Hello there!! I did these portraits from every year Snape was on Hogwarts He was a baby
Hope you like it!

shark vs the universe
occasionally subtle

Love Begins
d e v o n

Discoholic đȘ©

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
Monterey Bay Aquarium
â
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
The Stonewall Inn
Doug Jones
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
art blog(derogatory)
hello vonnie

gracie abrams
Mike Driver

tannertan36

#extradirty
One Nice Bug Per Day

seen from Brazil
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from Mexico

seen from United States
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
seen from India
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from Brazil
seen from Netherlands
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from Italy
seen from Brazil
seen from Ecuador

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
@lordslytherin
Hello there!! I did these portraits from every year Snape was on Hogwarts He was a baby
Hope you like it!
The reason Severus Snape takes so long to speak is because heâs trying not to swear, pass it on.
the snape being sexist headcanons are genuinely hilarious because theres nothing in canon to support them but on the other hand you have the marauders, one who threatens a girl to date him and sees her like a prize to win, one with severe mommy issues, who keeps ignoring and cutting off hermione whenever she talks sense, who beefs with mrs weasley acting like she doesnt have an entire family shes worried about, and one who ditches his pregnant wife. But theyre the woke feminists...right.
Right? Isn't it funny how much overlap there is between:
- fans who claim that the guy who was best friends with a girl for years, who made a nickname for himself out of his mother's maiden name, who had a specifically female patronus, and who pulled through what happened in the chapter Spinner's End with dignity, was a raging misogynist
And
- fans who claim that the group of traditionally masculine, sporty bros who were popular kids in the 70s, are known to emasculate and bully boys who they see as beneath them and one of whom tried to harass a girl into going on a date with him while another got cold feet and almost abandoned his pregnant wife, were feminists, the ultimate allies for women and minorities and warriors against toxic masculinity.
...
Really? These are your feminist heroes?
I'm really trying not to come off as too anti-Marauders on Tumblr, I don't hate them as characters, but I'm not going to pretend that the popular "sEnSiTivE fEmiNisT bOis uwu" fanon of them doesn't feel like utter bullshit.
On the other hand I kind of understand why it's such a big thing, because a lot of these fans/fanfic authors seem to be pretty young (as if I'm not 20 haha), and it's obvious that this is the fans/authors projecting their own battles HARD on the characters and the world. If the Marauders are your favorite characters, of course you'll want them to be on your side. You want Sirius and Remus to have been at Stonewall (notice the conspicuous change in country), you want James to be an outspoken warrior against sexist attitudes, you want to see Marauders who are comfortably in touch with their emotions to break down masculine stereotypes, et cetera, because those are the things that you would fight for and want your friends to fight for.
I 100% get it.
But.
As an AFAB, I just genuinely don't buy that the canon Marauders, especially as teenagers, would have been "woke" feminists. In my view, they are like... probably the most accurate representation of (casual) toxic masculinity in the series. And it doesn't make them all bad, especially considering that these books were written in the 90s and reflect the attitudes of those times. In the end, it's just one of the many, many different flaws people can have.
Like for example, there are so many headcanons of the Marauders crossdressing casually, because omg you go kweeeens fuck gender roles. But... canon Remus used crossdressing as a joke, to humiliate a colleague. How woke is it to laugh at a man you forced into women's clothing?
This all isn't to say that Snape is overall less toxic than the Marauders, but his toxicity is not all that gendered in nature, if that's the correct way to say it. His toxicity and bullying doesn't seem to be so much based on gender roles, compared to Sirius and James' - if anything, he seems to kind of resent masculine gender expectations, obviously struggling to fit them himself.
It all comes down to the fact that there is no canon evidence of the Marauders being feminists, while there is canon evidence of Severus NOT being a misogynist. I guess that's why it's so weird that those headcanons are as popular as they are.
Friendly reminder that the marauders are not saints, in fact they were pretty much assholes with huge prejudices :)
Percy Weasley in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
Snape swearing like a sailor is one of those things that are not canon but that you can pry out of my cold dead hands.
I mean, itâs basically canon:
- OOtP Ch 26
- OOtP Ch 28
He probably does swear like a sailor in his head.
I saw @foxyx âs snape in the sun post (HERE) and could not get this out of my head!! So, please enjoy Snape in an oversized sun hat.
    He pulled Harryâs wand from his pocket and began to trace it through the air, writing three shimmering words: TOM MARVOLO RIDDLE. Then he waved the wand once, and the letters of his name rearranged themselves: I AM LORD VOLDEMORT.Â
i face death in the hope that when you meet your match, you will be mortal once more. â r.a.b.
1000 Picspams Challenge | #262 Harry Potter Couples | Lily Evans & Regulus Black
I still love him
íŒììš© ë€ìŽì€í€ë€ì~~~~~~ííí
Iâm just thinking about how much fanon and fan fiction can change peopleâs perspectives of actual canon.
As an example, a while ago, I was writing a fic with a sister, and wanted to check and see exactly what Lupin and Sirius said to Harry when he asked them about the memory he saw in the pensieve. It had been a few years since Iâd read Order of the Phoenix, and Iâd somehow just gotten convinced that Lupin had been very regretful of what his friends had done to Snape, blamed himself for letting it happen, and didnât try to excuse it or victim blame Snape. And then I actually read it over again, and⊠itâs not that way. Lupin excuses it. Lupin doesnât express more than casual, absent regret, and minimizes the entire event, acting like it was just a joke that went too far.
I read what he said and I was actually shocked. I had a completely different idea of Lupin than the one actually presented in canon. My version of Lupin was sincerely sorry for what had happened and took full blame, and was very aware of how horrible his friends had been. And the actual, canon Lupin thought of what had happened as James and Sirius - who were the height of cool - just getting a little bit carried away, thatâs all. He didnât say anything when Sirius made the entire event out to be Snapeâs fault and went on about Snape being jealous of James and how he was involved in the dark arts, which James hated (when James in the memory made it clear he was tormenting Snape only because he existed and not because of any affiliation with the dark arts.) Lupin even made it seem like it was fine that James continued to torment Snape up to his seventh year and kept that fact from Lily, because Snape ânever lost an opportunityâ to curse the boy who tormented him for years and likely stripped him naked in front of a crowd.
I had spent so long writing my own versions of things and consuming fan fiction, that I had literally twisted the story in my mind without even realizing it wasnât canon. I try to consult the actual text before I defend anything now. But I donât say anything when people hate Lupin, because I like the twisted, headcanon version I invented that deeply regrets what happened, but I understand that some people didnât reinvent the character in their head and only went by canon and thereâs a lot of things to dislike in canon, or some people just reinvented the character in a different way. And I donât say anything when people hate Snape, because thereâs a lot to dislike in canon, for him, and not everyone reinvented him in their heads like I had, or maybe reinvented him a different way.
But itâs so weird when I see people insisting that liking Snape is just wrong, when many of the reasons they give for hating him are twisted, fanon versions that are just highly popular, who then get angry when people tell them that it isnât canon. Or sometimes they say that liking Snape is wrong for this or that reason, and then get mad when people tell them that what Snape did is comparable to things the marauders did. Thereâs not canon evidence that Snape was an incel, but there is canon evidence that James tried to coerce Lily to date him even after she made it clear that she wasnât interested. Snape mistreated Neville (although you could argue that he did that under his role as a spy, there are lots of people who still canât get past that or viewed that differently and thatâs understandable,) and Lupin didnât take his wolfsbane and almost murdered three children due to it, and let someone he thought was a serial murderer wander around Hogwarts at will, because he didnât want to admit his own flaws. Snape shook Harry hard and threw a jar at his head, and Lupin slammed him into the kitchen wall in Deathly Hallows, making Harry feel like heâd been punched. Snape had once been a willing Death Eater who turned spy, but it canât be denied that he once wanted that position and held those views. Despite canon suggesting he tried to get out of his Death Eater duties, and canon suggesting he changed as a person, Snape having been a Death Eater is understandably very hard for people to get past. But many Snape haters also love Sirius, who died an adult slave owner, who mistreated Kreacher, or many of them love Regulus, who also willingly became a Death Eater and supported those ideals.
Honestly, Iâm not trying to say that people canât like the Marauders and hate Snape, thatâs perfectly valid. But itâs just⊠bizarre, how people will actively go out of their way to ignore the canon things the Marauders have done and will go by only their twisted versions of them, and then pretend itâs canon. And then those same people get angry at Snape fans even when they actively acknowledge the bad things Snape did in canon. They make all these posts about how horrible people are for liking Snape, and get angry when they make posts describing why they hate Snape and theyâre told that some of the things they said arenât canon, they put it in the Snape tags or even the pro Snape tags because âSnape fans need to hear it,â and get mad when theyâre asked to use tags people can filter. I get how hard it can be to remember exactly how the books went years later, I get being confused because the idea of the character you have in your head is different than the actual canon character, and I literally thought Lupin was better than he was and would actually get annoyed when people acted like he was a bad person, I can get how weird it can be. And thereâs nothing wrong with reading Snape in all these ways, âincel, never changed, only did good things for selfish reasons, outside of the norm in his treatment of the students,â people can feel free to headcanon that. But it just isnât canon. And I just really, really want the fandom at large to please stop acting like people shouldnât be allowed to like Snape, when most of the fandom is operating with fanon ideas at this point, and weâre all picking and choosing and going by our own interpretation.
If someone writes a fan fic where Remus is a totally mature and not at all petty person who would never endanger or hurt a teenager, thatâs great for them, canon is dead, theyâre very valid. If they write a fan fic where Sirius and James were anti-House Elf slavery, were feminist icons, were only Fred and George level pranksters, and only hated Snape for very good reasons, thatâs great for them, canon is dead, theyâre very valid. If someone writes a fan fic where Snape was heavily coerced into joining the Death Eaters, deeply regretted the way heâd treated Lily, and changed as a person⊠Eh, that doesnât go against canon, actually. Let me try again. If someone writes a fan fic where Snape never mistreated his students, acted as a parental figure, and loved Dumbledore, thatâs great for them, canon is dead, theyâre very valid.
snape: thereâs an empty armchair there, in case you donât know
harry: thanks, Iâm comfortable here
Snape is Harryâs adoptive parent.
reference
Never forget the time when Snape agreed to be Lockhart's "assistant" at the Dueling Club and just fuckin decked him in front of the whole school, like
Seriously. Iconic.
While he did change, Iâm pretty sure young Snape was a true believer in blood purity and believed Lily to be some sort of exception.
First, Lily accuses him of calling all muggleborns mudbloods. He doesnât deny this. When humiliated and looking to hurt Lily, he instinctively reaches for the word mudblood, not other insults like say, bitch. This indicates that the word is a part of his vocabulary. Some may say that he adopted the vocabulary as a means to fit in, but Iâm not so sure. Snape isnât Lupin, he isnât a coward. He didnât grow into his bravery, it was something he always had (examples: threatening to sleep outside the Gryffindor common room to apologize to Lily, when he had just been assaulted by 4 Gryffindors, going to Dumbledore to beg for Lilyâs life thinking he was going to kill him, etc). And the final, most relevant point in my opinion, is that if Snape wasnât a true believer, then it makes the whole âdo not use that wordâ scene kind of... pointless? That scene was meant to show how Snape has truly changed his beliefs completely, to the point that he rebukes a portrait for his language, in private for nobody to see. If he was never a blood purist in the first place, then whatâs the point?
I would be interested in reading other viewpoints and opinions. However, this is meant to be a thoughtful analysis of Snape. If you hate Snape, then please do not interact, as this isnât meant to be a bashing post.
Oh, hard agree. I always saw him as a child believing magic > muggle, mostly due to his home life, and taking the leap from that to pureblood > muggleborn after getting into school must have felt... logical, perhaps. Lily's place was rationalized as an exception, because he knew her to be every bit as competent as he was, as magical as he was, and he couldn't wave that away. The changes he went through later had to involve confronting his prejudice, accepting he was wrong and he did, but I fully agree it wasn't something that happened overnight.
these are all good points. iâve seen people claim that snape couldnât have been a true blue All-Muggleborns-Are-Scum blood purist due to his own muggle heritage, but imo that argument doesnât hold water considering the prevalence of internalized bigotry both in real life and in fiction. if anything, teen/young adult snape probably doubled down on the anti-muggleborn sentiment as compensation for his less-than-ideal blood status, and to impress his slytherin housemates who likely saw him as inherently suspect due to his class and lack of a presitigious magical pedigree. i like to imagine that even in his darkest death eater days he still knew someplace very, very deep down that his beliefs were hateful and immoralâ because snape is a character who has consistently demonstrated that he has a conscience, outer nastiness notwithstandingâ but i also think that it took him a lot of time and work to unlearn his anti-muggleborn prejudice.
I wonder if Snape, with the logic of a young person not understanding the depth and menace of prejudice, might have thought that blood-purity beliefs were actually complimentary because they made Lily exceptional?
I mean, he clearly does not view Lily as inferior or lacking intelligence, talent, or magical power. He, like Slughorn, likely views her as something like âthe brightest witch of her age.â And, moreover, what status he does have in Slytherin, perhaps even Lucius Malfoyâs patronage, comes despite his mixed parentage, and he might have been praised for rising above his pedestrian origins. Class is a funny thing, malleable enough for exceptions when itâs profitable to make them, and if Severus-the-halfblood is âpractically as good as a purebloodâ for his talents, then why should not Lily-the-muggleborn be even more spectacular for being in his league despite being of even lower birth?
Itâs just that the scorn applied to the lower orders is conveniently right there when youâre mad and want to rage at someone for overstepping to soothe your own hurt feelings, or when youâre vulnerable and want to retreat to every form of security you can access.
Snapeâs security here is being Slytherin, and halfblood, and Slytherin identity is much tied up in blood-purism, and James, his actual tormentor, is not vulnerable to blood-purity insults, so instead Snape turns his only weapon on the person present who is. He grabs the one bit of power and dignity and security readily accessible to him and, desperate to wield it, turns it on the person it will work on.
Itâs a sort of a collateral damage, and sort of like how a person helping a panicked or angry animal escape from a trap or a fight will likely get their hands shredded for the effort.
And then afterwards, he doesnât understand, readily, how thatâs a dealbreaker for her. He is genuinely confused when she doesnât find exceptionalism as valuable as he does, or as secure* as he does, or as complimentary as he does.
*Actually, I wonder if that is whatâs behind his choices in regards to his appearance in adulthood: that if he leaves something deliberately, objectively wrong with himself, he can blame that for any disdain directed at him, from nearly any source. If heâs not high in pureblood circles, itâs not because heâs a halfblood of inferior worth, itâs because heâs greasy/sallow/ugly; he can point to a reason he âdeservesâ it, and his level of acceptability as a half-blood is left unchallenged, when otherwise he might run into the reality he might not really be good enough for, or accepted by, the people to whom heâs given his loyalty.
I find it of particular interest that, later on in life, he tries particularly hard to dissuade Harry from reading too much into the idea that he is exceptional---almost as though heâs someone whoâs learned the hard way that âexceptionalâ isnât the grand boon someone offered it might expect it to be.
Finally! Eight HP chibi characters~â I'll let you know when the keychains with them be ready ^ ^
MAKE ME CHOOSE. â @pansly asked: slytherin or ravenclaw?
you could be great, you know, itâs all here in your head, and slytherin will help you on the way to greatness, no doubt about that.
Itâs not just what characters say that I find interesting, but how they say it. Â
With that in mind, I keep thinking about two of Lupinâs comments from Prisoner of Azkaban, which seem to parallel each other neatly. Â
We were in the same year, you know, and we â er â didnât like each other very much. He especially disliked James. Jealous, I think, of Jamesâs talent on the Quidditch fieldâŠ
And:
That was the final straw for Severus. I think the loss of the Order of Merlin hit him hard. So he â er â accidentally let slip that I am a werewolf this morning at breakfast.
The first thing that fascinates me is the use of âerâ.
We know that âdidnât like each other very muchâ is a downplaying of the animosity between Snape and the Marauders, whilst âaccidentally let slipâ appears to be a downplay of what presumably eventuated (that Snape purposely told people).
I think it clearly establishes a tell - that when Lupin pauses, heâs going to understate.
The second thing that fascinates me are Lupinâs two theories - his two statements of, âI think.â
âJealous, I think, of Jamesâ talent on the Quidditch fieldâ. Â
âI think the loss of the Order of Merlin hit him hard.â
So, if we accept that âerâ is a tell, then âI thinkâ seems to be a similar indicator. On both occasions, Lupin deliberately misleads Harry - and in doing so, he minimises Snapeâs trauma, whilst reducing his own involvement.
The first reduces the bullying that Snape endured for the apparent crime of âexistingâ and suggests instead that Snape was at fault for being jealous.
The second reduces Snapeâs anguish at believing that heâd finally captured the traitor responsible for Lilyâs death and Dumbledore machinating so that the (as Snape thinks) traitor escapes, and instead suggests that Snape was at fault for glory hunting.
As I said, itâs not just what characters say thatâs important to analyse, but how they say it.