(via Pin on - 01 ˖ ˚ ◞ ┊ ” aesthetics . “)
Not today Justin

PR's Tumblrdome
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

bliss lane
NASA
𓃗
Sade Olutola
Monterey Bay Aquarium
sheepfilms
macklin celebrini has autism
noise dept.
tumblr dot com

blake kathryn
will byers stan first human second

gracie abrams
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

roma★
🪼

JVL

ellievsbear

seen from United States

seen from Laos
seen from Ecuador

seen from Brunei
seen from China
seen from Peru

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Colombia

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from Ireland
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@lookashiny
(via Pin on - 01 ˖ ˚ ◞ ┊ ” aesthetics . “)
(via Self Architecture)
(via Pin on - 01 ˖ ˚ ◞ ┊ ” aesthetics . “)
(via Pin on - 01 ˖ ˚ ◞ ┊ ” aesthetics . “)
(via Pin on J)
(via Antigua - view from the T-Club)
(via Pin on - 01 ˖ ˚ ◞ ┊ ” aesthetics . “)
(via We Heart It)
(via Pin on - 01 ˖ ˚ ◞ ┊ ” aesthetics . “)
(via Pin on - 01 ˖ ˚ ◞ ┊ ” aesthetics . “)
If a doctor proposed banning all antibiotics but refused to answer "What about sepsis?", you'd rightly walk out of the room.
Of course the ideal should be a world without prisons. In a perfect utopian future, we would have no need for cages because we would have successfully dismantled the root causes of crime, poverty, and harm. But this smug, dismissive refusal to engage with the grittiest realities of human behavior helps absolutely nothing and actively works against her goals.
It treats a foundational question of public safety as a tiresome "gotcha" rather than a deeply legitimate human concern.
When activists retreat into pure idealism and dismiss the public's valid fears about violent crime as unworthy of a response, they don't look visionary. They look condescending, elitist, and entirely disconnected from the reality of human nature.
So I read the rest of this comic and more of her work.
The underlying logic of this deflection relies on a false dichotomy - the idea that if you dare to ask how an abolitionist world handles a rapist or a murderer, you must be a blanket defender of mass incarceration.
Over here in reality, you can fully recognize that our current justice system is deeply flawed, broken, and failing survivors, while still demanding to know what replaces the physical containment of dangerous individuals.
To frame a question about immediate physical safety as a structural roadblock is an intellectual bait-and-switch. It assumes that anyone asking for a practical plan just "doesn't get it," when in reality they just want to know how you plan to keep their loved ones safe.
The comics series "Who's Left" is garbage.
Here's how it dismisses people who lived through the communist (authoritarian) regimes of the 20gh century: by calling them old and xenophobic.
And here's how it defends those regimes:
Speaking as a lifelong left-leaning liberal: this is tankie bullshit and it deserves your contempt.
Idealism is great. Pretending idealism is a suitable replacement for realism or pragmatism is idiocy.
I....
The reason it conjures images of gulags, bread lines, and violence is because those things actually happened. There are so many memoirs and histories about gulags out there. The comic is spitting in the face of the people who lived through that.
"Those were ~*anti-imperialist*~ mass graves and gulags" this is why radicalization is a bad thing. Because radical politics turns off the ability to see people as people. Even radical politics that claim to be about empathy.
Prison abolitionists will (rightly!) point out that we shouldn't dehumanize criminals, and then they'll turn around and reduce victims of violent crime to just. Inconvenient takking points. Just like tankies will rail against the suffering of people harmed by the west, then ignore, silence, and/or attack people who suffer under anti-western governments. Because in the end, it's not about making a better world. It's about winning an ideological war.
In my experience, they treat victims who want their attackers incarcerated as, at best, poor brainwashed dears who don't understand that what they want is evil. Like, I have seen, more that once, the phrase "this is why we don't let victims decide sentences." Like they've lost the right to have an opinion about the person who violated them.
the thing about CC is that she did plagiarize. she was found guilty of plagiarism and banned from fanfiction dot net! she plagiarized pamela dean, among others, and lied about it repeatedly! it happened! and regardless of whatever else she writes, regardless of whether the publishing industry and her fans trust her not to do it again, regardless of how many times her wikipedia page gets scrubbed clean, that will always have happened! so it is not in fact cruel gossip, but a factually true statement, to say that she plagiarized and i'm not interested in supporting her or giving her the benefit of the doubt because she plagiarized and lied about it repeatedly! fuck!
what really incenses me about cassandra clare — and forgive me for bringing this up again, but i don't think i've articulated this point yet — is not that i believe she is currently plagiarizing. any accusations i've seen about recent work seem to me to be superficial. but even if one could prove that she never plagiarized again once she started publishing, it wouldn't matter to me, because she chose to capitalize on her fandom history. while trying to distance herself from what she did, she made a brand out of the fanfic pen name "cassandra clare" and continues to profit off the reputation and fanbase that she amassed while she was, provably, a plagiarist.
you don't get to do that and bury the things that made you famous. as an individual, as a human being, she is capable of change and any other good qualities you may want to ascribe. but she built her career on lies. professionally, i don't understand why she gets to move on.
the worst part for me--worse than building her career on plagiarism--is that her career was also built on a truly reprehensible level of harassment. she told her followers to help get her unbanned from FFN (as if that would ever happen) and they spent months harassing the site owner and several abuse team members. one of them, after enduring extensive abuse, ended up in the hospital.
this was just the beginning of the harassment, though. CC additionally used her friend heidi, a lawyer, to send cease & desist letters and other forms of legal harassment against ppl. none of it would hold up in court and these sort of things weren't even heidi's area of expertise as a lawyer, but it still happened.
CC was such a terrible serial harasser that people started to leave her alone about the plagiarism stuff after a while because it was just not worth her blowing up your entire spot. not just with her lawyer, but with her minions who harassed targets on her behalf. getting a deluge of harassment is a horrible experience that hurts people, so of course people tried to avoid it.
i hate CC because she hurt lots of people. she did it intentionally, repeatedly, and with singular focus on covering her own ass no matter who she hurt.
she has the career she has now because of her harassment of fandom as much as the plagiarism.
receipts
fanlore article
I will never read any of her books or watch anything related to them, because I remember the plagiarism and laptopgate and charitygate that followed on its heels. Charitygate was, imo, probably the worst, because that involved harassing a woman whose mother had cancer. And saying she was lying.
Alex Roulette (American, b. 1986), Reflectors, nd
Oil on Panel, 32 x 36 in
(via Pin on - 01 ˖ ˚ ◞ ┊ ” aesthetics . “)
(via Pin on - 01 ˖ ˚ ◞ ┊ ” aesthetics . “)
(via Pin on - 01 ˖ ˚ ◞ ┊ ” aesthetics . “)