Cosimo Galluzzi
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Show & Tell
Jules of Nature
Stranger Things
❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
No title available
ellievsbear
almost home
ojovivo
todays bird
JVL
roma★
Discoholic 🪩
we're not kids anymore.
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
JBB: An Artblog!
No title available
🪼
Kaledo Art
seen from T1
seen from France
seen from Argentina
seen from Canada
seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from Brazil
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Romania
@mr-weirdo-mcgee
𝜗ৎ Strawpage: femdyk3spage's strawpage
𓂃 OC's strawpage: (NEW!) yearbooks's strawpage ( you can ask stuff about them on there :3 )
𓂃 also my pronouns page!
( My other accounts are :
Contradictory label blog
Petre/agree blog
Lesbinism blog, why not.
@spiteful-contradictory-hcs )
𝜗ৎ Pronouns Page ♡ / Pronoun.cc
Level 1: Asylums are scary because there's crazy people there.
Level 2: We shouldn't treat mental health facilities as objects of horror because it stigmatises mental illness.
Level 3: Asylums are scary because there's psychiatrists there.
Level 4: Asylum's are scary because they're dehumanizing cages that deny people any autonomy even over their own mind and their potential for neglect and other abuses is limitless.
Seriously though. I work in mental health with individuals attempting to regain life skills after being in long term mental health hospital holdings. One of my duties, as needed, is to escort clients to their appointments. Mind you, many of my clients are intellectually disabled adults, so things that seem obvious to others may not be obvious to them. One of them asked twice how much longer a client would be in her appointment. I had no idea of this, as I was outside in the car with some clients as said asking client went in to use the bathroom. Next thing I know, this psychiatrist bolts out the door, rushes across the parking lot, and begins screaming at me. In broad daylight. In front of other people coming and going from the building.
For one, why are you working in mental health if you’re so reactive? I’ve literally never once met this woman in a good mood. She’s so heavily disliked that when a bunch of my coworkers began running a D&D group in the conference room, she didn’t get an invite because no one wanted her there. Secondly, I don’t control the clients. They’re people. If there’s something *they* have done that you don’t like, talk to *them*- Preferably in a much calmer manner than you spoke to me.
You shouldn’t be working in mental health if you’re going to fly off the handle like that, have intense biases against people who need your care, and don’t even view them as people and just defer to others with them. Seriously. What the fuck.
'Disabled' is not a bad word. 'Disability' is not a bad word.
Unless someone has specifically said they do not like being called disabled, please, just call us disabled.
It's not an insult. It's not a bad thing to be disabled. The only reason people think it is, is because of ableism.
If you think calling someone disabled is insulting, you have to unlearn some serious ableism.
it is legit bizarre to me how hard video game creators and film directors and showrunners try to pretend that fat people don't exist. can you think of the last time you saw a fat person in a lead role? god forbid a fat woman? i can walk down the street or go into a shop or restaurant and see fat people everywhere but then i switch on the tv and suddenly it's like a glimpse into an alternate universe where no one has a bmi over 24. insidious and weird
People existing with self-harm scars is not promoting self-harm.
People posting photos of themselves with scars is not promoting self-harm.
People making and sharing art of characters with self-harm scars is not promoting self-harm.
Your just ableist.
No body should ever have to hide their body or be told their existence needs to come with a trigger warning
Women who you don't like, or you don't politically align with, or who are horrible people, still have the right to see their rapists and abusers face justice and to have their voices heard.
This is a putrid attitude to have, BTW. Rape isn't a punishment for being a shit person. It is a violent and fundamental violation of the right to control over one's body. Excusing, dismissing it, or justifying it, just once, just a little, is a road to total dehumanisation. The worst, most evil person in the world would still never deserve to have it happen to them.
Additional reminder that there are always going to be people who think YOU are a horrible person, sometimes by virtue of being a Democrat, or queer, or being pro-choice...
and if you subscribe to the "horrible people don't deserve to see their rapists face justice/do deserve to be raped" take, then there will be people out there who think those things about you.
That's the thing about human rights: every human deserves them. Every single one. You do not have to earn them by having the "correct" opinions or doing the "right" things. Every single human deserves them, no matter fucking what, simply because they are human.
Because the second you start dehumanizing people and then using that as justification for stripping away their rights, there WILL be someone who uses that same justification against you.
Not to take away from OP rightfully calling out the grossness of that attitude, because far too many actually think a version of this, but moldy cookie looks like another one of those “far right wing men LARPing as radical feminists to satisfy their humiliation fetish” people that @senatortedcruz encountered the other day:
Can yall stop downplaying getting called a slur as "unpleasant" or "troublesome"
That shit is TRAUMATIZING point blank
Just cuz yall didn't want to check on the Black individuals getting hit with slurs, don't mean this doesn't affect them mentally and emotionally
i am not a psychiatrist but i do find it really weird how autism checklists are so often focused on "outward" signs of autism rather than what is going on internally. i don't know how to explain it but "do you make eye contact with other people" feels like a much less relevant question than "how does it feel when you have to make eye contact with other people?"
while i'm here, the other one that always pisses me off is "do you interpret idioms literally, for example 'bull in a china shop'?"
well, no, obviously. i know what "bull in a china shop" means because that is a popular phrase with a clearly defined meaning. and if i hadn't heard it before, then i would still not interpret it literally, because it has the cadence of an idiom and i would probably be able to work out from context what it meant. what is the point of this question
third and final complaint: "are you good at noticing subtext?"
i feel like the problem with this question is best illustrated by a conversation i had with a friend a while back, where i said something like, "i feel very safe with you because you don't do subtle hints and you are always very straight-up with me about what you are thinking and feeling."
and he laid a hand on my shoulder and was like, look dude i'm gonna be straight up here. i am subtle with you constantly and you simply do not notice <3
@luckyybones hope you don't mind me screenshotting but you are actually so correct
This is because patients aren't treated as having their own thoughts and feelings, and also because people with the disorder are not the ones writing disorder information.
Disorder descriptions (diagnostic and otherwise), treatments, and recommended coping mechanisms all have these problems.
In almost all cases, disorder information should be written by people with the disorder, for people with the disorder.
Rare triple combo where everyone sucks: above you can see a mother who uses A PADLOCK to lock his son into this tent bed thing every night because he's autistic, in the first comment you can see the "parents of autistic people are sooo brave it must be horrible to exist around a disabled person 🥺" archetype, and then there's the third asshole
Child abuse is so fucking normalized ESPECIALLY when the child in question is disabled and people only care when it doesn't inconvenience parents. Do not mince words, people reading this and recoiling in disgust. This is objectively gross child abuse and neglect.
i think censoring subtitles is actually ableism
It feels like a convoluted form of infantilization of disabled people. Oh, I can watch a horror movie but can't read the word fuck? I can watch R-rated films, but I can't read the word shit?
It's one of two things:
1. It's deliberate infantilization of disabled people.
or 2. The puritanical impulses of American society are SO Fucking Off the Goddamn Walls at this point that most able bodied people can't recognize the cognitive dissonance of a film saying fuck but not letting the same exact adult audience read the word fuck.
it's probably both. But fuck, dude.
As a mostly able-hearing person who sometimes has the captions on because I’m half paying attention or have the sound at extremely low my-partner-is-asleep volume, I am noticing more and more of this caption-cleaning nonsense.
I thought at first, “well maybe they’re just simplifying the captions slightly for reading faster, or to fit the screen?” because sometimes the dialog flies fast. It seems like sometimes that’s true, but the number of “bad words” that get dropped is ridiculously out of proportion to any other word, so I assume it has to be intentional.
The FCC television captioning rules state
• Accurate: Captions must match the spoken words in the dialogue and convey background noises and other sounds to the fullest extent possible.
I think “fullest extent possible” is potentially giving captioners a lot of leeway there, but the intent is surely clear.
It would seem that the FCC rules about video on the Internet only covers video that was previously broadcast on TV, so that means anything the streamers produce direct for streaming isn’t covered.
However, in 2012, the National Association for the Deaf sued Netflix, alleging that internet companies were covered by Title III of the ADA, and the court ruled in their favor. One of the outcomes was that “Captions must be accurate, synchronous, complete, and properly placed.” Accurate and complete seem to be the operative words relating to this issue.
I am not a lawyer, but it would seem to me, if you see captions that are not accurate and complete, to write the company’s customer service to remind them of their obligations under the ADA, and ask them to correct them, and/or file a complaint with the DOJ, Civil Rights Division:
The ADA provides an important tool to fight discrimination: filing a complaint with an appropriate federal agency. This page outlines the st
As a caregiver, I'm tired of people asking,"Do you wipe ass for a living?"
This isn't inherently because it's disrespectul to my job, though it is and us caregivers do SO much more than that; we're taking care of people. That's 10% or less of the job.
It's the genuine DISRESPECT of my clients that bother me.
Do NOT speak about my client like they're a dog. "Do you wipe ass for a living?" You could not have phrased that in a more insensitive, ableist, and dehumanizing way.
Incontenience care is NORMAL.
It is NOT gross, weird, immature, or anything else besides normal.
My clients have felt ashamed for normal things like needing their briefs changed or having to do toiletry and everytime I reassure them they're completely fine and not doing anything wrong. It breaks my heart to see them so embarassed over a normal bodily function, esepcially when they still feel so even though I signed up to do this.
Maybe the elderly or disabled wouldn't be so ashamed of basic things that ARE normal if people didn't make it sound like it was the most absurd, repulsive, and gross thing ever.
Please be mature. If you are an adult and cannot comprehend someone needing toilet assistance without making it weird or sound gross, then you really really need to grow up.
I don't really like making aggressive sounding posts or scolding posts, because every single person is learning and we all make mistakes, but gosh guys, this really bothers me.
Stop making people feel bad and THINK about what you're saying when refering to another human being before you say it. I will NEVER tolerate this disrespect for these people I'm taking care of who trust me.
EDIT: Thank you SO much for the overwhelming sweet responses! They make my heart so happy<3 Thank you for the inbox thank-yous and stories as well! As of now, I will ask any thank yous, stories, or experiences be privately messaged or commented<3 I love all the appreciation, but my blog is about writing characters with OCD and other disorders/disabilities and I don't want to clog my blog up with replying to everyone :)<3
As a health student it always rubbed me the wrong way when my pre-CNA class would joke about having to 'wipe old people's asses for a living.' It's ableist and even dehumanizing. I may not go into the CNA class, since my own disabilities would likely affect my performance, but I'm tired of CNAs or any healthcare providers dehumanizing the disabled. Also, younger individuals require this type of care sometimes as well. Can't handle caring for disabled individuals or treating them like humans? Gtfo out of the healthcare field. We already have enough bigots in it and we need more accepting and lovely people.
sometimes "but you don't look disabled" is not even about the visibility of your disability. sometimes it's about "you look like an actual person and i picture disabled people as some weird creatures that i can never ever meet and now my reality is crashed by the fact that i see an actual disabled person and they look like a person."
the thing about art is that sometimes you'll be moved to tears by stuff that is not very good
doomscrolling tiktok together and I turn to you and ask, "why doesn't your algorithm recommend any videos with Black people?"
doomscrolling tumblr and I turn to you and ask, "why don't you reblog anti-racism when it makes you feel uncomfortable?"
T4T is never hetslop by the way, that's actually swaghet.
Got ppeople telling me this is "hetgem", absolutely the fuck not, that sounds like a name for some sort of Steven Universe discourse. Putting forth a motion to standardize swaghet.
Wait, isn't hetgem actually the drug they give you to treat cancer?? Gang we are not using the brand name of a prescription medication for F/M trans relationships. I once again motion the use and standardization of swaghet.
People will stare you straight in the face and make a joke where the ONLY punchline is a man being gay and then turn around and say happy pride month like noo go back wtf was that
Real talk tho yall why the hell are we using gender assigned at birth labels to identify “what kind” of nonbinary someone is. First of all AGAB was created by the intersex community to uplift their voices about medical discrimination. And for some reason, people saw it and went “oh goody!! A new box to shove nonbinaries into!!!!”
Yall. It’s not hard to say “person with breasts” or “person with a penis” or “person with a uterus” or “person who menstruates”. Like your “AGAB” doesn’t actually give anyone the information you think it does…
