What? and Why? of "I'm Bad for You" or "I'm Not Good for You"
I never really understood the phrases such as "I'm not good for you" or "I'm not good enough". Well, that's not a fully correct statement, I understand certain part of them or condition: when they are used in the domain-specific and task-oriented context, partially because I have felt like that in quite a few situations and cases. When it comes to the context of human relations and relationships, yeah, that one's lost one me. So this will be me exploring the difference between the two and attempting to understand them in the context when they are used in terms of relationships.
The Difference.
At the very first glance they might seem very similar, I know I have treated them in a very similar matter in the past, but they have very different psychological differences for they essentially tap into fundamentally different aspects of self-perception, they have different psychological weight, and have different implications for ones identity and well-being. I will speak about the relationship, relation, connection part more in depth down bellow.
One of the first major differences is that in context of tasks these phrases relate to the self-efficacy or your belief in your ability to perform specific tasks successfully and accomplish particular goals. Self-efficacy is task-oriented and domain-specific, which means that you can have high self-efficacy in certain areas, like chemistry, and low self-efficacy in other area[s], like public speaking or biology. What is important, is that self-efficacy is very context-dependent and changeable. Generally, if you feel that you are not good enough at particular task or area, you can learn new skills, gain more experience, practice and improve your overall competence. The assessment is based on observable, measurable capabilities that you can develop over time.
In contrast, the same phrases in the context of relations, connections and relationships, strikes at the very core of self-worth, or your very fundamental sense of value as a person. Self-worth, unlike self-efficacy, is global, it encompasses your overall evaluation of yourself as a human being, that deserves loves and belonging.
If self-efficacy asks the question "Can I do this?", then self-worth asks "Am I valuable as a person?". The question regarding relation implicates not just your abilities but also your identity, character, and fundamental worthiness of connection itself.
However, these varying contexts also create certain identity threats, if we can call them as such.
In cases when you feel inadequate in professional challenges or some tasks, you're experiencing something called performance-based or achievement-based identity threat. That threat is primarily regarding your competence in specific area/domain. Task related feelings of incompetence, inadequacy usually involve concerns about your abilities, capabilities, skills, or expertise in particular area. Things, such as imposter syndrome at work - feeling like a fraud despite there being evidence of competence - is characterized by doubt, that persists, about your abilities and you attributing success to luck rather than skill. The task based inadequacy threatens your identity that is based on performance and not the identity that is responsible for your core sense of human worth. You might feel you are bad or not up to par in some aspect like coding, budgeting or public speaking, but in no case does that mean that you are or that you believe that you are worthless as a person, as a human being.
In contrast, saying the same things in context of relationship, and for the ease of it I will refer to this using one of the mentioned words instead of mentioning "relations, connections, relationships" multiple times again and again (hello insanity), creates a threat to the identity that strikes much, much more deeper. This basically impacts the fundamental human needs that we all have - worthiness of love, belonging, intimate connection. The 'self' in context of relations is achieved through bonds of attachment with significant others and is based on reflected appraisal - how we believe important see us, even if that is completely wrong and far from reality. What we think how others see us and how others see us are different things in this case. When you believe in statements like "I am not good for them", when it is someone you care about, you are concluding that your presence, character, or your very being causes harm to someone you value. (And that, frankly, seems like self fulfilling prophecy - by believing in that you not just hurt yourself, but them as well). All this threatens not just what you can do, but who you are at your vey core. This identity threat in relationships involve perceptions that your capabilities, dignity, self-worth are questioned and challenged in ways that can affect the development and continuation of your self-identity.
Another point of distinction between these two context for these phrases is reflection of two different foundations of self-evaluation: performance based worth and inherent worth.
In the context of tasks and professional areas, it is often appropriate and adaptive to evaluate yourself based on how you perform, that is a common metric even in our daily lives that we constantly return to even if we do that subconsciously. Your sense of how competent you are fluctuates based on your actual abilities and achievements in specific areas. Phrases, such as "I'm not good enough at this task" is genuinely a valid concern of your abilities, that is task specific self assessment that can drive your further improvement. You are evaluating your current knowledge, competence, skill level against the demands of the particular task, which can provide useful feedback for learning and development.
The problem here might arise when performance based self esteem extends beyond specific tasks and becomes the foundation of your overall self-worth. When your entire sense of value depends achievement and external validation, your self esteem becomes fragile and very conditional - vulnerable to every setback or failure. Performance-based identity means "you are what you achieve" aka your worth rises and falls with your accomplishments. This creates quite shaky foundation where any downturn in performance threatens your entire sense of value.
In contrast, any healthy relationship should be built on recognition of inherent worth - the belief that people are valuable simply because they exist, not because of what they achieve. In other terms - every life is sacred for it is life. In the words of one of the founders of humanistic psychology, Carl Rogers, "unconditional positive regard". The phrase "I am not good for you" and its variations in any form are the contradiction of the very principle of inherent worth. By voicing and believing it, person suggests that their fundamental being, not just their performance in specific tasks, is somehow deficient and harmful. This is especially problematic because the relation value shouldn't be conditional on some performance. You don't have to "earn" love or belonging through achievements; these should all flow from mutual care, compatibility, and recognition of each person's intrinsic value.
The context and the phrases themselves differ quite drastically in their scope and how specific they are. When we say something in the lines of "I'm not good at programming", "I'm not good at playing certain instrument", etc., these statements are bound, they apply to that particular skillset, case and domain, and do not necessary generalize beyond them. You can be and feel highly competent in some areas, like reading and completely inadequate in mathematics, confident in chosen language and completely lost in biology. These beliefs exist to some degree independently and can vary across different areas of your life. This is highly narrow and specific.
Phrases like "I'm not good for you" make a complete sweep of a judgement about your entire being, the whole persona, the whole 'you' that exists in relation to another person. It's not specific and is not limited to behaviors or skills, it encompasses your whole character, personality, emotional state, life circumstances, and fundamental compatibility with another human. The nature of such statement, the globality of this relation inadequacy feelings makes them more pervasive and lot harder to address. You can't just simply study or practice to become "good" for someone the way it might work with specific task related conditions. It is global and diffuse.
Another core difference is how shapeable, malleable, changeable these perceived inadequacies are. Task based and specific ones are quite malleable. You can strengthen self-efficacy through various sources: mastery experience or successfully performing tasks, vicarious experience or observing others successfully performing tasks, social persuasion or encouragement from others, and by managing emotional states. If you are bad or "not enough" at or for the tasks today, you can become better and adequate tomorrow through learning, practice, feedback, and skill development, thus inadequacy in this case is situational and improvable.
Relation inadequacy, in contrast, feels more fixed and intractable. When you believe you are "not good for" someone, it is unclear what specific actions would change that fundamental assessment. The issue isn't, usually, about some learnable skills but about perceived incompatibility, unresolved trauma, mental health struggles, or deep-seated belies of being unworthy. This perception that such things are immutable is partially the reason why relational inadequacy statements are often used to exit relationships - they suggest that there is fundamental mismatch that no amount of personal growth will fix. Perceived does not mean it is real.
Both cases have significant differences in emotional consequences as well. Feeling inadequate about tasks usually produces performance anxiety - worry about meeting expectation, fear of failure, or a concern that one might be exposed as incompetent. Such anxiety is highly directed at specific situations and demands of certain conditions, tasks. Performance anxiety is and imposter syndrome can be distressing and impact well-being, they are however more manageable due to their nature off being more contained. You might feel anxious about certain task without questioning your fundamental core worth as a human being. It will, however, most likely impact work satisfaction, professional confidence, and achievement behaviours rather than your core identity.
If you believe that you are "not good for" someone you care about, it creates deeper existential distress that questions your very worthiness of love and belonging, again, it touches on the very fundamental needs for attachment and connection. Anxiety in context of relationship involves constant and persistent worry about the relationship itself and your worthiness in it. Unlike the task one, relationship anxiety can pervade your entire sense of self and affect multiple domains of your life. Relational conflicts and threats have particularly strong negative effects on well-being, creating tension, anxiety, emotional exhaustion, and sometimes even identity related burnout when persistent.
Of course there are some comparison processes involved as well. In context of tasks you are evaluating you abilities relative to others or objective standards in this particular task category, like how good you must be at graphic design for particular role and such. You might compare you performance, skills and abilities to classmates, colleagues or teammates. Social comparison in achievement context can affect self-concept , but it is relatively bound to certain domain in the sense that your self-concept in math wont most likely affect your self-concept in language arts or your overall sense of worth.
Relationship context is a bit more complex, it involves reflected appraisal or way of understanding yourself through how you believe important others see you. This comparison isn't just about relative abilities but about the very fundamental acceptability and lovability of yours as a person. When you believe you are "not good for" a romantic partner, you are essentially making a judgment not just about your relative compatibility but about whether your essential self causes harm or falls short of what a worthy partner should be. (spoilers - your self does not cause harm, and you are enough as a partner)
I will include some points about some ideas for recovery and resolution of such situations and conditions. I will, however, speak about relationship ones more in depth down bellow. For task based ones, it is quite straight forward: develop skills, practice, reframe your expectations, and building confidence through incremental success. If that is professional environment then organisations can provide training, mentoring and more supportive environment and than boost the skill level, confidence, self-efficacy. Even more persistent things, such as imposter syndrome, can be addressed through cognitive restructuring, recognizing your accomplishments, accepting feedback, and developing self-assessments that are more realistic to the reality.
It is worth mentioning about relationships as well. Path in this case is a lot more complex and psychologically involved. It oftentimes require for person to address their deep-seated beliefs about worthiness, healing attachment wounds, understanding their fears of intimacy, or sometimes recognising genuine incompatibility versus some anxiety-driven distortions. Sometimes the feeling of "I'm not good enough or you" might reflect legitimate self-awareness that requires some personal work before healthy relationships are possible. Other times, it just reflects distorted beliefs about unworthiness that therapy, which there is no shame in asking for help, can address. And in some cases it might accurately identify fundamental incompatibility that no amount of personal growth and work can bridge.
Now more about relationship part, what is it and why people even say such phrases as "I'm bad for you", "I'm not good for you".
The psychology behind
At the very core often lies fear off intimacy and vulnerability. When relationships deepen and emotional stakes increase, some people experience overwhelming anxiety about potential future plans, such phrases become a preemptive strike, a preemptive breakup - a way to end things before they potentially go wrong, instead of responding to the actual and current problem. This pattern usually emerges just as relationships require greater emotional investment. The person isn't responding to the reality, to what is actually happening in the relationship, but to what they fear might happen. Humans generally prefer avoiding loses over acquiring equivalent gains, meaning the potential pain of a future breakup can feel more significant than the joy of continuing relationship.
These phrases can also be a reflection of deeply rooted beliefs about one's unworthiness that has been formed during childhood. These "core beliefs" operate largely in the unconscious and can be surprisingly dramatic and untrue, yet people unwittingly base all their life decisions around them. Someone who truly believes that "I'm not good enough" at their very core may genuinely thing they are protecting their partner by leaving, even when the relationships is healthy. When person struggles with low self-esteem, they might convince themselves that their partner deserves better, that they'll inevitably cause harm, or that the lack what's needed to sustain a healthy relationship. This becomes a self fulfilling prophecy - by believing they are not good enough and acting accordingly, they create the very rejection and relationship failure they feared.
People who are of anxious-avoidant or fearful-avoidant attachment styles often experience an internal conflict between craving closeness and fearing intimacy. This creates sort of push-pull dynamic where they initially come on strong with intense feelings, but as the relationship deepens and vulnerability increases, they retreat emotionally. The phrase itself becomes their exit strategy when discomfort of closeness becomes overwhelming. Rather than navigating the vulnerability required for genuine intimacy, they push their partner away to avoid the terrifying prospect of being truly known and potentially rejected.
Additional meaning and motivation
Sometimes these phrases might as a simple and soft way to reject someone. Rather than saying that the other person is not good enough or that you don't want to be with them, you frame that as "I'm not good for you" and that can feel kinder and less harsh. It shifts the blame away from the other person and positions the one proclaiming that as someone who is self-aware of their limitations.
in some cases, the phrase might reflect legitimate self-recognition of problematic behaviours. Someone might genuinely recognize they are having negative impact due to unresolved mental health issues, addictions, or toxic patterns they haven't yet addressed. When someone tells you shouldn't be with them, it is oftentimes wise to listen to them and believe. However, the crucial distinction is whether this recognition leads to actual change and growth, or whether it becomes a recurring excuse to avoid commitment and vulnerability.
The phrase can also be a manifestation of self-sabotage behaviour - unconscious patterns that undermine relationships. People who are engaged in self-sabotage might:
Look for flaws in otherwise healthy relationships to justify leaving
Create problems or conflicts that provide an excuse to exit
Engage in deliberately hurtful behaviors to give their partner a reason to leave them
Fixating on negative aspects while ignoring positives
This behaviour often stems from deep seated belief that they don't deserve love and/or happiness, or from fear that intimacy will ultimately lead to pain.
In some twisted way of a paradox, many people who use these phrases are actually terrified off being abandoned. By ending the relationship first - framing it as protection for the other person - they maintain control over the inevitable loss they believe is coming. This preemptive self-rejection allows them to experience rejection and loss almost like "on their own terms" rather than risking being blindsided by it later. People who anxiously expect rejection become hypervigilant for signs of it, readily perceive it in ambiguous situations, and then overreact with anger, withdrawal, or controlling behaviours. These reactions often create the very rejection they feared, completing the self-fulfilling prophecy.
Manipulation vs Self-Protection
It is important to distinguish between someone struggling with these psychological patterns and someone using the phrase manipulatively. In unhealthy or toxic relationships, saying "I'm not good or you" or similar can be a form of emotional manipulation - a way to keep partner off-balance, to avoid accountability for harmful behaviour, or to maintain control through intermittent reinforcement of affection and withdrawal.
The impact
Being on the receiving end of this phrase can be deeply confusing and quite painful. Partners oftentimes feel:
Rejection yet uncertainty - the message is unclear about whether it's about compatibility or about person's internal struggles
Frustrated - especially if the relationship seemed healthy and the concerns feel unfounded
Caught in a push-pull cycle - where they are drawn in and then pushed away
Breaking
Recognising the use of this phrase, recognition in general is the first step. There are some ways how to address this pattern:
Therapy to explore attachment wounds, core beliefs, and self-worth issues
Present-moment awareness to distinguish between actual relationship problems and fear-based reactions
Open communication about fears using "I" statements rather than ending relationships prematurely
Building self-esteem independently of external validation
Ultimately, the use of the phrase and the phrase itself reveals more about speaker's internal world - fears, wounds, and beliefs about themselves - than it does about the actual viability of the relationship. Understanding these underlying dynamics can help both involved people navigate these painful and unpleasant moments with more clarity and compassion.
Using these phrases as motivation
One of more nuanced points and approaches is to use these phrases, whatever their basis and reason, as additional source of motivation. Not "in spite" or "proving yourself" but "because I want to grow" and "because I value the other person".
The framing
The crucial part in framing of the motivation is moving from external validation to internal development. We shift to "not to prove something" so that we can acknowledge that the goal is not to earn acceptance or to fear or avoid rejection - it is genuine personal development that happens to be catalyzed by the relationship. This aligns with what is called relational catalyst support - the concept that healthy relationships can inspire and support perisomal growth and thriving, not through pressure or proving worthiness, but through mutual encouragement towards becoming one's best self. Partners should and when they do support each other's goal-strivings in responsive ways, it promotes feelings of capability, self-esteem, self-growth, and goal accomplishment over time.
There is something that's called healthy interdependence which can be described as "developing self-worth with you". This is fundamentally different from codependency. In interdependent relationships, both partners maintain their individuality and autonomy while also supporting each other's growth. Interdependence involves a balanced blend of autonomy and connectedness where individuals rely on each other for emotional support and personal growth while maintaining their sense of independence. The relationship becomes a context for mutual evolution, not a stage for proving worthiness.
Valuing your partner can be a legitimate, healthy motivation for change. When it is done from a place of genuine care for the partner and loved one, and not from the fear or obligation, it is natural and can be positive. People, partners powerfully influence each other's positive changes, people are more likely to successfully change when their partner changes with them. This mutual influence reflects healthy interdependence rather than one-sided people-pleasing.
Accountability vs Proving. Healthy accountability involves recognizing your actual problematic patterns and taking responsibility or addressing them - not to avoid abandonment, but because you genuinely want to be better. "Owning your part is and act of humility, and that gesture opens the door for your partner to reciprocate." True accountability asks "What is my part in this dynamic?" with curiosity rather than self-flagellation. It involves self-awareness, empathy, honestly, and emotional resilience - qualities cultivated over time that function fundamentally changes how you interact. in contrast, "proving" focuses on external validation, creating an unsustainable dynamic where you're constantly monitoring whether you're "good enough" yet. The core difference here is whether you're changing because you've gained genuine insight into problematic patterns you want to address, or because you're desperately trying to avoid rejection.
Intrinsic vs Extrinsic Motivation. The healthiest growth is primarily motivated intrinsically - driven by your own values and desires to become best self - even when relationship serves as additional inspiration. According to self-determination theory, autonomy-supportive partners, the ones who support your self-directed goals, enhance motivation and well-being precisely because they don't pressure change. "Autonomy support from partners was associated with greater self-determined motivation for healthy eating and self-report well-being." The key is that your partner creates an environment that supports your autonomous growth rather than demanding you change to meet their needs. Reframing the statement suggests that relationship adds motivational fuel to growth you genuinely want for yourself, which is different from changing yourself primarily to be acceptable.
Mutual growth and reciprocity. Healthy interdependent relationship involve both partners growing together, not one person constantly working to be worthy while other remains static. A healthy relationship have three relationships - yours, your partner's, and your together relationship. Couples that change behaviours together are more successful than when only one partner is healthy or changing. This mutual influence reflect genuine partnership rather than one-sided striving. Being the only one working on growth while your partner remains unchanged or is unsupportive might be a red flag suggesting that it is more like a codependency rather than interdependency.
Maintaining Core Authenticity. Healthy changes involves adjusting problematic behaviours and patterns while remaining true to your core self and values. You are becoming better version off yourself, not a different person shape to meet someone else's preferences. In healthy relationships, partners help each other move towards their "ideal selves" - the person you aspire to be based on your own values - through what is called the Michelangelo phenomenon. This is vastly different from molding yourself to fit someone else's idea.
Self-Worth Development, Not Self-Worth Dependence. Phrasing it as "develop self-worth with you" is critical. Healthy relationships contribute to your self-worth but don't become the source of it. In interdependent relationships, partner's support increases self-esteem and confidence, but individuals don't rely on their partner or basic feelings of worth. "It's never healthy to depend on others to validate yourself". In codependent dynamics, self-worth is entirely contingent on the partner's approval, creating desperate attempts to maintain that approval. if the motivation truly is developing self-worth "with" your partner - meaning they support and inspire your growth but your fundamental sense of worth isn't dependent on them - this maintains healthy boundaries.
This whole reframing is most likely to be healthy when:
You're Addressing Genuine Patterns You Recognize. If "I'm not good for you" reflects legitimate self-awareness about patterns you've identified as problematic - like emotional unavailability, poor communication, unresolved trauma responses, or addictive behaviors - then working on these issues is appropriate and healthy. The key is that your recognition comes from genuine self-reflection, not from your partner criticizing you or from fear of abandonment.
Both Partners Are Committed to Growth. Healthy relationships involve both people working on themselves and supporting each other's development. If your partner is also examining their patterns and growing alongside you, this creates the mutual evolution that characterizes thriving relationships.
The Relationship Provides "Relational Catalyst Support". Partners can provide what's called relational catalyst support - responsive encouragement that promotes exploration, autonomy, and goal-striving rather than pressure or control. When partners offer this type of support, it enhances the supported person's feelings of capability, which predict long-term thriving outcomes including self-growth, self-esteem, and goal accomplishment. If your partner responds to your growth efforts with responsive, autonomy-supportive encouragement rather than criticism, pressure, or impatience, the relationship truly becomes a catalyst for positive development.
You're Working on Yourself Independent of Relationship Outcomes. The healthiest approach involves committing to growth whether or not the relationship continues. If you're addressing these patterns because they align with who you want to be regardless of any particular relationship, that's a strong sign of healthy motivation.
Some pitfalls to watch for
Even with this healthy framing there are some risks that are present:
Avoiding Genuine Incompatibility. Sometimes "I'm not good for you" reflects fundamental incompatibility that personal growth cannot resolve. If the core issue is mismatched attachment needs, values, life goals, or availability, working harder on yourself may keep you stuck in an unsuitable relationship. Some incompatibilities have no remedy because conforming to the other's needs would make the relationship miserable for one or both people. Growth is valuable, but it cannot bridge all gaps.
Slipping Into Codependency. The line between healthy interdependence and codependency can be subtle. Warning signs that you've crossed into unhealthy territory include losing sight of your own needs and interests, seeking constant validation from your partner, feeling unable to function independently, or basing your entire self-worth on whether you're "good enough" for them.
One-Sided Effort. If you're doing all the work while your partner makes no effort to address their own patterns or support your growth, this creates an imbalanced dynamic characteristic of codependency rather than healthy interdependence.
Using Growth as Emotional Avoidance. Sometimes focusing intensely on self-improvement can become a way to avoid confronting difficult relationship realities or uncomfortable emotions. If you're frantically working on yourself to avoid facing whether the relationship is genuinely healthy or meeting your needs, that's a form of avoidance.
The quality and context matter.
Reframing - treating "I'm not good for you" as additional motivation for growth focused on developing self-worth with your partner rather than proving yourself - can be healthy, but the specific context and quality of implementation matter enormously.
This approach is most likely to be healthy when it reflects genuine accountability for patterns you've identified through honest self-reflection, when growth is primarily intrinsically motivated with the relationship providing additional inspiration and support, when both partners are engaged in mutual evolution, and when you maintain core authenticity and self-worth that isn't entirely dependent on your partner's approval.
The crucial test is whether the relationship functions as a catalyst for your authentic development or as a source of pressure to become someone you're not. Healthy relationships inspire you to become the best version of yourself - not a different person designed to avoid rejection.
Relationships can be powerful catalysts for personal growth, providing the mirror we need to see ourselves clearly and offering challenges that drive us toward becoming our best selves. When both partners support each other's autonomous growth through responsive encouragement, the relationship becomes a context for mutual thriving.
However, this only works when you're simultaneously maintaining your independence, ensuring your self-worth doesn't depend entirely on the relationship, addressing real patterns rather than morphing yourself to please someone, and ensuring the relationship itself is fundamentally compatible and healthy.
If your motivation truly is "I recognize patterns I want to change, I value you and our relationship, and that adds fuel to growth I'm pursuing for myself," you're likely in healthy territory. If it's "I need to become different so you'll stay," you've crossed into unhealthy proving behavior.
Sources:
https://www.verywellmind.com/fear-of-intimacy-2671818
https://mentalzon.com/en/post/2664/understanding-anxiously-avoidant-attachment-the-push-pull-of-love-and-fear
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/maybe-its-just-me-but/201004/when-you-feel-youre-not-good-enough-for-somebody
https://www.harleytherapy.co.uk/counselling/feeling-not-good-enough.htm
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/speaking-in-tongues/202409/im-not-good-enough
https://www.hoffman-counselling.com/single-post/jealousy-cycles
https://psychcentral.com/relationships/ways-to-overcome-a-push-pull-dynamic-in-your-relationship
https://albertellis.org/2014/04/dealing-with-your-partners-fear-of-intimacy/
https://www.talkspace.com/blog/self-sabotaging-relationship/
https://nickwignall.com/7-signs-youre-dating-an-emotionally-immature-adult/
https://www.besttherapists.com/blog/self-sabotaging-relationships-examples
https://www.verywellmind.com/are-you-sabotaging-your-relationship-4705235
https://therapygroupdc.com/therapist-dc-blog/understanding-self-sabotaging-relationship-signs-and-solutions/
https://psychcentral.com/relationships/the-startling-reason-we-sabotage-love
https://psychology.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/2016-11/merp.pdf
https://www.rwapsych.com.au/blog/the-causes-of-emotional-distance-in-couples/
https://mentalzon.com/en/post/2161/the-martyr-complex-sacrificing-for-recognition-and-self-worth
https://lyrapolska.pl/en/blog/spread-your-wings-self-esteem-as-a-self-fulfilling-prophecy
https://positivepsychology.com/psychological-distancing/
https://breakthroughcounsellingcentre.co.ke/how-to-know-you-have-martyr-complex/
https://willingness.com.mt/the-self-fulfilling-prophecy-in-our-relationships/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3160517/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/your-future-self/201803/the-danger-of-self-protection-in-relationships
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anzf.1398
https://www.talkspace.com/blog/people-who-are-bad-for-us-falling-for-how-to-stop/
https://www.verywellmind.com/signs-that-youre-in-an-unhealthy-relationship-5218237
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/friendship-20/201712/7-signs-that-youd-be-better-off-ending-a-relationship
https://www.respectvictoria.vic.gov.au/news/red-flags-what-love-bombing-and-why-it-bad
https://psyche.co/guides/how-to-handle-rejection-so-that-you-can-heal-and-move-on
https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-rejection-sensitivity-4682652
https://nationalsocialanxietycenter.com/social-anxiety/anxiety-about-romance-rejection/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/working-through-shame/201906/facing-rejection
Sources:
https://www.healthline.com/health/mental-health/pushing-people-away
https://mentalzon.com/en/post/2868/is-distancing-the-same-as-ignoring-understanding-healthy-emotional-separation
https://thoughtcatalog.com/ellen-scheidt/2014/05/dont-ruin-your-relationship-with-self-fulfilling-prophecies/
https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/449344/
https://sweetinstitute.com/personal-growth-in-relationships-a-journey-of-mutual-evolution/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/all-about-addiction/202501/the-power-of-relationships-in-driving-self-improvement
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26997969/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4795838/
https://psychcentral.com/blog/imperfect/2018/09/the-difference-between-dependency-and-codependency
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352250X14000025
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/understanding-ptsd/202210/creating-healthy-interdependence-in-your-relationship
https://www.verywellmind.com/how-to-build-a-relationship-based-on-interdependence-4161249
https://codependencyrecovery.org/2024/01/04/the-need-to-prove-oneself/
https://bobcat-gopher-ljrz.squarespace.com/blog/change-self-change-relationship-growth
https://www.talkspace.com/blog/insecurity-in-relationships/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6131030/
https://www.talkspace.com/blog/self-sabotaging-relationship/
https://davidtianphd.com/beyond-success/brutal-truth-why-always-toxic-relationships-how-to-break-free-7/
https://meridianuniversity.edu/content/codependent-vs-dependent-the-impact-on-personal-relationships
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rediscovering-love/201911/are-you-the-only-one-trying-to-fix-your-relationship
https://adaa.org/learn-from-us/from-the-experts/blog-posts/consumer/understanding-emotional-avoidance
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8210843/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7065936/
Sources:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/relational-intimacy/202304/encouraging-your-partner-to-change
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-longitudinal-investigation-of-relational-catalyst-Tomlinson-Feeney/2409831f1801d2303f7a1b52a1d6933d97e96cc6
https://www.psychologytoday.com/ie/blog/secure-connections/202410/moving-your-relationship-from-meh-to-meaningful
https://dallasmentalhealth.com/self-esteem-vs-self-efficacy/
https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-self-efficacy-2795954
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11556260/
https://www.apa.org/pi/aids/resources/education/self-efficacy
https://positivepsychology.com/self-worth/
https://pure.eur.nl/files/149738270/2023-93532-001.pdf
https://www.southampton.ac.uk/~crsi/Individual_self.pdf
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9752820/
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244013505292
https://www.verywellmind.com/imposter-syndrome-and-social-anxiety-disorder-4156469
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4198626/
https://www.thechelseapsychologyclinic.com/therapy/feeling-like-a-fraud-at-work/
https://www.mcleanhospital.org/essential/impostor-syndrome
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0883035512001103
https://bobcat-gopher-ljrz.squarespace.com/blog/change-self-change-relationship-growth
https://www.verywellmind.com/how-anxiety-can-cause-relationship-problems-1393090
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/performance-anxiety
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5256475/
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0034654320919354
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0092656685900054
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8834764/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-real-superheroes/202010/i-am-not-good-enough-managing-imposter-syndrome
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/why-bad-looks-good/201712/the-clearest-sign-that-a-partner-is-not-the-one
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00332941231152389
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1041608024000554
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886925000820
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7391967/
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41502403
https://ctsi.au/postgrad/Simonfinley_thesis.pdf
https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/am-pdf/10.1111/bjso.12378
There probably are more that I forgot to mention or missed.
blakekathryn
snowghoul
dailybridgerton
theartofmadeline
baratheonpilled
izzy806
germansingergirl
jacobvanloon
romaincrisis