if you participated in harassing isff/suggestrogen off of this website, or you think she stepped "out of line" in any way and are happy she's gone,
get the fuck off my blog.
Sade Olutola
𓃗
trying on a metaphor
Game of Thrones Daily
ojovivo

Origami Around

roma★
Today's Document
🪼

blake kathryn
Noah Kahan
cherry valley forever
Not today Justin
Misplaced Lens Cap

ellievsbear
No title available

⁂
DEAR READER
No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from Philippines
seen from Singapore

seen from Germany

seen from Norway
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Guatemala
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from France
@miss-emissary
if you participated in harassing isff/suggestrogen off of this website, or you think she stepped "out of line" in any way and are happy she's gone,
get the fuck off my blog.
tbh i think every transfem who publicly disagreed with isff/suggestrogen should be ashamed of herself. she was your sister and mine, one of the best of us, and you abandoned her under assault from transmisogynists because pedophile is too icky of a word for you
everyone was on board with the other stigamtized kinks she posted about, forcefemming and siscon, but when she pointed at pedophilia and said its the same idea you cut and ran, and i hope youre embarrased to your core that you couldnt get over yourself long enough to see she was right
i feel it is important to add to @emmacandle 's post, that those transfems who publicly disagreed with with isff/suggestrogen are the EXACT transfems the initial post was addressing. like literally just read the opening few sentences as quoted from the original post:
"This post is for those of you who defend other trans women to your very last, women like kinky-robot-girl, Patricia Taxxon, sailatina (sailor-crusader) isuggestforcefem, all the ageplaying transfems on this site who get nuked multiple times a day, etc.. Despite all this support and rhetoric, which I love to see, I do not think many of you are really willing to fully acknowledge that thought-crimes are not real in the case of people attracted to children."
this reaction was predicted and cautioned against from the fucking start. its shameful.
prepping lunch for girl mutuals
i love my wife 🥰
it's her birthday today!! 🎂
happy to be taking pics again 🥰
the innocent angel
Oh my god. I need to share another story of my new friend making today. So my friends husband says, very casually, as we’re about to leave for the ren faire, “Yeah, it’s like my story about fucking a chicken.”
And of the four people present I was the only one who was shocked. The others all nodded as if to say, yes yes, we know, the chicken fucking.
So he explained, when a progressive person is analyzing a behavior they will typically use the metric, Harm/No Harm. They may not like things in the No Harm category but they wouldn’t object.
Conversely, a more conservative mindset used something like eight metrics. Authority/No Authority Moral/Not Moral, things like that.
So, he posited if you want to sound out someone’s mindset (and you’re willing to live with the repercussions) you can ask: if a man buys a dead chicken from the store, cleans it thoroughly, then fucks it, and then eats it himself…?
I listened in dawning horror, both rapt and disgusted. But into the growing pause I whispered, “No harm…” because it really has no effect on me or anyone else if a man fucks a dead chicken. I don’t like it, I think he’s a weird dude, but like. That’s his dick. But a more conservative person will hear that and object on moral grounds despite not being harmed.
It’s been haunting me all day, so please enjoy.
This is also a handy probability scale for who's gonna be wearing your skin in a week.
I know you’re joking but this joke is absolutely the point. You’ve assigned a moral judgement to the act, rather than acknowledging it as not harmful.
In the current climate sex has so many moral judgements applied, and I can tell you that perfectly bland every day people do some Crazy Sex Stuff. When I worked at a sex shop they’d tell me all about it. It didn’t preclude them to murder or being serial killers. If someone wants to fuck a warm cantaloupe or a dead chicken it doesn’t matter. It doesn’t harm me or anyone else.
Your morals should not be applied to anyone else’s sex life unless there’s actual harm, and a time where public indecency laws are rearing their heads again creeping toward the immoral queers, it’s something to actively push against.
I've been such a good girl this week, I got so many new patrons and I scheduled an consult to get my letters of recommendation for bottom surgery - I deserve a pretty girl coming over to make me pho I dont want her to be sick it's not fairrrrr
No no, that was good to hear actually. Thank you xP
what if we kissed 🫣. and we were both lemons 🍋😳
Penelope the dog
(she/they)🐕🏳️⚧️🦴
LOVE AND PEACE FOR IT/ITS PRONOUNS
there's a really fun balance when you know someone has a crush on you where you can tease them for having a crush on you without letting them know you know they have a crush on you. this only works because people who have crushes will analyze everything you say but not very well. anyway, i love playing with my food.
Gosh, that's so perfect. Your friend is actually the only one who is engaging with this post correctly. Supersedes my original intent, even. Sorry, I bow to her wisdom here. Tell your friend I hope she's having fun!
my honest reaction
im sick of messing w it JUST TAKE IT
People will say "this is the hottest woman ever", then show you a screenshot whose art style makes her look like some kind of bug, and you just have to sit with not knowing whether they're really talking about the sexy fanart version of the character, or whether the show's art style is part of the appeal.
The phenomenon this post is actually referring to:
The bugfuckers in the notes: