Day break at the orchard
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
noise dept.
tumblr dot com

Origami Around
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Xuebing Du
Peter Solarz
ojovivo
Three Goblin Art
trying on a metaphor
taylor price
$LAYYYTER

pixel skylines
hello vonnie
d e v o n
No title available
KIROKAZE
todays bird

JVL
will byers stan first human second

seen from Italy

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Kenya

seen from Qatar
seen from Venezuela

seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from United States
@microanthropic
Day break at the orchard
Fun with iPhones and microscope lenses ... Need to get a steadier hand
A Brown Hooded Owlet moth caterpillar, Cucullia convexipennis, that I found munching on some goldenrod at my cabins
The Prismoids by Richard Clifton-Dey.
Righteous.
Through Leeuwenhoek’s Looking Glass by i-heart-histo
Antony van Leeuwenhoek lived three hundred years ago in the Netherlands. He made microscopes that were more powerful than the microscopes that everyone else was using at the time. His microscopes let him see the tiniest living things: sperm, red blood cells, protozoa, and bacteria. They were everywhere, but they had no names until he referred to them as animalcules (animals + molecules).
Looking back, we can see their significance. But everything that he saw, he was the first human ever to see. Before then, in a world as rife with pseudo-scientific speculation as ours, no one even imagined that the microscopic world existed.
He did not begin to report his observations until he was forty years old. However, he lived, and observed, until he was past ninety. All of his reports, beginning in 1673, were informal letters to the editors of the journal of England’s Royal Society. In 1680, in recognition of his achievements, the Royal Society elected him a Fellow. By his death in 1723, with over a hundred letters published by the journal, he was their most-frequent author, and is now known and celebrated throughout Europe among scientists and those interested in science.
He made his discoveries by manufacturing small lenses and observing plant parts, pond water, and slices of animals’ internal organs to collect a cabinet of curiosities. He could not draw well and so he hired an illustrator to prepare drawings of the things he saw, to accompany his written descriptions. Most of his descriptions of microorganisms are instantly recognizable.
Compiled here are only a small selection of the illustrations published in his letters, highlighting the extent of his
1676, April 21 (Ash Tree)
Observations about the vascular system of a thin section of a year-old sprig from an ash tree.
1677, November 19 (Human semen)
In a letter to William Brouncker he described observing in a semen sample a multitude of “animalcules,” less than a millionth the size of a coarse grain of sand and with thin, undulating transparent tails.
1688, 7 September (Tadpoles and fish)
Two tadpoles and an unspecified fish that illustrated a self-published pamphlet Omloop des bloeds (Circulation of Blood) in 1688.
1702, 20 April (Silkmoth parts)
Facets of adult silkmoth eye and a leg claw.
1712, 17 December (Cod muscle)
In a letter to Antoni Heinsius, Raat-Pensionaris van Holland Leunheuk demonstrated a cross-section of dried cod muscle showing how the fibers shrink irregularly and break the membranes between them.
1713, March 25 (Mouse hair)
A mouse hair demonstrated at its thickest and thinnest parts in a letter to Adriaen van Assendelft.
1714, August 21 (Cow flesh)
A dried, shrunken, and re-wetted cross-section of cow flesh and a similar longitudinal section.
1714, October 26 (Gnat)
A flying creature called a Spek-eeter [lit: ham eater]
1714, November 20 (Mouse flesh)
A flesh fiber from the lowest shank of a mouse near the foot showing three ‘pullers’ (tendons) with spiraling ridges and one puller (right) without them. A multipennate muscle with striations.
1715, March 26 (Sugar pear)
Cross section through the vessels of a sugar pear.
1716, September 28 (Coconut wood)
A small piece of coconut wood showing the joints that draw nearer and farther from each other.
1717, March 2 (Spinal nerve)
A cross section of spinal cord nerve showing five bundled nerves and surrounding fat. Early demonstration of epineurium, perineurium, endoneurium and axons.
1717, March 6 (Pig brain)
Small vessels on the brain of a pig.
1722 (Silkworm trachea and egg)
Published in Opera Omnia. The image shows the trachea (referred to as ‘vessels’) on one side of the head of an unborn silkworm and an egg where the silkworm has bitten through to emerge (G-H).
For more information on Leeuenhoek and his work click here
The 1722 compendium Opera Omnia is available digitally here
How can one person be more real than any other? Well, some people do hide and others seek. Maybe those who are in hiding - escaping encounters, avoiding surprises, protecting their property, ignoring their fantasies, restricting their feelings, sitting out the pan pipe hootchy-kootch of experience - maybe those people, people who won’t talk to rednecks, or if they’re rednecks won’t talk to intellectuals, people who’re afraid to get their shoes muddy or their noses wet, afraid to eat what they crave, afraid to drink Mexican water, afraid to bet a long shot to win, afraid to hitchhike, jaywalk, honky-tonk, cogitate, osculate, levitate, rock it, bop it, sock it, or bark at the moon, maybe such people are simply inauthentic, and maybe the jacklet humanist who says differently is due to have his tongue fried on the hot slabs of Liar’s Hell. Some folks hide, and some folk’s seek, and seeking, when it’s mindless, neurotic, desperate, or pusillanimous can be a form of hiding. But there are folks who want to know and aren’t afraid to look and won’t turn tail should they find it - and if they never do, they’ll have a good time anyway because nothing, neither the terrible truth nor the absence of it, is going to cheat them out of one honest breath of Earth’s sweet gas.
Tom Robbins (via microanthropy)
Mihály Csíkszentmihályi says “we do not understand what happiness is any better than Aristotle did.” His studies of “optimal experience” led to the idea of “an active state of flow,” in which a challenging skilled activity, with clear goals and unambiguous feedback, enables concentration to the point of loss of consciousness of self and time. Such autotelic (done for their own sake) activities are common in sports, music and the arts, but rare when we’re passive. Similarly, Martin Seligman distinguishes the raw feelings of easy pleasures from earned “gratifications,” which are the longer-lasting rewards of flow-like activities. ... Nouns like “happiness” and “well-being” seem too static. Verbs reflecting the required cyclical activity would fit better. Sadly the verb “happies,” used in Shakespeare’s sixth sonnet, is obsolete. “Well-doing” is more precise than “well-being”. And “flourishing” is fitter than “being happy.
Jag Bhalla http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/mind-guest-blog/2013/06/07/happiness-should-be-a-verb/
Through Leeuwenhoek’s Looking Glass by i-heart-histo
Antony van Leeuwenhoek lived three hundred years ago in the Netherlands. He made microscopes that were more powerful than the microscopes that everyone else was using at the time. His microscopes let him see the tiniest living things: sperm, red blood cells, protozoa, and bacteria. They were everywhere, but they had no names until he referred to them as animalcules (animals + molecules).
Looking back, we can see their significance. But everything that he saw, he was the first human ever to see. Before then, in a world as rife with pseudo-scientific speculation as ours, no one even imagined that the microscopic world existed.
He did not begin to report his observations until he was forty years old. However, he lived, and observed, until he was past ninety. All of his reports, beginning in 1673, were informal letters to the editors of the journal of England’s Royal Society. In 1680, in recognition of his achievements, the Royal Society elected him a Fellow. By his death in 1723, with over a hundred letters published by the journal, he was their most-frequent author, and is now known and celebrated throughout Europe among scientists and those interested in science.
He made his discoveries by manufacturing small lenses and observing plant parts, pond water, and slices of animals’ internal organs to collect a cabinet of curiosities. He could not draw well and so he hired an illustrator to prepare drawings of the things he saw, to accompany his written descriptions. Most of his descriptions of microorganisms are instantly recognizable.
Compiled here are only a small selection of the illustrations published in his letters, highlighting the extent of his
1676, April 21 (Ash Tree)
Observations about the vascular system of a thin section of a year-old sprig from an ash tree.
1677, November 19 (Human semen)
In a letter to William Brouncker he described observing in a semen sample a multitude of “animalcules,” less than a millionth the size of a coarse grain of sand and with thin, undulating transparent tails.
1688, 7 September (Tadpoles and fish)
Two tadpoles and an unspecified fish that illustrated a self-published pamphlet Omloop des bloeds (Circulation of Blood) in 1688.
1702, 20 April (Silkmoth parts)
Facets of adult silkmoth eye and a leg claw.
1712, 17 December (Cod muscle)
In a letter to Antoni Heinsius, Raat-Pensionaris van Holland Leunheuk demonstrated a cross-section of dried cod muscle showing how the fibers shrink irregularly and break the membranes between them.
1713, March 25 (Mouse hair)
A mouse hair demonstrated at its thickest and thinnest parts in a letter to Adriaen van Assendelft.
1714, August 21 (Cow flesh)
A dried, shrunken, and re-wetted cross-section of cow flesh and a similar longitudinal section.
1714, October 26 (Gnat)
A flying creature called a Spek-eeter [lit: ham eater]
1714, November 20 (Mouse flesh)
A flesh fiber from the lowest shank of a mouse near the foot showing three ‘pullers’ (tendons) with spiraling ridges and one puller (right) without them. A multipennate muscle with striations.
1715, March 26 (Sugar pear)
Cross section through the vessels of a sugar pear.
1716, September 28 (Coconut wood)
A small piece of coconut wood showing the joints that draw nearer and farther from each other.
1717, March 2 (Spinal nerve)
A cross section of spinal cord nerve showing five bundled nerves and surrounding fat. Early demonstration of epineurium, perineurium, endoneurium and axons.
1717, March 6 (Pig brain)
Small vessels on the brain of a pig.
1722 (Silkworm trachea and egg)
Published in Opera Omnia. The image shows the trachea (referred to as ‘vessels’) on one side of the head of an unborn silkworm and an egg where the silkworm has bitten through to emerge (G-H).
For more information on Leeuenhoek and his work click here
The 1722 compendium Opera Omnia is available digitally here
Dandelion
microscopic city plan
Toilet Paper
Stoma and all
Which way?
Mad’s “What, Me Worry?” Halloween Mask