisy of "Don't Like, Don't Read" When They Won't Let You Scroll in Peace

PROSHITS DNI!

There is a specific kind of irony that only exists in online fandom, and it's embodied by the proshipper who preaches "don't like, don't read" while making it functionally impossible to avoid their content. For a community that claims to value freedom above all else, they sure do spend a lot of energy forcing their work into spaces explicitly marked as off-limits.

Let's talk about tagging, or rather, the deliberate refusal to do it properly. Fandom runs on tagging. It's the basic courtesy that allows a 14-year-old looking for fluffy fanart to avoid stumbling onto explicit adult content. It's the entire reason the "don't like, don't read" philosophy can even function. But too many proshippers treat tagging like a suggestion rather than a boundary-respecting necessity. They'll use vague tags. They'll hide problematic content under cutesy euphemisms. They'll create entirely new tags specifically to evade the block functions that antis and minors use to protect themselves. This isn't creative freedom. This is actively sabotaging the tools people use to consent to what they see.

And when they get blocked? When an anti curates their own space and excludes them? The response is often block evasion. New blogs. New accounts. A relentless determination to force their way back into a space that explicitly rejected them. This isn't engagement. This is harassment with extra steps.

Then there's the invasion of anti spaces. Proshippers will wander into tags like "anti proship" or "antis dni" and act shocked—shocked—that the people there don't want to see proship content. They'll reblog anti posts to mock them. They'll flood the tags with their own content specifically to trigger the people filtering those tags. They deliberately cross the line and then cry censorship when they're met with resistance.

And here's the killer: these are the same people who plaster "DNI IF YOU'RE AN ANTI" all over their own blogs. They demand that antis respect their boundaries. They demand that antis stay out of their spaces. They insist that consent matters. But the moment the roles are reversed? Suddenly boundaries are "censorship." Suddenly curated spaces are "echo chambers." Suddenly the rules only apply when they're the ones being protected.

You cannot claim to care about consent and then deliberately circumvent every tool designed to secure it. You cannot preach "your kink is not my kink and that's okay" while shoving your kink down the throats of people who have explicitly said it's not okay. The refusal to tag properly, the block evasion, the tag invasion—these aren't acts of creative defiance. They are acts of targeted harassment dressed up in the language of freedom.

If you truly believe in "don't like, don't read," then you have to accept that "don't read" means allowing people the space to not read. You have to tag honestly. You have to accept blocks. You have to stay out of tags that aren't for you. Otherwise, you're not a defender of free expression. You're just a hypocrite who can't stand that someone, somewhere, doesn't want to see what you're making.

[antiproship-lizzie]

"its children day in Japan, because we cannot respect their cultures or holidays or treat them like people lets sexualize their children!:"

[antiproship-lizzie]

everytime someone accused me of being someone who believes in perfect victims my mind comes to this.

[antiproship-lizzie]

No, I'm not against using fiction as a coping mechanism

No, I don't want to censor you.

No, I'm not pro harassment

I'm against people romanticizing/sexualizing/glorification of dark topics in media. And treating it cutely.