Big if true, most normal Brideshead Revisited enjoyer
The Bowery Presents
noise dept.
Xuebing Du
NASA

titsay
art blog(derogatory)
$LAYYYTER
Show & Tell
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Product Placement
Jules of Nature
ojovivo

tannertan36
𓃗
No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi
hello vonnie
Today's Document
we're not kids anymore.

izzy's playlists!

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Slovakia

seen from United States

seen from Slovakia
seen from Slovakia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
@motherlicker
Big if true, most normal Brideshead Revisited enjoyer
most sane Anglicans actually
art trade w @zxc4783tuplesr
NEED more people to talk about the lbj centaur
Yeah I guess you could call me a trendsetter
2,500 years of the USA
Another day, another Sam Kriss fever dream; how does an essay on the bisesquicentennial turn into -checks notes- brother-sister incest? (Sam Kriss, baby)
Europeans live in an Oedipal world of structures and prohibitions, a long-settled order that you can slot yourself into by fucking your mother. Not Americans. America is a world of dangers and possibilities that you explore by fucking your sister. Haven’t you seen the porn they make over here? What are you doing, stepbro, now you’re liberated from all patriarchal bonds? This is what it means when they talk about Liberty and the Rights of Man; it’s all code for sisterfucking. It doesn’t have anything to do with personal independence; you’re still stuck in a hive-like hierarchy, subject to the terrifying power of the Great Sun, but your incestuous fantasy is arranged horizontally instead of vertically. And that really is a kind of freedom; maybe the only kind to ever really exist.
Bro look at my (pervert vulgarian) model it has anxiety
Qwen's Jacobean lens is frying me, I expect nothing less from Alibaba llm
Tell me, Adeimantus — you who have spent so many hours in the discords and subreddits of our people — what is it that distinguishes a shounen anime from a shoujo?
I confess I have never considered the matter carefully, Socrates. I suppose shounen is for boys and shoujo is for girls?
A fine beginning. But let us look deeper. Imagine a young boy, playing with his toys. Does he not bash them together?
He does, yes.
And do he and his friends not argue endlessly over which of their toys would win in a fight?
Constantly, and with great passion.
Now imagine a young girl, playing with her toys. Does she not make them kiss?
…She does.
Does she not argue with her friends not over who would win in a fight, but over who belongs with whom?
I begin to see where you are going.
And if Aphrodite has been kind, and has bestowed upon her the φουτζόσι nature — does she not find her brother's Naruto and Sasuke toys, and make them explore each other's bodies?
I — yes, Socrates. I suppose she does.
Then the soul of shounen discourse is powerscaling — who beats whom — and the soul of shoujo discourse is shipping — who loves whom, and how, and with what degree of emotional devastation.
That seems correct.
Now. Is there a further distinction to be made, within these categories? Between those who are, as the moderns say, woke, and those who are chuds?
I think there must be, though I am uncertain how to draw it.
Consider: is it not the woke who care deeply about the precise definitions of abuse and consent — who will debate endlessly about power imbalances and trauma responses and what exactly constitutes a toxic dynamic?
It is. I have seen these debates. They are very long.
And do the chuds not repudiate such pretensions entirely, and concern themselves only with who is the most attractive — who, as they put it, is best to goon to?
They do, and they are also very loud about it.
Good. Then let us apply this framework to some examples, so that we may be sure we understand it. What of Dragon Ball Z?
Clearly a shounen. The discourse is entirely about power levels. Goku versus Superman. Whether Vegeta could beat Frieza if he had another week to train. Neither especially woke nor especially chud — simply loud.
Ouran High School Host Club?
Shoujo, plainly. The discourse is entirely about which host Haruhi should end up with. Neither particularly woke nor unwoke — simply romantic.
Steven Universe?
Woke shoujo, and almost insultingly obvious. The entire discourse concerns whether various gems were abusive toward Steven, what his codependency with his father means, and whether Spinel deserved better. I have never once seen anyone ask whether Steven could beat a particular gem in a fight. I have seen thousands of words written about whether Pink Diamond was a victim or a perpetrator.
And now — Chainsaw Man?
Surely it is a shounen? It has a chainsaw for a head. There are extremely gory fight scenes. I would have said… neither woke nor chud, perhaps. But certainly shounen.
Think carefully, Adeimantus. Did not the scene in the back alley, with Yoru, and the nature of what she offered Denji — did that not spark hundreds of Reddit threads?
…It did. I remember them. They were quite heated.
And were they debating whether Denji could beat a given devil in a fight?
No. They were debating whether what occurred constituted a meaningful violation, given Denji's initial objection and Asa's anger.
Consent and abuse discourse.
…Yes.
And do not some fans still mourn Reze, and insist she was the one who truly understood Denji? While others argue passionately that Asa is the only one who could give him what he actually needs?
The shipping wars are, I will admit, extensive.
And have you ever — even once — heard Chainsaw Man fans argue about whether Denji could beat a particular devil in a straight fight?
…I cannot say that I have.
Then observe what we have found. Chainsaw Man's discourse is concerned not with power, but with relationships. It is therefore shoujo. Its discourse is concerned not with attractiveness, but with abuse, consent, and emotional damage. It is therefore woke. And thus —
Astonishing, Otakrates. Chainsaw Man is a woke shoujo manga.
I could not have said it better myself.
ALSO..some more masturbation facts about me. theres a nonsexual scene in a book where a kid gets spanked for some reason. it was set in like the 40s and he was in a boarding school i forget. but i think i either misread the scene . or maybr the author actually did write this and theyre just fucking weird. and i thought the protag got hit (with like a ruler or something). on the penis instead of on the arse. and i remember my 11 year old brain being like. i wonder why i think that would feel good.
and so my first ever "experiment" with masturbation was. slapping my dick with a ruler. and when that felt good. my first ever way of masturbating was. stacking heavy books on my penis. and then hitting the top book. so that the force was distributed down the series of books. into my penis. and of COURSE it didnt work i was punching books into my dick but it laid a strong foundation for a great gooning career . hey everyone PLEASE pretend you didnt read this post
This weekend is someone’s last with 10 fingers
Tbh, what are we even celebrating?
when the story primarily told through alternating unreliable narrators suddenly drops the pretense and you see them both as they really are
Very important to me
You have been scheduled to succumb to Poster’s Madness. Adopt a topic to become obsessively devoted to, alienating all your friends and followers.
Visigothic irredentism
The ancient Armenian space program
Salish as the original language of humanity
The Garden of Eden was in Las Vegas
The Time Dodecahedron
Aliens live among us, and are stealing human sperm
Transvestigating Alexander the Great, Caesar, Jesus
The Roman Empire is a lie invented by the Catholic Church
Tanadrin keeps breaking into my house and stealing loose change
Other (please specify)
can’t believe the visigoths are getting shafted like this. 𐌲𐌿𐍄𐌸𐌹𐌿𐌳𐌰 𐌰𐍆𐍄𐍂𐌰 𐌿𐍂𐍂𐌴𐌹𐍃𐌹𐌸! 𐌿𐌽𐍃𐌰𐍂 𐌳𐌰𐌲𐍃 𐌵𐌹𐌼𐌹𐌸!
“How would you feed if you were a vampire” reveals a lot about people
“Steal blood donations from hospitals and blood banks” = my personal favorite. They assume the process for this is simpler than dealing with eating people, clearly the most ethical.
“Stealing blood bags is more unethical than eating people” = surprisingly common take. Perhaps they hold the belief some people deserve life saving care over others. If stealing blood people donate anonymously that would keep both you and potential victims alive, then how is it unethical? Most likely, they read this take online and never really thought about it too hard just agreed because everyone else did. Very telling.
“I’d only feed off of volunteers”= has a deep set faith in a sense of community. Not only people that you trust to keep your secret but would put themselves in danger for you. That’s beautiful. Probably gay.
“I’d feed off of strangers but knock them out first, I’d just take a little” = the belief this is more ethical than stealing blood donations is fascinating
“I’d only eat bad people” = MASSIVE can of worms, requiring its own post. who do you believe deserve to die, how would you be sure of that, and how is this more ethical? This conversation is now about who you would murder if you could get away with it
> it's an, uh, open flank