A take on Lennon/McCartney
Note: This post started as a reply to @sweating-cobwebs recent post on the valuable information we can take from the full quote regarding Paulâs âimovable heterosexualityâ, but it completely turned into a stream of consciousness type thing and I thought better not to clog the original post with my rambling. So, to the interested parties, buckle up! Also, I preemptively apologize for its meandering quality.Â
Iâve only started the adventure of getting acknowledged with the history of the Beatles this last September 2018. Before that I only knew a couple of songs, the band membersâ names and that John Lennon had been murdered by a fan somewhere in the faraway past. So I came into this pretty much with a clean slate in terms of pre-established conceptions or other mainstream opinions about the bandâs dynamics.
But I can also say that the Lennon/McCartney partnership was pretty much a draw, something that fascinated and interested me from the moment I started listening to Beatles music on YouTube and came across the âWe Can Work It Outâ video. There was just such a wonderful companionship there, it made me want to know more! I was far from guessing the mammoth of a history between those two and the band in general.
On Tumblr, I came across posts with quotes about them, some without a source and that proved false, but with a little bit of digging you could just find the most fascinating statements by the actual people there. Blogs like the wonderful @amoralto where crucial in giving me trustworthy and interesting information, with little to no personal bias on the posts themselves.
And so, clean of all other narratives, it was quite clear to me that John Lennon was a very emotionally unstable man, who tried to protect all this rawness and easily wounded heart by attacking first. He was unbelievably fragile and had a tendency to want to put himself in the care of other people, to absolve himself of the responsibility of managing himself.
But simultaneously, he bloated his ego, to try and run away from his own crippling insecurity, and the crash between one state and the other lead him to bitter rages and depressed states.
Because of this insecurity, this basal fear of being fundamentally unlovable and thus getting left behind again, he was also extremely jealous* and rebelled against the authority he craved, for the power it would have to hurt him.
(*In terms of the jealousy, I always saw it again as an extent of his own fear of abandonment; in the terms of âif he is that much better than me, then he doesnât need me and can leave at any time.â)
So, based on all Johnâs quotes, it was clear he was extremely vulnerable and exposed emotionally to whatever the people he decided to latch on to did. It was quite a (frustrating) realisation when I became aware that a lot of people had the complete opposite idea, that he was this confident guy (maybe only on the outside) and the domineering leader of this group.
Again, I think he only tried to publicly (and perhaps in his head) maintain this position as a matter of bravado and to keep a relevant position (so that people donât get the idea of just leaving him behind). But I donât see this as a natural state for him⌠Yes, he was charismatic and could rally people around him but in terms of making decisions, he seemed to like to hand over the reins to someone else.
Paul, on the other hand, I had some difficulty figuring out. But from what I was seeing he wasnât the Cute one either.
He always seemed harder than any of the others, more stable and resilient, much more in control of himself. Consequentially, he was also in a position to be in more control of the people and circumstances around them. So I also couldnât understand how he is sometimes painted as the pining, helpless one.
But things are never that simple, because I see Paulâs own need to have a strong hold on his emotions very much like his own armour, designed to hide and protect his own vulnerabilities (often, from himself). The soft, charming and easygoing exterior is the ultimate manifestations of these two layers.
First, it serves to conceal that there even is a hard underside in the first place, and by masking the armour itself, people donât question whatâs within the armour.
Secondly, the diplomatic and charming attitude helps him fulfil his need to manage the people and circumstances around him, in a way that people donât realise theyâre being nudged and so egos arenât hurt.
But the last thing we mustnât forget is that Paul isnât pleasant and affable to the people around him solely as a means to an end, to get what he wants. He sure learned to use it to his advantage, but he isnât just some manipulating sociopath.
In the end, he genuinely likes to be liked and likes people around him to be having, much like himself, a generally good time. He is consciously and purposefully positive, keen on looking at the bright side of life and enjoy it all as best as he can. But never independently, or at the expense of those around him. Making people happy, loving them, and getting more love in return also helps appease the fears and needs he keeps deep within him and fights to ignore.
They were incredibly similar in their core. That must have been one of the factors that brought them together like that. But whereas John seemingly only had âtwo layersâ (hard covering soft), leaving him much more exposed and volatile, Paulâs different approach at protecting his soft inside by covering it thickly and pretend it doesnât exist (soft covering hard covering soft), made them different in a lot of interesting ways. Â
And if these personalities helped them be stronger together and take advantage of each otherâs strong points, the fear within them became at some point so great that it rippled through everything else and threw the dynamic out of balance. Now, the exacerbation of their own characteristics made them out of sync and just served to fracture them further.
Johnâs bite and acerbic wit were like a wall of thorns, a perfect filter that guaranteed that if people stuck around him and went through all that just to get to him, then maybe they were strong and loved him enough that he was âsafeâ in getting attached. And once he latched he just held tightly and completely, with everything he had. Here was someone that could fill the void within him, someone that could make him whole and better.Â
But unfortunately, that hole could only ever be filled with self-love, because every other love he received would be tainted by fear:Â âIâm not worth loving, so this love Iâm getting mustnât be love at all; or if it is, they are never as desperately dependent on me as I am on them, and so they could leave with their love at any moment and Iâd be left alone and empty again. And who could blame them? Iâd abandon myself too if I could.â
So, regardless of how much love and affection he received, this would always be doubted, never believing it was there at all. I think it must have been the trauma of being abandoned by both his parents as a three-year-old that planted that seed of doubt in his mind: âIf my own parents, who should love me unconditionally, donât love me, then there is nothing in me to love at all.â This lack of love for himself created a void within him that needs filling, but because of the fear itself, it could never be completed by nothing external. But at the same time, he expected it to come from out there because it sure wasnât coming from himself.
And so we have this frustratingly insatiable craving and people he hopes can fill it, and who he ultimately blows of, raging because of the pain, when it feels as though they arenât trying or about to give up on him. (Because I donât think he quite realized that nobody but him could fill it, otherwise he might have reached some kind of catharsis.)
We can see this happening clearly in his relationship with Paul. âHere is this incredibly talented person, who despite being quite extraordinary still sticks around with me and takes up with all my bullshit. I bet we could be great together, that he could complete me and make me better and worth something in the whole of us both. I could just surrender in this common entity of JohnandPaul and he could take care of us both.â But at the same time: âHere is this incredibly talented person, who by being quite extraordinary, has no reason to still stick around with me and take up with all my bullshit. I bet he doesnât need/love me as much as I need/love him, and so he could leave this common entity of JohnandPaul at any moment. Maybe I need to keep testing the truthfulness of his commitment by making him jealous and pushing him away. If he truly loves me he will fight back through the wall of thorns and continue to stick around and take up with my bullshit.âÂ
On the other side, we have Paul, who I believe was quite taken with this incredibly personality that was John Lennon, and once he fought through the wall of thorns and found the hurt, scared and lonely little boy inside he couldnât help himself than love him even more. Because he too was a hurt lonely boy. âHere is this incredibly talented person that loves music as much as I do, and who despite being quite extraordinary still sticks around with me. I bet we could be great together!â
And thatâs the crucial difference. Paul still loved himself when he met John. He was quite sure, given his childhood, that he was inherently someone worthy of it. People always recount him as a rather confident kid. Of course, he still craved the appreciation of those around him. He still loved to be loved, by strangers but especially by people he loved himself. But it wasnât as desperately fundamental a need as Johnâs was, and so, at least in the beginning, the doubt of his own self-worth didnât cloud what he was receiving from others.Â
But he wasnât completely secure in his relationship with John either. Otherwise, he wouldnât have protected his inner core like that when dealing with John, always keeping him somewhat at an emotional arms length. And all of Johnâs Mind Games, the casting aways for a new idol and attempts at making him jealous (to quiet Johnâs own insecurities) couldnât have helped much in the matter of trust either. Paul was constantly made to doubt and fight to re-establish his position as The Best Mate. The fact that both were that possessive of the other shows how afraid of losing the relationship and doubt over their true importance in the otherâs eyes belied their dynamic. There was just too much fearâŚ
And while I see John as somehow more aware of how much he needed Paul, and thus his fear stemmed directly from that need being unmet if Paul left, I think the latter, in his urge not to be controlled by his emotions but instead being the one on command, was also afraid of how vulnerable his own attachment to John made him.Â
So, on the one hand, we have Paul, trying to strike a balance and find the ideal proximity between the two. Not too far, because he does love him and likes to spend time with him, and in some ways felt he needed him too. But not that close, because then he risked both losing his own identity and freedom in the conjoined name of Lennon/McCartney and, maybe, having to face the true depth of his feelings and the strength of his attachment. Thereâs also the assumptions that could have been made regarding their relationship, and Paul, with his rigid upbringing (coupled perhaps with a bit of defensiveness that rose from his more feminine looks) and what it might have meant for the future of the band, always stroke me as a publicly âno homoâ kind of guy.
On the other hand, we have Johnâs rollercoaster strategy of alternatively holding Paul as close as possible, smushing them together to the point of being able to disappear into them, and at other times throwing him some thorny vines, playing âMind Gamesâ to force Paul to prove his devotion, to fight for him.
And in the beginning, Paul played them, literally fighting for Johnâs attention. Maybe, in his youth, he hadnât developed quite a good enough grip on his emotions yet, hence the quite obvious outwards expressions of dislike with Stuart. Or maybe he felt that while it was appropriate to compete for his best friend against another male friend, coming between John and a female love interest would raise more eyebrows.Â
Either way, as he got older, Paul stopped responding so directly to Johnâs provocations (maybe not to give him the satisfaction of seeing how he unsettled him) and started reposting in more subtle digs, such as with the composing of âEleanor Rigbyâ, or not engaging at all, as it was the most mature thing to do. Unfortunate for John, as he needed to get a clear reaction out of Paul to make sure that he still cared.Â
The rising tensions concerning one of the great landmarks in their relationship, the LSD usage, came to a breaking point once Paul finally relented and agreed to drop acid with John. And for a second, everything was perfect.
Paul and Mal Evans came to stay with us somewhere in the late spring of 1967. (âŚ) Paul and Mal, this time, were full of tales of this here LSD and what it could do. Unrecognisable psyches on familiar heads and shoulders: the voice was Paulâs but the tone was ⌠Godâs? Paul said he and John had had 'this fantastic thingâ; which really wasnât very informative, so I pressed him to flesh it out. 'Incredible, really, just locked into each otherâs eyes ⌠Like, just staring and then saying, âI know, manâ and then laughing ⌠And it was great , you know.â ⌠Realising he wasnât getting through , Paul said, 'Youâll just have to try it.
-Â Derek Taylor, Fifty Years Adrift, 1983.
I think at that moment they became as close emotionally as theyâd ever been. But I think that distance was out of Paulâs previously defined comfort zone. And like two atoms coming too near, the instability rose and the forces of repulsion overpowered the forces of attraction.
I donât think John was aware of Paulâs discomfort. On those months before their stay in Rishikesh, he seemed to be on cloud nine!Â
But then something happened in India. Maybe John wanted even more proximity (he was, after all, hoping to create a Beatle paradise on some Greek Island). Perhaps Paul reached a breaking-point all on his own. Either way, whatever may have happened, for whatever reasons, John felt rejected by Paul in some way. When the latter left the camp early, a humiliated and broken-hearted John stayed behind.
People around them noticed the raised tension upon their return:
Our first night back in the studio began, as usual, with small talk and catching up. âSo how was India?â I asked.
âIndia was okay, I guess⌠apart from that nasty little Maharishi,â John replied, venomously.
Harrison looked deflated, as if it were a conversation theyâd had many times before. With a deep sigh, he tried to calm his agitated bandmate.
âOh come on, he wasnât that bad,â he interjected, earning a withering glance. Lennonâs bitterness and anger seemed almost palpable.
Ringo tried deflecting things with a little humor. âIt reminded me of a Butlins holiday camp, only the bloody food wasnât as good,â he said with a wink.
I glanced in Paulâs direction. He was staring straight ahead, expressionless and weary. He didnât have much to say about India that day, or any other.
I sensed at that moment that something fundamental in them had changed. They were searching for something, but they didnât know quite what it was; they had journeyed to India looking for answers, and they were disappointed that they hadnât found them there⌠but it seemed to me that they didnât even know the questions.
-Â Geoff Emerick, Here, There and Everywhere. (2005)
I see John come to his own breaking point on the four-day trip he made with Paul for the promotion of Apple. I donât really know what triggered it. Maybe something happened or didnât happen when they were alone. Maybe as soon as he saw Linda, or Paul and Linda together, he knew he had to change strategies. The crux of it is, three days after their return from New York, John invites Yoko Ono for the 1st time to his house, where he takes LSD with her, records âTwo Virginsâ and they have sex at the end of the night.
And though Paulâs reaction was somehow hostile in the beginning, by the âGet Backâ sessions we can clearly witness his more diplomatic tone. Maybe he truly was being more mature and accepting and respecting Johnâs choice. Or perhaps he felt like he had caused this himself, and so had no right to try and gain back his chance. But again, Paulâs lack of engagement in the âMind Gameâ of jealousy, even after John shoved Yoko in his face any way he could (including making him listen to a tape of them having sex), only seemed to prove to John how little Paul had ever cared for him, making him want to disappear into Yoko even more.
But I think Paul was indeed begging for a second chance, with âOh! Darlingâ and âThe Long and Winding Roadâ clear examples of this. Now, whether he was ready to give in to the level of closeness John wanted (but the latter didnât get the message, clouded with drugs and paranoia as he was), or rather, he just wanted things to go back to the safe comfortable level of intimacy they shared before, Iâm not really sure.Â
I think the tragic part of it is, the level of closeness John needed and the one Paul felt comfortable with didnât match up, even when Paul spent the seventies trying to build the bridges necessary to bring them back together. Maybe John made this so hard because he was still terrified of being hurt again. Maybe he thought that Paul wasnât willing to give him the intimacy he craved.
But I think, throughout it all, we have heartbreak on both ends. John reveals the depth of his emotions by the magnitude of his hurt, that translated in an irrational rage and absolutely cruel lashing against his former partner, that unfortunately clouds many peopleâs opinions on Paulâs talent as a musician and songwriter to this day, despite Lennon having tried to swallow a lot of things back not even a year after the break-up. But painting their history in Ugliness made for a better storyâŚ
The depth of Paulâs attachment is revealed in his despair at the loss of the band and his closest friendship. How much John meant to him shows in the way all his attacks landed, wounding Paul deeply, completely shattering his self-esteem, the very same thing that fundamentally separated him from Lennon in the first place. For many years, you could see Paul doubting his worth and Johnâs true opinion on him, or how much he meant to him. Â
Funnily enough (not funny at all, actually), it seems that in the brutal break-up, John managed to break Paul too and instil in him the same insecurities that had tormented him all his life.
But Paul, contrary to John, never let himself use that pain as a weapon against those he loved. He rarely retaliated, but rather prevailed with persistent positivism, always working to build a better tomorrow (though not really tending to the bleeding wounds of yesterday). But his love for John was truthfully unconditional, as nothing John could say or do would diminish it, and he placed Johnâs happiness above his own need to express his pain. In the end, if John needed Paulâs love the most, Paul was the one who loved better.
Theirs is a cautionary tale of how despite loving each other immensely, they succumbed to their own fears and let them destroy something beautiful, the possibility of that love manifesting mainly as pleasure rather than pain. John, so scared to lose him that he kept testing how strong Paul was holding back, managed to totally push him away. Paul, afraid that if he got too close to John he would end up hurt, managed to push him away too, and get terribly hurt in the process.Â
I think with Johnâs death, the notion that he had lost him for good hit Paul so monumentally, that he couldnât quite deal with the guilt and the regret at the missed opportunities for some time. Only after did we see him open up and dare to admit to himself and to others how much John had meant to him.
I must admit itâs a very bittersweet story, but incredibly beautiful nonetheless, and certainly worth remembering. Because if there is one constant throughout all of this, itâs the sheer depth and scale of their Love.
Closing Remarks: You must have noticed how I discuss their connection solely on the terms of emotional closeness. I do this because Iâm still not certain how they expressed their immense love in terms of physical intimacy. Despite not seeing this detail as particularly relevant to the understanding of the depth of feeling they had for each other, it is something that society as a whole values quite a bit, and thus, it has the power to have deeply impacted their choices, based on the outside pressures and stigma that existed.
At this point, John Lennonâs bisexuality is almost incontestable, and I believe he clearly confirmed and identified as such during his lifetime. I also believe that amidst all his need for emotional and mental intimacy, sharing physical affection with Paul was just another desired facet, as he himself expressed rather obviously in one of my favourite quotes from him:
Itâs a plus, itâs not a minus. The plus is that your best friend, also, can hold you without⌠I mean, Iâm not a homosexual, or we could have had a homosexual relationship and maybe that would have satisfied it, with working with other male artists. [faltering] An artist â itâs more â itâs much better to be working with another artist of the same energy, and thatâs why thereâs always been Beatles or Marx Brothers or men, together. Because itâs alright for them to work together or whatever it is. Itâs the same except that we sleep together, you know? I mean, not counting love and all the things on the side, just as a working relationship with her, it has all the benefits of working with another male artist and all the joint inspiration, and then we can hold hands too, right?
John Lennon, interview w/ Sandra Shevey. (Mid-June?, 1972)
Paul, on the other hand, remains, as usual, the more mysterious one. I previously answered an ask where I touch upon this, but basically, I havenât definitely made up my mind if he truly lacked a sexual attraction towards John or if, like a lot of things within himself, he completely denied and repressed those feelings for the longest times. He could have also been worried about the publicâs reaction, and what them being thought of as queer would mean for the future of the band.
But maybe Paulâs relationship with homosexuality and physical affection can be better explored later, in another post.
For now, this is a rather messy take on their relationship, and I would love to hear your opinions on the matters addressed here! But Iâm just incredibly grateful if you bothered with reading until here!
snowghoul
janainaart
vaporwave
areudirty
pixelskylines
tangentwithtanner
2087
stormborns
yousharknotpass
jbbartram-illu
